U code Production numbers 1972
#41
Terry, you are the U & V code go-to for sure. My info states J (L32) & M (L34) code dual exhaust cars got the RPO N10 with AT or MT? Thought this data was from this site. Its handwritten on the back side of my 72 paperwork. I don't have the actual option order sheets like Joe has. I didn't record where I got this from which wasn't a habit when I saved the data.
Sams 350 M20 car is a rare bird for sure. Sam N10 or not on your car?
Steve
Sams 350 M20 car is a rare bird for sure. Sam N10 or not on your car?
Steve
#42
Terry, you are the U & V code go-to for sure. My info states J (L32) & M (L34) code dual exhaust cars got the RPO N10 with AT or MT? Thought this data was from this site. Its handwritten on the back side of my 72 paperwork. I don't have the actual option order sheets like Joe has. I didn't record where I got this from which wasn't a habit when I saved the data.
Sams 350 M20 car is a rare bird for sure. Sam N10 or not on your car?
Steve
Sams 350 M20 car is a rare bird for sure. Sam N10 or not on your car?
Steve
Terry
#43
131, W29 verts in 1972 got sticks, (vin 4267). We don't have the breakdown quantities on engines, carbs or which stick tranny these 131 cars had, at leat I do not. Sam, what letter is in your vin? I imagine either a J or an M? If so you should have the N10 rear bumper as well?
Every 1968-1971 442 came with the bumper. Every 1972 U, V, or X code W-29 car came with the bumper. I do not believe the a 1972 U or V car that was not a W-29 got it, however (I'll defer to Terry on this). Also, 1970-71 SX cars got the bumper, as did the 1972 H/Os.
#44
There is the clarification I (we all) needed. In Olds speak I thought N10 was dual exhaust with the cut-out bumper. This makes sense. It's similar to the N25 exhaust tips through the bumper option found on the 71-2 Buick GS, for which one needed to have N10 to obtain. RPO N25 triggered the different tailpipes and bumper part numbers.
Did Olds have a similar procedure? What was the 442 cut out bumper option called at the factory? Or was it simply a part number triggered by W29 with 400/455? Thanks Joe and Terry. I'll update my data.
Steve
Did Olds have a similar procedure? What was the 442 cut out bumper option called at the factory? Or was it simply a part number triggered by W29 with 400/455? Thanks Joe and Terry. I'll update my data.
Steve
#45
That is a really good question, and I can't answer it. Since every part choice on the assembly like is documented on the build sheet with a code (think springs, shocks, etc), one would assume there was some code on the build sheet that indicated the cutout bumper. Since that part was not available as a separate RPO, that code doesn't appear in the SPECS booklet or on the order forms. N10 applied to any car with dual exhausts, including wagons and full size cars, so it did not explicitly include the bumper.
#46
more
All 1972 cars used the M-20 trans. Cutout rear bumper was only factory installed on U and V W-29 cars, not 350s. Could be dealer installed though.
So out of those 131 M-20 cars, some were V code 455s. 66 Supreme convertibles had that L75 455/M20 combo - many were W-29s, but not all of them.
Terry
So out of those 131 M-20 cars, some were V code 455s. 66 Supreme convertibles had that L75 455/M20 combo - many were W-29s, but not all of them.
Terry
#47
So I read here any '72 U code should have a cut-out bumper. My one owner before me U code Supreme conv does have duals, W-Z manifolds, but no cut out bumper. Maybe I better look for one, and the build sheet.
#48
#49
#50
#51
That is a really good question, and I can't answer it. Since every part choice on the assembly like is documented on the build sheet with a code (think springs, shocks, etc), one would assume there was some code on the build sheet that indicated the cutout bumper. Since that part was not available as a separate RPO, that code doesn't appear in the SPECS booklet or on the order forms. N10 applied to any car with dual exhausts, including wagons and full size cars, so it did not explicitly include the bumper.
