General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

W36 stripes at Seven Springs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old August 19th, 2009 | 12:35 PM
  #121  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,407
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by wolfman98
Ok so I know they are not w-36 stripes but did Olds put any solid verticle stripes on any Cutlass'.
No

It's listed as a Cutlass Coupe so what options were available in 1971 and what does this car have that was not an option for it. I need some enlightenment
Uh, most of if?

The intake, carb, air cleaner, and ignition are obviously not OEM. The dual gate was a factory option, but not that steering wheel or gauges. The W25 hood was an available option (but I've got $10 that says the one on that car is an all-'glass repro). The stripes to not mirror anything that was factory available, and as we've pointed out here before, the only Cutlii with stripes on the trunk were the 1970 pace cars and the 1972 H/O.
Old August 19th, 2009 | 03:21 PM
  #122  
citcapp's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 9,127
From: Rathdrum, Idano
Joe can I ask you about stripes, I know this is a new topic for you. Now start at the beginning and just explain everything you know about stripes and where they go on the car, how wide, how far apart, and so on and so on and oh you know what I mean....................................
Old August 19th, 2009 | 03:26 PM
  #123  
The Stickman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 733
From: Lehigh Valley Pa
Wonder if I put W36 stripes on my wagon will Joe's head explode?
Old August 19th, 2009 | 04:01 PM
  #124  
wolfman98's Avatar
Captain of my ship
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,880
From: Annapolis Valley , Nova Scotia
Seems that it's better to not ask if you don't know being curious about the stripes and hood mostly maybe I could have found it on the internet somewhere
Old August 20th, 2009 | 06:00 AM
  #125  
wolfman98's Avatar
Captain of my ship
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 1,880
From: Annapolis Valley , Nova Scotia
Thanks for the info joe , I know it gets tedious but I found out something about the trunk stripes. Thought I had read before it was not something Olds did and the pace cars were the only ones with them.being new to Oldsmobiles ( first one ever) and new to having a classic car I tend to ask a lot of dumb questions. Didn't someone say that there are no dumb questions? I guess that depends on ones perception , to me it may not sound dumb but to a lot of the guys who have been collecting olds and knowledge of Olds it may be.I did see a similar Olds with the trunk stripes at a show around here last year but thought it was not original.Not sure though if it was a 72 so if I see it again I will check it out a lot closer.
Old August 20th, 2009 | 06:20 AM
  #126  
Jamesbo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 17,748
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Originally Posted by citcapp
Joe can I ask you about stripes, I know this is a new topic for you. Now start at the beginning and just explain everything you know about stripes and where they go on the car, how wide, how far apart, and so on and so on and oh you know what I mean....................................
And when you're finished with citcapp 's request, you can tell us about motor mounts.
Old August 20th, 2009 | 07:47 AM
  #127  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,407
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Jamesbo
And when you're finished with citcapp 's request, you can tell us about motor mounts.
Sure, go ahead. Pile on...

Old August 20th, 2009 | 07:52 AM
  #128  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Jamesbo
And when you're finished with citcapp 's request, you can tell us about motor mounts.
Yeah, and the off-set motors in the Supremes.......
Old August 30th, 2009 | 01:01 PM
  #129  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,621
Originally Posted by MN71W30
I hear ya,
But they still look good. When I had my 68 W30 25 years ago the original stripes were still on the car. My friend has a 69 RT Coronet with a special stripe delete package so he left them off. I guess thier very rare but I'd be putting the stripe on the back of that Dodge if it were mine.
I've got production figures of various Mopars and it seems stripe deletes usually range from 20-35% depending on the model and the year - they really aren't that rare. Instead of the stripe, you got a metal R/T badge. Ditto for the Charger. The Super Bee still got the decal with the circle and the bee, but not the bumblebee stripe.

Back to the W36 . . . I would love to see all the stripe colors. I recall both orange and red being available, which is kinda strange because they probably were close to each other. I know there's one factory red photograph with a very subtle stripe, which I'm guessing is orange. For 1968 at least, orange seems to be an interesting color choice for a stripe. I'd have to look in my book for the other colors, but I'm gonna guess black, white, and . . . hmm, I don't think gold came out till '69? There must be one or two other colors (blue?), but considering there's so many problems with the stripe on restored cars, I doubt I'll be able to find the cars or pics of them.
Old August 30th, 2009 | 02:21 PM
  #130  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Diego
I'd have to look in my book for the other colors, but I'm gonna guess black, white, and . . . hmm, I don't think gold came out till '69? There must be one or two other colors (blue?), but considering there's so many problems with the stripe on restored cars, I doubt I'll be able to find the cars or pics of them.
'68 stripe colors are listed as Black, White, Orange, Red.

