Tech Editor's Desk Projects, papers, writings, thoughts, musings of our technical editor Joe Padavano. To begin with, he will be making threads and can approve posts to it if he wishes. This can be changed in the future if it does not work out well.

Overheating Problem 70 Cutlass

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old September 2nd, 2010, 04:51 AM
  #41  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,199
Originally Posted by 71 Cutlass
but yet still cannot touch dipstick w/out incurring 3rd degree burns
Interesting. I've encountered too-hot-to-touch dipsticks before, but I'm not sure that this would be a symptom of an engine running too hot. Even an engine running at normal temperature is too hot to touch with your bare hands. So if it was running some number of degrees above normal, the engine would still, as far as your hands are concerned, just be hot too hot to touch.

The dipstick handle sticks way out away from the engine and should be cooled enough by air circulation. In my experience, a too-hot dipstick has more often than not been caused by the dipstick handle being too close to something else that gets hot.
jaunty75 is online now  
Old September 2nd, 2010, 05:54 AM
  #42  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by captjim
........ Is this a 350 or 455? ........

Doesn't matter unless it is not the original engine or cooling system.

You are right, nobody has ever built a 455 too tight causing internal friction and heat issues.
captjim is offline  
Old September 2nd, 2010, 06:19 AM
  #43  
Junior Member
 
88 coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,212
Originally Posted by captjim
........ nobody has ever built a 455 too tight causing internal friction and heat issues.
nobody has ever built a 350 too tight causing internal friction and heat issues.


Originally Posted by BlackGold
........ The water pump is pushing a fixed volume per second of coolant, regardless of which core you have. If that volume of coolant were to hit a very narrow restriction, the velocity of the coolant would speed up tremendously and spend very little time in that restriction........
If I replace my dual 3" exhaust with a 1" single, how much increase in power can I expect?

If I replace my .500" fuel line with the original .312" tubing, how much ET/speed improvement can I expect?

I just replaced my ¾" main water supply with 1½" pipe and experienced a marked increase in flow and volume at the tap. Where did I go wrong?

Norm
88 coupe is offline  
Old September 2nd, 2010, 06:21 AM
  #44  
One of None W-31
 
71 Cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 671
Jaunty,
I merely mentioned the dipstick temp to point out that w/out overflowing radiator, but yet hot dipstick, I'm making an "educated" guess that temps must be normal at this point (not too hot, not too cold). Of course, as I said, you may have prodded me to me to get a definitive reading on the actual temp.
71 Cutlass is offline  
Old September 2nd, 2010, 07:16 AM
  #45  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,199
Originally Posted by 88 coupe
I just replaced my ¾" main water supply with 1½" pipe and experienced a marked increase in flow and volume at the tap. Where did I go wrong?
Simple application of the mechanical energy balance. If the upstream pressure remained the same, the pressure at your tap is decreased. You can't get something for nothing. Your increased volumetric flowrate comes the price of a lower outlet pressure. Those hot showers won't be quite as tingly, and your lawn sprinkler won't throw the water quite as far.
jaunty75 is online now  
Old September 2nd, 2010, 07:22 AM
  #46  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Quote:
Originally Posted by captjim
........ nobody has ever built a 455 too tight causing internal friction and heat issues.

nobody has ever built a 350 too tight causing internal friction and heat issues.

Once again, Norm, you are arguing for it's sake. We both know that with the much longer stroke of a 455 and the problems with Speed pro clearances that this is a MUCH more common problem with 455s than it is with 350s.
captjim is offline  
Old September 2nd, 2010, 08:02 AM
  #47  
Registered User
 
Nilsson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,076
I have to wonder if the thread starter found what they were looking for as far as a possible solution.
Nilsson is offline  
Old September 2nd, 2010, 08:04 AM
  #48  
Registered User
 
citcapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idano
Posts: 9,127
Same here,

Most likely gave up and moved on when he figured out his thread was hijacked.
citcapp is offline  
Old September 2nd, 2010, 08:55 AM
  #49  
One of None W-31
 
71 Cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 671
Original post was concerning thermostats and heating issues...so in a way the topic has remained on target, just a few extra battles the original poster probably never intended to endure...and extra "scientific" info to boot.
What's so ridiculous is that I live so close to Tony (orignal poster), I ought to just go down the road and see what I can do to help...if he wants me to.

