New engine needed, 231 or 350?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old July 23rd, 2015 | 06:49 PM
  #1  
Dasaki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 20
From: Columbus, IN
New engine needed, 231 or 350?

As the title suggests, I need to replace the engine in my 77 Omega as I have a bad rod bearing and, while it drives still, I'm somewhat scared it'll finally throw the rod every time I go to work. The original engine is the VIN C odd-fire 231 V6 and it has the TH200 transmission sitting behind it.

There aren't any available 231s in my area though there's one about 200 miles away that would be good in it. However I'm unsure about the shipping process for motors and have been looking at what the local junkyard has available, mainly some 350 V8s out of large early-80s chevy trucks and TH350 transmissions.

Aside from the transmission, what else would need to be replaced under the hood if I were to go from the V6 to a V8, or should I just have a 'new' 231 shipped from Ohio?
Old July 24th, 2015 | 04:15 AM
  #2  
1970cs's Avatar
Lansing built
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,255
From: Grand Ledge, MI
Welcome to C.O. IIRC that's a Buick designed engine. If you're going to salvage that engine, you may be able to obtain parts from those fellers?

Pat
Old July 24th, 2015 | 05:43 AM
  #3  
M-14's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 162
Although a different engine swap isn't too hard on these you might want to tell us your budget. Its the little stuff that adds up.
Me, I'd go with a 350 or 403 olds & a th2004r trans, you should be able to get a lot of parts for the swap from junkyard cars like B & G bodied cars with 307 engines.
I'm not sure on the driveshaft for the X body.
Old July 24th, 2015 | 09:15 AM
  #4  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,401
From: Northern VA
Another 231 is the only bolt-in engine replacement. Any other engine will require new mounts, new exhaust, new accessory locations and wiring, a different radiator, and possibly a different trans. We don't know your expertise or skills, so we can't advise without more info. A Chevy truck 350 requires Chevy mounts, a Chevy trans, Chevy brackets, etc. The trans from that truck will be a long tailshaft and will require mods to fit your car.
Old July 24th, 2015 | 09:24 AM
  #5  
Dasaki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 20
From: Columbus, IN
Ah, yeah, my skills are minimal for large repairs and my budget is almost nil. The joys of owning a classic and working at a gas station.

Sounds like the 231 is indeed my best option.
Old July 24th, 2015 | 10:41 AM
  #6  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 41,180
From: Poteau, Ok
Ask around to see if there are any decent volume engine remanufacturers. Or you may be able to find a Jasper engine dealer in your area.
Old July 24th, 2015 | 11:03 AM
  #7  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Another 231 is the only bolt-in engine replacement. Any other engine will require new mounts, new exhaust, new accessory locations and wiring, a different radiator, and possibly a different trans. We don't know your expertise or skills, so we can't advise without more info. A Chevy truck 350 requires Chevy mounts, a Chevy trans, Chevy brackets, etc. The trans from that truck will be a long tailshaft and will require mods to fit your car.

Very true. The easiest V8 swap is a Buick 350, the Olds conversion is a lot more complicated.
Old July 24th, 2015 | 11:08 AM
  #8  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,401
From: Northern VA
This website might be useful to you.
Old July 24th, 2015 | 11:11 AM
  #9  
Dasaki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 20
From: Columbus, IN
The yard actually has one of the Buick 350s, however it has a number of aftermarket parts and is priced at twice the cost of the Chevy engines.
Old July 24th, 2015 | 11:27 AM
  #10  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 41,180
From: Poteau, Ok
However when you consider the cost of installing the Chevy engine... You'll need a trans or adaptor, possibly a drive shaft or a yoke. Brackets, pulleys, starter, and all the incidentals. Its probably way more.
Old July 24th, 2015 | 11:49 AM
  #11  
Dasaki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 20
From: Columbus, IN
Makes sense. Now one more question. Will it make any difference going from an odd-fire to an even-fire 231?

I seem to have lost out on the odd-fire closest to me, however I have located an even-fire with 68000 miles for $350 with $150 shipping
Old July 24th, 2015 | 02:51 PM
  #12  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,401
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Dasaki
Makes sense. Now one more question. Will it make any difference going from an odd-fire to an even-fire 231?

I seem to have lost out on the odd-fire closest to me, however I have located an even-fire with 68000 miles for $350 with $150 shipping
The even-fire will run more smoothly. Is the new engine complete? Things like the distributor will be different, so you can't use your old one. Balance will be different so you can't use your flexplate or balancer (I don't think, anyway). Tune up parts like the distributor cap will be different, so you'll need to remember to get parts for the engine, not the car. Assuming it's a carburated 231 from a pre-computerized RWD car (and not a 3800 or FWD or CCC engine from the 1980s), you probably can use it, however. If it is a CCC engine you'll need to swap your old intake and you'll need to find a non-computer, even-fire distributor.
Old July 24th, 2015 | 06:31 PM
  #13  
Dasaki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 20
From: Columbus, IN
The engine is coming off of a 78 Omega so aside from being even instead of odd, it should be identical, also considering asking if they can email me a picture of the rear door since I need that on the passenger side...

