General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

Is it or isnt it?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 12, 2023 | 07:34 PM
  #1  
CroixDad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 54
From: San Francisco
Angry Is it or isnt it?

Hey folks.I am having an issue with a friend over my car. It is a 65 Cutlass/442 Convertible. It has the automatic (Jetaway) but I converted it to the 2004R for better Freeway gearing. He states that my car cannot be a 442 because it has 3.08 gears instead of 3.23's I keep trying to explain that there were at least three seperate gear ratios provided by the factory and 2 or more additional available from the dealer. Can anyone help me out with this issue? All Help is appreciated.
The Vin is 338675Z128685
Old Dec 12, 2023 | 08:12 PM
  #2  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,655
From: Evansville, IN
Tell him he's a moron, if he's a close friend. If not, disagree.

While a 442 can be real or fake, it does not depend on the rear end, usually.
Old Dec 12, 2023 | 08:21 PM
  #3  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,655
From: Evansville, IN
Looking at the 65 specs booklet, the jetaway 442 package Cutlass or F-85 had a 3.08 standard. If I'm reading this right, a 2.78 might have been an option. Sticks got 3.23.
Old Dec 12, 2023 | 08:36 PM
  #4  
69CSHC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 2,057
Interesting Koda...

According to Automobile Catalog the lowest (numerical) gear ratio available for a 2 speed 1965 Convertible 442 is 3.23

I had a 1966 442 2 speed hardtop and it was 3.23 and Auto Cat also says no lower ratio (numerically) available as well .

As you stated Croixdad there were 5 gear ratio options available. 3.23 3.55 3.90 4.11 4.33 (Again according to Auto Cat.)

As Koda mentions I don't know that that's the best way to identify 442s... I guess what you are really getting at is if we can verify a Fremont 442 ?
Old Dec 12, 2023 | 08:53 PM
  #5  
69CSHC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2019
Posts: 2,057
CroixDad this may help.

Comes from a dealer that sold a roller 1965 Fremont 442 that of course has no 4V code. This is how they determined it to be the real deal.

"The 4 mounting holes are present. The frames "ARE" different... A true 442 has 4 holes where the rear-end upper control arm bolts to the frame (note: 10 bolt rears are in the 3rd hole from the top, 12 bolts are in the 2nd), the non 442 has only 1 hole. This can't be counter fitted without cutting and welding connecting points to the frame or trying to accurately drill the other holes."

https://www.classicautomall.com/vehi...bile-442-coupe


Hopefully members here can verify this ...
Old Dec 12, 2023 | 08:57 PM
  #6  
rocketraider's Avatar
Oldsdruid
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,600
From: Southside Vajenya
Fremont build throws a wrench in proving 442, but the 65 CSM indicates 3867 V8 Jetaway could have come factory equipped with either of two 3.08 gearsets depending on tire size (442 had 7.75-14 tires), 3.23, or 3.55. All ratios were available either regular or anti-spin.

Cars with 15" wheel option had the same available gearsets.

Tell your friend find a 1965 dealer car order form and look it over. GM was only too happy to offer customers a choice back then and some judicious checking of the car order form could produce some interesting cars.

Last edited by rocketraider; Dec 12, 2023 at 09:02 PM.
Old Dec 13, 2023 | 06:25 AM
  #7  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,539
From: Northern VA
Here is the info directly from Oldsmobile, and as usual it's conflicting. The SPECS booklet says that 3.08 was the base axle ratio with AT in the Cutlass models (it does not break out the 442 option separately).





The special 442 brochure on the other hand shows 3.23 as the lowest numerical ratio with the 442 option and AT.




Of course this is a Fremont car, so the 4V code won't be on the cowl tag. For 1965 cars the frame is probably a more reliable indicator. It's too bad the original trans is missing as the HD Jetaway used in the 442 carried an "MK" code.






Old Dec 13, 2023 | 08:15 AM
  #8  
CroixDad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 54
From: San Francisco
Thanks, everyone. I hope he looks at this and sees the darn ambiguity with the Fremont convertible.



Old Dec 13, 2023 | 08:53 AM
  #9  
BangScreech4-4-2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,604
Nice car. Don't suppose you hung onto the original Jetway?
Old Dec 13, 2023 | 09:00 AM
  #10  
OLDSter Ralph's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 5,171
From: St. Paul Minnesota
Originally Posted by CroixDad
Thanks, everyone. I hope he looks at this and sees the darn ambiguity with the Fremont convertible.
Print out a couple copies of the literature and leave one laying around for your friend to sneak a peek at.
Old Dec 13, 2023 | 09:40 AM
  #11  
zl1 camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 496
From: ROCHESTER NY
65 only frame ?

Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Here is the info directly from Oldsmobile, and as usual it's conflicting. The SPECS booklet says that 3.08 was the base axle ratio with AT in the Cutlass models (it does not break out the 442 option separately).





The special 442 brochure on the other hand shows 3.23 as the lowest numerical ratio with the 442 option and AT.




Of course this is a Fremont car, so the 4V code won't be on the cowl tag. For 1965 cars the frame is probably a more reliable indicator. It's too bad the original trans is missing as the HD Jetaway used in the 442 carried an "MK" code.



