1970 Radiator Clutch Fan vs Modern Electric Fans

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 3, 2020 | 09:37 PM
  #1  
pettrix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,098
From: Utah
1970 Radiator Clutch Fan vs Modern Electric Fans

How many cfm did a 1970's 455 clutch fan put out of air flow?

I am looking at a dual Durale High-Output fan kit that will put out 4,000 cfm of airflow.

Old Jul 3, 2020 | 10:55 PM
  #2  
70cutty's Avatar
Beer Connoisseur
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 2,092
From: Daly City, California
My 463 never ran hot with 3600CFM dual fans mounted on a Northern Aluminum radiator.
I also installed Dakota Digital fan controller and their relays. SPAL relays failed after 2 years.
Old Jul 4, 2020 | 01:09 AM
  #3  
pettrix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,098
From: Utah
I am looking at this dual fan setup from Derale:

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/der-16838

Old Jul 4, 2020 | 12:05 PM
  #4  
VC455's Avatar
Barely Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,590
From: Gillespie County, Republic of Texas
Originally Posted by pettrix
How many cfm did a 1970's 455 clutch fan put out of air flow?
I've seen ratings of 4800 to 5000 cfm. If you use an aluminum radiator, you can get by with lower cfm.
Old Jul 4, 2020 | 03:45 PM
  #5  
Mr Nick's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 882
From: Tinley Park, IL
Originally Posted by pettrix
I am looking at this dual fan setup from Derale:

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/der-16838

That should be fine. I run dual fans on my small block with different on/off temps, and I don't think the secondary fan has ever actually turned on since the primary one is enough. I ground the relay on the second fan as part of my annual routine in the Spring to be sure it still works!
Old Jul 5, 2020 | 01:44 AM
  #6  
pettrix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,098
From: Utah
Some say around 10-15hp is freed up with an electric vs mechanical fan. Plus the electric fan is supposedly more efficient at slow speeds as they are pulling max cfm. While a mechanical fan is most efficient at higher RPMs.

It's also nice not to have to worry about having your hand cut off with a mechanical fan running and being under the hood doing work.

Old Jul 5, 2020 | 04:24 AM
  #7  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,385
From: Poteau, Ok
Sorry I disagree, mechanical fans are most efficient at lower rpms. The cooling system by original design is more efficient when the car is moving.
Old Jul 5, 2020 | 06:36 AM
  #8  
Hammerdrop's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 341
With our alternators not rated anywhere near what is out there today, is that ever a concern? Even with ac, I think mine is only 62 amps. Those fans use many amps.
Old Jul 5, 2020 | 12:00 PM
  #9  
matt69olds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,061
From: central Indiana
A mechanical fan with a THERMAL clutch takes a minimal amount of power to turn, unless it’s engaged. I have verified this at the track. I made a couple passes, then removed the fan and clutch and made a couple more passes. The car ran exactly the same. If it doesn’t show up on a timeslip, there is no way your “butt-o-meter” will feel anything.

A mechanical fan with a thermal clutch is pretty efficient. Your probably not going to find an electric fan that will move the same amount of air as a mechanical fan, and fit in the same area. Electric fans became common when front wheel drive cane out, there isn’t a easy way for a mechanical fan to fit with the engine turned sideways.

If electric fans were superior to mechanical, then they would be used on heavy duty trucks.
Old Jul 5, 2020 | 04:46 PM
  #10  
VC455's Avatar
Barely Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,590
From: Gillespie County, Republic of Texas
Those are all good points. Well stated, Matt.
Old Jul 7, 2020 | 06:00 AM
  #11  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,971
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
I have Olds powered cars with both. Actually my 70S has the 4 blade non A/C fan and no shroud, two core Copper rad. Actually snuck up to 205 last trip in the city. Wondering whether the drum brakes or this fan or the dying 350 is killing mileage, 17 mpg Imperial with a super lean 307 carb. Should be better with 28" tall tires and a 2004R, 1400 rpm at 60 mph. My 88 Cutlass with electric Pylmouth Breeze fans runs around thermostat temp. Has an A body aluminum plastic rad, makes a big difference. With a 2004R, 26.3" tires and 3.42 gears when that same 307 carb was on it, 20 mpg. The Derale fans are supposed to move a lot of air, should be adequate. My biggest issue is fan controllers with electric fans. All the cheap ones fail in one way or another, add another $150 for something that will last with at least a 60 amp rating. I have the low fan circuit through a 40 amp relay with the key on. The push in sensor was bad out the box, I kid you not, so I clipped the connections into a 30 amp fuse. I have a direct toggle switch for high fans. Go over the reviews and warranty before you buy a controller. Also do a big two core aluminum rad at the same time. Good luck.
Old Jul 7, 2020 | 07:43 AM
  #12  
Olds64's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,133
From: Edmond, OK
Here's a good thread on installing electric fans:

https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...r-fans-141678/

I still use an electric fan from a Ford Taurus with a 3.8l v6 in my Olds and it works great!
Old Jul 7, 2020 | 08:49 AM
  #13  
garys 68&72's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 350
From: Camdenton, MO
Consider the Windstar fans. Got mine for $20 at the junkyard. Ford made A LOT of them, available at every parts store, cheap, work great. Don't forget to upgrade your alternator, wire from alt to starter, and don't try to run them through your existing fuse panel.
Old Jul 8, 2020 | 06:05 AM
  #14  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,971
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Yeah, the Summit chrome 70 amp 10DN alternator has worked great for me. I only had the electric on the 70S for a short time, controller blew the 40 amp relay board almost right away but may go back. The alternator had a 51 amps at idle and 82 amps at cruise performance tag. It is the minimum I would use with electric fans, any less won't keep up.
Old Jul 9, 2020 | 11:27 PM
  #15  
android 211's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 338
It's hard to beat a seven blade factory clutch fan with a new Hayden clutch and a good factory shroud that doesn't have any chunks missing.
Finally a 4 core brass radiator or a new aluminum radiator. The car won't overheat if the timing and jetting are correct.
Old May 17, 2021 | 11:59 AM
  #16  
pettrix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,098
From: Utah
The Dorman 2000 Ford Windstar dual electric fan for $100 seems like a good deal & it supposedly fits in the factory place with very little modifications. Specs shows it pulls 4,500 cfm and each fan pulls around 25 amps.





As far as a controller for it goes, the Davies Craig Digital Thermatic Fan Switch one seems like a good controller. It kicks on the 1st fan at the preset temp and then the 2nd fan kicks on 10 seconds later to prevent overloading the start up amperage on the electrical system. Controller also allows for a manual override so you can run the fans manually. That comes in handy if the car is off and you want to cool down the radiator to prevent heat sink.

Any input from someone using this controller?

https://www.summitracing.com/parts/dcw-dc-0444



Last edited by pettrix; May 17, 2021 at 12:05 PM.
Old May 17, 2021 | 05:21 PM
  #17  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,971
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
That is the best fan controller I have ever bought, it works great, turns on and off when it is supposed to.
Old May 17, 2021 | 06:18 PM
  #18  
pettrix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,098
From: Utah
Originally Posted by olds 307 and 403
That is the best fan controller I have ever bought, it works great, turns on and off when it is supposed to.
Thanks for the input!

So if you set it at let's say 180F, the fans will turn off if cruising down the highway and the coolant temps reach 170F, right?

Do you have the temp probe that goes into the radiator fins?
Old May 18, 2021 | 05:40 PM
  #19  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,971
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Yes, it turns on at the set point, with the start up delay between fans #1 and #2. I think it actually shuts off 5 degrees below temp. Yes, I have the push in probe, very accurate according to my gauge.
Old May 18, 2021 | 06:37 PM
  #20  
cfair's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,179
From: Northern California
I had a couple of overheating events in the 80’s and 90’s. I’m in engine-heat detox now and getting used to my 455’s running 170-180. This winter I changed both cars to a 180F thermostat after at least 25 years on 160F thermostats. I like the change a lot. Seems like gas mileage is up and temperatures are not really up much, except on cool mornings as they should be.

I used to worry a great deal about them going above 180, but am getting over it since the engines run better at 180 or so. But I’ve made a bunch of changes to make things better over the years, so my change in thermostats is at least a decade or 2 late.

I have an A/C big car and non A/C big car. Both use Hayden thermal clutch fans & 7 blade 18” GM fans. Both are shrouded to heck & back on the rear of the radiator using modified ‘66 shrouds (there was only one for A, B & C bodies in ‘66). For both cars, I’ve cut up the driver’s side edge of the factory shroud and added a driver’s side “end” from a ‘67 or 68 toronado shroud to be sure it covers the entire back of the big car radiators. I’ve even put Trimlok rubber bulb seal around the leading edge of the shroud to be sure it seals against the radiator.

