Engine rebuild thread, '72 350.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 05:32 PM
  #1  
Seff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,591
From: Denmark
Engine rebuild thread, '72 350.

Alright, finally getting around to putting my engine together. '72 350, as found, and after the machine shop. Bored 0.040 over, crank turned 0.010 down.

Now, the long-term plan in a TKO-500 and multiport fuel injection, so I ordered this cam, due to anticipating the need for the advertised increased low end torque with my 2.56 Posi rear.

Egge flat top pistons on factory connecting rods, factory valve train, factory nodular crank. Blocked the exhaust crossover and welded the exhaust divider up properly. No porting done so far. Factory intake with bungs being welded to it before long.

Now, to the problem I'm currently facing: The cam bearings I installed, Sealed Power, are excessively tight. Is there anything wrong with gently sanding/polishing then down so the cam can actually move by hand?
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 06:09 PM
  #2  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,320
From: NJ
Did you use the proper tool for installing the bearings? Without the proper tool they can become distorted and then they will seem tight when the cam is inserted. If it were me I would see if all or just one is tight and replace with a new one s
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 06:14 PM
  #3  
Seff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,591
From: Denmark
The bearings were installed with a metal plate attached to the end of the old cam shaft, oil, and a hammer.

I'm giving it one day of work at polishing the ones that seem the worst/most uneven, then I'm ordering new bearings. Those'll take two weeks to arrive, though. I've been informed of the existence of something called a bearing knife, which more than anything tells me that as long as I do it properly, bearings can be saved.
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 06:37 PM
  #4  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
I am fairly experienced and confident building engines. One job I let the shop do is install the cam bearings. There is a special tool to use and it is a bit tricky. I would NOT use the ones you installed, especially given the method you used.

Also, why use the factory intake? An RPM would be better suited to your compression and aluminum is much easier to work with.
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 06:42 PM
  #5  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,320
From: NJ
Well I would say your installation tool is lacking and has caused the bearings to go out of round when being installed. They are fragile and some force is required to get them in place. Yes there are bearing scraper knives but their usage I would say would be for a professional. With the proper cam bearing tool there will be no problem with the cam and bearing interference.
Old Dec 28, 2012 | 06:47 PM
  #6  
Seff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,591
From: Denmark
Alright, I'm hearing both of you. Bearings are being ordered.

Intake: Because I can't weld in aluminum, and they don't make multiport injector intakes for SBO.
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 05:45 AM
  #7  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,488
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by Seff
Alright, I'm hearing both of you. Bearings are being ordered.

Intake: Because I can't weld in aluminum, and they don't make multiport injector intakes for SBO.
I'll echo what the others said, install new bearings with the right tool and I'm sure they'll be fine.
And for more low end torque I would've used a single pattern cam on a tighter lobe sep.

Jmo
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 05:48 AM
  #8  
Seff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,591
From: Denmark
How would that affect street drivability?
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 11:57 AM
  #9  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,488
From: Central Fl
Wider lobe seps and/or bigger duration staggers make it more lazy.
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 12:21 PM
  #10  
Seff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,591
From: Denmark
Fair enough, that's taken into consideration. Does it hurt acceleration and/or high speed performance?

Part of the original decision to keep the cam close to stock is that we have a 20% power increase limit on engine tuning by law - what has since been made aware to me is that any increase in power that doesn't involve changing crank, heads or block is exempt from the 20% rule, meaning I can put injection, bore up the block, and add crazy cams until I hit 1000 HP if I so desire.

As for the bearings, I fooled around today, cutting four slits in each bearing contact surface on the old cam, then spun it around in the new bearings, cutting off any uneven spots. Now the new cam turns just shy of by hand. If I do this or this, I can turn it.

Completely crazy?

Last edited by Seff; Dec 29, 2012 at 12:33 PM.
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 12:55 PM
  #11  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by Seff
Fair enough, that's taken into consideration. Does it hurt acceleration and/or high speed performance?

