Replace a 1971 TH400 to Overdrive Transmission
#1
Replace a 1971 TH400 to Overdrive Transmission
Hello and thanks for letting me post. I am new at this so......here it goes. I owner a 1971 442 convertible, it has the original 455, TH 400 and 3.23 rear end. My mom ordered this 442 and I got it in 1977 with about 75K miles. I had the engine rebuilt in 1994 and it has about 20,000 miles on it since then, it runs well. The rear end has not been out of the car. My question is what to do with the transmission. The original TH 400 was re-built in 1994 and it shifts tight, except for a few leaks. I have started the 2nd major restoration and would like to have overdrive for improved highway drive ability.
Does anyone have a suggestion for an overdrive that requires the least amount of modifications. 344671M179031
Does anyone have a suggestion for an overdrive that requires the least amount of modifications. 344671M179031
#2
Welcome to the site, post some pics when you get a chance. My opinion on overdrive transmissions is if your not driving it all over the place mostly on the highway, money can be better spent on something else.
#4
Hello and thanks for letting me post. I am new at this so......here it goes. I owner a 1971 442 convertible, it has the original 455, TH 400 and 3.23 rear end. My mom ordered this 442 and I got it in 1977 with about 75K miles. I had the engine rebuilt in 1994 and it has about 20,000 miles on it since then, it runs well. The rear end has not been out of the car. My question is what to do with the transmission. The original TH 400 was re-built in 1994 and it shifts tight, except for a few leaks. I have started the 2nd major restoration and would like to have overdrive for improved highway drive ability.
Does anyone have a suggestion for an overdrive that requires the least amount of modifications. 344671M179031
Does anyone have a suggestion for an overdrive that requires the least amount of modifications. 344671M179031
#5
Hello and thanks for letting me post. I am new at this so......here it goes. I owner a 1971 442 convertible, it has the original 455, TH 400 and 3.23 rear end. My mom ordered this 442 and I got it in 1977 with about 75K miles. I had the engine rebuilt in 1994 and it has about 20,000 miles on it since then, it runs well. The rear end has not been out of the car. My question is what to do with the transmission. The original TH 400 was re-built in 1994 and it shifts tight, except for a few leaks. I have started the 2nd major restoration and would like to have overdrive for improved highway drive ability.
Does anyone have a suggestion for an overdrive that requires the least amount of modifications. 344671M179031
Does anyone have a suggestion for an overdrive that requires the least amount of modifications. 344671M179031
#6
This is what I would opt for. Gear vendors are a few $$$ and require driveshaft mod. Nice way to fly and have basically 6 speed transmission.
Otherwise you could try a 3.08 or 2.73 rear gear ratio / and / or a taller rear tire I have been using 255/60/15 mickey thompsons on a couple of my cars.
Have Fun
Otherwise you could try a 3.08 or 2.73 rear gear ratio / and / or a taller rear tire I have been using 255/60/15 mickey thompsons on a couple of my cars.
Have Fun
#8
#10
Average use of a "collector" car , maybe 1000 miles per year.
Approximate cost of gasoline $2.50 .
The best savings on fuel mileage with overdrive perhaps 5 MPG .
5 MPG / 1000 Mi. =50 gal. X 2.50 = $125 / year.
$2500 / $125 =20 years just to get your money back ! Before you save ANY money !
Save your money and buy gas!
#11
No. The 4L80E that I mentioned above is a TH400 with an extra OD gear set. Unfortunately, that extra gear set makes the 4L80E considerably longer than a TH400, which I why I noted that floorpan mods are required. The 700R4 is a new design that is not any stronger than a 200-4R in stock form. Either require expensive mods to live behind a 455. The 200-4R has a BOP bellhousing and is an easier trans to fit in an Olds for other reasons also.
#12
#13
The GV may give you access to six different gear ratios, but two of them are worthless. Do you really need an extra gear between first and second or between second and third in a TH400? Do the math on the resulting ratios and effects on performance and you'll find that this sounds impressive but is useless in real life. The OD final drive is the only place that the GV is useful. Real six speed transmissions have a much wider ratio from first to sixth. The GV doesn't change that - first is still the same 2.48:1 of the TH400.
#14
You might consider rebuilding the 200-4R yourself if your mechanically handy. That would definitely keep your cost down.
Here's a well rated website that provides high-end transmissions and transmission rebuild parts.
http://www.monstertransmission.com/
Here's a well rated website that provides high-end transmissions and transmission rebuild parts.
http://www.monstertransmission.com/
#15
The GV may give you access to six different gear ratios, but two of them are worthless. Do you really need an extra gear between first and second or between second and third in a TH400? Do the math on the resulting ratios and effects on performance and you'll find that this sounds impressive but is useless in real life. The OD final drive is the only place that the GV is useful. Real six speed transmissions have a much wider ratio from first to sixth. The GV doesn't change that - first is still the same 2.48:1 of the TH400.