Olds cheaped out in ‘66 and the ‘66 shroud only covered about 70% of the big car radiators, but I it probably did a great job on the Cutlasses. I’m aiming at using factory style solutions, but just trying to do it better than they did.

Next, in front of the radiator cores for both cars, I’ve carefully reconstructed the masticated rubber curtains (sides, top, and bottom) that are in effect a “front shroud” and force air to the radiator core and prevent passage of air around the edges of the radiator. I even sealed the top corners to prevent air from leaking around the radiators there.

My mistake was recreating and improving over the factory mechanical solution and then _not_ letting the solution work by retaining the 160F thermostats too long. Once I’d gotten the full shroud, 7 blade fan, and front rubber curtains in, I should have replaced the 160F thermostats with 180F. But I was to overheat scarred (scared?) to do it and kept the cool ‘stats. Turns out that was probably too conservative.

There are a million threads on cooling, they recur every May and disappear in October like clockwork. For those on the electric team with strong new alternators, go for it!. I’m sticking with factory mechanical optimized to about the technology of 1975. Big risk here is when the Hayden clutch fans give up, but that doesn’t worry me much.

My $.02
Chris

Old May 19, 2021 | 05:17 AM
  #21  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,971
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Yeah, I also prefer 180 thermostats, 160 is too low and 195 will push temps past 200. Electric fans allow better in town temperatures with 160 thermostat but still run too cold on the highway. Those rubber flaps and the GN air dam on my 88 Cutlass made a massive difference for cooling.
Old May 19, 2021 | 07:13 PM
  #22  
cfair's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 2,179
From: Northern California
When I swapped over to the 180F thermostats in my street big cars, I also adjusted my water/coolant mix to 70% water/ 30% traditional green glycol. I also added 2 bottles of water wetter. More or less against the views of local experts who advised 50/50.

I went 70/30 since I live near SF and it _never_ freezes here. Per our “authoritative” internet, water has more heat transfer capability than glycol which is there to lubricate and prevent freeezing. I figured 70/30 wouldn’t hurt and might give me some protection from overheating in warm weather traffic. Water wetter / photo flow has worked well for me before, so I continue to use it.

I adjusted the water/coolant mix to aim at Summer cooling since freezing isn’t an issue. I’d always done 50/50, but wanted to see if 70/30 worked better for cooling. A few weeks experience here indicates that 70/30 does cool better than 50/50. Perhaps too much so. Even with the 180F thermostat my engines are running steady at 160F - 165F most of the time.

So now I’m thinking maybe 50/50 with water wetter may be optimal for my driving to keep the temps between 170F and 180F. I’ll take a look at the end of Summer and see how it went.

Decades ago I tried electric fans zip tied through the radiator core. Don’t do this. The early electric aftermarket fans were off balance enough to eventually cause a leak in the radiator core. Modern solutions are undoubtedly much, much better. I’m fine with electric, but I think I’ve gotten where I need to go with a factory style mechanical solution. I’m happy about that.
Old May 19, 2021 | 07:18 PM
  #23  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,655
From: Evansville, IN
Antifreeze is also a corrosion inhibitor.
Old May 19, 2021 | 07:26 PM
  #24  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,385
From: Poteau, Ok
Originally Posted by cfair
When I swapped over to the 180F thermostats in my street big cars, I also adjusted my water/coolant mix to 70% water/ 30% traditional green glycol. I also added 2 bottles of water wetter. More or less against the views of local experts who advised 50/50.

I went 70/30 since I live near SF and it _never_ freezes here. Per our “authoritative” internet, water has more heat transfer capability than glycol which is there to lubricate and prevent freeezing. I figured 70/30 wouldn’t hurt and might give me some protection from overheating in warm weather traffic. Water wetter / photo flow has worked well for me before, so I continue to use it.

I adjusted the water/coolant mix to aim at Summer cooling since freezing isn’t an issue. I’d always done 50/50, but wanted to see if 70/30 worked better for cooling. A few weeks experience here indicates that 70/30 does cool better than 50/50. Perhaps too much so. Even with the 180F thermostat my engines are running steady at 160F - 165F most of the time.

