belt vs eletric waterpump

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old May 23rd, 2016, 06:15 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SeanMiller063's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 233
belt vs eletric waterpump

Looks like I'm in need of a waterpump mine is leeking quite a bit what do you guys have to say about belt vs eletric? Also need a power steering pump but thats for another thread
SeanMiller063 is offline  
Old May 23rd, 2016, 10:57 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Fun71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 13,817
If it is a street driven car, get a replacement belt driven water pump. Electric pumps are best suited for the drag strip.
Fun71 is offline  
Old May 24th, 2016, 05:08 AM
  #3  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 15,959
Electric pumps are best suited for the drag strip.
x2

Get yourself a new or rebuilt water pump from the auto parts store.
Olds64 is offline  
Old May 24th, 2016, 04:14 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SeanMiller063's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 233
Electric* why do you guys say that? most of them now are rated for street also more and more Manufacturers are switching over to me it makes sense but I'm a noob, would you guys please explain a bit? Sorry if I'm asking to much
SeanMiller063 is offline  
Old May 25th, 2016, 05:46 AM
  #5  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 15,959
You could always put an electric water pump on your car. It will be more expensive than a stock water pump though. Plus, if you buy a water pump from an auto parts store it will almost certainly have a warranty on it.
Olds64 is offline  
Old May 25th, 2016, 06:09 AM
  #6  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,597
There is nothing wrong with an electric water pump. Do what you feel comfortable with. You will also need an electric cooling fan.
oldcutlass is offline  
Old May 25th, 2016, 07:29 AM
  #7  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
You are looking to install an electric water pump, power steering pump, and, therefore, and electric cooling fan.

How much does your alternator put out? Or are you planning on installing another two alternators where the water pump and the power steering pump used to be?

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old May 25th, 2016, 12:54 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SeanMiller063's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 233
I'm not too worried about the draw on the alternator where as they do sell high output ones if need be and quite a few modern cars have those plus nav and stereo and ecus ect. And still work well supplying enough current
SeanMiller063 is offline  
Old May 25th, 2016, 01:16 PM
  #9  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Originally Posted by SeanMiller063
I'm not too worried about the draw on the alternator...
Okay.

A quick check shows a water pump drawing 8 amps and a standard F-rd cooling fan drawing 28A on Low and 40A on High, and I have no idea what a p/s pump would draw, but you're already up to 55A on a hot day, and stock alternators were generally 32A or 55A.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old May 25th, 2016, 07:10 PM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SeanMiller063's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 233
I'll go out and the alternator tomorrow and make sure as well as do the math to ensure im within the proper range and if I have to buy an upgraded high output alternator I will when the time comes. I like a good challenge
SeanMiller063 is offline  
Old May 25th, 2016, 07:57 PM
  #11  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,632
I run and electric water pump (drive) and dual electric fans with a stock alternator. It is a 3/4 ton high out out unit from a mid 80's gm truck but its one wire and fits. I drive my car to the track 120 mile round trip and around town all the time and it works great. never figured out how much draw it created but it works and has for many years.

Fwiw i had a proper fan and fan clutch and shroud. My current set up keeps the temps down slightly better and is worth a few tenths in the 1/4 mile. Many guys wont agree but thats just my experience.

Fwiw Im running a moroso water pump drive kit with a replacement motor. Buy the kit new and buy the replacement and run it vs whats provided and keep the one not in use in the glove box. 2 8mm nuts is all it takes to swap the electric motors. The replacements are actually much more heavy duty . Then for fans im running GM 9c1 caprice dual fans.

Last edited by coppercutlass; May 25th, 2016 at 08:05 PM.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old May 26th, 2016, 06:11 AM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SeanMiller063's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 233
Coppercutlass thank you for the constructive reply!
SeanMiller063 is offline  
Old May 26th, 2016, 06:42 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Professur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Mo-Ray-Al, K-Bec.
Posts: 1,815
I love people that ask for advice, then argue the advice.

