School me on the 400

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23, 2023 | 06:57 AM
  #441  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,924
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Most don’t know this, but those adv duration numbers are at .000, not .006. Erson never changed them from years ago. Take about 12* off of both.
I used the same lobe family but a 222/228@.050 on the same 108lsa in at 105 on a 9.5:1 350. I had 14-15” of vacuum and it ran great. That cam isn’t too big for a moderate 400 build.

are all their cams rated at .000 advertised, or just that one?

as far as being to big..if it wasn’t degree’d, and it wasn’t, and it’s in retarded, it will act way to big and have the symptoms he has

Last edited by CANADIANOLDS; May 23, 2023 at 07:28 AM.
Old May 23, 2023 | 11:21 AM
  #442  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,924
Originally Posted by brotherGood
Per the assembly shop (and yes, that is a measured statement based on the current situation) the preload is .050. That's what he sets preload on every engine he assembles, and with that preload in the lifters that's how he verified pushrod length. (Something to that extent anyway)

In regards to intake centerline, why 102 when the cam card states 106? Not questioning the reason, just looking for a better understanding as the most I'd ever paid attention to was LSA for sound, and lift for springs as the stuff I worked on previous was notorious for weak springs
cam card saying int C/L is 106 means it’s ground 2 degrees advanced. Nothing to do with any engine it’s going in..it’s a basic suggestion. It can be wherever the builder wants to put it

in your case advancing it even more helps build cylinder pressure early which brings the TQ band in sooner. Earlier int valve closing helps with idle vacuum
Old May 23, 2023 | 11:43 AM
  #443  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,477
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by CANADIANOLDS
are all their cams rated at .000 advertised, or just that one?

as far as being to big..if it wasn’t degree’d, and it wasn’t, and it’s in retarded, it will act way to big and have the symptoms he has
Correct, I told him he may have an incorrect timing set, etc.
And yes to some degree, but mostly just their early flat tappet stuff. Most of those numbers are at .000, not .006. If they seem a bit large at times, then it’s a good likelihood that they’re at .000. Their stuff isn’t THAT lazy.😉.
Old May 23, 2023 | 12:00 PM
  #444  
brotherGood's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,378
From: OH
Just out of curiousity, when the cam finally gets degreed/new timing set installed, will this fix my "new zero" mark on the timing tab? Or I guess a better way to ask, are they related?
Old May 23, 2023 | 12:09 PM
  #445  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,770
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by brotherGood
Just out of curiousity, when the cam finally gets degreed/new timing set installed, will this fix my "new zero" mark on the timing tab? Or I guess a better way to ask, are they related?
The zero on the balancer and timing tab are governed solely by the crank and piston. You MUST ensure that is correct FIRST, before degreeing the cam.
Old May 23, 2023 | 12:15 PM
  #446  
brotherGood's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,378
From: OH
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
The zero on the balancer and timing tab are governed solely by the crank and piston. You MUST ensure that is correct FIRST, before degreeing the cam.
currently, it is not. It is quite a few degrees up from the zero on the tab. I wouldn't overrule the potential of the new balancer being incorrect, but I do know when I went through trying to locate TDC to retime the car, it was not aligned (balancer to tab)
Old May 23, 2023 | 12:16 PM
  #447  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,924
Originally Posted by brotherGood
Just out of curiousity, when the cam finally gets degreed/new timing set installed, will this fix my "new zero" mark on the timing tab? Or I guess a better way to ask, are they related?
are you using the original damper and timing tab?

if you are, the only way the zero on the tab won’t line up at tdc with the mark on the damper is if damper outer ring has moved/slipped from its hub.

a damper like that should never be used again.

You can make a new mark on the damper but chances are it will move again

can you post a pic of your timing tab?
Old May 23, 2023 | 12:17 PM
  #448  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,770
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by brotherGood
currently, it is not. It is quite a few degrees up from the zero on the tab. I wouldn't overrule the potential of the new balancer being incorrect, but I do know when I went through trying to locate TDC to retime the car, it was not aligned (balancer to tab)
OK, the reality is that you will be degreeing the cam with a degree wheel, not the balancer and timing tab, but since you have to determine TDC to zero the degree wheel, you should also adjust the timing tab at the same time.
Old May 23, 2023 | 12:48 PM
  #449  
brotherGood's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,378
From: OH
Original tab, new balancer (Summit)

Upon completion of the assembly, he scribed a mark on the tab where the new zero is (I'll try to get a picture this evening).

In regards to adjusting the tab..is it movable or is my only option the scribe that he put on there?
Old May 23, 2023 | 01:03 PM
  #450  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,924
Originally Posted by brotherGood
Original tab, new balancer (Summit)

Upon completion of the assembly, he scribed a mark on the tab where the new zero is (I'll try to get a picture this evening).

In regards to adjusting the tab..is it movable or is my only option the scribe that he put on there?
a pic of the tab would help.

what’s the part number/manufacturer of the new damper?

it’s odd the builder was diligent enough to figure out the damper tdc mark wasn’t actual tdc, but didn’t degree the cam? To find out what he found out, he would need a degree wheel, piston stop and go through everything involved in degree’ng a cam…but didn’t?

