are post 74 motors still considered true rockets?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old November 15th, 2012, 11:27 AM
  #41  
Registered User
 
brown7373's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Pierce, FL
Posts: 1,124
I just checked on the Brochures website that through 1975 they still referred to Olds engines as Rockets. In fact, they introduced the 260 V8 as the new standard engine, and that it had the same durability as other Olds Rocket engines. Brochures I saw in 1976 made no mention of Rocket in the brochures that I saw, and had the disclaimer about having the right to use various corporate engines.
brown7373 is offline  
Old November 15th, 2012, 11:59 AM
  #42  
Registered User
 
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delta BC Canada
Posts: 3,688
Fyi

Originally Posted by brown7373
I just checked on the Brochures website that through 1975 they still referred to Olds engines as Rockets. In fact, they introduced the 260 V8 as the new standard engine, and that it had the same durability as other Olds Rocket engines. Brochures I saw in 1976 made no mention of Rocket in the brochures that I saw, and had the disclaimer about having the right to use various corporate engines.
Corporate engine sharing started in before 1976. For example the 400 cid Pontiac was actually an option on the 1975 Delta 88. Not many were made that way but the option was in the books.
oldsmobiledave is offline  
Old November 15th, 2012, 12:03 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,205
Originally Posted by oldsmobiledave
For example the 400 cid Pontiac was actually an option on the 1975 Delta 88. Not many were made that way but the option was in the books.
Goes back before that, I believe. Wasn't the 215 V-8 used in the early Cutlasses a Buick engine?

The difference between those examples and this one is that Olds noted right up front that it was a non-Olds engine you were getting. What caused all the problems in 1977 was their substituting Chevy engines and not telling anyone about it. Many owners first discovered they didn't have an Olds engine when they went to have the oil changed or some other service done, and the mechanic found that Olds parts didn't fit.
jaunty75 is offline  
Old November 15th, 2012, 12:11 PM
  #44  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,377
Originally Posted by djcrook73
joe p that's kinda cold , i thought it was a fairly legitimate question as i am not as knowledgeble on the olds engines and cars as some of you..
My comment was not directed at you, sorry if it came across that way. It was directed at the "experts" who routinely claim that the "Rocket" is something special as compared to lesser Olds motors.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old November 15th, 2012, 01:01 PM
  #45  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,377
Originally Posted by brown7373
...The defense GM offered back then was that the Chevy 350 was a better, more advanced than the old design Olds 350...
Well, the SBC was introduced in the 1955 model year, the SBO in the 1964 model year. Both 350 cu in versions debuted in the 1968 model year.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old November 15th, 2012, 01:30 PM
  #46  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,377
Originally Posted by jaunty75
Goes back before that, I believe. Wasn't the 215 V-8 used in the early Cutlasses a Buick engine?
Interestingly, the 215 as used by Olds actually had unique block, heads, pistons, and valve covers as compared to the Buick version. Yes, it's Buick architecture, but Olds customized it with unique Olds-designed parts. The Rover versions are Buicks.

Contrast this to the 225 V6 used in 64-65 or the Chevy I6 used after that. In those cases the motors are identical to those used by their "home" organization. And the Pontiac 400 was used in 1975.

Of course, Olds (as well as Buick and Pontiac) used a FORD transmission in the 1960s, and the other transmissions were "corporate". And the Aurora motor is simply a Northstar with a smaller bore (87mm vs, 93mm).
joe_padavano is online now  
Old November 15th, 2012, 01:53 PM
  #47  
Proud Viet Nam Veteran
 
redoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 9,977
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Well, the SBC was introduced in the 1955 model year, the SBO in the 1964 model year. Both 350 cu in versions debuted in the 1968 model year.
Actually the 350 Chevy came out in the 1967 Camaro. I know you are an Olds guy Joe.

Last edited by redoldsman; November 15th, 2012 at 03:23 PM.
redoldsman is offline  
Old November 15th, 2012, 02:46 PM
  #48  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,377
Originally Posted by redoldsman
Actually the 350 Chevy can out in the 1967 Camaro. I know you are an Olds guy Joe.
You are correct. Sorry about that. I had better stick to Oldsmobiles.
joe_padavano is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Solid Lifters
General Discussion
7
August 3rd, 2013 08:36 PM
Bernhard
Big Blocks
5
December 3rd, 2012 07:28 AM
Paladin31
Cars Wanted
27
November 30th, 2012 06:07 AM
Dan Wirth
General Discussion
154
May 21st, 2012 11:30 AM
1972cutlass350
Parts For Sale
2
March 2nd, 2011 08:07 PM



Quick Reply: are post 74 motors still considered true rockets?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:51 AM.