My Tranny is only a 2 spd...Should I get a new one?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 05:43 PM
  #1  
rhett838's Avatar
Thread Starter
68 Cutlass S Convertible
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 258
From: Euless, TX
My Tranny is only a 2 spd...Should I get a new one?

I have a 69 cutlass S convertible 350. I'm a car novice, but I've learned alot over the year I've had this car. Now I'm at a crossroads.

The car runs fine, it needs work, so do I keep putting money into it or do I buy one a little more complete?

I ask b/c after thinking my tranny wasn't shifting to 3rd gear, today I found out it never will b/c it's a 2spd. I was told I should consider getting a new tranny, even though I paid $600 to get the one I have overhauled, and there's nothing wrong with it. On the highway though, it just runs at too high of an RPM.

I want a cruiser, but I want it to have some kick too.

Anyone have any advice?

Also, anyone know what rear end gear I might have in it? I know it's a 12 bolt, that's about it, is it a 3.08? If I decide to upgrade it, should I upgrade to a 3.55 or a 3.73? Remember I want a cruiser with kick.
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 05:58 PM
  #2  
jensenracing77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 11,898
From: Brazil Indiana
a 3 speed (th350 or 400) will run the same rpm on the highway. your second gear and the other two transmissions third gear is all 1 to 1. direct drive. if you are not worried about being original i would go with the TH350 and a 3.42 posi.
Old Sep 1, 2010 | 06:38 PM
  #3  
rocketraider's Avatar
Oldsdruid
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,628
From: Southside Vajenya
If you just spent $600 on it and it works well, why go thru the aggravation unless you change it to a 200-4R to get overdrive?

I have to stop and remember that most people under 40 have never seen or driven a 2-speed automatic transmission. Think the last one was around 1973 in Chevy Novas. 1969 was the last Olds to use it and even then only in A-body and 350-2bbl Deltas.
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 05:05 AM
  #4  
matt69olds's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,104
From: central Indiana
Installing a TH350 will make a big difference in the off the line performance, due to the much lower first gear ratio (TH350 is 2.52 to 1, the Jetaway is 1.82 to 1). The highway cruise speed will be the same.
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 06:01 AM
  #5  
rhett838's Avatar
Thread Starter
68 Cutlass S Convertible
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 258
From: Euless, TX
Originality isn't too big of a concern. If I got a new trans, I'd probably save the old one for just incase I sold it. But that's my conundrum. If I keep putting $ into this, I'm not going to sell it, and the payoff will be more gratifying down the road. Or, I can get one that's more complete, and needs fewer things. If I got a new tranny, I think I would have to keep the car and see it through.

Just out of curiousity, how much does a TH350 run? Should I get a brand new one or are there good used ones out there?
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 07:03 AM
  #6  
jensenracing77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 11,898
From: Brazil Indiana
i have seen good used th350 go for as low as $100 but you don't really know what you are getting. i have one i would sell for $100 that works but know nothing about it other than it shifts and is in a car. i am sure you could find a used one in your area for around that amount.
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 07:03 AM
  #7  
Olds64's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 18,225
From: Edmond, OK
If you are going to get a new transmission get a 200 4R instead of a TH 350; otherwise, just stick with your 2 speed (especially since you rebuilt it recently).
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 09:19 AM
  #8  
rhett838's Avatar
Thread Starter
68 Cutlass S Convertible
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 258
From: Euless, TX
I found a TH 350 on craigslist for $150. It's off a 78 TA. He says it's ready to bolt on and go.

Also, My mechanic said he'll rebuild a TH 350 for me and install it and everything for $500 out the door

Here's the link TA Tranny...Tell me what you think please

http://dallas.craigslist.org/ndf/pts/1930646426.html
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 11:20 AM
  #9  
slowolds's Avatar
Loose Radical
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 199
From: Joliet, Il
I would not replace a good transmission without a great reason and I had a good grasp on future upgrades or use.
Also, don't be too quick to purchase an unknown tranny. They all say it worked great when it was pulled!
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 11:37 AM
  #10  
jensenracing77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 11,898
From: Brazil Indiana
X2 on not getting one till you know for sure what you are going to do with the car.
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 11:47 AM
  #11  
1968Cutlassfallbrook's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 236
I wouldn't spend your money on another tranny if you have already gotten yours redone. Plus the 350 isn't much of a difference unless you're wanting that lower first gear for taking off faster. If you're looking for something to lower the rpm you'd either want to go with a 200 R4 or a 700 r4 with an adaptor to bolt it up to the oldsmobile. Those jetaway trans are great for the torque these engines produce and are harder to find now of days. I have spoken with tranny shops and they all tell me the same either keep what you have or go to an overdrive trans.
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 12:11 PM
  #12  
Blk71SX's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 411
From: NW Arkansas
Originally Posted by rhett838
He says it's ready to bolt on and go.
we've all heard those famous words
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 12:45 PM
  #13  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Only you can decide if a trans upgrade is what you want. Your Jetaway was recently rebuilt, so I assume it's working fine. The TH350 will definitely give you better acceleration off the line, due to the steeper first gear, but since both transmissions have the same top gear, highway mileage will be unchanged. I'll also suggest that if you really do want a different trans, get a 200-4R four speed AT with overdrive. The 200-4R has both the steeper first gear for better off the line acceleration and an overdrive fourth gear for improved gas mileage. It also has a lockup torque converter that helps with mileage. The swap is not quite a bolt-in, but close. The biggest problem will be hooking up the throttle valve cable and installing a converter lockup system. Neither is particularly difficult but are unique to that trans. Of course, if you're happy with how the car runs now, leave the trans alone until it starts giving you problems, then swap it.
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 01:47 PM
  #14  
bil's Avatar
bil
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 301
From: Westmoreland,NH-Malibu CA
depends on what condition your car is in ,if you want to know if you should keep putting money into it-we haven't seen it! As far as your 2 speed,it is a fine transmission,they still use them at the drags.i love mine in my 65 442,I can really wind it up between lights in first,sounds good when you let off.In high,it will cruise the highway all day.try the tach idea,you may be surprised at how high you aren't revving! ---bil
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 02:58 PM
  #15  
Ddbord's Avatar
Will NEVER Grow Up!
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 593
From: Landrum, SC in "The Blue Ridge Foothills"
Blue Belle just loves her Jetaway 2-speed!