Last edited by CANADIANOLDS; May 23, 2023 at 01:06 PM.
Old May 23, 2023 | 01:12 PM
  #451  
brotherGood's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,378
From: OH
Dorman 594-117 (currently not available)
https://www.summitracing.com/parts/RNB-594-117

He claimed he couldn't degree it because he only used parts that were supplied. However the previous machine shop supplied Pontiac bearings that were wrong, and had balanced/reconditioned rods that were bent..so that (to me) doesn't really hold up.
Old May 23, 2023 | 03:10 PM
  #452  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,477
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by CANADIANOLDS
it’s odd the builder was diligent enough to figure out the damper tdc mark wasn’t actual tdc, but didn’t degree the cam? To find out what he found out, he would need a degree wheel, piston stop and go through everything involved in degree’ng a cam…but didn’t?
^^^^^^
His builder is an idiot by the way, a total idiot.
Old May 23, 2023 | 05:24 PM
  #453  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,924
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
^^^^^^
His builder is an idiot by the way, a total idiot.
so you know his work?

hard to believe anyone doesn’t degree a performance cam when doing a build these days..especially admitting to it
Old May 23, 2023 | 06:42 PM
  #454  
brotherGood's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,378
From: OH
Originally Posted by CANADIANOLDS
so you know his work?

hard to believe anyone doesn’t degree a performance cam when doing a build these days..especially admitting to it
He only admitted it when blaming me for the parts (timing gear set) supplied. How was I to know that it needed a 9 keyway gearset..id never done this before.
Old May 24, 2023 | 07:17 AM
  #455  
67OAI's Avatar
Old(s)GuysRule
 
Joined: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,550
From: S.E.Georgia
If I am reading this correctly, this shop wants to sell you a 9 keyway timing set because they could not degree the cam without it! They (many cam companies and others) make camshaft degree bushing kits (approx. $25.00) which are very easy to use and only require partially enlarging the hole in your camshaft sprocket to accommodate insertion of the advance/retard bushing of necessity to properly degree your cam! This should be your choice and not theirs, inexpensive bushing kit or expensive 9 keyway timing set!!
Old May 24, 2023 | 09:39 AM
  #456  
brotherGood's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,378
From: OH
Originally Posted by 67OAI
If I am reading this correctly, this shop wants to sell you a 9 keyway timing set because they could not degree the cam without it! They (many cam companies and others) make camshaft degree bushing kits (approx. $25.00) which are very easy to use and only require partially enlarging the hole in your camshaft sprocket to accommodate insertion of the advance/retard bushing of necessity to properly degree your cam! This should be your choice and not theirs, inexpensive bushing kit or expensive 9 keyway timing set!!
They're not even trying to get me to purchase anything through them, its simply a "we're using your parts, its not our fault if its wrong" mentality. To an extent, I can kind of understand, however if the incorrect parts keep you from correctly assembling the engine-then that should tell you off the rip you need to obtain correct parts.
Old May 24, 2023 | 09:41 AM
  #457  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,477
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by brotherGood
He only admitted it when blaming me for the parts (timing gear set) supplied. How was I to know that it needed a 9 keyway gearset..id never done this before.
You’re kinda missing the point, he could’ve at least checked it with the supplied set. But he didn’t even do that.
Old May 24, 2023 | 09:42 AM
  #458  
brotherGood's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,378
From: OH
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
You’re kinda missing the point, he could’ve at least checked it with the supplied set. But he didn’t even do that.
Fair point
Old May 24, 2023 | 09:44 AM
  #459  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,477
From: Central Fl
[QUOTE=CANADIANOLDS;1500170]so you know his work?/QUOTE]
From my many conversations with the op, I know his builder doesn’t check anything. That’s enough for me.
Old May 24, 2023 | 09:32 PM
  #460  
68post's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 229
From: Indianapolis
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Correct, I told him he may have an incorrect timing set, etc.
And yes to some degree, but mostly just their early flat tappet stuff. Most of those numbers are at .000, not .006. If they seem a bit large at times, then it’s a good likelihood that they’re at .000. Their stuff isn’t THAT lazy.😉.
Is the (my) Erson JB100 spec'd at the same ".000" and not ".006" (the only diff I see btw this TQ40 and the JB100 is the JB's 112* LS) ??
It's advertised is 296/304 also .
Old May 25, 2023 | 03:54 AM
  #461  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,477
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by 68post
Is the (my) Erson JB100 spec'd at the same ".000" and not ".006" (the only diff I see btw this TQ40 and the JB100 is the JB's 112* LS) ??
It's advertised is 296/304 also .
Yes, you can take about 10-12* off both of those.
Note; ALL Erson cams are supplied with a Cam Pro sheet showing all durations etc. Just look at what it says at .006. That compares with what most other cam companies use as their advertised duration.