So the blue W36 stripes we've seen are not an original color, I take it.
Old August 30th, 2009 | 02:25 PM
  #131  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,621
You could be right. I have a dealer book that, I believe, doesn't list the colors available, but I know the "442 Resto Guide" does.

In that case, the blue-striped '68 may be wrong - a shame!
Old August 30th, 2009 | 02:27 PM
  #132  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Diego
In that case, the blue-striped '68 may be wrong - a shame!
Agree, as it looks so good. Orange is a surprise, too. Can't recall seeing an orange W36 stripe.
Old August 30th, 2009 | 04:59 PM
  #133  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,621
Indeed, the color choices are black, white, orange, and red.

Interestingly enough, Nocturne Blue had red and orange as being a recommended combo. Ditto for Willow Gold, Ocean Turquoise, Teal Blue, Silver Green, Scarlet (like the ad), and Jade Gold. The combos I mentioned are the only ones where both red and orange were available with the respective color, and I skipped obvious colors like Provincial White.

While a poor picture, THIS auction has the book with the red/orange (or red/red?) stripe car.
Old August 30th, 2009 | 06:02 PM
  #134  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Diego
While a poor picture, THIS auction has the book with the red/orange (or red/red?) stripe car.
Right-o! Pulled out my copy, and there it is. You'd miss it if you weren't looking for it. Too bad all of the pics inside are black & white.
Old August 30th, 2009 | 06:13 PM
  #135  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,621
I think that car was used in a magazine test, most likely something like Hi-Performance cars, so possibly there are other photos in color.
Old August 31st, 2009 | 01:11 AM
  #136  
mugzilla's Avatar
is Fast Enough ...
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,308
From: dogtown
The O in GTO stands for Options ...

One reason I bought my 442 is that it is well optioned for an Olds ...

It is also a non w machine and those are getting rarer all the time ...
Old August 31st, 2009 | 01:40 AM
  #137  
mugzilla's Avatar
is Fast Enough ...
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,308
From: dogtown
Oh yeh ...

No stripes for my car ...

yet ...

Last edited by mugzilla; August 31st, 2009 at 12:43 PM.
Old August 31st, 2009 | 12:54 PM
  #138  
mugzilla's Avatar
is Fast Enough ...
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,308
From: dogtown
Originally Posted by Run to Rund
A few points came to me as I read this thread:


What about a race car that was sold as a new car in full race trim and lettered? It is a promo car, with dealer installed options. If documented (like the original bill of sale as a new car), shouldn't it go into stock class?
Were there 500 made ..?

A "Race" car would outclass the stock cars ...

If you auction the car it will be "Judged" by judges looking to buy and I am pretty sure they will pay a premium and be impressed by the raw beauty of such a beast ...
Old August 31st, 2009 | 02:45 PM
  #139  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,407
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by mugzilla
Were there 500 made ..?

A "Race" car would outclass the stock cars ...

If you auction the car it will be "Judged" by judges looking to buy and I am pretty sure they will pay a premium and be impressed by the raw beauty of such a beast ...
In my opinion, "stock" means as the car came from the factory assembly line and generally available to the public. Unfortunately, this gets complicated in a hurry. Are the Hemi Darts from the late 1960s "stock"? They were sold as "not for street use".
Old August 31st, 2009 | 03:50 PM
  #140  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,621
There's a difference between "stock" and "street-legal." Stock is anything from the factory, so a Hemi Dart or Barracuda is stock as long as it has not been modified. However, it can't be compared with a 4-4-2 or anything like that because the Mopars are not street-legal.

In comparison, a ZL-1 Camaro is a more apt comparison to the Olds because the ZL-1 was street-legal. The fact that the car was packaged as such, relying on the owner to made the mods necessary for competition (early W-30s and later 4-speed cars were like this too), is in its favor even though there's light years difference between a regular Olds and a ZL-1 that cost 8 grand.
Old August 31st, 2009 | 04:43 PM
  #141  
Run to Rund's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,894
A race car could be a "one-off" done with that specific lettering by the dealership, for example. there woldn't be 500 of them. I was referencing the OCA rules about dealer added stuff, documentation, and its status as a promo vehicle. AFAIK, only two such race cars have shown up at the Nationals, one restored and never to be raced again, the other a re-creation that is raced.
Old August 31st, 2009 | 08:46 PM
  #142  
mugzilla's Avatar
is Fast Enough ...
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,308
From: dogtown
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
In my opinion, "stock" means as the car came from the factory assembly line and generally available to the public. Unfortunately, this gets complicated in a hurry. Are the Hemi Darts from the late 1960s "stock"? They were sold as "not for street use".
They are stock if they are homologated but if the car was not available to the public, 500 cars only went so far, it should not be allowed to compete with cars that were. They Outclass the normal stock cars ...

