SBO Stroker build

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January 1st, 2013, 08:27 AM
  #41  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,971
Originally Posted by coppercutlass
How did that quick fuel slayer work out. Their testing was on a chevy now that you ran one on an olds your input would be greatly appreciated,
1 jet change and a squirter change. The vacuum secondary has an adjusting screw, not multiple springs. Great setup, changed the screw about 1/4 turn.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old January 1st, 2013, 08:37 AM
  #42  
Chevy budget Olds powered
 
coppercutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Elgin, Illinois
Posts: 8,632
That sounds great. Thank you.
coppercutlass is offline  
Old January 1st, 2013, 11:18 AM
  #43  
Registered User
 
380 Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,130
Nice for a street motor. I thought the 380 cube is a nice combo. Always liked the RPM intake too. Good job Mark!
380 Racer is offline  
Old January 1st, 2013, 11:35 AM
  #44  
Registered User
 
kitfoxdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: treasure coast FL
Posts: 698
Chomping at the bit! I can almost smell those 2 black stripes in the road.....
kitfoxdave is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2013, 04:40 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
61reoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sault ste Marie ,Ont
Posts: 542
Mark , If I read the dyno sheet correctly is the peak HP
around 320 ? Isn't that a bit low for a 380 cu in Stroker
or am I missing a detail or reading the sheet wrong ?
Thnx
61reoldsman is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2013, 05:06 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
captjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,250
Originally Posted by 61reoldsman
Mark , If I read the dyno sheet correctly is the peak HP
around 320 ? Isn't that a bit low for a 380 cu in Stroker
or am I missing a detail or reading the sheet wrong ?
Thnx
It IS a 9 to 1 mild street engine. Personally, I'll take the 400 ft/lbs at 3500 over 360 HP at 6 grand any day.

Last edited by captjim; January 2nd, 2013 at 06:50 PM.
captjim is offline  
Old January 2nd, 2013, 05:37 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
kitfoxdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: treasure coast FL
Posts: 698
Mark and I discussed this engine at length prior to the build. The goal is low end torque, about 315 HP, and the ability to use 89 octane fuel. The car is a cruiser to go on LONG trips with. The Rocky mountain grades will be easier with the higher torque. Premium fuel can be hard to come by in some areas, therfore the lower compression. Yes it could have had more compression, and a whole pile of other options and cranked out a huge amount of Horsepower, but that was NOT the goal... (I do plan on leaving some black parallel stripes here and there!)
kitfoxdave is offline  
Old January 3rd, 2013, 07:51 AM
  #48  
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melville, Saskatchewan
Posts: 9,140
I bet 87 will be useable. With right gears and converter, high 13's should be easy. Nice street build. Upgrades can always be done, if not enough. Nice solid foundation. My 403 was slower than what it should have been. I would have been lucky to hit 275 hp when it was running right. It was fun for one reason, torque! I sure miss that torque driving the v6 Dakota and Challenger. Of our streets of ice here right now, the traction control and 4x4 make up for it. Come spring, different story.

Last edited by olds 307 and 403; January 3rd, 2013 at 07:53 AM.
olds 307 and 403 is offline  
Old January 3rd, 2013, 09:39 AM
  #49  
Registered User
 
DoubleV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 370
Originally Posted by olds 307 and 403
With right gears and converter, high 13's should be easy.
I would think high 13's even with sub-optimal converter and gears ( unless the car's a tank ). Either way it should be a fun cruiser with enough power to be fun.
DoubleV is offline  
Old January 3rd, 2013, 06:58 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
61reoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sault ste Marie ,Ont
Posts: 542
Thumbs up

Originally Posted by kitfoxdave
Mark and I discussed this engine at length prior to the build. The goal is low end torque, about 315 HP, and the ability to use 89 octane fuel. The car is a cruiser to go on LONG trips with. The Rocky mountain grades will be easier with the higher torque. Premium fuel can be hard to come by in some areas, therfore the lower compression. Yes it could have had more compression, and a whole pile of other options and cranked out a huge amount of Horsepower, but that was NOT the goal... (I do plan on leaving some black parallel stripes here and there!)
So in essence the goals out of this engine build have been met and that's awesome ,I hope it serves you well ,kudos to Mark for delivering the right combo .Have fun and let us all know when you drop it in the car and go for the first real CRUZE.(BTW what's it going in ?,PICS eh!)
61reoldsman is offline  
Old January 4th, 2013, 02:46 AM
  #51  
Registered User
 
kitfoxdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: treasure coast FL
Posts: 698
Going into the 72 cutlass convertible in my avatar... more pics in major build forum. or at www.sport-pilot.us click on oldsmobile link
kitfoxdave is offline  
Old January 5th, 2013, 11:31 AM
  #52  
Registered User
 