Agree. Seems a shame no one makes just a simple final drive overdrive that would bolt up to a TH400. Maybe for a little less money than the GV unit. Weren't these available many years ago...or is my dementia kicking in again??
#16
I suspect you are thinking of the Hone overdrive unit, a predecessor to the GV. Both are simple planetary gear sets derived from the Volvo factory overdrive.
#17
Check out this link for a little laugh.. http://hone-o-drive.com/shop/
Cheaper than GV?...aaaahhhhh no!!!
#18
Thanks for the memory jog. Looks like they are making them again, at least for the 9" Ford rear end.
Check out this link for a little laugh.. http://hone-o-drive.com/shop/
Cheaper than GV?...aaaahhhhh no!!!
Check out this link for a little laugh.. http://hone-o-drive.com/shop/
Cheaper than GV?...aaaahhhhh no!!!
![](https://cimg8.ibsrv.net/gimg/classicoldsmobile.com-vbulletin/577x230/122342_scan0013_fb6fa79c56889e9d2faa594d2a4f0c602a920024.jpg)
#19
The GV may give you access to six different gear ratios, but two of them are worthless. Do you really need an extra gear between first and second or between second and third in a TH400? Do the math on the resulting ratios and effects on performance and you'll find that this sounds impressive but is useless in real life. The OD final drive is the only place that the GV is useful. Real six speed transmissions have a much wider ratio from first to sixth. The GV doesn't change that - first is still the same 2.48:1 of the TH400.
Agreed that what he / original poster is after final drive ratio...
Have you ridden in a car with G/V whose driver wants to shift 5 times and like it????
"Priceless"
Smiles per gallon
#20
Welcome aboard.
I know 69' 442 started saying it but this is a 71' 442 convertible, I'm assuming #'s matching, why mod this car? How much fuel will you save with a 200-4R vs. depreciation? However, if you do mod it make sure you hold the 400. If you really want to get fuel economy keep the secondaries closed.
I know 69' 442 started saying it but this is a 71' 442 convertible, I'm assuming #'s matching, why mod this car? How much fuel will you save with a 200-4R vs. depreciation? However, if you do mod it make sure you hold the 400. If you really want to get fuel economy keep the secondaries closed.
#21
Hi, I have done 200R4 twice. in my, 71 455 VC and 70 350 vc. Both daily drivers. Engines stock, both transmissions fresh rebuilds with minor + parts (not really needed), all driven smartly, not raced. Only required mods include,
1) Driveshafts need need shortning,
2)trans mount needs relocation to preexisting secondary factory location,
3)TV cable,
4)OD lock up switch- I used a simple rocker.
I did it `cause I just wanted more relaxed cruise, even around town. Definitely worth it to me.
Only down side is, a bit crisper (bordering on harsh) 1,2,3 shifting.
1) Driveshafts need need shortning,
2)trans mount needs relocation to preexisting secondary factory location,
3)TV cable,
4)OD lock up switch- I used a simple rocker.
I did it `cause I just wanted more relaxed cruise, even around town. Definitely worth it to me.
Only down side is, a bit crisper (bordering on harsh) 1,2,3 shifting.
#22
Welcome aboard.
I know 69' 442 started saying it but this is a 71' 442 convertible, I'm assuming #'s matching, why mod this car? How much fuel will you save with a 200-4R vs. depreciation? However, if you do mod it make sure you hold the 400. If you really want to get fuel economy keep the secondaries closed.
I know 69' 442 started saying it but this is a 71' 442 convertible, I'm assuming #'s matching, why mod this car? How much fuel will you save with a 200-4R vs. depreciation? However, if you do mod it make sure you hold the 400. If you really want to get fuel economy keep the secondaries closed.
#23
My solution on the 71 442 convertible I owned many years ago was to change the rear end. Although My car had a non stock 3.55 in it when I got it. It was fun until the speed limit was raised to 70 from 55. I had a 2.73 laying around, so in it went. It made driving on the highway very nice. It changed the personality of the car but would still chirp the tires shifting to second. The surprise was that the quarter mile et was almost the same, but the trap speed and 60 ft. time changed a lot. probably a good example of how much low end torque can move a car even with a highway gear. So here's my recomondation. Finding a used 2.73 complete rear end wouldn't cost much and you could keep the original to maintain the value of your car. ~BOB
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
4speed455
Transmission
39
June 8th, 2017 05:22 PM
White Spyder
Transmission
20
January 16th, 2013 03:13 PM