You bring up an interesting situation, Say I just restored a nice well documented "Stock Race Car" I would want to show it maybe win a trophy...

At most shows there would only be me in the "Stock Race Car" category, Would judges be able to grade a car like that on correctness ..?
Old September 1st, 2009 | 08:29 AM
  #143  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
In my opinion, "stock" means as the car came from the factory assembly line and generally available to the public.
Originally Posted by mugzilla
......
A "Race" car would outclass the stock cars ...
.
Originally Posted by Diego
There's a difference between "stock" and "street-legal." Stock is anything from the factory.......
Originally Posted by mugzilla
They are stock if .......
I think the word "stock" can be thrown on the scrap pile right along with "numbers matching" and "original" as terms that *by themselves* are worthless.
This again shows why we need better terminology.
Old September 1st, 2009 | 08:52 AM
  #144  
68Tom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,052
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by Diego
While a poor picture, THIS auction has the book with the red/orange (or red/red?) stripe car.
While I have never looked at that book, I imagine the car you're discussing is the exact same 442 used in the Oldsmobile "The facts of life." ad that I currently have hanging on my wall at work.

factsoflife.jpg

Last edited by 68Tom; September 1st, 2009 at 09:39 AM.
Old September 1st, 2009 | 09:33 AM
  #145  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Run to Rund
A race car could be a "one-off" done with that specific lettering by the dealership, for example. there woldn't be 500 of them. I was referencing the OCA rules about dealer added stuff, documentation, and its status as a promo vehicle. AFAIK, only two such race cars have shown up at the Nationals, one restored and never to be raced again, the other a re-creation that is raced.
Joe, even with good terminology (my previous post), you have a good example of a rightfully questionable situation.
When considering what should be in the stock classes, we have basically 2 choices:
1. How it came from the factory.
2. How it came from the dealer*.
I can understand why #2 should be considered, but the dealer had the latitude to add pretty much *anything* to a car. So if the proverbial "kitchen sink" was added, should *that* be allowed? Personally, I think #2 is fine if limited to *Oldsmobile* accessories, both dealer and factory.

*OCA is not very clear at all on this ("“Accessories of the Era” will be treated as dealer options and proof of Authenticity may be required. (Supportive Literature )" and "STOCK / RESTORED STOCK means that the vehicle is as it appeared when new plus any accessories of the era and so-called “Promo Vehicles” must provide proof of existence.") as to exactly what this means. Sounds like "fuzzy dice" are acceptable.
Old September 1st, 2009 | 03:07 PM
  #146  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,407
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by wmachine
Joe, even with good terminology (my previous post), you have a good example of a rightfully questionable situation.
When considering what should be in the stock classes, we have basically 2 choices:
1. How it came from the factory.
2. How it came from the dealer*.
I can understand why #2 should be considered, but the dealer had the latitude to add pretty much *anything* to a car. So if the proverbial "kitchen sink" was added, should *that* be allowed? Personally, I think #2 is fine if limited to *Oldsmobile* accessories, both dealer and factory.
This is unfortunately a very slippery slope. The 68-69 H/Os did not come from an Olds assembly line in their final form, nor did a dealer perform the conversion, but they are "factory authorized" (for whatever that's worth) and accepted as stock by OCA. Does a Motion Performance 442 also count as "stock"? A Berejik-modified 442? Why is a non-original engine installed in a dealership garage any more "stock" than one installed in my garage?

I'm somewhat of a purist here. I would argue that a factory assembled L-69 car is "stock", but a dealer-installed Track Pac car is not (thought it IS "stock-appearing"). This whole argument gets very ugly very quickly.
Old September 2nd, 2009 | 06:48 AM
  #147  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
This is unfortunately a very slippery slope. .............This whole argument gets very ugly very quickly.
Of course. Thus the need not to even use the term "stock" unless it is put in context. It doesn't need to be an argument as much as it needs to have definition.
A car "is what it is", so trying to call it something like "stock" doesn't mean much unless there is a context or purpose for the definition/classification.
In this case, we're talking about judging classification for OCA judging.
So when it comes to what is in a "stock" class, we clarify definitions and make decisions (*and* exceptions) accordingly.