Inquisitive Old Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4
Question on Dyno Service Used

Mr. Cutlassefi,

Do you dyno test over at Robert's ?

Just inquisitive as I saw him at the recent PRI show (late November) for the first time in years.

Thanks in advance,
IOG
Inquisitive Old Guy is offline  
Old January 5th, 2013, 12:49 PM
  #53  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,971
Originally Posted by Inquisitive Old Guy
Mr. Cutlassefi,

Do you dyno test over at Robert's ?

Just inquisitive as I saw him at the recent PRI show (late November) for the first time in years.

Thanks in advance,
IOG
No, I do all my dyno stuff at Automotive Performance Engines in Auburndale Florida.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old January 5th, 2013, 02:06 PM
  #54  
Registered User
 
Inquisitive Old Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 4
Thanks for the heads-up.

Fulco's place is over near Tampa.

When I looked at the dyno sheet, I couldn't feature why it might have been run without recording the airflow into the engine as that loses VE%, A/F, BSAC and an easy way to evaluate the engine as a self-driven air pump.

IOG
Inquisitive Old Guy is offline  
Old January 6th, 2013, 07:54 PM
  #55  
Registered User
 
61reoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sault ste Marie ,Ont
Posts: 542
Just for interest sake what would a motor built like this 380 cost the average joe?
61reoldsman is offline  
Old January 8th, 2013, 08:46 AM
  #56  
Registered User
 
61reoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sault ste Marie ,Ont
Posts: 542
I guess if ya have ta ask ya cant afford it !!!
61reoldsman is offline  
Old January 8th, 2013, 03:30 PM
  #57  
Registered User
 
kitfoxdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: treasure coast FL
Posts: 698
Best to figure what you really want. Make a list of goals and then pm an Olds engine builder. As everyone else has said Olds's are more expensive than chevy's so keep tbat in mind! Also keep in mind the good builders are always busy... It will take time to do it right so be patient!
kitfoxdave is offline  
Old February 18th, 2013, 06:49 PM
  #58  
Registered User
 
61reoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sault ste Marie ,Ont
Posts: 542
So Mark how are ya coming along with the 434 stroker motor?,any updates?
61reoldsman is offline  
Old February 19th, 2013, 06:24 AM
  #59  
Seasoned beater pilot.
 
J-(Chicago)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,468
Originally Posted by 61reoldsman
Just for interest sake what would a motor built like this 380 cost the average joe?
I'd guess More than 6k, less than 10.
J-(Chicago) is offline  
Old February 19th, 2013, 06:43 AM
  #60  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,971
Originally Posted by J-(Chicago)
I'd guess More than 6k, less than 10.
Correct, depending on the pieces used.

I had to wait for the new style .921 lifters to become available. Got em now, should be next week.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old February 19th, 2013, 09:43 AM
  #61  
Registered User
 
61reoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sault ste Marie ,Ont
Posts: 542
Cool,should be interesting to see the results.
61reoldsman is offline  
Old February 19th, 2013, 11:25 AM
  #62  
Registered User
 
f85 rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: N. Alabama
Posts: 45
What is the proscribed procedure for running a sbo crank in a diesel block ?
I know in the 400 sbc a 327 crank can be used with saddled bearings. Is there something like this for the olds ? I was thinking a 330 crank in the diesel would be extra stout.
f85 rocket is offline  
Old February 19th, 2013, 01:20 PM
  #63  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,971
There are some spacers out there, but using a sbo crank severely limits the available stroke.
IMO it's best just to turn the counterweights down on a 425 crank and grind the rod journals to a bbc size.
From there you can use a bunch of different off the shelf rod and piston combos to get the most cubic inches possible.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old February 19th, 2013, 03:46 PM
  #64  
Registered User
 
