Insert image icon
Insert image icon
As I was just starting a new thread, I tried to use the "INSERT IMAGE" icon to add some photos and when I saved the thread the photos did not appear... I was able to insert them using the attachment icon without issue... Is this another change that was made recently, or did I do something incorrectly???
That bloody thing (
) seemed to stop working properly a few months ago, so I've just ignored it.
It presents some kind of a huge, cumbersome image mechanism, which, as you noted, you can completely avoid by using the "Manage Attachments" feature and then embedding images manually using the [img] -- [/img] tags.
- Eric
) seemed to stop working properly a few months ago, so I've just ignored it.It presents some kind of a huge, cumbersome image mechanism, which, as you noted, you can completely avoid by using the "Manage Attachments" feature and then embedding images manually using the [img] -- [/img] tags.
- Eric
Works for me also. I especially like the new insert image functionality that gives you the option of inserting from a URL or from a file on your device. FYI, I'm using Firefox on a Win10 machine, in case browser matters here.
I just find the new image loading system to be cumbersome and buggy.
When I tried to use it (several times), I was unable to have it place the image exactly where I wanted it, and almost every time that I tried to load an image from a url, it said that the image couldn't be found.
On the other hand, if I open an image in its own window (to confirm its appearance), copy the url, and place the url between img tags, it loads exactly the way and in the location where I want it.
- Eric
When I tried to use it (several times), I was unable to have it place the image exactly where I wanted it, and almost every time that I tried to load an image from a url, it said that the image couldn't be found.
On the other hand, if I open an image in its own window (to confirm its appearance), copy the url, and place the url between img tags, it loads exactly the way and in the location where I want it.
- Eric
I've had it happen with straight .jpg files, with no terminal strings.
The new interface is slick, but it didn't make me happy.
Of course, I felt fine about typing code when I wanted boldface or italics when word processing on a VAX 11/780, so maybe I'm just old.
- Eric
The new interface is slick, but it didn't make me happy.
Of course, I felt fine about typing code when I wanted boldface or italics when word processing on a VAX 11/780, so maybe I'm just old.
- Eric
I just find the new image loading system to be cumbersome and buggy.
When I tried to use it (several times), I was unable to have it place the image exactly where I wanted it, and almost every time that I tried to load an image from a url, it said that the image couldn't be found.
You have to click on the line in the post where you want the picture prior to clicking on the symbol or it will put it as the first line.
On the other hand, if I open an image in its own window (to confirm its appearance), copy the url, and place the url between img tags, it loads exactly the way and in the location where I want it.
- Eric
When I tried to use it (several times), I was unable to have it place the image exactly where I wanted it, and almost every time that I tried to load an image from a url, it said that the image couldn't be found.
You have to click on the line in the post where you want the picture prior to clicking on the symbol or it will put it as the first line.
On the other hand, if I open an image in its own window (to confirm its appearance), copy the url, and place the url between img tags, it loads exactly the way and in the location where I want it.
- Eric
Prior to that I had been using chrome and firefox.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aliensatemybuick
General Discussion
0
Nov 12, 2009 05:21 PM