As an theoretical example of what I mean:
"Stock" class is determined by "factory correct". Dealer installs of *Oldmobile items* are allowed *with supporting* literature or proof.
Then we have to determine *specifically* what deviations are simply points off, and what takes it out of the class. (And as I've previously said, standards need to be developed)
Hurst Olds can be made a specific exception ('68 and '69 are the only ones that need it, right?). Other exceptions like that can be made.

Decisions like that can be made right down the line to pretty much sort things out. I don't ever see covering every little possible exception that comes along, but the vast majority could be covered. But it has to be done specifically, not in general terms.
I consider this to be a minor problem compared to not having standards established. Put specifically, what class to put a '68 Hurst Olds in is not nearly the problem that not having a standard developed for it is.
Old September 2nd, 2009 | 02:48 PM
  #148  
Run to Rund's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,894
NHRA and IHRA have definitions of "stock" for their usage. OCA has such a definition for judging (see above on stuff of the era and promo vehicles). thus, as also pointed out above, what really is stock? Then, there is the argument of L69 and W30 Track Pack cars. Back in 66-67, these were merely options. 397615 converted your 442 to L69, and 230195 converted it to W30, so are they stock, are they dealer/owner installed options, or what? If the dealer puts in a radio, is your car no longer stock? How about power steering or different wheel covers? See the point? If GMPD offered it, and specified it for your year/model, how can you exclude it? Darn few of the 66 W30 factory cars came with dog dish hubcaps, but "everyone" "restores" them that way. Should they be kicked out of stock OCA judging?
Old September 2nd, 2009 | 11:32 PM
  #149  
mugzilla's Avatar
is Fast Enough ...
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,308
From: dogtown
Since a lack of factory documentation like phs plagues Olds the proper documentation is important...

I used to think a logical progression of parts date codes was sufficient but I guess with Olds
you can forget about that ...

I'm glad I have a 70 (442 in vin) non w 30 (I don't have to document that )...
Old September 3rd, 2009 | 05:39 AM
  #150  
Jamesbo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 17,748
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Factory vs. Dealer installed

So, In 1968 I'm in a show room looking at a 68 442. The salesman says, Would you like to buy this car?" And I say, "Yeah, I would but I really wanted the fender stripes."

Does the salesman say," I can order you one." or "I can have stripes put on any car you want."

My long awaited point?

I wonder how many W-36 stripes were added [all be it incorrrectly] at the dealerships [as opposed to during restoration] i.e Has anyone seen an incorect survivor?

Just food for thought.
Old September 3rd, 2009 | 09:19 AM
  #151  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,407
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Jamesbo
I wonder how many W-36 stripes were added [all be it incorrrectly] at the dealerships [as opposed to during restoration] i.e Has anyone seen an incorect survivor?

Just food for thought.
Every one I have ever seen has been recently repainted/restored.

FYI, the term you're looking for is "albeit", not "all be it"...
Old September 3rd, 2009 | 11:29 AM
  #152  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by Run to Rund
NHRA and IHRA have definitions of "stock" for their usage. OCA has such a definition for judging (see above on stuff of the era and promo vehicles). thus, as also pointed out above, what really is stock? Then, there is the argument of L69 and W30 Track Pack cars. Back in 66-67, these were merely options. 397615 converted your 442 to L69, and 230195 converted it to W30, so are they stock, are they dealer/owner installed options, or what? If the dealer puts in a radio, is your car no longer stock? How about power steering or different wheel covers? See the point? If GMPD offered it, and specified it for your year/model, how can you exclude it? Darn few of the 66 W30 factory cars came with dog dish hubcaps, but "everyone" "restores" them that way. Should they be kicked out of stock OCA judging?
All good points, but once again we're stumbling on the word "stock" We don't have to stumble on it, we just have to define it.
There is:
1. How it (a particular car) came from the factory (or dealer, however defined). Only a well documented car would be able to qualify for this and even so, there are *lots* of details that are still open to scrutiny.
2. How it (any car) *could* have come from the factory (or dealer however as defined)
There is *nothing* in the judging that takes #1 into consideration. Not that there should be necessarily, as this would be extremely difficult to evaluate for accuracy.
So we have #2 for judging purposes. So there would be no problem, ram-air or no ram-air, radio or no radio, as long as standards are developed to determine if they were available.. There is a category for "authenticiy" and though I believe that it too isn't well defined, it seems to mean just "how correct".

