heater hose restrictor?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 27, 2017 | 03:23 PM
  #1  
airborne1942's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 61
From: kentucky
heater hose restrictor?

is there suppose to be a restrictor in the heater hose on a 1970 Cutlass 350 with out AC?
Old May 27, 2017 | 08:28 PM
  #2  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Not specifically, but the nipple that screws into the intake manifold provides a restriction.

- Eric
Old May 27, 2017 | 09:44 PM
  #3  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Is there a problem with heat or lack of heat to the heater core?
Old May 27, 2017 | 11:07 PM
  #4  
Tiha's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 100
Originally Posted by MDchanic
Not specifically, but the nipple that screws into the intake manifold provides a restriction.

- Eric
would be great if some one has a part no. (dorman or any other brand) from these nipple !

thanks
Old May 28, 2017 | 06:02 AM
  #5  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,768
From: Northern VA
Inline Tube sells the correct nipple with restrictor for $18. Note that the 1964-70 factory intakes use a smaller NPT than the 1971-up intakes. There is no telling what thread is used on aftermarket intakes.

Old May 28, 2017 | 06:10 AM
  #6  
airborne1942's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 61
From: kentucky
heater hose restrictor

no, there are no problems, I'm replacing the heater hoses and wanted to put it all back factory, I have all the correct hoses, and I seen reproduction from inline tube, heater hose fitting that goes in the back of the intake, in the ad it says with built in restrictor, so I didn't know if there suppose to be a restrictor in the heater hose or in the heater hose fitting on the back of the intake, or no restrictor at all. my heater works fine right now. I just wanted the correct way to put it back together. thanks! Brian
Old May 28, 2017 | 06:15 AM
  #7  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,768
From: Northern VA
The reason for the restrictor is to avoid overpressurizing the heater core, leading to leaks. On A/C cars, the heater control valve provides this restriction, but on heat-only cars the restriction is built into the nipple.
Old May 28, 2017 | 06:52 AM
  #8  
airborne1942's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 61
From: kentucky
my intake looks like it has the original fitting on the intake manifold for the heater hose, so I should not have any problems if I put the it all back together.
Old May 28, 2017 | 11:25 AM
  #9  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,394
From: Phoenix, AZ
FYI, the restriction is simply a smaller diameter hole (1/4" maybe?) in the much larger diameter hose fitting. You should be able to look at the inside of the fitting and see if it is restricted or not.
Old May 28, 2017 | 03:22 PM
  #10  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,082
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Inline Tube sells the correct nipple with restrictor for $18. Note that the 1964-70 factory intakes use a smaller NPT than the 1971-up intakes. There is no telling what thread is used on aftermarket intakes.

Pretty sure the SBO Performer, along with the RPM has 3/4" NPT threads.
Old May 29, 2017 | 08:22 AM
  #11  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,394
From: Phoenix, AZ
Yes, those two have the larger size opening. I had to use a reducer bushing on my cars.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MrGasser
Big Blocks
1
Sep 23, 2015 07:42 AM
Sampson
General Discussion
15
Mar 24, 2015 09:33 AM
flatlander442
General Discussion
8
Nov 1, 2013 08:03 AM
Tedd Thompson
General Discussion
3
Sep 14, 2012 05:57 PM
Colorado Olds
Other
2
Mar 2, 2008 01:57 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:17 PM.