So now I’m thinking maybe 50/50 with water wetter may be optimal for my driving to keep the temps between 170F and 180F. I’ll take a look at the end of Summer and see how it went.

Decades ago I tried electric fans zip tied through the radiator core. Don’t do this. The early electric aftermarket fans were off balance enough to eventually cause a leak in the radiator core. Modern solutions are undoubtedly much, much better. I’m fine with electric, but I think I’ve gotten where I need to go with a factory style mechanical solution. I’m happy about that.
If you're running 160 with a 180 thermostat, it's defective. Your temps have absolutely nothing to do with your mix ratio.
Old May 20, 2021 | 07:25 PM
  #25  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,971
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
A motor will run cooler with straight water, so a 70:30 water to coolant ratio will cool better. The benefit is a raised boiling point and corrosion protection over straight water. Unfortunately here, a 50/50 coolant ratio is necessary at minimum.
Old May 21, 2021 | 01:17 PM
  #26  
pettrix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,098
From: Utah
I got the Dorman Ford Windstar fan. It comes with one 3 prong and one 2 prong fan connection. Any info on how this wires up using the Davies Craig Digital Thermatic Fan Switch?







Old May 21, 2021 | 01:58 PM
  #27  
pettrix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,098
From: Utah
I think I figured it out. The 3 pin is just an extra pin for the AC control but it is not used on applications like ours. It's just 2 pins (positive, negative) for each fan.

Will wire each fan to the Davies Control unit and done. Using 8 or 10 gauge wire from fan to Davies relay.

According to specs, each fan uses approximately 22-25 amps.

Last edited by pettrix; May 21, 2021 at 02:07 PM.
Old May 21, 2021 | 06:26 PM
  #28  
matt69olds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,061
From: central Indiana
Are those 2 speed fans? If so, I bet one pin is a common ground, one pin is the low speed, the remaining pin high?
Old May 21, 2021 | 06:37 PM
  #29  
pettrix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,098
From: Utah
Originally Posted by matt69olds
Are those 2 speed fans? If so, I bet one pin is a common ground, one pin is the low speed, the remaining pin high?
No, they are single speed.

I believe the 3rd pin is for factory AC
Old May 22, 2021 | 07:36 AM
  #30  
ach1992880's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 204
From: Omaha, NE
Those really are great fans. I have them on my 71 with a Champion 2 row rafiator and it stays dead nuts on the 180 t-stat no matter the conditions. I have the 2nd fan set to come on at 205 and I am guessing it works but has never triggered in the 4 or so years I have driven the setup.
Old May 29, 2021 | 07:16 PM
  #31  
pettrix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,098
From: Utah
The fan hits the lower radiator hose. Would have to cut the fan housing to make it fit.

Are the push through zip ties an acceptable way to mount the fan to the radiator?

Last edited by pettrix; May 30, 2021 at 07:57 PM.
Old May 31, 2021 | 09:36 AM
  #32  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,655
From: Evansville, IN
No.
Old May 31, 2021 | 12:16 PM
  #33  
matt69olds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,061
From: central Indiana
Those push thru zip ties will eventually destroy your radiator. That’s too much weight, with too much vibration on the radiator core.
Old May 31, 2021 | 05:31 PM
  #34  
pettrix's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,098
From: Utah
I was thinking of using JB Weld to epoxy a bolt onto the radiator and using it as a mounting stud on the solid part of the radiator. Then using the mounting stud on the fan to run a nut/washer to tighten it down to the radiator.

Old May 31, 2021 | 06:00 PM
  #35  
ach1992880's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 204
From: Omaha, NE
The windstar fans have 4 mounting pads on the outside. Make some brackets out of flat stock and bend them to fit so you can mount the fans to the radiator support. As far as the lower hose you will need to cut the shroud around the hose outlet a little. Pretty minor fabrication but easily doable without many tools.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jreguez
Cutlass
33
Jul 7, 2021 07:04 AM
oldsrock
Parts Wanted
6
Apr 25, 2020 05:38 AM
Macadoo
Small Blocks
26
Aug 17, 2014 05:09 PM
Alex72cutty
Small Blocks
28
May 30, 2014 03:20 PM
esisson
Big Blocks
12
May 20, 2008 12:09 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:19 PM.