Believe me, a lot (I'd even say most) of these problems arise from a from a lack of definitions. Let alone standards.
Old September 3rd, 2009 | 11:54 AM
  #153  
Jamesbo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 17,748
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Every one I have ever seen has been recently repainted/restored.

FYI, the term you're looking for is "albeit", not "all be it"...
Thanks for the spelling lesson Joe. But hey, I have an excuse, It was early.
Old September 3rd, 2009 | 12:09 PM
  #154  
mugzilla's Avatar
is Fast Enough ...
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,308
From: dogtown
Originally Posted by wmachine
All good points, but once again we're stumbling on the word "stock" We don't have to stumble on it, we just have to define it.
There is:
1. How it (a particular car) came from the factory (or dealer, however defined). Only a well documented car would be able to qualify for this and even so, there are *lots* of details that are still open to scrutiny.
2. How it (any car) *could* have come from the factory (or dealer however as defined)
There is *nothing* in the judging that takes #1 into consideration. Not that there should be necessarily, as this would be extremely difficult to evaluate for accuracy.
So we have #2 for judging purposes. So there would be no problem, ram-air or no ram-air, radio or no radio, as long as standards are developed to determine if they were available.. There is a category for "authenticiy" and though I believe that it too isn't well defined, it seems to mean just "how correct".

Believe me, a lot (I'd even say most) of these problems arise from a from a lack of definitions. Let alone standards.
I was thinking that we should have an online car show...

The entrants would post pics and if possible take additional pics as requested ...

We (the judges/members) could try to categorize the different cars ...

I would put up some t-shirts ( I entered the C O .com car show and all I got was this t-shirt) ...

We could have a poll for peoples choice and other categories ...
Old September 3rd, 2009 | 01:27 PM
  #155  
Jamesbo's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 17,748
From: Atlanta, Georgia
Great Idea

Great Idea

Car show w/o sun baked parking lot.
Old September 3rd, 2009 | 07:54 PM
  #156  
mugzilla's Avatar
is Fast Enough ...
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,308
From: dogtown
Originally Posted by Jamesbo
Great Idea

Car show w/o sun baked parking lot.
Or brats with ice cream faces rubbing said face on your door panel ...

I showed my car when it was beat. I 'd be parked next to $250,000 custom and more people stopped to check out "Chuckles". I'd let them sit in it and I'd start it and rev it up ...

Interactive display ...
Old September 5th, 2009 | 05:54 PM
  #157  
Bluevista's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,430
From: Northeast Ohio
Albeit? My name is Al and now I be it?
I always have to be it.

An online car show would be safe for the cars, Photoshop may be a slight problem for those not inclined to full disclosure of truth.

I have to say at this point in time that the world's top Bikini models wearing their work clothes are always loitering around and on my car whenever I take pics of it.
I ask in advance that all virtual car show judges please refrain from any thought suggesting that I would manipulate my photographic images to gain any advantage with my photo editing software that I know how to do that with.

Thank you
Old September 7th, 2009 | 02:28 PM
  #158  
mugzilla's Avatar
is Fast Enough ...
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,308
From: dogtown
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Went to the Nats on Friday for the day. I'll upload pictures when I can get a high speed connection. For now, it's time for my periodic ranting on 1968 W36 stripe cars. Admit it - now you're all just doing this

just saw this posted here ...

DSCN0332.jpg
Old September 7th, 2009 | 02:32 PM
  #159  
mugzilla's Avatar
is Fast Enough ...
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,308
From: dogtown
Originally Posted by Bluevista
Albeit? My name is Al and now I be it?
I always have to be it.

An online car show would be safe for the cars, Photoshop may be a slight problem for those not inclined to full disclosure of truth.

I have to say at this point in time that the world's top Bikini models wearing their work clothes are always loitering around and on my car whenever I take pics of it.
I ask in advance that all virtual car show judges please refrain from any thought suggesting that I would manipulate my photographic images to gain any advantage with my photo editing software that I know how to do that with.

Thank you
...
Old September 7th, 2009 | 03:42 PM
  #160  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Thread Starter
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,407
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by mugzilla
just saw this posted here ...

Yeah, that's not the first Cutlass to get the stripes...

And again, it's your car, do what you want. My whole point was the irony that with the large number of 68s with the stripes at Seven Springs, NONE of the cars to be judged had them painted correctly.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:43 PM.