Start from ... the factory put a belt driven pump on the car, and built the rest of the system around that detail. Flow rates and pressures, fluid and radiator capacity were calculated to keep the engine at operating temp through it's normal operating cycle. To change it, you have to reinvent the wheel. Was there any problem with the vehicle using the old system? Lack of flow while idling? Difficulty in obtaining a reliable replacement? No? Then what reason is there to change? Maybe you just WANT to go electric? Sure, why not. Well .. because you have to reinvent the wheel.
Professur is offline  
Old May 26th, 2016, 06:46 AM
  #14  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,597
With that logic, why even modify a car in the first place?
oldcutlass is offline  
Old May 26th, 2016, 07:08 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Professur's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Mo-Ray-Al, K-Bec.
Posts: 1,815
Because you want to .... knowing you'll have to reinvent the wheel.
Professur is offline  
Old May 26th, 2016, 09:59 AM
  #16  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,632
It's simple. The electric water pump flows more at idle that the stock one. The fans flow more at idle that the stock unit. Why. The spin at higher rpms. So where it's needed is where it counts. While driving they are just as good as stock if not slightly better imo from my experience. Kinda simple logic.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old May 26th, 2016, 11:44 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Fun71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 13,817
I always find it amusing when folks are having overheating issues in the cooler parts of the country. I wonder what would happen if their vehicle were driving around here in Phoenix, with the AC on, in traffic, when it's 118ºF out? My car does that with no overheating issues using basically the factory setup (only mod is a 4 row radiator instead of the original 3 row). This leads me to think there is an issue somewhere in their system that could easily be remedied; it just takes identifying the problem area first.
Fun71 is offline  
Old May 26th, 2016, 12:06 PM
  #18  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Yes, but it's a dry heat.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old May 26th, 2016, 12:22 PM
  #19  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SeanMiller063's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 233
Originally Posted by Professur
I love people that ask for advice, then argue the advice.

Start from ... the factory put a belt driven pump on the car, and built the rest of the system around that detail. Flow rates and pressures, fluid and radiator capacity were calculated to keep the engine at operating temp through it's normal operating cycle. To change it, you have to reinvent the wheel. Was there any problem with the vehicle using the old system? Lack of flow while idling? Difficulty in obtaining a reliable replacement? No? Then what reason is there to change? Maybe you just WANT to go electric? Sure, why not. Well .. because you have to reinvent the wheel.
I suppose you are not completely in the wrong. However I never asked what exactly I should go with just what people had to say about "belt vs electric" (and then like the person i am tried to make points to validate where I wanted to go) that and yes I could have gone all stock replacements and most likely saved myself about $400 but if you want to talk about factory set ups in 1969 it was over priced to do an electric water pump and electric fans but I feel like if they could have they would have just like many manufacturers are doing so today... and yes reinventing the wheel is a good challenge as i posted before i like a good challenge from time to time and putting any aftermarket or preformance parts on a delta 88 is indeed one.
SeanMiller063 is offline  
Old May 26th, 2016, 12:29 PM
  #20  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SeanMiller063's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 233
Originally Posted by Fun71
I always find it amusing when folks are having overheating issues in the cooler parts of the country. I wonder what would happen if their vehicle were driving around here in Phoenix, with the AC on, in traffic, when it's 118ºF out? My car does that with no overheating issues using basically the factory setup (only mod is a 4 row radiator instead of the original 3 row). This leads me to think there is an issue somewhere in their system that could easily be remedied; it just takes identifying the problem area first.
That is impressive.

Also thank everyone for their replies I appreciate both the for and against.
SeanMiller063 is offline  
Old May 28th, 2016, 05:37 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
83hurstguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,394
Originally Posted by MDchanic
Okay.

A quick check shows a water pump drawing 8 amps and a standard F-rd cooling fan drawing 28A on Low and 40A on High, and I have no idea what a p/s pump would draw, but you're already up to 55A on a hot day, and stock alternators were generally 32A or 55A.

- Eric
Just to add to this, alternators don't put out their nameplate capacity at idle, it's more like 50% of nameplate. So if you end up with an electric fuel pump, big fans, electric water pump, etc. with a 55 amp draw, you likely want a 120-140 amp alternator. Powermaster should have output curves in their catalog.

It's relatively popular to put electric water pumps on newer street cars, have a brother that has ran one on his daily driver camaro for 10 years now without a failure. Runs ice cold too. They are expensive, but which is likely why the factory won't use them. Also makes running a lot of accessories challenging when you lose the center pulley. There's no doubt you can free up power, but you need good electric fans to keep a BBO cool.
83hurstguy is offline  
Old May 28th, 2016, 08:10 AM
  #22  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,383
Originally Posted by 83hurstguy
They are expensive, but which is likely why the factory won't use them.
Actually, many factory cars are moving to electric coolant pumps now for the same reason that they are using electric PS and A/C compressors. The electric motor drive can be controlled to match demand, thus reducing parasitic load on the engine and increasing mileage (at least, for EPA rating purposes). BMW and Jaguar, among others, now use electric coolant pumps.