Even in these hills, she does all I want her to do. The Jetaway is on the back end of a standard 330 cu. in. 2-barrel and climbs just fine. Might not do too good up Pike's Peak, but is good around here. Sure I'd love a 4-speed, but I'm not interested in that mod.

Back in the day, this was one of the favored transmissions at the dragways.

Unless you're going to make a Super Modified Automatic, keep the Jetaway!

A Sage has Spoken....

--Don
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 03:06 PM
  #16  
rhett838's Avatar
Thread Starter
68 Cutlass S Convertible
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 258
From: Euless, TX
Originally Posted by coldwar
How about connecting a accurate 8-cyl tach and advising exactly what rpm you observe at 65mph. You might come away surprised where you are in terms of RPM at road speed. All of the suggestions so far are well and good, but without knowing the rpm, it's all conjecture. My 2¢ regardless is use up your Jetaway - CW
Does a the rally pack have a good tac? Is it compatible with a 69? (isn't for cars 71 and later...i don't know)

I kind of want to keep it looking stock. Are those things expensive?

What if I just pop out the useless clock an put one in it's place? Has anyone done that?
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 03:08 PM
  #17  
rhett838's Avatar
Thread Starter
68 Cutlass S Convertible
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 258
From: Euless, TX
Here's my car pre manifold/carb change out. Not bad for only $6500! I should get a vanity plate "$$$ PIT"

http://www.flickr.com/photos/rhett838/with/4692999672/
Old Sep 2, 2010 | 06:03 PM
  #18  
jensenracing77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 11,898
From: Brazil Indiana
looks very nice
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 09:28 AM
  #19  
rhett838's Avatar
Thread Starter
68 Cutlass S Convertible
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 258
From: Euless, TX
Holy Cow! A 68-69 olds rally pack is between $400 and $500??!!!! I can justify spending $500 for a tranny (the kind that goes in your car), but not for gauges!
Old Sep 3, 2010 | 01:29 PM
  #20  
Bluevista's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,430
From: Northeast Ohio
You want to change the rear gear to have some "kick" but you also want low freeway rpm's without switching to an overdrive trans?
How about a set of 96" wheels and tires.

Get a test tach and hook it up then duct tape it to the windshield, use JB Weld if you want it there permanently.
Old Oct 12, 2010 | 10:26 PM
  #21  
michael hilsabeck's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 173
From: moses lake wa
1969 oldsmoble

the 2 speed are good you can wine them out 60 in 1st slam in 2 you will go thay use them at the track like they said if you dont have the money keep it use the money on other things for your car
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 09:54 AM
  #22  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by michael hilsabeck
the 2 speed are good you can wine them out 60 in 1st slam in 2 you will go thay use them at the track like they said if you dont have the money keep it use the money on other things for your car
No one uses an ST300 (aka, Jetaway) at the track. You are confusing this trans with a Powerglide. More importantly, the use of a two speed trans at the drag strip is due to the elimination of one gear change - the small delay during shifting can slow a car in the quarter, ASSUMING the engine is properly built to rev as needed to use the two speed trans. It also assumes the selection of the right rear axle ratio to match the trans gearing and engine power band.

More to the point, on a street driven car, more gears are always better for driveability than fewer. There's a reason why new cars use six, seven, and eight gear automatics now.
Old Oct 13, 2010 | 05:00 PM
  #23  
stan 65 cutlass's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,548
From: duncan bc
i say keep the rebuilt trans if its working correctly, if you wanna switch go all the way, muncie!
Old Oct 15, 2010 | 05:07 AM
  #24  
firefrost gold's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 2,444
From: mn
Originally Posted by michael hilsabeck
the 2 speed are good you can wine them out 60 in 1st slam in 2 you will go thay use them at the track like they said if you dont have the money keep it use the money on other things for your car
my lemans with 256 gears would run 95 mph in first was a slug off the line
but at 55 to 60 it would surprise the mustang guys when I could hold tight to them or pull them on the freeway. I Did the th 350 swap and the off the line pull is nice but with the one wheel peel I tend to just loop out . was it worth?
Ask me when I put a posi and 3:08 in it this winter.
Old Oct 16, 2010 | 11:04 AM
  #25  
Rickman48's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,057
From: Shorewood, Il.
Personally, I'd go with the 200r4 - quite a difference! Then keep it for bil, as if he keeps 'backing off' in low, he'll be blowing the front pump on his!!!

