intake manifold

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 02:17 PM
  #1  
oldsracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 25
intake manifold

I've got an aluminum olds 350 intake I am thinking of using on my 403.I was wondering what your opinions on this are? It has the casting of CFD 3
22504068

near the thermostat housing is the letter/number A4

anybody know what this came off of?
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 02:59 PM
  #2  
Bobsw32's Avatar
BobsW32
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 208
It will save some weight but there is NO performance gain.. SOme say they actually flow less than the their cast Iron brothers
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 03:53 PM
  #3  
oldsracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 25
Originally Posted by Bobsw32
It will save some weight but there is NO performance gain.. SOme say they actually flow less than the their cast Iron brothers
well that sucks!
Old Aug 23, 2009 | 06:28 PM
  #4  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,697
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by oldsracer
near the thermostat housing is the letter/number A4

anybody know what this came off of?
Yeah, a 307. Fortunately, it came off a flat tappet 307 with the 5A heads, so it doesn't totally suck - unlike the A5 intake, which, since it is also aluminum, doesn't even make a good doorstop.
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 02:47 PM
  #5  
oldsracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 25
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Yeah, a 307. Fortunately, it came off a flat tappet 307 with the 5A heads, so it doesn't totally suck - unlike the A5 intake, which, since it is also aluminum, doesn't even make a good doorstop.

I am hoping I can go after it with some carbide burrs and put a spacer on top and make it a little better. If nothing else i will lose about 35 lbs on the front of the car.
Old Aug 24, 2009 | 04:38 PM
  #6  
oldsracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 25
this intake has a couple of things sticking up inside the primary throttle bores---should I remove these for a performance use? and what are they?
Old Sep 2, 2009 | 01:55 PM
  #7  
oldsracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 25
Originally Posted by oldsracer
this intake has a couple of things sticking up inside the primary throttle bores---should I remove these for a performance use? and what are they?
anybody?
Old Sep 2, 2009 | 02:17 PM
  #8  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,697
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by oldsracer
this intake has a couple of things sticking up inside the primary throttle bores---should I remove these for a performance use? and what are they?
Those are the EGR ports. If you are not running an EGR valve, you can remove them and insert pipe plugs.
Old Sep 2, 2009 | 02:37 PM
  #9  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Not sure of your budget but Performers for a SBO are plentiful used in decent shape for $100. I am one of the minority that believes they are an upgrade over stock cast, plus they look better along with the weight savings. Just a thought.
Old Sep 2, 2009 | 03:25 PM
  #10  
oldsracer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 25
Originally Posted by captjim
Not sure of your budget but Performers for a SBO are plentiful used in decent shape for $100. I am one of the minority that believes they are an upgrade over stock cast, plus they look better along with the weight savings. Just a thought.
I would love to put a performer on it but the class rules dictate stock motors. NO ALUMINUM INTAKES Im hoping I can get away with a stocker.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
shamusj
Big Blocks
5
Dec 18, 2014 09:28 AM
svnt442
Parts For Sale
3
Jul 17, 2011 04:43 PM
jjatich
Small Blocks
3
Jul 29, 2007 07:57 PM
SMOKEYMTNKUSTOMS
Parts Wanted
1
Oct 12, 2006 12:18 PM
magnusdog
Small Blocks
2
Sep 2, 2006 10:01 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:55 PM.