Race bearings

Old Jul 9, 2020 | 12:00 PM
  #1  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
Race bearings


Out of my 1970 442 street/race car over a thousand passes.
Hmm 3,4,5 barley have copper showing.

Last edited by wr1970; Jul 9, 2020 at 12:02 PM.
Old Jul 9, 2020 | 01:29 PM
  #2  
Bernhard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,990
From: Vancouver BC
What do the rod bearings look like?
Old Jul 9, 2020 | 02:53 PM
  #3  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
The rods bearings had no damage lol. I still have them i think maybe I should show what they looked like.VR1 20/50 race oil was used. I just can not wrap my mind around the mains only half of the thrust bearing showed any damage and 4 was minor 5 rear main was also slight. But why these and nothing with 1and 2?
Old Jul 9, 2020 | 03:15 PM
  #4  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
The clearance on crank was done by the book Joe Mondello. The mains and rods used stock bolts and same with rods. Hi volume melling oil pump stock oil pan. Stock balancer ,stock push rods,roller rockers HS,stock E heads 207 intake 168 exhaust, performed intake, 750 demon carb 461 ci,.
Old Jul 9, 2020 | 09:19 PM
  #5  
Battenrunner's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2018
Posts: 782
Sorry, I don't have the Mondello book handy anymore..... You said by the book, but, I wish You could mic the main journals and see where 1-5 are in the numbers to see if 3-5 are slightly larger than 1 and 2.

Did you run any oil restrictors anywhere?

I know there are way smarter folks than I who might be able to better read your bearings....

Thanks for sharing your experience and info!
Old Jul 10, 2020 | 05:51 AM
  #6  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,472
From: Central Fl
Not necessarily in this order but;
clearances
align hone (And just because they may be in size doesn’t always mean they’re inline).
Balance-my bet is it’s not as close as it needed to be

Hope this helps.
Old Jul 10, 2020 | 06:10 AM
  #7  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
Originally Posted by Battenrunner
Sorry, I don't have the Mondello book handy anymore..... You said by the book, but, I wish You could mic the main journals and see where 1-5 are in the numbers to see if 3-5 are slightly larger than 1 and 2.

Did you run any oil restrictors anywhere?

I know there are way smarter folks than I who might be able to better read your bearings....

Thanks for sharing your experience and info!
No oil restrictor anywhere. Not sure what journals measured as this was my first build 2001. I assisted my friend he had the mondello book. I did buy one for my next build. These were all standard bearings. I will try to get journal sizes . I remember we used plasti gauge to check tolerance after torqued. Guys say that is not a good idea but it worked on this engine with these passes and around 4 thousand street miles. Car weighed 3750 pounds with me in it. Car ran best 12.50 108 mph 496 lift bullet cam. I think there was more left in it with a better cam and different gear. 355 rear gear posi. 1970 442. Compression is 10 to 1 . If I ever had a complaint it would be heat soak after a few runs this engine did it's job way better than my eye ***** on the tree racing.😂

Last edited by wr1970; Jul 11, 2020 at 06:33 PM.
Old Jul 10, 2020 | 04:24 PM
  #8  
edzolz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,009
From: Red Oak, Texas
How straight is the crank? Turned correctly and polished? Looks like a big problem with #2 and #4.
Old Jul 10, 2020 | 06:04 PM
  #9  
BillK's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 1,966
From: Beautiful Southern Maryland
Originally Posted by edzolz
How straight is the crank? Turned correctly and polished? Looks like a big problem with #2 and #4.
He said they were std bearings so it was not turned.

Its kind of hard to really tell because of the lighting in your picture. I think what I thought was wear in the center of the bearings is actually a reflextion. I would say the clearances are pobably close but there is either a problem with the align hone or the balance job or maybe both. Still it did ok for 1000 passes. I bet the wear on the bearings was there almost immediately and then they "clearanced" themselves and stayed that way for the duration.
Old Jul 11, 2020 | 05:41 AM
  #10  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
Originally Posted by BillK
He said they were std bearings so it was not turned.

