Rocker arm ratios

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 13, 2014 | 02:38 PM
  #1  
Oldskool84's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 178
Rocker arm ratios

Is there a such a thing as TOO much lift?
Old Jan 13, 2014 | 02:54 PM
  #2  
TripDeuces's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,613
From: Rogues Island, USA
No, unless of course you start hitting the piston dome with the valve.
Old Jan 13, 2014 | 03:56 PM
  #3  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
When putting an engine together, it is possible to have too much, too little, or just enough of absolutely anything.

The trick is to have just enough of each thing, so that it all works together.

- Eric

ps: factors influencing degree of lift:
Mechanical limits of the combustion chamber (as George said - you don't want to introduce the valve to the piston)
Mechanical limits of the valvetrain
Limits to how quickly the cam can lift the valve, related to the laws of physics (ramp speed).
Old Jan 13, 2014 | 05:08 PM
  #4  
Oldskool84's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 178
Roger, thx.
Old Jan 13, 2014 | 05:11 PM
  #5  
TripDeuces's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,613
From: Rogues Island, USA
I wasn't even thinking of the stock set up. There's a limitation there.
Old Jan 14, 2014 | 11:25 AM
  #6  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,770
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Oldskool84
Is there a such a thing as TOO much lift?
Actually, yes, and not just because the valve hits the piston.

Keep in mind that the cam lobe must have a shape that can accelerate the lifter, pushrod, rocker arm, and valve from closed to fully open and back about five times every second at 5000 RPM. The higher the lift, the further those parts must travel from closed to fully open, thus the quicker the acceleration and the higher the loads. A larger diameter valve at lower lift with the same total flow will be preferable to a smaller diameter valve at high lift for this reason. Bottom line is that you should use the smallest lift possible to achieve your power goals.
Old Jan 14, 2014 | 12:18 PM
  #7  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Check your calculator, Joe, you're off by an order of magnitude.

The lobe has to open the valve 42 times a second at 5,000 RPM.

Otherwise, yeah, what you said.

- Eric
Old Jan 14, 2014 | 12:44 PM
  #8  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,770
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by MDchanic
Check your calculator, Joe, you're off by an order of magnitude.
No, actually I'm off by the number of cylinders. I divided by eight because I was incorrectly thinking about CFM-like calculations. DOH!

42 is correct. I thought my number was awfully low. Sorry about that.
Old Jan 14, 2014 | 12:58 PM
  #9  
rcrac3r's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 359
From: Didsbury, Alberta
Originally Posted by Oldskool84
Is there a such a thing as TOO much lift?
Sure. In my build I had to swap out the stock pushrods & pedestal rocker arms for shorter pushrods & adjustable roller rockers because of the camshaft I chose to put in.
Old Jan 14, 2014 | 01:43 PM
  #10  
oldcutlass's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 42,475
From: Poteau, Ok
I don't believe it was required to change all your rockers and push rods for that cam. I believe you chose to as the stock stuff would have worked with it.
Old Jan 14, 2014 | 02:59 PM
  #11  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,477
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by rcrac3r
Sure. In my build I had to swap out the stock pushrods & pedestal rocker arms for shorter pushrods & adjustable roller rockers because of the camshaft I chose to put in.
That's not necessarily true. That cam was obviously ground on a different base circle than the original. Typically there is enough room on a cam with the stock base circle to add a bit of lift before you reach the limits of the cam journals but yours was apparently different. That coupled with possible mods/changes to your heads is what most likely necessitated a valvetrain change.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
66ninetyeightls
Big Blocks
13
Oct 24, 2010 04:40 PM
GoldOlds
Drivetrain/Differentials
5
Jan 8, 2008 09:52 PM
martine
Drivetrain/Differentials
16
Sep 13, 2007 10:12 PM
thomaswatk
Cutlass
2
Mar 22, 2007 01:31 PM
69olds350
Transmission
0
Nov 9, 2006 07:32 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:25 AM.