380 Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,130
Personally, I liked using a 330 crank in my 380. Yes cubes were limited, got the spacers from BTR, but the crank weighed less, less Mallory, less labor to get it to fit, 2" crank pins (also less bearing speed). All made it a little monster..........I would build another one too.
380 Racer is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 06:06 AM
  #65  
Registered User
 
61reoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sault ste Marie ,Ont
Posts: 542
So what is the most stroke that can be safely ground into a stock 350 crank ?without welding ?
61reoldsman is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 08:46 AM
  #66  
Registered User
 
380 Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,130
Going 2.0" pin gives you a 3.50" stroke. Going with a 1.88 Honda bearing will result in a 3.60" stroke. I'm not sure how strong that would wind up.
380 Racer is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 09:19 AM
  #67  
Registered User
 
61reoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sault ste Marie ,Ont
Posts: 542
So with that 2.0" pin you'd be using a SB chevy rod with a 2.100 hole?and the rest would be the bearing ,is that correct?and then to get to the 380 you'd use a chevy 400 piston @4.155 size.What length rod did you use ?6.125 ?6.2?
61reoldsman is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 09:36 AM
  #68  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,971
Originally Posted by 61reoldsman
So with that 2.0" pin you'd be using a SB chevy rod with a 2.100 hole?and the rest would be the bearing ,is that correct?and then to get to the 380 you'd use a chevy 400 piston @4.155 size.What length rod did you use ?6.125 ?6.2?
You're going to use a small journal rod, the housing bore is 2.125.
As far as length goes, you can use a 6.125 rod with a 1.425 cd piston or 6.00 rod with a 1.550 cd piston.
You normally have more choices with the 1.425 cd piston.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 09:56 AM
  #69  
Registered User
 
61reoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sault ste Marie ,Ont
Posts: 542
Hey Mark ,thanks for responding I've been doing a lot of researching online with rod and piston combinations,(even made an Excel spreadsheet!) and it seems like its endless.So many choices for SBC stuff,that can be used in a 350 Olds motor.I really don't see why anybody wouldn't want to use SBO parts stuff when there is so much available at reasonable prices.
61reoldsman is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 10:02 AM
  #70  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,971
I agree.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 10:11 AM
  #71  
Registered User
 
61reoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sault ste Marie ,Ont
Posts: 542
I'm coming to Florida in April any chance your shop is around the Orlando area ?
61reoldsman is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 10:36 AM
  #72  
Registered User
 
380 Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,130
Originally Posted by 61reoldsman
What length rod did you use ?6.125 ?6.2?
I used a 6.300" Manly rod with a custom JE piston to come up with just under 14:1 compression. The rod/stroke ratio caused very minor wear patterns. Ran like a raped ape.......the left shot in my sig line had the 380.
380 Racer is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 12:01 PM
  #73  
Registered User
 
61reoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sault ste Marie ,Ont
Posts: 542
That piston must have had a really short compression height !?
61reoldsman is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 03:39 PM
  #74  
Registered User
 
380 Racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,130
Yes the pin heigth was very short along with the skirt. The official piston build sheets went with the rods and pistons to their new home.
380 Racer is offline  
Old February 20th, 2013, 04:55 PM
  #75  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,971
Piston would be about 1.250 cd. That's not overly short by today's standards.
The DX build is using a piston with a 1.165cd but the pin still isn't up in the oil ring because of the narrow ring pack, 1.5/1.5/3.0mm.
cutlassefi is offline  
Old February 21st, 2013, 07:51 PM
  #76  
Registered User
 
61reoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Sault ste Marie ,Ont
Posts: 542
Ive seen some pictures of pistons that have a pin button that gets installed before the rings do ,thats seems pretty extreme.
61reoldsman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
boese1978
Major Builds & Projects
13
September 2nd, 2016 03:40 PM
TORTUS
Big Blocks
28
October 18th, 2012 04:50 AM
cutlassefi
Small Blocks
47
July 9th, 2012 09:34 PM
import extermination
Small Blocks
3
October 17th, 2011 07:16 PM
442 Jack
Big Blocks
48
May 23rd, 2008 11:16 PM



Quick Reply: SBO Stroker build



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:24 PM.