What motor is this?
Hard to say. I see electronic installed, air cleaner is wrong. I am guessing the engine may not be original. Get the casting numbers from the front of the block on the shelf behind the water pump. In this photo look at the base of the oil fill tube and under the upper radiator hose, that is where to look. post the numbers here and someone should be able to decipher.
Definitely not a 330 just from the picture.
I see HEI distributor and some emmissions stuff??
Looks like a 2bbl carb may be hiding under the air cleaner??
I'm gonna guess 307 before any other info is given about it...
I see HEI distributor and some emmissions stuff??
Looks like a 2bbl carb may be hiding under the air cleaner??
I'm gonna guess 307 before any other info is given about it...
My guess is late-70s 350, but you might get lucky and it be a 403. Then again you might be wayyyyyy unlucky and it be a 260, esp if there's a DualJet 2-barrel carb on it.
Get rid of that EGR intake and paint it gold, and non-Olds people would never know it's not a 330 with an HEI upgrade.
Good googely moogely, look at all the ROOM!
Get rid of that EGR intake and paint it gold, and non-Olds people would never know it's not a 330 with an HEI upgrade.
Good googely moogely, look at all the ROOM!
My guess is late-70s 350, but you might get lucky and it be a 403. Then again you might be wayyyyyy unlucky and it be a 260, esp if there's a DualJet 2-barrel carb on it.
Get rid of that EGR intake and paint it gold, and non-Olds people would never know it's not a 330 with an HEI upgrade.
Good googely moogely, look at all the ROOM!
Get rid of that EGR intake and paint it gold, and non-Olds people would never know it's not a 330 with an HEI upgrade.
Good googely moogely, look at all the ROOM!
I forgot about the 260 V8??
All the SBO from 1964 to 1990 and the BBO from 1968 (?) to 1976 are the same extrenally. The BBo's are 2 inches taller than the SBO
The 330 I have will find it's way into a 1978-1985 Delta 88 (or 1978 to 1990 CC) soon
All the same mounting points and such, so since it's got an Olds already, it's an easy swap.
Sucks that it's got a 260, but it's also good, somebody could have put a SBC in there
The 330 I have will find it's way into a 1978-1985 Delta 88 (or 1978 to 1990 CC) soon
All the same mounting points and such, so since it's got an Olds already, it's an easy swap.
Sucks that it's got a 260, but it's also good, somebody could have put a SBC in there
maulsWhat are my options as far as mounting a 330, or possibly a 442 engine? Will the mounting brackets line up?
What do you mean?

Do you guys think this is worth getting?
330 ci
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/pts/1770533122.html
Assuming it's in decent shape?
Here is a 350:
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/pts/1721543940.html
Here is a 455 (I think it is overpriced without a transmission):
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/pts/1714257082.html
Here is another 350:
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/pts/1694331279.html
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/pts/1721543940.html
Here is a 455 (I think it is overpriced without a transmission):
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/pts/1714257082.html
Here is another 350:
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/pts/1694331279.html
Here is a 350:
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/pts/1721543940.html
Here is a 455 (I think it is overpriced without a transmission):
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/pts/1714257082.html
Here is another 350:
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/pts/1694331279.html
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/pts/1721543940.html
Here is a 455 (I think it is overpriced without a transmission):
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/pts/1714257082.html
Here is another 350:
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/pts/1694331279.html
Thanks for the links
Would I be alright running this motor in my 65 jetstar, it should bolt up, assuming that's what it originally had in it.
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/pts/1770533122.html
Any pro's or Con's on this transmission
I think I found me a project motor, to replace this 260
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/pts/1754065991.html
"i have a rebuilt 403 short block for sale. it has new clevite rod and main bearings. new trw piston rings and new cam bearings. has all new brass freeze plugs too. the motor is standard bore and standard on the crank as well. it needs a timing chain camshaft and oil pump to finish up to a complete motor. i have the heads, but they needs the valves redone i also have the intake its the factory 4bbl iron intake. they only made these motors for 3 years and are very hard to find. i am asking 300 cash for the engine as i have more than that in parts already. call or text me with questions and or offers. 816-392-7890 i have a oil pan to go with it also. comes with new engine stamd as well. thanks"
http://kansascity.craigslist.org/pts/1754065991.html
"i have a rebuilt 403 short block for sale. it has new clevite rod and main bearings. new trw piston rings and new cam bearings. has all new brass freeze plugs too. the motor is standard bore and standard on the crank as well. it needs a timing chain camshaft and oil pump to finish up to a complete motor. i have the heads, but they needs the valves redone i also have the intake its the factory 4bbl iron intake. they only made these motors for 3 years and are very hard to find. i am asking 300 cash for the engine as i have more than that in parts already. call or text me with questions and or offers. 816-392-7890 i have a oil pan to go with it also. comes with new engine stamd as well. thanks"
Are you talking about bumping the compression on the 403? I'd like to gain as much performance as I can for the $ but I don't want to build a drag racer or anything.