So I need to make sure it has the distributor and flexplate then or get those from another vehicle?
Old July 27th, 2015 | 05:08 PM
  #14  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,186
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Get the Buick 350 and the TH350 that was connected to it. It is worth twice as much as bone stock chevy. Supposedly everything swaps right over. The 3.8 is useless, gutless turd in non turbo or efi.
Old July 27th, 2015 | 06:24 PM
  #15  
M-14's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 162
There's a good write on a 350 buick swap from a 3.8 (231) over at g body, I don't know if I should post a link. Is that against the rules?
Old July 27th, 2015 | 07:42 PM
  #16  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 41,180
From: Poteau, Ok
You can post the link.
Old July 28th, 2015 | 04:56 AM
  #17  
M-14's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 162
OK, its a long one.
https://gbodyforum.com/threads/buick...50-swap.30492/
Old July 28th, 2015 | 12:13 PM
  #18  
Dasaki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 20
From: Columbus, IN
Thanks for that info on the 350 swap, going to keep that handy for the future as I don't plan on ever letting this car go for anything short of totaling it (gods I hope that never happens)

I'm just going to go for the 231 at present time as it's cheap enough to fit my budget and I just need the car running again as soon, and cheaply, as possible. Yay classic daily drivers!
Old July 28th, 2015 | 10:57 PM
  #19  
67442nut's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,190
From: Charleston, West Virginia
Originally Posted by Dasaki
Makes sense. Now one more question. Will it make any difference going from an odd-fire to an even-fire 231?

I seem to have lost out on the odd-fire closest to me, however I have located an even-fire with 68000 miles for $350 with $150 shipping
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
The even-fire will run more smoothly. Is the new engine complete? Things like the distributor will be different, so you can't use your old one. Balance will be different so you can't use your flexplate or balancer (I don't think, anyway). Tune up parts like the distributor cap will be different, so you'll need to remember to get parts for the engine, not the car. Assuming it's a carburated 231 from a pre-computerized RWD car (and not a 3800 or FWD or CCC engine from the 1980s), you probably can use it, however. If it is a CCC engine you'll need to swap your old intake and you'll need to find a non-computer, even-fire distributor.
Odd-fire, even-fire!!!!???????
What in the he!! does that mean???
Old July 28th, 2015 | 11:16 PM
  #20  
Sugar Bear's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 3,409
Are you rather sure it is a rod knock? Those engines were notorious for bad timing chain tensioners that would cause a knock. It was a small spring on a rubbing block that would fail, an easy fix by pulling the front cover.

If you have the odd-fire version you could also use an early 225 Buick V-6, they were often in Jeeps and Outboard Marine Corporation (OMC) powered boats and were rated at 155HP.

A rugged engine in my opinion but not a ton of power. As mentioned a Buick V-8 would be an easy swap with good power.
Old July 29th, 2015 | 05:04 AM
  #21  
M-14's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 162
Originally Posted by 67442nut
Odd-fire, even-fire!!!!???????
What in the he!! does that mean???
When you base a v6 off of a 90 degree v8 you get an unbalance condition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buick_V6_engine
Read up on it, they tried off setting the crank journals to make it even firing (1977) but they still shaked. They really got smooth with the balance shaft in '88.

Last edited by M-14; July 29th, 2015 at 05:09 AM.
Old July 29th, 2015 | 09:14 AM
  #22  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,401
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by 67442nut
Odd-fire, even-fire!!!!???????
What in the he!! does that mean???
Do the math. When you have cylinders at 90 deg apart and crank throws at 120 deg apart (as needed for a V6), firing pulses occur at 150-90-150-90-150-90 intervals instead of every 120 degrees. The even fire motors split the crank throws to even this out.

As an interesting bit of trivia, leave it to Ford to go the other way and build an odd-fire V8. The second gen Taurus SHO used a V8 with the cylinder banks at 60 degrees (for packaging reasons).
Old July 29th, 2015 | 09:38 AM
  #23  
Dasaki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 20
From: Columbus, IN
Originally Posted by Sugar Bear
Are you rather sure it is a rod knock? Those engines were notorious for bad timing chain tensioners that would cause a knock. It was a small spring on a rubbing block that would fail, an easy fix by pulling the front cover.
Yeah, I've had two different mechanics and the local junkyard manager tell me that it's the rod and two of the three have told me it's too late for a rebuild.