Hey Joe, this is [only] for the 65 442 as you said correct ? My frame on the 66 442 is not like this where the trailing arm is attached...
Old Dec 13, 2023 | 10:09 AM
  #12  
CroixDad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 54
From: San Francisco
No, reason why I swapped is because a trans shop threw away the Torque convertor so the tranny was essentially useless to me to keep.
Old Dec 13, 2023 | 10:12 AM
  #13  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,539
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by zl1 camaro
Hey Joe, this is [only] for the 65 442 as you said correct ? My frame on the 66 442 is not like this where the trailing arm is attached...
Yes, 1965.
Old Dec 13, 2023 | 10:34 AM
  #14  
zl1 camaro's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 496
From: ROCHESTER NY
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Yes, 1965.
Thank you Joe, now I can sleep tonight.
Old Dec 13, 2023 | 10:43 AM
  #15  
Fonz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 140
in '68, I had a '65 442 Conv, (Midnight blue met w/powder blue int. ) it was a 400, 2 speed trans and 355 gears. car was Loaded, AC, PW,Pb, PS. the trans even had a factory shift kit in it ! Judgeing it by the rear end "gears" is totally Lame.
Old Dec 13, 2023 | 10:49 AM
  #16  
Fonz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 140
Originally Posted by CroixDad
Thanks, everyone. I hope he looks at this and sees the darn ambiguity with the Fremont convertible.


Could you please POST the "COLOR CODE" ? Beautiful color, especially under a street light (Purple Tint)
Old Dec 13, 2023 | 11:27 AM
  #17  
fleming442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 3,797
From: Mt.Ary, MD
Originally Posted by zl1 camaro
Hey Joe, this is [only] for the 65 442 as you said correct ? My frame on the 66 442 is not like this where the trailing arm is attached...
My 67 has 2 holes. The FSM says they are chosen by transmission type, auto or manual.
The upper control arm angle affects the instant center and how it reacts from a dig.
Old Dec 13, 2023 | 12:07 PM
  #18  
Koda's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 12,655
From: Evansville, IN
Hey that thing has a school bus mirror.
Old Dec 13, 2023 | 01:22 PM
  #19  
1969w3155's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,437
From: Muskegon, Mi.
Have you pulled the diff. cover and determined that it does have 3:08's, and not the 3:23's?
Old Dec 13, 2023 | 02:21 PM
  #20  
CroixDad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 54
From: San Francisco
No code. It is my Mix of Super Midnight Blue Metalflake.
Old Dec 13, 2023 | 03:04 PM
  #21  
BangScreech4-4-2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,604
Originally Posted by CroixDad
No, reason why I swapped is because a trans shop threw away the Torque convertor so the tranny was essentially useless to me to keep.
Yeah, except for that pesky MK code that would have helped to authenticate your car. Another reason why I've always tried to keep every OE part I've taken off my cars.
Old Dec 13, 2023 | 05:30 PM
  #22  
CroixDad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 54
From: San Francisco
Okay, Joe, another question. I have a 3.08 in my 65 Olds Cutlass/442 and was told it CANNOT be a 442. Can you clarify one way or the other?
Old Dec 13, 2023 | 06:07 PM
  #23  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,539
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by CroixDad
Okay, Joe, another question. I have a 3.08 in my 65 Olds Cutlass/442 and was told it CANNOT be a 442. Can you clarify one way or the other?
That was the whole point of Post #7. Again, check the frame. That will tell you one way or another.
Old Dec 14, 2023 | 08:52 AM
  #24  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,882
Unless it was re framed. Saying the rear gear or frame proves or disproves it’s a legit 442 is just not true.
Old Dec 14, 2023 | 09:25 AM
  #25  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,539
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by CANADIANOLDS
Unless it was re framed. Saying the rear gear or frame proves or disproves it’s a legit 442 is just not true.
And the rear axle could have been swapped also. Things can be restamped. At some point there is no reality.
Old Dec 14, 2023 | 01:14 PM
  #26  
CroixDad's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 54
From: San Francisco

What do the 3867 numbers signify in the below Vin?? I see it as a Cutlass Convertible WITH the 442 Option.


VIN3 3867 5m147020


Division: Oldsmobile
Year: 1965
Model: Cutlass 442 option
Body: 2dr Convertible
Engine: V8
Plant: Lansing, Michigan
Serial #: 147020
Production #: 12,628
Old Dec 14, 2023 | 01:25 PM
  #27  
1969w3155's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,437
From: Muskegon, Mi.
Nothing in the vin in 1965 can identify your car or any '65 as a 442. That did not start until 1968.
Old Dec 14, 2023 | 02:18 PM
  #28  
rocketraider's Avatar
Oldsdruid
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 10,600
From: Southside Vajenya
3800- Cutlass V8 (330 or 400)
67- Fisher Body code for convertible
From Sept 64 printing of 1965 Chassis Service Manual.



Last edited by rocketraider; Dec 14, 2023 at 02:31 PM.
Old Dec 14, 2023 | 03:29 PM
  #29  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,882
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
And the rear axle could have been swapped also. Things can be restamped. At some point there is no reality.
true…guys have to remember some of these cars could have gone through multiple restoration’s

Last edited by CANADIANOLDS; Dec 14, 2023 at 03:35 PM.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
wtp0417
442
18
Jun 7, 2022 07:57 AM
craig442
Drivetrain/Differentials
2
Jan 26, 2020 09:53 AM
Patrick Byrne
General Discussion
14
Dec 2, 2018 10:05 PM
Joeg
General Discussion
11
Oct 27, 2014 01:47 PM
OWD53
The Newbie Forum
11
Oct 21, 2013 05:28 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:41 PM.