Transmission removal from under car vs pulling engine/trans as whole
#43
#45
High mileage oil can have additives in it that are actually detrimental to an engine. A common one is a chemical that causes rubber seals to swell. It purports to reduce seal leakage, but what it actually does is soften a hard seal and make it wear faster. Then if you stop using the high mileage additive, the seal shrinks back leaving you with a worse leak than before. Another additive is to reduce sludge ... but what that can do is chew up sludge ridges on seals making them leak, and loosen deposits in the engine that can then plug up oil ports ... sort of like a stroke in a human from a wandering blood clot.
If a high mileage oil would help your engine, you need to just stop and get it rebuilt right in the first place. In the end, it's like botox ... it only makes things worse.
If a high mileage oil would help your engine, you need to just stop and get it rebuilt right in the first place. In the end, it's like botox ... it only makes things worse.
#54
I don't know where to find the engine build date. But yes, the date on the carb does precede the build date of the car. Carb date is September 13th 1969. Date on broadcast card is October 17th 1969.
#56
But I'm not so sure because all of the carb #s I saw on here say that this wouldn't be the original carb with this number. The one on the car is for a 4 speed. But you are saying that the one on the car is correct? Maybe I'm misunderstanding.
#59
Some of the W-30 guys will chime in if we are not right. Hopefully, this
is the carb it was born with, always a bonus. It will be a sweet ride regardless.
I have been following along, good luck with her.
is the carb it was born with, always a bonus. It will be a sweet ride regardless.
I have been following along, good luck with her.
#63
How could it not be with a build date THAT close? You'd have to scour the world to find the carb that close! I bet it was born with it. I'm no expert, just natural deduction. Very, very cool car. I love this stuff.
#64
Yes the date is close. No doubt there. At least I have verified that this carb didn't come from his 69 H/O. So that's a plus.
However, I am wondering how a beneficial/detrimental a carb that was meant for the 4 speed cars would be to an automatic. I'm also starting to get curious on the rear end gear on the car. Is there any way to tell without opening it up?
However, I am wondering how a beneficial/detrimental a carb that was meant for the 4 speed cars would be to an automatic. I'm also starting to get curious on the rear end gear on the car. Is there any way to tell without opening it up?
#66
#68
Joe, I'd be interested in hearing your opinion on the carb not matching an automatic. Or am I making too big of a deal of this? Did these W-30s sometimes roll off the line with the 7040256 carb when they were an automatic?
#69
That carb is probably original as they may have run out of the other on the line and used that one. In the end the car needs built and shipped out. I don't know the differences between the 2 as far as jetting but I'm sure it wouldn't be any difference you could feel.
#70
There is a big difference in the AT and MT carbs for the 1970 W-30 motors. Keep in mind that the AT motors got the 285/287 cam and the MT motors got the 328/328 cam. The AT carb used the normal Qjet power piston design with primary metering rods in the jets. The '256 MT carb did NOT use a power piston due to the lack of manifold vacuum from that cam. These carbs have smaller primary jets (056 if I remember correctly) and no primary metering rods. I can't imagine that one of these would be installed on an AT motor from the factory.
#72
There is a big difference in the AT and MT carbs for the 1970 W-30 motors. Keep in mind that the AT motors got the 285/287 cam and the MT motors got the 328/328 cam. The AT carb used the normal Qjet power piston design with primary metering rods in the jets. The '256 MT carb did NOT use a power piston due to the lack of manifold vacuum from that cam. These carbs have smaller primary jets (056 if I remember correctly) and no primary metering rods. I can't imagine that one of these would be installed on an AT motor from the factory.
#73
That super tuning guide does not reflect how the cars were actually built.
#74
Just so you know, I wasn't trying to prove you wrong. I'm not that kind of person. But I do think someone who comes across this super-tuning guide and is doing a restoration project could be a little confused. Or maybe only me. haha.
Do you think my first "project" car could have been a little easier? Hurst this, hurst that...manual trans carb, and we'll see on the distributor...
I hope you had a chance to take a look at the many pics I posted above to tell me if you see anything else that is of note. My head is spinning at times from all of this. Sure this is nothing for someone who lives their life in a garage, but me...well I stopped changing the oil in my cars 5 years ago and let someone else do it since. So this is a little challenging for me.
Do you think my first "project" car could have been a little easier? Hurst this, hurst that...manual trans carb, and we'll see on the distributor...
I hope you had a chance to take a look at the many pics I posted above to tell me if you see anything else that is of note. My head is spinning at times from all of this. Sure this is nothing for someone who lives their life in a garage, but me...well I stopped changing the oil in my cars 5 years ago and let someone else do it since. So this is a little challenging for me.
#75
You also need to understand that some of these tuning guides from the late 60s-early 70s were intended to tell you how to set up the car for NHRA Stock classes. They were not intended to be judging guides 45 years later. NHRA "Stock" wasn't (and isn't) showroom stock. On the other hand, the 1970 Oldsmobile Engine Assembly Manual (pg 7) clearly shows that W-30 MT cam is different from the AT cam. The "659" engine shown in the fourth line down from the top is the 455 in an A-body, and note that all AT 455s in an A-body automatic got the same cam as the W33 and W34 cars (P/N 400165). Only the MT W30 (second line from the bottom) got the more radical cam (P/P 402569).
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
ChefDeadpool
Transmission
37
May 23rd, 2012 08:32 PM
Aceshigh
General Discussion
13
September 29th, 2010 10:31 PM