Last edited by 71 Cutlass; September 2nd, 2010 at 08:58 AM.
71 Cutlass is offline  
Old September 2nd, 2010, 08:57 AM
  #50  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,199
But that's what makes it interesting!
jaunty75 is online now  
Old September 3rd, 2010, 07:38 AM
  #51  
Junior Member
 
88 coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,212
Originally Posted by jaunty75
If the upstream pressure remained the same, the pressure at your tap is decreased ........
Upstream (actually downstream) pressure from the city water supply, and the pressure at the tap, are unchanged. The available volume at the tap has increased due to the reduced restriction of the larger pipe.

Originally Posted by BlackGold
........ The water pump is pushing a fixed volume per second of coolant, regardless of which core you have. If that volume of coolant were to hit a very narrow restriction, the velocity of the coolant would speed up tremendously and spend very little time in that restriction .........
Which, according to this, is the opposite of what should occur.




Originally Posted by captjim
Once again, Norm, you are arguing for it's sake ........
I thought we might be finished with your childish personal attacks.

If, instead of using [b], [/b], [img], [/img], [i], and [/i], you were to use the same [quote] and [/quote] code that comes with that little "quote" button at the bottom right of the post, you would be far less confusing.

Originally Posted by captjim
........ and the problems with Speed pro clearances ........
From the opening post:
Originally Posted by Tony Cutlass
........ Lenmar Motor Sports short blocked it for me ........
I would expect a competent shop to choose clearances that fit the customers actual needs, not a generic guideline.

Looking for ghosts is a poor substitute for a proper diagnosis.

Norm
88 coupe is offline  
Old September 3rd, 2010, 08:15 AM
  #52  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,199
Originally Posted by 88 coupe
Upstream (actually downstream) pressure from the city water supply, and the pressure at the tap, are unchanged. The available volume at the tap has increased due to the reduced restriction of the larger pipe.
You can't get something for nothing. If what you're saying is true, you could increase the outlet pipe diameter to any arbitrary size, get as much increase in the volumetric flow as you want, and it would be at no cost.

Let's look at this another way. You put your thumb over the end of the garden hose. The water comes out faster so you can spray off the sidewalk. But the quantity (mass) of water coming through per unit time cannot be changed because the amount of water entering the piping leading to your house is not changed. This is because that depends on the diameter of the inlet pipe at the bottom of the municipal water tank and the pressure due to the weight of the water in the tank, which is a function of its height, which is presumably constant.

Therefore that increased velocity that you're getting through the garden hose comes at the price of smaller mass (or volume) flowrate. The total amount of water passing through the hose has to stay constant.

So going the other way, as you suggest, and changing your pipe diameter from 3/4" to 1.5", means that the opposite will happen as compared to putting your thumb on the hose. You'll get water filling up that increased pipe diameter just fine, but it will come out at a slower velocity.

You can verify this by timing how long it takes to fill a gallon bucket. Using the smaller diameter pipe means that the water will come out at a higher velocity, but the volumetric rate is reduced. Using the larger pipe diameter means the water will come out a slower velocity, but the volumetric rate is increased. In either case, the time necessary to fill the gallon bucket will be the same.

Last edited by jaunty75; September 3rd, 2010 at 08:36 AM.
jaunty75 is online now  
Old September 3rd, 2010, 08:17 AM
  #53  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Not "chasing ghosts", but getting as much information as possible. Engine size is an issue. Also, though a shop may be quite "competent" there is the fact that using the listed Speed Pro clearances has caused issues on 455s in the past. Ask any EXPERIENCED Olds builder and they will verify that the listed clearances are too tight and will probably cause galling/scuffing. Not a red herring, a fact to consider.

Anything anyone else posts is "childish", but not you, right? Look at the last half dozen threads that you have participated in, every one becomes contentious. Look at the number of those threads that you are not involved in, wait, there are none.

Let me get this right, my posting style is confusing??? Are you serious?

