hydramatic v.s jetaway

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old August 12th, 2008, 09:04 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
gerlof_1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: netherlands
Posts: 48
hydramatic v.s jetaway

does the older type jetaway also fit the 394?
gerlof_1 is offline  
Old February 12th, 2009, 10:57 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
d2_willys's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: earth
Posts: 288
yes!
d2_willys is offline  
Old June 30th, 2011, 05:42 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Al Steinmetz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 4
trans conversion

Originally Posted by gerlof_1
does the older type jetaway also fit the 394?
I would say if you have a complete swap from a 60 I believe you can do it.Pontiac carried it through 64 as an option.Al
Al Steinmetz is offline  
Old July 13th, 2011, 03:46 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
rickr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 20
I converted a 61 Olds 4 door from a slim jim to a Jetaway back in the 1980's. It is best to have a doner car. ( I used a 59 88) The flywheel, lower engine bellhousing, drive shaft, rear engine mounts, linkage, and trans floor hump have to be changed out. Maybe even the starter motor, I canot recall on that.
rickr is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Pookster6
Transmission
6
January 14th, 2016 02:29 AM
DreWRoolZ
Parts Wanted
0
October 3rd, 2011 05:39 AM
kgenesse
Transmission
0
April 10th, 2011 05:36 AM
The_German
Parts Wanted
0
March 5th, 2011 11:09 AM
TECH9TWISTA
Transmission
0
July 16th, 2006 06:51 PM



Quick Reply: hydramatic v.s jetaway



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:25 PM.