'64 Turbo-Hydramaitc into a '63 Super 88
#1
'64 Turbo-Hydramaitc into a '63 Super 88
I am contemplating a transmission swap in a 63 Super 88. I would like to instal a Turbo-Hydramatic (I have a complete 64 Olds "98" arts car) into a 63 Super 88 with a Roto-Hydramatic. What kind of torque coverter to rear crankshaft problems will I have and what other problems can I expect to encounter. Has anyone on this forum ever attempted this swap or know anyone who has? I'm going to do it one way or another, I'm just trying to see if anyone else has ever done it.
Thanks. Dennis Vieira / Auburn, New Hampshire
Thanks. Dennis Vieira / Auburn, New Hampshire
#2
AFAIK this is a direct swap. There is no conventional torque converter/flex plate on the slim jim tranny. It uses a cast iron flywheel, and there are a couple weights; Starfires used the light one and that would be the best.
#4
64 Olds Transmissions
No, that's not correct. In 64, with the 98 and 98 only, the transmission is a Turbo-Hydramatic. The rest of the line has the Roto-Hydramatic. I'm just trying to find someone whoes done it.
#5
Well Dennis, I have gone the other way, from a 1963 88 into a 1964 98. No problem at all, as the transmissions looked identical. I pulled many, many Roto-Hydramatics out of 1964 98s when I was working at the Olds dealership after I got out high school. The trans guy would overhaul them the next day, and when school was out the next day I would reinstall them. I've never seen a factory-installed Turbo Hydramatic in a 1964 Olds.
DW
DW
#6
ALL fullsize Oldsmobiles and short wheelbase big Pontiacs had Roto 10s. Long wheelbase big Pontiacs had Super (Jetaway) HydraMatic. 1964 B-body Buicks were still using DynaFlow and 1964 Cadillac D and commercial chassis were using Controlled Coupling (Jetaway) HydraMatics.
If that Ninety Eight has a Turbo HydraMatic, someone besides the factory put it there.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post