Last edited by captjim; September 3rd, 2010 at 11:47 AM.
captjim is offline  
Old September 13th, 2010, 09:29 PM
  #54  
Junior Member
 
88 coupe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Southern CA
Posts: 2,212
Originally Posted by captjim
........ Are you serious?
Yes.



So much for the childish personal attacks:

Seems that I have chosen a poor analogy.

Originally Posted by jaunty75
........ If what you're saying is true, you could increase the outlet pipe diameter to any arbitrary size, get as much increase in the volumetric flow as you want, and it would be at no cost .........
There would be no "cost" as long as the supply had sufficient pressure and volume to support the increase.

Originally Posted by jaunty75
........ But the quantity (mass) of water coming through per unit time cannot be changed because the amount of water entering the piping leading to your house is not changed ........
An easy assumption to make and, in this case, quite justified.

To clarify:
Originally Posted by 88 coupe
Upstream (actually downstream) pressure from the city water supply, and the pressure at the tap, are unchanged. The available volume at the tap has increased due to the reduced restriction of the larger pipe.
The pipe to the house is the one that was changed.

Originally Posted by jaunty75
........ Therefore that increased velocity that you're getting through the garden hose comes at the price of smaller mass (or volume) flow rate. ........
In this case, the increased velocity is incidental to the release of pressure to the atmosphere. Not so in an automotive cooling system where (except for changes in water pump speed) pressures are constant in an enclosed system.

Originally Posted by BlackGold
And if anyone's wondering why wider tubes or more tubes cools better, it's because there's more volume of coolant inside those tubes at any given time, which means the coolant travels through the radiator more slowly, allowing it to transfer more heat to the outside air ........
If flow could be increased by reducing tube size, it would occur after the coolant left the tubes. If it did occur within the tubes, it could provide a little support for the "water moving too fast to be cooled" myth.

Norm
88 coupe is offline  
Old September 14th, 2010, 04:46 AM
  #55  
Registered User
 
jaunty75's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: southeastern Michigan
Posts: 14,199
Whatever you say, Norm.


How about another beer?
jaunty75 is online now  
Old November 2nd, 2010, 07:43 AM
  #56  
Registered User
 
daviidwilson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 2
Originally Posted by 71 Cutlass
Jaunty,
Sorry for the wording confusion, read "into the motor" as "allowing water to circulate through the motor" (Obviously from engine to the radiator). At any rate, my car has 10.5:1 compression, and as a result never seems "cold", esp. with 3.42 gears, 2500 stall, and A/C in stop/go traffic in the Texas weather. What do you know regarding the high flowing thermos?

Brian...you are the bravest person I know

Waiting to see if it "Will go round in circles" again.
Personally, if my engine is stock and the thermostat called for in the service manual is not keeping the engine running at the correct temperature, I would be looking for the cause of this, rather than trying to cover over the problem by installing a different thermostat. Poor cooling can be due to a number of reasons, the most likely of which is clogged or corroded coolant passages in the engine and/or radiator
daviidwilson is offline  
Old November 2nd, 2010, 08:48 AM
  #57  
Registered User
 
dc2x4drvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,661
A 10.5 comp. motor is not stock.
dc2x4drvr is offline  
Old November 3rd, 2010, 10:12 AM
  #58  
Registered User
 
bkeese's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 285
I've changed the radiator, thermostat, hoses, electric fan, after market aluminum fan, etc. I think it was built too tight.

Many years ago I had my 62 vette motor rebuilt professionally, same radiator as before a spun the bearing, with thermostat and without, it would overheat sitting still and was fine move on a hot summer day. I concluded that the engine rebuild was the problem. It was the only thing that changed. I hoped it would loosen up, but 2 years laterit was still a problem and I sold the car. That's one way to fix the problem.
bkeese is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wz1t8k
Big Blocks
15
July 5th, 2014 10:18 AM
69CuTlass S
The Newbie Forum
17
September 19th, 2010 09:24 AM
GAslim78
Big Blocks
19
March 14th, 2010 02:24 PM
1971442convertible
442
12
December 28th, 2007 08:26 PM
labrats804
Small Blocks
3
July 19th, 2007 07:16 AM



Quick Reply: Overheating Problem 70 Cutlass



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:32 AM.