Its kind of hard to really tell because of the lighting in your picture. I think what I thought was wear in the center of the bearings is actually a reflextion. I would say the clearances are pobably close but there is either a problem with the align hone or the balance job or maybe both. Still it did ok for 1000 passes. I bet the wear on the bearings was there almost immediately and then they "clearanced" themselves and stayed that way for the duration.
no wear on one or two three was edge so was four except wider and five was back edge. I am a dunce! That being said I couldn't measure crank because I forgot I installed new bearings when I posted. Does bearing i still have and show them. This was the factory standard crank. I with Mark balance could be off but unfortunately I am leaving it alone. The car will not be raced anymore . I think under normal driving it will last a long time. Jmo
The lighting was bad with reflections. You have to enlarge picture to see the copper.

Last edited by wr1970; Jul 11, 2020 at 05:44 AM.
Old Jul 11, 2020 | 05:05 PM
  #11  
Bernhard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,990
From: Vancouver BC
I would post some HD pictures on Class Racer. They have a solid base of good engine builders with vast experience on the site.
For what was done to the engine, I think 1000 passes is impressive. These engines have a history of self destructing without careful attention to detail.
Old Jul 12, 2020 | 01:12 PM
  #12  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645

Passenger side bearings
Old Jul 12, 2020 | 01:17 PM
  #13  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645

Drivers side
Old Jul 12, 2020 | 01:21 PM
  #14  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
Scratches from normal wear but nothing you can feel. Except rod bearing #4 in one spot copper showing.
Old Jul 12, 2020 | 01:25 PM
  #15  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645

Crazy nothing on the other half #4rod bearing.
Old Jul 12, 2020 | 01:34 PM
  #16  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
So there you have it. Short block is almost done just painted oil pan. Got ng back out to install oil pump bought a new one. Was seeing pressure drop is why this engine came out. I think it held up good for what it was. Wasn't make nearly the ET it did when fresh still in high 12 second range. Oh I forgot to mention. This car was not shifted it was drove at the track in drive only. The eng was run though 3" exhaust dropped in front of rearend. race dump were capped.
Old Jul 12, 2020 | 05:42 PM
  #17  
VORTECPRO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,878
From: Thousand Oaks Ca
Originally Posted by Bernhard
I would post some HD pictures on Class Racer. They have a solid base of good engine builders with vast experience on the site.
For what was done to the engine, I think 1000 passes is impressive. These engines have a history of self destructing without careful attention to detail.
Combination of dirt, possibly inaccurate machine work and setting bearing clearance with plasticguage, this is the end result.
Old Jul 12, 2020 | 11:37 PM
  #18  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
Originally Posted by VORTECPRO
Combination of dirt, possibly inaccurate machine work and setting bearing clearance with plasticguage, this is the end result.
Maybe! With three thousand plus street miles and these passes who cares. Oh and my first engine build I am happy with what it did.
Gee almost twenty years ago when this engine was rebuilt from factory build.


Last edited by wr1970; Jul 13, 2020 at 04:57 PM.
Old Jul 13, 2020 | 05:48 AM
  #19  
VORTECPRO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,878
From: Thousand Oaks Ca
Originally Posted by wr1970

