VERY low numeric rear end ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 07:30 AM
  #1  
garys 68's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 904
From: St Louis, MO
VERY low numeric rear end ratios

I saw a post a while back about a rear end ratio around 2.2:1. I've never seen that low in anything other than a porsche.
Was a 2.2x ratio available in an Olds or Chevelle 10 or 12 bolt rear end?
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 07:52 AM
  #2  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,272
From: NJ
I know the 67 Turnpike Cruiser had the 252 gear standard I am not sure if lower numerically were available.
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 08:17 AM
  #3  
GAOldsman's Avatar
"Car"mudgeon
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,191
From: Perry, GA
2.41 was lowest numerical gear in '67 for the 3300 - 3800 series
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 09:05 AM
  #4  
J-(Chicago)'s Avatar
Seasoned beater pilot.
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,468
From: Chicago
Originally Posted by garys 68
I saw a post a while back about a rear end ratio around 2.2:1. I've never seen that low in anything other than a porsche.
Was a 2.2x ratio available in an Olds or Chevelle 10 or 12 bolt rear end?
The 77-79 metric rear wheel cadillacs came with 2.21? gearing. That's the only time I've come across one.

Some 80's cutlass' came with a 2.14 i've been told, but I never had one.

Mostly 2 series were 2.41 or 2.73 as previously stated.
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 09:42 AM
  #5  
nonhog's Avatar
Registered car nut
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,146
From: Puyallup
This might be helpful. I did not read it word for word. Gives a general idea.
http://www.hemmings.com/mus/stories/...feature22.html

Pretty sure my old 69 Impala had 2.29 gears.
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 10:26 AM
  #6  
GAOldsman's Avatar
"Car"mudgeon
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,191
From: Perry, GA
Originally Posted by garys 68
I saw a post a while back about a rear end ratio around 2.2:1. I've never seen that low in anything other than a porsche.
Was a 2.2x ratio available in an Olds or Chevelle 10 or 12 bolt rear end?
To answer the original question yes, GM in the mid 70's - mid 80's had a 10-bolt that was the 7.5 metric version had 2.29:1
What are you going to do? Run in Bonneville?
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 11:20 AM
  #7  
garys 68's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 904
From: St Louis, MO
That'll be me, blasting across the salt flats in a jet powered, monkey navigated....oh nevermind...
Actually, I've got an LS motor in my 72 442 and 2.73 rear. I use it as a hiway cruiser. It's got a muncie, but I'm putting in a T10 that has a 3.42 1st. It's running 2400 at 70mph now. I can get a 70 chevelle 2.56 rear end locally for under $100. The LS motors run great at 2000 rpm, so I might pick that up.
Anyway, I was just curious what lower gears were available. I've never seen anything under 2.4 or 2.5.
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 11:33 AM
  #8  
mmurphy77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 1,079
From: Raleigh, NC
I had an '80 Trans Am with a 301 and 2.41 rear gear and couldn't spin the rear tires in the snow!! It would do 140 mph all day long though.
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 02:46 PM
  #9  
Jetstar 88's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 205
From: Tampa
Would such a rear end help highway mileage significantly?
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 02:54 PM
  #10  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
We've had that discussion here.

It should, but there was some disagreement.

- Eric
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 02:56 PM
  #11  
GAOldsman's Avatar
"Car"mudgeon
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 5,191
From: Perry, GA
Originally Posted by Jetstar 88
Would such a rear end help highway mileage significantly?
Depends on how "heavy" your foot is But yes it will bring the RPMs down and therefor save on fuel consumption over a steeper gear.
Old Feb 16, 2012 | 07:59 PM
  #12  
garys 68's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 904
From: St Louis, MO
About 10% increase running a 4L60 in OD. A little less with a manual trans. No theoretical stuff, real world experience.
It especially true with SFI motors with cams, heads, intakes, etc designed to run at under 2000 rpm on the hiway. They go to batch fire at about 2400 rpm.

Originally Posted by Jetstar 88
Would such a rear end help highway mileage significantly?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
66-3X2 442
General Discussion
93
Oct 18, 2023 06:09 AM
71supreme
Drivetrain/Differentials
23
Sep 27, 2013 05:19 AM
9drsixwheelolds
Cars For Sale
8
Nov 1, 2010 09:15 AM
martine
Drivetrain/Differentials
16
Sep 13, 2007 10:12 PM
thomaswatk
Cutlass
2
Mar 22, 2007 01:31 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:22 PM.