#52
Bumpers are big, so I would think they'd be picked out of their packaging back in conveyance areas and send out "sequenced" in order. There would have probably been a code on the sheet hanging on the firewall or the core support or the open hood that the worker would check, and I presume a sticker or something on the back of the bumper with a code. Or, they could have just had a huge area and the guy knew the cutout bumpers were always over THERE, and didn't need a sticker.
#53
I have some stats from the GM Heritage Center. However they only go up to June 1972 so it's not complete production - a month is missing.
Additionally, it's for all L75 engines, so it would include V-code cars as well.
3200: 83 through June
3600: 2,359 through June
4200: 3,015 through June
4800: 4,860 through June
Additionally, it's for all L75 engines, so it would include V-code cars as well.
3200: 83 through June
3600: 2,359 through June
4200: 3,015 through June
4800: 4,860 through June
#56
Hey Allan in my intro post you decoded my VIN with the U engine designation as the L74 455. According to the CSM, the L74 was used in B bodies, while the L75 was the A body code. I'm guessing it was a typo, but I just wanted to clarify for all the others on the quest of verifying their VINs.
#57
#60
It was even easier than that. The exhaust system was already hung on the chassis before body drop, and thus long before bumper installation. Cars with trumpets got the cutout bumper, cars with turndowns did not. You couldn't install a straight bumper on a car with trumpets.
#61
Hey Allan in my intro post you decoded my VIN with the U engine designation as the L74 455. According to the CSM, the L74 was used in B bodies, while the L75 was the A body code. I'm guessing it was a typo, but I just wanted to clarify for all the others on the quest of verifying their VINs.
#62
Thanks for the above info. If I am reading things correctly, there is no production number breakdown for a W29 1972 442 convertible with the U code 455, correct?
What is the closest breakdown that is known for this combination?
What is the closest breakdown that is known for this combination?
Last edited by Ctls442; July 20th, 2020 at 10:30 PM.
#64
I'd like to know where you got that statistic, knowing that there were only 11571 34267 models produced in 72. How many of each models does your source list, and how many U code and V code also?? FWIW, W29 production was not exclusive to the L75 455 engine, it also included the L32 and L34 350 engines. Another interesting fact that may skew your stats - Every W30 car had to have the W29 option as part of its build. The statistics from Helen Early and James Walkinshaw simply show the number produced of each model and the engine availability. So if you have a source that shows the number of W29's produced in each category that would be worth sharing here.
#65
All 1972 cars used the M-20 trans. Cutout rear bumper was only factory installed on U and V W-29 cars, not 350s. Could be dealer installed though.
So out of those 131 M-20 cars, some were V code 455s. 66 Supreme convertibles had that L75 455/M20 combo - many were W-29s, but not all of them.
Terry
So out of those 131 M-20 cars, some were V code 455s. 66 Supreme convertibles had that L75 455/M20 combo - many were W-29s, but not all of them.
Terry
Last edited by wr1970; October 12th, 2024 at 08:36 AM.
#66
Terry
#67
I’m just departing on a trip now for a week so I won’t have my production numbers in front of me until the 19th. If you nudge me with a reminder I’ll pull up the fastbacks with the L75 then. A couple others on here also have copies of the mainframe printout numbers so they may be able to assist.
Terry
Terry
Last edited by wr1970; October 12th, 2024 at 11:42 AM.
#68
#69
All this talk of U code 72's and H/O's, then I see this (not mine, nor could I handle this restoration).
https://cleveland.craigslist.org/cto...788998006.html
https://cleveland.craigslist.org/cto...788998006.html
#70
Last edited by wr1970; October 12th, 2024 at 03:12 PM.
#71
All this talk of U code 72's and H/O's, then I see this (not mine, nor could I handle this restoration).
https://cleveland.craigslist.org/cto...788998006.html
https://cleveland.craigslist.org/cto...788998006.html
#73
Yes. The only small block Olds A-body to ever get a cutout bumper from the factory was the Rallye 350, period. As far as the 1972 W29 cars, the use of the bumper (or lack thereof) is well documented in the Product Information Manual.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
hurst68olds
General Discussion
4
August 31st, 2018 02:50 PM
help442onguam
General Discussion
4
March 20th, 2011 12:25 PM