VERY low numeric rear end ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old February 16th, 2012, 07:30 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
garys 68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 904
VERY low numeric rear end ratios

I saw a post a while back about a rear end ratio around 2.2:1. I've never seen that low in anything other than a porsche.
Was a 2.2x ratio available in an Olds or Chevelle 10 or 12 bolt rear end?
garys 68 is offline  
Old February 16th, 2012, 07:52 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 7,105
I know the 67 Turnpike Cruiser had the 252 gear standard I am not sure if lower numerically were available.
Oldsmaniac is online now  
Old February 16th, 2012, 08:17 AM
  #3  
"Car"mudgeon
 
GAOldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Perry, GA
Posts: 5,191
2.41 was lowest numerical gear in '67 for the 3300 - 3800 series
GAOldsman is offline  
Old February 16th, 2012, 09:05 AM
  #4  
Seasoned beater pilot.
 
J-(Chicago)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,468
Originally Posted by garys 68
I saw a post a while back about a rear end ratio around 2.2:1. I've never seen that low in anything other than a porsche.
Was a 2.2x ratio available in an Olds or Chevelle 10 or 12 bolt rear end?
The 77-79 metric rear wheel cadillacs came with 2.21? gearing. That's the only time I've come across one.

Some 80's cutlass' came with a 2.14 i've been told, but I never had one.

Mostly 2 series were 2.41 or 2.73 as previously stated.
J-(Chicago) is offline  
Old February 16th, 2012, 09:42 AM
  #5  
Registered car nut
 
nonhog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Puyallup
Posts: 1,146
This might be helpful. I did not read it word for word. Gives a general idea.
http://www.hemmings.com/mus/stories/...feature22.html

Pretty sure my old 69 Impala had 2.29 gears.
nonhog is offline  
Old February 16th, 2012, 10:26 AM
  #6  
"Car"mudgeon
 
GAOldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Perry, GA
Posts: 5,191
Originally Posted by garys 68
I saw a post a while back about a rear end ratio around 2.2:1. I've never seen that low in anything other than a porsche.
Was a 2.2x ratio available in an Olds or Chevelle 10 or 12 bolt rear end?
To answer the original question yes, GM in the mid 70's - mid 80's had a 10-bolt that was the 7.5 metric version had 2.29:1
What are you going to do? Run in Bonneville?
GAOldsman is offline  
Old February 16th, 2012, 11:20 AM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
garys 68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 904
That'll be me, blasting across the salt flats in a jet powered, monkey navigated....oh nevermind...
Actually, I've got an LS motor in my 72 442 and 2.73 rear. I use it as a hiway cruiser. It's got a muncie, but I'm putting in a T10 that has a 3.42 1st. It's running 2400 at 70mph now. I can get a 70 chevelle 2.56 rear end locally for under $100. The LS motors run great at 2000 rpm, so I might pick that up.
Anyway, I was just curious what lower gears were available. I've never seen anything under 2.4 or 2.5.
garys 68 is offline  
Old February 16th, 2012, 11:33 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
mmurphy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,079
I had an '80 Trans Am with a 301 and 2.41 rear gear and couldn't spin the rear tires in the snow!! It would do 140 mph all day long though.
mmurphy77 is offline  
Old February 16th, 2012, 02:46 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Jetstar 88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Tampa
Posts: 205
Would such a rear end help highway mileage significantly?
Jetstar 88 is offline  
Old February 16th, 2012, 02:54 PM
  #10  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
We've had that discussion here.

It should, but there was some disagreement.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old February 16th, 2012, 02:56 PM
  #11  
"Car"mudgeon
 
GAOldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Perry, GA
Posts: 5,191
Originally Posted by Jetstar 88
Would such a rear end help highway mileage significantly?
Depends on how "heavy" your foot is But yes it will bring the RPMs down and therefor save on fuel consumption over a steeper gear.
GAOldsman is offline  
Old February 16th, 2012, 07:59 PM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
garys 68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: St Louis, MO
Posts: 904
About 10% increase running a 4L60 in OD. A little less with a manual trans. No theoretical stuff, real world experience.
It especially true with SFI motors with cams, heads, intakes, etc designed to run at under 2000 rpm on the hiway. They go to batch fire at about 2400 rpm.

Originally Posted by Jetstar 88
Would such a rear end help highway mileage significantly?
garys 68 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
66-3X2 442
General Discussion
93
October 18th, 2023 06:09 AM
71supreme
Drivetrain/Differentials
23
September 27th, 2013 05:19 AM
9drsixwheelolds
Cars For Sale
8
November 1st, 2010 09:15 AM
martine
Drivetrain/Differentials
16
September 13th, 2007 10:12 PM
thomaswatk
Cutlass
2
March 22nd, 2007 01:31 PM



Quick Reply: VERY low numeric rear end ratios



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:19 AM.