Need Experts to Explain

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 6, 2015 | 04:19 PM
  #1  
Bennyboy2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 47
From: Hampton Va
Cool Need Experts to Explain

Recently purchased 70 Cutlass Supreme . Ok Everything I see says they came with 350 /2 barrel. Mine definitely is a four barrel dual exhaust with a 400 automatic. Any thoughts??
Old Aug 6, 2015 | 04:45 PM
  #2  
Octania's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
I think many other engine options were available, but not a TH400 behind a 350 engine, so you need to do more detective work on exact casting ID's and whatnot
Old Aug 6, 2015 | 05:08 PM
  #3  
1970cs's Avatar
Lansing built
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 3,330
From: Grand Ledge, MI
In 1970 the supreme had the 350 4bbl. as the standard engine. You could opt out for 350 2bbl. for a credit.

And if you went with the SX option you would receive the 455 2bbl. And W32 option 455 4bbl.

Pat
Old Aug 6, 2015 | 05:21 PM
  #4  
Bennyboy2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 47
From: Hampton Va
Wink Thanks

Time to get my specs on and do a closer exam!
Old Aug 6, 2015 | 05:24 PM
  #5  
Bennyboy2's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 47
From: Hampton Va
Thanks for the heads up ! I am just enjoying the Car. Sold my 54 delivery sedan after 3years for building and showing so now just looking to Cruise in style !
Old Aug 7, 2015 | 07:09 AM
  #6  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,770
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Bennyboy2
Recently purchased 70 Cutlass Supreme . Ok Everything I see says they came with 350 /2 barrel. Mine definitely is a four barrel dual exhaust with a 400 automatic. Any thoughts??
Yeah, I think that "everything" that you've been looking at is incorrect. First, the base drivetrain in the 1970 Supreme was the 350 4bbl with three speed column shifted manual. The only automatic factory installed behind the 350 in that car was the TH350. NO 1970 Supremes got a TH400 with a 350 motor from the factory, period. The 350 2bbl was an available option, but not standard equipment. You could also get a 455, and that was the only way to get a factory-installed TH400. Check the VIN-derivative on the engine and trans.
Old Aug 7, 2015 | 03:32 PM
  #7  
61reoldsman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 542
From: Sault ste Marie ,Ont
Hey Joe what about the Hydramatic 375 ? Wasn't that in a 400 style transmission body?
Old Aug 7, 2015 | 03:37 PM
  #8  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by 61reoldsman
Hey Joe what about the Hydramatic 375 ? Wasn't that in a 400 style transmission body?
It was, but it was never installed in A-bodies.

- Eric
Old Aug 7, 2015 | 04:24 PM
  #9  
Diego's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,625
Originally Posted by Bennyboy2
Everything I see says they came with 350 /2 barrel. Mine definitely is a four barrel dual exhaust with a 400 automatic. Any thoughts??
What is everything you've seen?
Old Aug 7, 2015 | 04:43 PM
  #10  
61reoldsman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 542
From: Sault ste Marie ,Ont
Ahh ok then
Old Aug 8, 2015 | 06:38 AM
  #11  
442Harv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,732
From: Tracy Ca
I had a 72 VC. It had a 350, with a 375 tran. I thought it was a 400 till I took it out, as it looks like a 400, but has the tail shaft the same size as a 350. Maybe they only used them in VC?
Old Aug 8, 2015 | 07:31 AM
  #12  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by 442Harv
I had a 72 VC. It had a 350, with a 375 tran. I thought it was a 400 till I took it out, as it looks like a 400, but has the tail shaft the same size as a 350. Maybe they only used them in VC?
Interesting. I was under the impression they were B/C-body 350 only, but it looks like I was mistaken - the '72 SPECS Guide shows TWO columns for the M40 transmission under "Power Teams":
One column for the big blocks, and another for the SB fullsize models and the SB Vista, so it looks like the SB Vista got the TH375 in '72 (though none of the other A-bodies did).

- Eric
Old Aug 8, 2015 | 07:49 AM
  #13  
Octania's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
Yes, a Vista is NOT the same as a Cutlass.
Similar in many ways, but not identical.
Like, trans use...
Old Aug 9, 2015 | 10:19 AM
  #14  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,770
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Octania
Yes, a Vista is NOT the same as a Cutlass.
Similar in many ways, but not identical.
Like, trans use...
Except from the front doors forward...

The TH375 was used in the VC behind the small block from at least the 1968 model year. My first car was a 68 VC that my parents bought new (after the 63 D88 wagon got t-boned) and I inherited when I got my license. It had a 350/TH375 drivetrain.

Of course, VC also got the bigger back brakes, bigger rear wheel bearings, fully boxed frame, longer wheelbase, and other changes Chris alludes to based on the intended heavier hauling duties this wagon was supposed to handle. Keep in mind that until 1971, the VC was the top-of-the-line wagon for Olds.
Old Aug 13, 2015 | 06:24 PM
  #15  
Octania's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
"Except from the front doors forward..."

Oh, Joe P., is the engine not forward of the front doors now?

:-)
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jpc647
Small Blocks
7
Jun 10, 2013 11:48 AM
Octania
General Questions
3
Mar 28, 2013 09:19 AM
jensenracing77
General Discussion
8
Jul 24, 2012 12:17 PM
dmontanagrizzlies
General Discussion
8
Jun 19, 2009 09:27 AM
jeffs 89 cutlass salon
General Discussion
11
Nov 5, 2007 05:48 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:47 PM.