Timing Advance

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2015 | 01:05 PM
  #1  
DoubleV's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 370
Timing Advance

Internet searching has shown the 41 weights and 375 center to be some sort of magical formula for a great timing curve. This is supposed to give you about 35ish total running 12 initial. Yet on Olds specific forums everybody seems to recommend running lots of initial timing ( 20+ ) but still around 36 total.

So what am I missing? Is it that Olds engines specifically do better with lots of initial timing compared to Chevy's ( which is what most people are probably referring to on other forums/magazine articles ) or what?

I'm currently at around 12-13 initial and 35 all in at around 3k. That's pretty darn right on that 'magical' 41/375 combo yet the people in the Olds world are telling me to run 20+ initial all in before 3k. This is a lot more aggressive than what everybody else recommends.
Old Feb 20, 2015 | 01:35 PM
  #2  
don71's Avatar
same but different
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,965
From: Central Missouri
When doing research, try to compare apples to apples.

My guess is, that most people suggesting 20 degrees are using the garden variety HEI,(low compression) which probably doesn't have 41/375 combo.

The more compression your engine has the less initial timing it will tolerate.

You have to tune what you have. Its not plug n play.

My experience is, you have to tune what you have. Use all other info as a guide line, not something set in stone.
Old Feb 20, 2015 | 02:16 PM
  #3  
DoubleV's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 370
Certainly need to tune what you have but you need a starting point. When the experts tell you to do contradictory things though it certainly makes things a lot more difficult and confusing.

So do Olds engines in general like more initial timing vs say Chebby's ( with similar build ) thereby validating the Olds guys saying to run a lot more initial vs the 'magical 41/375 combo being constantly recommend on other forums?

Last edited by DoubleV; Feb 20, 2015 at 02:20 PM.
Old Feb 20, 2015 | 02:27 PM
  #4  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,496
From: Poteau, Ok
It's not an Oldsmobile thing, the timing numbers are a general rule of thumb for all V8's. Where and how the timing curve is set is dependent on compression, cam profiles, altitude, fuel quality, and application.

Most people set their timing for the 36ish mechanical and let the initial fall where it may. I don't see how magical the numbers are on the weights and center as there are hundreds of different sets that have been used on different engines over the years.

Does your engine run and perform better with the setup you have now vs the previous?
Old Feb 20, 2015 | 02:51 PM
  #5  
don71's Avatar
same but different
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,965
From: Central Missouri
GM had to sell cars in Miami and Denver.

The ignition curve had to work in both conditions. Meaning, v8 engines like certain timing windows to work within.

GM gave you the starting point.

Magical is subjective, until a dyno says otherwise.
Old Feb 20, 2015 | 03:12 PM
  #6  
don71's Avatar
same but different
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,965
From: Central Missouri
In the interest of trying to help, try different carb settings/jets.
Old Feb 20, 2015 | 03:39 PM
  #7  
captjim's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
What exactly are we discussing? The chevy 307 had 9 to 1 CR, the Olds 307 7.8 to 1 CR. HEI or points? If you want a real kick-azz ride, lock the timing at 38 or whatever and get a start-retard box, OMG!!! Part throttle response is awesome! Timing curves were designed to adjust for easy starting and a multitude of applications, as Don suggested.
Old Feb 20, 2015 | 09:31 PM
  #8  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,409
From: Phoenix, AZ
I had a Moroso HEI Advance Curve Kit in my distributor and it gave 24º mechanical, so the initial was 12º for 36º total = practically the same as the factory points setup (10º initial, 24º mechanical).

Many folks said a higher initial setting gives more off-idle torque, more idle vacuum, and a smoother idle. I put the factory center bar and weights back in (18º initial , 18º mechanical) and sure enough, it idles smoother, has more vacuum, and the RPM doesn't drop when I put it in gear or turn the AC on.

So for my engine, the higher initial is a plus.

I should say with the 18-20º initial the engine sounds smooth whereas with the 10-12º initial there is a noticeable lope.

Last edited by Fun71; Feb 21, 2015 at 06:04 PM.
Old Feb 21, 2015 | 01:14 PM
  #9  
DoubleV's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 370
Fun71, what centerbar and weights are you using? Are you running vac advance?
Old Feb 21, 2015 | 06:11 PM
  #10  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,409
From: Phoenix, AZ
Sorry I posted 18/18 as that is what I keep remembering when I was playing around with different springs, but the measurements I have in my notes from that time are actually 16/20. When I set the initial to 18 I probably had 38 total - I was doing a lot of experimenting then.

I looked up my notes and posted the info in this thread:
https://classicoldsmobile.com/forums...enterbars.html

Weights stamped 139, plate stamped 446
Old Feb 22, 2015 | 08:25 AM
  #11  
DoubleV's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 370
Yeah it's good to see real world timing numbers people are getting with their different center/weight combos for reference.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pcard
General Questions
0
Feb 11, 2013 05:09 PM
jensenracing77
General Discussion
40
Aug 18, 2012 08:06 PM
7.5 Litre Nightmare
Big Blocks
9
Jun 3, 2009 08:34 AM
442scotty
General Discussion
8
May 13, 2009 05:42 PM
1FSTLS1
General Discussion
1
Jan 1, 2009 02:39 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:38 AM.