Yes I am. The 4A heads have 80cc chambers and with the huge dish of the stock 403 pistons yield about 7.8:1 compression. You can get that up considerably with the early heads and still not need anything more than premium gas. The only thing you'll need to do would be to open up the head bolt holes due to them being for 7/16 bolts and the 403 having ½" head bolts. The dowel pins are also slightly larger on the 403 from what I understand, but that should be simple for the shop to take care of.
If he used stock style pistons, use the above mentioned heads to get a reasonable compression ratio. You will be happy with the 403 that way. Get a basic cam for it and the difference between the 260 and that will blow you away!
If he spent big $$$$ on high compression pistons ( I doubt it if he is selling it for $300) then the 4A heads will be fine. With the 4As and stock style pistons compression will be lucky to in the 8:1 range.
If I was up there I would have picked up that 403 already, for that price. I just bought a core motor for $150 and will end up with a couple of grand into it by time I even start bolting it together.
sb
If he spent big $$$$ on high compression pistons ( I doubt it if he is selling it for $300) then the 4A heads will be fine. With the 4As and stock style pistons compression will be lucky to in the 8:1 range.
If I was up there I would have picked up that 403 already, for that price. I just bought a core motor for $150 and will end up with a couple of grand into it by time I even start bolting it together.
sb
Just for info: Jetstar 88 was made from 1964-66 and ALL came with the 330CI Engine.
According to the Casting Number 557751 the 260ci Engine
260
A smaller 260 cu in (4.3 l) V8 was produced in 1975 by decreasing the bore to just 3.5 in (89 mm). This was the first powerplant to use the smaller Rochester Dualjet two-barrel carburetor; all 260s used it. Production of the 260 V8 ended in 1982 when the 307 became the only gasoline V8 in Oldsmobile's line.
The 260 was designed for economy and it was the first engine option above the 3.8L Buick V6 standard in many Oldsmobile models by the late 1970s. While the 260s were not very powerful compared to the larger 350 and 403 V8s, fuel economy was almost as good as the base V6. Compared to the V6, the 260 was also smoother-running, and far more durable.
Most 260s were coupled to the Turbo Hydramatic 200. A 5-speed manual transmission was also available with some 260-equipped vehicles.
Applications:
1975–1977 Pontiac Ventura, Pontiac Le Mans, Oldsmobile Omega, and Buick Skylark
1975–1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
LV8
The LV8 was a 260-cubic-inch (4.3 L) version produced from 1975 to 1982. It produced just 105 hp (78 kW) and 205 lb·ft (278 N·m).
According to the Casting Number 557751 the 260ci Engine
260
A smaller 260 cu in (4.3 l) V8 was produced in 1975 by decreasing the bore to just 3.5 in (89 mm). This was the first powerplant to use the smaller Rochester Dualjet two-barrel carburetor; all 260s used it. Production of the 260 V8 ended in 1982 when the 307 became the only gasoline V8 in Oldsmobile's line.
The 260 was designed for economy and it was the first engine option above the 3.8L Buick V6 standard in many Oldsmobile models by the late 1970s. While the 260s were not very powerful compared to the larger 350 and 403 V8s, fuel economy was almost as good as the base V6. Compared to the V6, the 260 was also smoother-running, and far more durable.
Most 260s were coupled to the Turbo Hydramatic 200. A 5-speed manual transmission was also available with some 260-equipped vehicles.
Applications:
1975–1977 Pontiac Ventura, Pontiac Le Mans, Oldsmobile Omega, and Buick Skylark
1975–1982 Oldsmobile Cutlass
LV8
The LV8 was a 260-cubic-inch (4.3 L) version produced from 1975 to 1982. It produced just 105 hp (78 kW) and 205 lb·ft (278 N·m).
Last edited by OLDZGUY; Dec 8, 2010 at 09:41 AM. Reason: change info
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
BLACKCADDY
Parts Wanted
12
Jun 2, 2015 09:38 AM




thats bad news! 