I'll also point out that increasing pump throughput isn't necessarily going to improve cooling. It takes a finite amount of time to transfer the heat from the coolant to the air in a given radiator. Increasing pump speed and flow rate can often cause coolant to pass through the radiator too quickly, resulting in lack of cooling. The radiator size, water pump flow rate, and other elements of the cooling system need to be matched for best performance.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old May 28th, 2016, 09:00 AM
  #23  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Increasing pump speed and flow rate can often cause coolant to pass through the radiator too quickly, resulting in lack of cooling.
No, Joe. You know that's not true.

We discussed it here.

FlokKooler mentions it here.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old May 28th, 2016, 09:58 AM
  #24  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,383
Originally Posted by MDchanic
No, Joe. You know that's not true.

We discussed it here.

FlokKooler mentions it here.

- Eric
My point was that one of the arguments above for an electric pump was that pump flow wasn't related to engine speed. My point was that this may not be a benefit. For example, say you are running at freeway speeds, then get off the freeway into traffic. At lower RPMs, the engine probably isn't generating as much heat, so it's probably better to have the hot coolant stay resident in the radiator longer. A belt-drive pump does this automatically. An electric pump would need a controller with the proper programming to do it.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old May 28th, 2016, 10:03 AM
  #25  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
I would agree that one of the virtues of the mechanical pump is that is speed (and therefore its power draw) is automatically coupled to the amount of heat that the engine is generating.

If you are running an electric pump full speed at idle, though, as you indicated, all you will do is cool down the engine and be pushing through the bypass hose and against a closed thermostat, which will help nothing, and probably use more power than pumping through an open thermostat (though I am not an expert on hydraulic pumps, and may be mistaken about the extra power usage).

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old May 28th, 2016, 12:00 PM
  #26  
Gary
 
VC455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Gillespie County Texas
Posts: 2,092
When I added an electric pump, I put a Meziere in the lower hose. I broke the impeller off the water pump shaft and reinstalled the water pump.

Ergo, I can still use the factory belt drive for all the engine-mounted accessories.

It has worked well for 10 years.
VC455 is offline  
Old May 28th, 2016, 07:53 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
83hurstguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,394
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
My point was that one of the arguments above for an electric pump was that pump flow wasn't related to engine speed. My point was that this may not be a benefit. For example, say you are running at freeway speeds, then get off the freeway into traffic. At lower RPMs, the engine probably isn't generating as much heat, so it's probably better to have the hot coolant stay resident in the radiator longer. A belt-drive pump does this automatically. An electric pump would need a controller with the proper programming to do it.
Sorry Joe, but we'll have to agree to disagree on this one. Faster moving fluid will transfer more heat, especially if you have more turbulence in the tubes. It's a function of the internal tube film coefficient, which has inputs of Reynolds number and Nusselt number. The actual bulk heat transfer capability has nothing to do with time unless you have some reason you are trying to control radiator exit temperature, and there's no reason to consider that here.

EMP Stewart has a pretty good tech section on their website. One of the sections on radiator design is here: http://stewartcomponents.com/index.p...ormation_id=13
83hurstguy is offline  
Old May 28th, 2016, 08:05 PM
  #28  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SeanMiller063's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 233
Alright again thank you everyone for your replies both for and against. I ended up with a CSR electric water pump made in the USA I've read just as many good reviews as meziere hopefully it will be as good I'll let you guys know how it goes. I'll do a write up of everything I can in my build thread in the eighty-eight section
SeanMiller063 is offline  
Old May 29th, 2016, 08:00 AM
  #29  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,383
Originally Posted by 83hurstguy
Sorry Joe, but we'll have to agree to disagree on this one. Faster moving fluid will transfer more heat, especially if you have more turbulence in the tubes. It's a function of the internal tube film coefficient, which has inputs of Reynolds number and Nusselt number. The actual bulk heat transfer capability has nothing to do with time unless you have some reason you are trying to control radiator exit temperature, and there's no reason to consider that here.

EMP Stewart has a pretty good tech section on their website. One of the sections on radiator design is here: http://stewartcomponents.com/index.p...ormation_id=13

If the coolant were not flowing, eventually there would be zero heat transfer. Obviously flow rate (which has a time component) matters. Here's a paper on automotive radiator design that has the thermodynamics formulas. Note that eventually, time (in the form of flow rate) is included.

Here's a NASA paper on designing a closed loop cooling system for lunar use that also demonstrates that flow rate (time) is important.


joe_padavano is offline  
Old May 29th, 2016, 06:49 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
83hurstguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,394
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
If the coolant were not flowing, eventually there would be zero heat transfer. Obviously flow rate (which has a time component) matters. Here's a paper on automotive radiator design that has the thermodynamics formulas. Note that eventually, time (in the form of flow rate) is included.

Here's a NASA paper on designing a closed loop cooling system for lunar use that also demonstrates that flow rate (time) is important.