Part of the original decision to keep the cam close to stock is that we have a 20% power increase limit on engine tuning by law - what has since been made aware to me is that any increase in power that doesn't involve changing crank, heads or block is exempt from the 20% rule, meaning I can put injection, bore up the block, and add crazy cams until I hit 1000 HP if I so desire.
How in the world can they actually enforce a law like that? Very strange....
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 01:01 PM
  #12  
Seff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,591
From: Denmark
A lot of people get away with it, especially on cars as old and obscure as mine, but most vehicle inspection guys (which is a requirement every 2nd year, or the police come around and take away your license plates) can easily tell if a modern car is performing above what it's registered as performing.
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 01:28 PM
  #13  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by Seff
A lot of people get away with it, especially on cars as old and obscure as mine, but most vehicle inspection guys (which is a requirement every 2nd year, or the police come around and take away your license plates) can easily tell if a modern car is performing above what it's registered as performing.
But you said that any increase that does not involve the crank, block, or heads is OK. Even IF they can tell the difference, how can they determine where it comes from?
Old Dec 29, 2012 | 02:10 PM
  #14  
Seff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,591
From: Denmark
They can't. Those are given as examples of 'major changes' and said examples are taken as the only cases by those enforcing. It's all very stupid, but could be very expensive if not adhered to.
Old May 11, 2013 | 09:44 AM
  #15  
Seff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,591
From: Denmark
Update: While priming the engine before startup, the cylinder 7 intake lifter isn't delivering oil to the pushrod, and isn't getting hard. I assume this means I have an oil supply issue? It's the only one not supplying oil, the rest of them ooze that stuff all over the place. Plugged oil passageways, maybe? I've just been turning the engine by hand.
Old May 11, 2013 | 09:49 AM
  #16  
coppercutlass's Avatar
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,638
From: Elgin, Illinois
I had a similar issue. It took alot of priming to get oil out of mine Some took longer than others. Even then the first few seconds it ran the lifters ticked but quickly went away. In my situation i was not worried as i used a lot of the cam assembly lube. But you gotta first find out if you can get oil to the top of the number 7. for me it took me some time like i mentioned but everything runs good no issue no noises.
Old May 11, 2013 | 09:53 AM
  #17  
Seff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,591
From: Denmark
CSM says the clicking on startup is normal. The lifters came in at very different times, but I'm worried that I forgot to clean something, since all but that one are supplying oil excellently.

As far as I can tell, the #7 is at the end of an oil galley, so it makes sense that it's the least supplied place, but turning the engine over 75-100 times SHOULD have brought some oil up there.
Old May 11, 2013 | 06:54 PM
  #18  
Octania's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286


I generally leave the engine still and turn the oil pump drive rod to purge oil system air and get her primed.
Old May 11, 2013 | 06:57 PM
  #19  
coppercutlass's Avatar
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,638
From: Elgin, Illinois
Im with octania how are you priming it. I used an air drill and a 5/16ths socket welded to a section on 1/4 in. square stock.
Old May 12, 2013 | 01:00 AM
  #20  
Seff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,591
From: Denmark
Socket on the balancer nut.

That other way sounds easier, though, I must admit.
Old May 12, 2013 | 07:35 AM
  #21  
coppercutlass's Avatar
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 8,638
From: Elgin, Illinois
Remember that since the distributor goes counter clockwise you will have to run the drill in reverse.
Old May 12, 2013 | 08:20 AM
  #22  
Seff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,591
From: Denmark
Done, and done. No dice. I removed #7 exhaust first and spun the drill CCW, no oil at all. Removed #7 intake lifter and spun it again, two foot geyser of oil.

This led me to tap the plug behind the oil galley plug screw out, which fell into the oil pan, naturally, and subsequently sped four hours failing at getting the oil galley plug out. It isn't reverse thread or something crazy like that, is it?
Old May 17, 2013 | 09:04 AM
  #23  
Seff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,591
From: Denmark
There was an inch of dried up oil behind the driver's side rear oil galley plug. It took a screwdriver and a hammer to get it out of there.

I cleaned both oil galleys and cleared out the small oil holes in the, I've yet to prime the engine again since I had the pan off to fish out the service plug that fell down there.

Does this look familiar? I don't remember removing it from my engine, but it must've come from SOMEWHERE.
QwZeHOL.jpg


With the specs my engine has, would it be right to install this cam straight up?
OTP3f0o.jpg
Old May 17, 2013 | 09:19 AM
  #24  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by Seff
There was an inch of dried up oil behind the driver's side rear oil galley plug. It took a screwdriver and a hammer to get it out of there.
Ick.

Originally Posted by Seff
Does this look familiar?
Doesn't look like an Olds part to me.

More like debris from construction, or out on the farm.

- Eric
Old May 17, 2013 | 09:23 AM
  #25  
Seff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,591
From: Denmark
It used to be "pronged" like that on both ends. I don't see anywhere it's missing.
Old May 17, 2013 | 11:35 AM
  #26  
Seff's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,591
From: Denmark
Also, looking at the Howards Cam site, the specs for the 510011-12 are different from the note that came with the cam. This worries me. Which should I trust?

Link: http://howardscams.com/index.php/old...-455-1967-1990
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
jdana24
Small Blocks
43
Sep 5, 2013 02:17 PM
Jrod
Small Blocks
30
Mar 22, 2013 05:01 AM
Charles Ludwick
Small Blocks
74
Dec 27, 2011 03:17 PM
KRICHEN922
Small Blocks
26
Sep 19, 2011 06:02 PM
JoeKraus
Small Blocks
3
May 29, 2011 05:44 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:22 AM.