Rocker arm ratios
#3
When putting an engine together, it is possible to have too much, too little, or just enough of absolutely anything.
The trick is to have just enough of each thing, so that it all works together.
- Eric
ps: factors influencing degree of lift:
Mechanical limits of the combustion chamber (as George said - you don't want to introduce the valve to the piston)
Mechanical limits of the valvetrain
Limits to how quickly the cam can lift the valve, related to the laws of physics (ramp speed).
The trick is to have just enough of each thing, so that it all works together.
- Eric
ps: factors influencing degree of lift:
Mechanical limits of the combustion chamber (as George said - you don't want to introduce the valve to the piston)
Mechanical limits of the valvetrain
Limits to how quickly the cam can lift the valve, related to the laws of physics (ramp speed).
#6
Actually, yes, and not just because the valve hits the piston.
Keep in mind that the cam lobe must have a shape that can accelerate the lifter, pushrod, rocker arm, and valve from closed to fully open and back about five times every second at 5000 RPM. The higher the lift, the further those parts must travel from closed to fully open, thus the quicker the acceleration and the higher the loads. A larger diameter valve at lower lift with the same total flow will be preferable to a smaller diameter valve at high lift for this reason. Bottom line is that you should use the smallest lift possible to achieve your power goals.
Keep in mind that the cam lobe must have a shape that can accelerate the lifter, pushrod, rocker arm, and valve from closed to fully open and back about five times every second at 5000 RPM. The higher the lift, the further those parts must travel from closed to fully open, thus the quicker the acceleration and the higher the loads. A larger diameter valve at lower lift with the same total flow will be preferable to a smaller diameter valve at high lift for this reason. Bottom line is that you should use the smallest lift possible to achieve your power goals.
#8
No, actually I'm off by the number of cylinders. I divided by eight because I was incorrectly thinking about CFM-like calculations. DOH!
42 is correct. I thought my number was awfully low. Sorry about that.
42 is correct. I thought my number was awfully low. Sorry about that.
#9
#11
That's not necessarily true. That cam was obviously ground on a different base circle than the original. Typically there is enough room on a cam with the stock base circle to add a bit of lift before you reach the limits of the cam journals but yours was apparently different. That coupled with possible mods/changes to your heads is what most likely necessitated a valvetrain change.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
thomaswatk
Cutlass
2
March 22nd, 2007 01:31 PM