Rocker arm ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January 13th, 2014, 02:38 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Oldskool84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 178
Rocker arm ratios

Is there a such a thing as TOO much lift?
Oldskool84 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2014, 02:54 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
TripDeuces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rogues Island, USA
Posts: 3,613
No, unless of course you start hitting the piston dome with the valve.
TripDeuces is offline  
Old January 13th, 2014, 03:56 PM
  #3  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
When putting an engine together, it is possible to have too much, too little, or just enough of absolutely anything.

The trick is to have just enough of each thing, so that it all works together.

- Eric

ps: factors influencing degree of lift:
Mechanical limits of the combustion chamber (as George said - you don't want to introduce the valve to the piston)
Mechanical limits of the valvetrain
Limits to how quickly the cam can lift the valve, related to the laws of physics (ramp speed).
MDchanic is offline  
Old January 13th, 2014, 05:08 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Oldskool84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 178
Roger, thx.
Oldskool84 is offline  
Old January 13th, 2014, 05:11 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
TripDeuces's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Rogues Island, USA
Posts: 3,613
I wasn't even thinking of the stock set up. There's a limitation there.
TripDeuces is offline  
Old January 14th, 2014, 11:25 AM
  #6  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,856
Originally Posted by Oldskool84
Is there a such a thing as TOO much lift?
Actually, yes, and not just because the valve hits the piston.

Keep in mind that the cam lobe must have a shape that can accelerate the lifter, pushrod, rocker arm, and valve from closed to fully open and back about five times every second at 5000 RPM. The higher the lift, the further those parts must travel from closed to fully open, thus the quicker the acceleration and the higher the loads. A larger diameter valve at lower lift with the same total flow will be preferable to a smaller diameter valve at high lift for this reason. Bottom line is that you should use the smallest lift possible to achieve your power goals.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old January 14th, 2014, 12:18 PM
  #7  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Check your calculator, Joe, you're off by an order of magnitude.

The lobe has to open the valve 42 times a second at 5,000 RPM.

Otherwise, yeah, what you said.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old January 14th, 2014, 12:44 PM
  #8  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,856
Originally Posted by MDchanic
Check your calculator, Joe, you're off by an order of magnitude.
No, actually I'm off by the number of cylinders. I divided by eight because I was incorrectly thinking about CFM-like calculations. DOH!

42 is correct. I thought my number was awfully low. Sorry about that.
joe_padavano is online now  
Old January 14th, 2014, 12:58 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
rcrac3r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Didsbury, Alberta
Posts: 359
Originally Posted by Oldskool84
Is there a such a thing as TOO much lift?
Sure. In my build I had to swap out the stock pushrods & pedestal rocker arms for shorter pushrods & adjustable roller rockers because of the camshaft I chose to put in.
rcrac3r is offline  
Old January 14th, 2014, 01:43 PM
  #10  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,874
I don't believe it was required to change all your rockers and push rods for that cam. I believe you chose to as the stock stuff would have worked with it.
oldcutlass is online now  
Old January 14th, 2014, 02:59 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,920
Originally Posted by rcrac3r
Sure. In my build I had to swap out the stock pushrods & pedestal rocker arms for shorter pushrods & adjustable roller rockers because of the camshaft I chose to put in.
That's not necessarily true. That cam was obviously ground on a different base circle than the original. Typically there is enough room on a cam with the stock base circle to add a bit of lift before you reach the limits of the cam journals but yours was apparently different. That coupled with possible mods/changes to your heads is what most likely necessitated a valvetrain change.
cutlassefi is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
66ninetyeightls
Big Blocks
13
October 24th, 2010 04:40 PM
GoldOlds
Drivetrain/Differentials
5
January 8th, 2008 09:52 PM
martine
Drivetrain/Differentials
16
September 13th, 2007 10:12 PM
thomaswatk
Cutlass
2
March 22nd, 2007 01:31 PM
69olds350
Transmission
0
November 9th, 2006 07:32 AM



Quick Reply: Rocker arm ratios



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:31 PM.