A seized fan can cost 20 H.P. and 3-4 MPG, and will make a 4-speed car sound like a garbage truck coming down the street!!

And I believe there's an aftermarket tac that'll fit directly in that center pod, usually unused!

Last edited by Rickman48; Oct 16, 2010 at 11:08 AM.
Old Oct 16, 2010 | 12:11 PM
  #26  
InfoJunkie's Avatar
InfoJunkie
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 287
From: Belleville ON Canada
ST300 is Super Turbine 300 or also known as a "switch pitch". There should be a second terminal where the kickdown wire connects to the trans. If you hook power to it(via toggle switch) , it will increase the stall speed of the convertor(while powered). I have had 2 ST400's and it was real fun to play with the pitch. Increasing the stall will give you better takeoff. Hopefully the rebuilder didn't cut the wire inside as was done to my first ST400.

Last edited by InfoJunkie; Oct 16, 2010 at 12:14 PM.
Old Oct 16, 2010 | 12:39 PM
  #27  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by InfoJunkie
ST300 is Super Turbine 300 or also known as a "switch pitch". There should be a second terminal where the kickdown wire connects to the trans. If you hook power to it(via toggle switch) , it will increase the stall speed of the convertor(while powered). I have had 2 ST400's and it was real fun to play with the pitch. Increasing the stall will give you better takeoff. Hopefully the rebuilder didn't cut the wire inside as was done to my first ST400.
Not all ST300 transmissions used the dual stall speed torque converter, thought I'm pretty sure all ST300s installed in Oldsmobiles did.
Old Oct 16, 2010 | 05:25 PM
  #28  
d2_willys's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 292
From: earth
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Not all ST300 transmissions used the dual stall speed torque converter, thought I'm pretty sure all ST300s installed in Oldsmobiles did.
Buick and Olds used switch pitch in their ST300/Jetaways from 64-67. After that ST300's in BOP'S had fixed pitch converters.
Old Oct 17, 2010 | 08:38 AM
  #29  
InfoJunkie's Avatar
InfoJunkie
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 287
From: Belleville ON Canada
Were the ST400 the same way or were they switch the entire production?
Old Oct 17, 2010 | 09:59 AM
  #30  
Warhead's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,012
From: Phx, AZ
Originally Posted by d2_willys
Buick and Olds used switch pitch in their ST300/Jetaways from 64-67. After that ST300's in BOP'S had fixed pitch converters.
Turbo-350 production started in 1969, I thought all st-300's were done for by then.
Are you sure that it is a 300ST, or did you just lose 3rd gear on a turbo 350?
Just a thought,
Can you give us a pic of the trans pan?
The dog as your avatar is cute, so why can't I stand to look at it anymore?
Jim

Last edited by Warhead; Oct 17, 2010 at 10:02 AM.
Old Oct 17, 2010 | 03:11 PM
  #31  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Warhead
Turbo-350 production started in 1969, I thought all st-300's were done for by then.
Are you sure that it is a 300ST, or did you just lose 3rd gear on a turbo 350?
Just a thought,
Can you give us a pic of the trans pan?
The dog as your avatar is cute, so why can't I stand to look at it anymore?
Jim
The ST300 was available in the 1969 model year, and d2_willys is correct, the 68-69 ST300s were fixed stall speed. Sorry for the misinformation.
Old Oct 17, 2010 | 06:37 PM
  #32  
Warhead's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 1,012
From: Phx, AZ
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
The ST300 was available in the 1969 model year, and d2_willys is correct, the 68-69 ST300s were fixed stall speed. Sorry for the misinformation.
Ok, Joe.
When in 69 did they go to the T-350? I've had a 69 with the factory T-350 in it, I just thought they started these with the beginning of the 69 production.
Real curious now.
Jim

BTW, just kidding you about the pup.
Old Oct 18, 2010 | 12:05 PM
  #33  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Warhead
Ok, Joe.
When in 69 did they go to the T-350? I've had a 69 with the factory T-350 in it, I just thought they started these with the beginning of the 69 production.
Real curious now.
Jim

BTW, just kidding you about the pup.
St300, TH350, and TH400 were all offered at the same time in the 1969 model year.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Octania
Small Blocks
23
Jan 30, 2016 09:18 PM
arcee1951
The Newbie Forum
3
May 13, 2014 08:47 AM
ramairthree
General Discussion
64
Jul 4, 2013 02:32 PM
2blu442
General Discussion
4
Mar 24, 2013 09:47 AM
archeryshooter
Parts For Sale
0
Dec 25, 2011 05:33 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:05 AM.