Last edited by cutlassefi; May 25, 2023 at 03:58 AM.
Old May 25, 2023 | 09:56 AM
  #462  
brotherGood's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,378
From: OH
Compression test results

Old May 25, 2023 | 10:20 AM
  #463  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,924
Originally Posted by brotherGood
Compression test results
Not good. A low of 140 on a fresh build on one ? Even 155 is low to me for a performance build

I’ll bet that cam is in retarded
Old May 25, 2023 | 10:26 AM
  #464  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,924
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Yes, you can take about 10-12* off both of those.
Note; ALL Erson cams are supplied with a Cam Pro sheet showing all durations etc. Just look at what it says at .006. That compares with what most other cam companies use as their advertised duration.
why wasn’t this guys cam supplied with all that info , like the .006”?

is it really old stock ?
Old May 25, 2023 | 01:14 PM
  #465  
sysmg's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 472
Originally Posted by brotherGood
Compression test results
At least they are all within tolerances. +/-10%.
Old May 25, 2023 | 04:08 PM
  #466  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,924
Originally Posted by sysmg
At least they are all within tolerances. +/-10%.
on a fresh build they should all be the same
Old May 25, 2023 | 09:39 PM
  #467  
BangScreech4-4-2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,688
Originally Posted by CANADIANOLDS
on a fresh build they should all be the same
... and closer to 175.
Old May 26, 2023 | 05:30 AM
  #468  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,477
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by CANADIANOLDS
why wasn’t this guys cam supplied with all that info , like the .006”? Is it really old stock?
That paper is in EVERY Erson cam box. I’ll bet his builder had no idea what he was looking at.
Old May 26, 2023 | 05:33 AM
  #469  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,477
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by CANADIANOLDS
on a fresh build they should all be the same
Yes they should at least be close but you’ll have chambers that are different sizes, one head may have been surfaced more than the other etc. And I’m sure he didn’t cc anywhere near all of them.
Old May 26, 2023 | 05:44 AM
  #470  
brotherGood's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,378
From: OH
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Yes they should at least be close but you’ll have chambers that are different sizes, one head may have been surfaced more than the other etc. And I’m sure he didn’t cc anywhere near all of them.
Not that it matters, but Im fairly certain both sleeved cylinders are on this side. While A. It shouldn't effect compression and B. It'd only be the two so I'm not sure why 3 of the 4 are lower on that side.
Old May 26, 2023 | 06:03 AM
  #471  
maxi426's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 87
From: Buffalo NY
Were ALL of the plugs removed while doing the test? Was the battery getting weak? Was it on a charger? Did all of the cylinders "pump" the exact same number of times? Might be time for a leakdown test.
Old May 26, 2023 | 07:45 AM
  #472  
brotherGood's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,378
From: OH
Yes.
Didn't seem to be cranking any slower
No.
Counted 5 revolutions each time.
Old May 26, 2023 | 07:47 AM
  #473  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,924
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Yes they should at least be close but you’ll have chambers that are different sizes, one head may have been surfaced more than the other etc. And I’m sure he didn’t cc anywhere near all of them.
not in my world…even a good old running never apart factory engine is within a couple pounds of each other from what I’ve seen
Old May 26, 2023 | 08:00 AM
  #474  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,477
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by CANADIANOLDS
not in my world…even a good old running never apart factory engine is within a couple pounds of each other from what I’ve seen
But this has been apart, and had a valve job done, etc.
Old May 26, 2023 | 09:46 PM
  #475  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,924
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
But this has been apart, and had a valve job done, etc.
that amount of difference on a fresh build is totally unacceptable to me…I’m not being picky.

that’s absolutely crap work if engines come out like that. that’s worse than 60’s assembly line engines
Old May 27, 2023 | 03:52 AM
  #476  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,477
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by CANADIANOLDS
that amount of difference on a fresh build is totally unacceptable to me…I’m not being picky.

that’s absolutely crap work if engines come out like that. that’s worse than 60’s assembly line engines
Agreed. But at this point nobody knows why, and that’s the issue.
Old May 27, 2023 | 01:47 PM
  #477  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,924
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Agreed. But at this point nobody knows why, and that’s the issue.
here’s my guess on what’s wrong and why it’s idle vac is low.

the cam is in retarded.

second problem, when the deck was cut, it wasn’t cut the same on each side, or front to back.

the crank psi gets progressively lower on each bank from front to back , with the exception of #6 which

they are all evenly down, side to side, front to back..that’s a dead give away of incorrect machining …the crank psi drops front to back

i put money on the front deck being cut more on the front, both sides, and less on the right bank






Old May 27, 2023 | 01:51 PM
  #478  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,924
My fix, if this is the problem.

pull the heads…check piston deck numbers. If they are out of whack. Cut the heads to get the cyl CC the same on all 8

correct the cam ..I would still put it in 6 ahead with a 102 int cl

Last edited by CANADIANOLDS; May 27, 2023 at 01:54 PM.
Old May 27, 2023 | 02:09 PM
  #479  
tru-blue 442's Avatar
Old School Olds
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 9,270
From: Marble Falls TX
Should have ditched the pos when he saw this.
Old May 27, 2023 | 03:14 PM
  #480  
brotherGood's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2021
Posts: 1,378
From: OH
Originally Posted by tru-blue 442
Should have ditched the pos when he saw this.
Had it not been the original engine, I probably wouldn't have even bought the car.



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:26 AM.