Crazy nothing on the other half #4rod bearing.
What your seeing here is the rod parting lines pulling in at top dead center, more RPM and it will be worse. The fix for this is oval honing the factory production rods, and of course a lighter piston always helps with this. What kind of RPM did this engine see?
Old Jul 13, 2020 | 04:54 PM
  #20  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
5400 rpm 99% I did do a few time only's to see if anything left shifting. Shifted t/o at 5600 found nothing better so I just left it run in drive. Also as stated this is a stock crank with no rework. Rods are stock were only resized.
Old Jul 13, 2020 | 05:43 PM
  #21  
VORTECPRO's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,878
From: Thousand Oaks Ca
If this engine is going in your new car chances are it will RPM higher through the lights, you might want to clean up the back of the bearings for a little more clearance, now that you know what your working with you can fine tune the bearing clearance.
Old Jul 13, 2020 | 08:13 PM
  #22  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
Originally Posted by VORTECPRO
If this engine is going in your new car chances are it will RPM higher through the lights, you might want to clean up the back of the bearings for a little more clearance, now that you know what your working with you can fine tune the bearing clearance.
Back to the top this is the numbers match engine to my 1970 442. It is not going anywhere except back in the 1970 442. The motor in the 1970 442 is my second build it is a 468 ci. It will be modified for temp rocket vapor engine to get car to the track this year while building the permanent engine for rocket vapor. This is as cash allows i am not diamon Jim or Mr money bags.

Last edited by wr1970; Jul 13, 2020 at 08:16 PM.
Old Jul 17, 2020 | 05:55 PM
  #23  
Bernhard's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,990
From: Vancouver BC
Originally Posted by wr1970
Back to the top this is the numbers match engine to my 1970 442. It is not going anywhere except back in the 1970 442. The motor in the 1970 442 is my second build it is a 468 ci. It will be modified for temp rocket vapor engine to get car to the track this year while building the permanent engine for rocket vapor. This is as cash allows i am not diamon Jim or Mr money bags.
I know money is tight because of your Rocket Vapor build!
If it was my numbers matching engine I would lean towards having the crank polished by a competent machine shop.
The key being competent. The reason I say this is guys that build performance cars tend to drive them enthusiastically
I have experience with spun bearings, that's why I'm so impressed with your 1000 pass stock rod std crank 455.
Bearings are softer than the crank surface, but I wonder if any damage might have been done to the surface of the crank given the bearing wear?
What does the crank look like?
Old Jul 17, 2020 | 08:12 PM
  #24  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
Crank looked real nice . Like I said with the miles and hammering it with 1000+ passes I just don't care. I think it will hold up just great under normal driving.
Old Nov 7, 2020 | 03:01 PM
  #25  
Olds Performance Machine's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2020
Posts: 30
I just can not wrap my mind around the mains only half of the thrust bearing showed any damage and 4 was minor 5 rear main was also slight. But why these and nothing with 1and 2?


It's not uncommon to have torsional flex in the Oldsmobile 455 engine block. Typically the average assembly by nature is just very heavy. The cars that these engines go in are heavy as well. What you're seeing is block flex with clearances that are too tight. If you stop the block from flexing, then those clearances that you run.,would be fine for that given HP that you have. A partial fill of the engine block and a mid plate, really makes a difference. It takes the stress off the factory motor mount area. We use the Valvoline VR 10-30 and VR 20-50 in the majority of our engine builds that take place in the shop.

Last edited by Olds Performance Machine; Nov 7, 2020 at 03:04 PM.
Old Nov 10, 2020 | 06:29 AM
  #26  
wr1970's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 3,645
Originally Posted by Olds Performance Machine
It's not uncommon to have torsional flex in the Oldsmobile 455 engine block. Typically the average assembly by nature is just very heavy. The cars that these engines go in are heavy as well. What you're seeing is block flex with clearances that are too tight. If you stop the block from flexing, then those clearances that you run.,would be fine for that given HP that you have. A partial fill of the engine block and a mid plate, really makes a difference. It takes the stress off the factory motor mount area. We use the Valvoline VR 10-30 and VR 20-50 in the majority of our engine builds that take place in the shop.
I use VR 20-50 Thanks for info.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Doug Carner
Big Blocks
2
Feb 25, 2020 07:51 PM
dc2x4drvr
Drivetrain/Differentials
6
Jul 12, 2018 11:39 AM
airborne1942
Drivetrain/Differentials
6
Sep 14, 2017 05:48 PM
JCMC64
Parts For Sale
0
Jun 13, 2014 07:13 PM
zbarrow
Drivetrain/Differentials
5
May 2, 2013 04:29 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:09 PM.