I worded it poorly earlier, as flow velocity does have the time element included. Neither of those papers support slow coolant flow at idle... The first is classical heat transfer equations; velocity is an input for Reynolds number, which is an input to Nusselt number, which is an input to film coefficient. The NASA paper is interesting, but phase change evaporative cooling isn't how you want the car radiator to work.
83hurstguy is offline  
Old May 29th, 2016, 07:08 PM
  #31  
Gary
 
VC455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Gillespie County Texas
Posts: 2,092
As 86hurstguy accurately stated, when the Nusselt number increases (greater flow velocity) the film coefficient becomes more favorable, not less favorable. Therefore the heat transfer rate increases with flow rate.

I believe the myth of coolant flowing too fast to cool the engine came from high speed water pump cavitation fooling people into thinking that the water was flowing through the radiator too fast to cool. Cavitation occurs when the coolant is near its boiling point and the pump impeller is turning very fast. During cavitation, the pump impeller spins inside a bubble of water vapor, the flow rate falls drastically, and the radiator fails to cool because of the low flow rate.
VC455 is offline  
Old June 18th, 2016, 05:34 PM
  #32  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SeanMiller063's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 233
Alright guys I did end up with an electric pump and have a question. Well two. How should i plumb in the heater corr hose a T on the outlet? And what about the one coming down from the manifold?
SeanMiller063 is offline  
Old June 20th, 2016, 06:54 AM
  #33  
Registered User
 
oddball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 1,847
Run the heater return to the radiator. Or send the water pump back to be modified to add an inlet for the heater return. Or find a radiator hose T and add the return to the lower hose. Going back to the radiator is the easiest, assuming you have a stock replacement rad with the extra nipples on it.

Plug the bypass and drill some bypass holes in the thermostat.
oddball is offline  
Old June 22nd, 2016, 05:51 AM
  #34  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
SeanMiller063's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 233
Originally Posted by oddball
Run the heater return to the radiator. Or send the water pump back to be modified to add an inlet for the heater return. Or find a radiator hose T and add the return to the lower hose. Going back to the radiator is the easiest, assuming you have a stock replacement rad with the extra nipples on it.

Plug the bypass and drill some bypass holes in the thermostat.
Thank you! I figured as much for the heater but the bypass had me scratching my head.
SeanMiller063 is offline  
Old June 22nd, 2016, 09:59 AM
  #35  
Registered User
 
cjsdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 1,365
Originally Posted by coppercutlass
I run and electric water pump (drive) and dual electric fans with a stock alternator. It is a 3/4 ton high out out unit from a mid 80's gm truck but its one wire and fits.
Back when I was installing stereos we always recommended customers with GM vehicles to upgrade their alternator to one from a late '80s fully optioned Suburban because they are "rated" at 120 amp output. Obviously that is dependent on engine speed and the charging lead being upgraded to at least 8 gauge. The electric power is available so go for it.
cjsdad is offline  
Old June 22nd, 2016, 10:03 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
Octania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
Russell # has velocity in it, no?


Velocity, by definition, has time in it.
Octania is offline  
Old June 22nd, 2016, 10:20 AM
  #37  
Registered User
 
cjsdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Norfolk, Va
Posts: 1,365
Originally Posted by Fun71
I always find it amusing when folks are having overheating issues in the cooler parts of the country. I wonder what would happen if their vehicle were driving around here in Phoenix, with the AC on, in traffic, when it's 118ºF out? My car does that with no overheating issues using basically the factory setup (only mod is a 4 row radiator instead of the original 3 row). This leads me to think there is an issue somewhere in their system that could easily be remedied; it just takes identifying the problem area first.
I worked in an automotive air conditioning shop for a while in Phoenix and it was always fun to find all the ways people modified older vehicles. As long as the air in front of the radiator is forced through it and not allowed to go around it you should be able to cool the engine.

Originally Posted by MDchanic
Yes, but it's a dry heat.

- Eric
Not during the Monsoon when it's 118ºF and raining! The worst is after the rain stops and all of the water steams up off the ground. That puts the humidity up to 100%. Put that into your heat index calculator! Phoenix has a higher average humidity than Albuquerque anyway.
cjsdad is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
greg pettit
Big Blocks
6
June 4th, 2013 06:55 PM
Olds98
General Questions
0
August 6th, 2010 05:02 AM
MN71W30
Big Blocks
15
August 13th, 2009 04:51 AM
montvaleplace
Parts Wanted
0
May 29th, 2009 06:33 AM
wolfman98
General Questions
13
February 10th, 2009 05:16 PM



Quick Reply: belt vs eletric waterpump



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:55 PM.