Plan on saving the old motor though, if nothing else I can use it for a core in a future engine purchase
Old July 29th, 2015 | 11:57 AM
  #24  
67442nut's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,190
From: Charleston, West Virginia
Originally Posted by M-14
When you base a v6 off of a 90 degree v8 you get an unbalance condition.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buick_V6_engine
Read up on it, they tried off setting the crank journals to make it even firing (1977) but they still shaked. They really got smooth with the balance shaft in '88.
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Do the math. When you have cylinders at 90 deg apart and crank throws at 120 deg apart (as needed for a V6), firing pulses occur at 150-90-150-90-150-90 intervals instead of every 120 degrees. The even fire motors split the crank throws to even this out.

As an interesting bit of trivia, leave it to Ford to go the other way and build an odd-fire V8. The second gen Taurus SHO used a V8 with the cylinder banks at 60 degrees (for packaging reasons).
OK.
I understand the concept, although I honestly never considered it before.
Just never heard those terms before. (I'm still living in '67. )
Also, I didn't realize the engine being discussed was a "chopped off" V8.
Looks like the "off-fire" design wouldn't even run without modifying the crankshaft.
What about the Chevy 4.0 V6? Isn't it basically a chopped off small block V8?
Is it an "off-fire" also?
Thanks for the clarification/explanation.

Last edited by 67442nut; July 29th, 2015 at 12:00 PM.
Old July 29th, 2015 | 12:12 PM
  #25  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 48,401
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by 67442nut
OK.
I understand the concept, although I honestly never considered it before.
Just never heard those terms before. (I'm still living in '67. )
The odd-fire Buick V6 came out in 1961.

Also, I didn't realize the engine being discussed was a "chopped off" V8.
It is, but that alone doesn't make it an odd-fire engine. It's the odd spacing of the firing pulses that cause that. The whole concept was to lower cost of the V6 by building it on the same assembly line and with the same tooling as the V8, thus the use of the 90 deg bank angles on the cylinders. Of course, this also meant that accessory brackets, front cover, etc from the V8 could be reused on the V6, again to save cost. Ironically, the V6 was produced far longer than the Buick V8.

Looks like the "off-fire" design wouldn't even run without modifying the crankshaft.
It does, but you get a "magic fingers" ride. Here's how the crank was modified to get the even fire engine. First photo is an odd-fire crank with conventional throws for the rods. Second photo is an even fire crank with split throws to even out the firing pulses.






What about the Chevy 4.0 V6? Isn't it basically a chopped off small block V8?
Is it an "off-fire" also?
There is no "4.0" Chevy V6. If you mean the 4.3, yes it's odd fire. It's a truck engine primarily, so vibration is less of a concern, though later versions did include a balance shaft. The 4.3 is essentially an SBC 350 (same bore and stroke) with cylinders 3 and 6 removed from the block.
Old July 30th, 2015 | 04:08 PM
  #26  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 9,186
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Olds 4.3 Diesel V6 was a chopped off DX with a Serpentine setup and extra head bolts. Was supposed to be the best of the Olds diesels.
Old July 30th, 2015 | 06:27 PM
  #27  
Dasaki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 20
From: Columbus, IN
Figure I'll give an update. If all goes as planned, I should have her back on the road by Sunday night! One of my customers at work does some mechanical stuff on the side, and even has a cherry picker to do the heavy lifting, and if there's no surprises he can do the engine swap for a mere $300!

And since this thread is pretty text-based, a picture of the old engine as a bonus.

QDgWxWy.jpg

D6QRWE9.jpg

Last edited by Dasaki; July 30th, 2015 at 06:33 PM.
Old August 2nd, 2015 | 04:13 PM
  #28  
Dasaki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 20
From: Columbus, IN
The new engine, as it sat in the bed of my dads F 150 yesterday

hA60KU1.jpg
Old August 2nd, 2015 | 06:07 PM
  #29  
M-14's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 162
Boy, that bay has a lot of room, a 350 buick wouldn't be too hard to swap in. Maybe next time.
Old August 3rd, 2015 | 02:32 PM
  #30  
Dasaki's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 20
From: Columbus, IN
Good news: engine went in without trouble, car us driving again!

Bad news: new engine appears to have a bad valve cover gasket and I was making quite the smoke trail down the interstate!

Overall not too bad, since I was recommended to take the valve covers off the old one anyway, as the hose hole is on the opposite side with the new covers, and the hose barely reaches. So I can simply replace the gasket during that process.
Old August 3rd, 2015 | 04:15 PM
  #31  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 41,180
From: Poteau, Ok
Valve cover gaskets are a relatively simple task. Glad your back on the road.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
QS442
Parts Wanted
6
June 30th, 2015 05:17 PM
85oldsman
Parts Wanted
2
March 25th, 2011 12:02 PM
Redog
Major Builds & Projects
1
August 26th, 2009 03:29 AM
slipbakka
Cutlass
4
March 19th, 2007 12:49 AM
slipbakka
Cutlass
3
March 15th, 2007 07:42 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:22 PM.