My inventory - Not what it is supposed to be

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old February 5th, 2014, 12:26 AM
  #1  
Nop
2-stroke 1-cylinder guy
Thread Starter
 
Nop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 333
My inventory - Not what it is supposed to be

After removing my DS inner fender I was finally able to take a complete inventory.

I have a '70 Oldsmobile Cutlass Supreme with a 4bbl 350, originally high comression/~310BHP

My numbers so far:

VIN:

342570Zxxxxxx: a 1970 Fremont car.

Engine:

3955582: "Heavy casting" 350
30Zxxxxxx: '70 Olds, Fremont, VIN matches

TH350:

70 JL172 D, apparently the right "JL" for my car.

Oil filler tube:

0223247, also apparently from '70

Intake manifold:

404520 casted at the rear

So far so good. Now the more suspect things

Carb:

Quadrajet 17054938, a post-70 (74?) Cadillac (#3) carb for an automatic trans?!?!?

Heads:

#8 heads. Nooooo! The 73-76 79cc heads with 8:1 compression ratio.

Didn't drive a lot of miles so far, the Cutlass is torn apart at the moment, but I'd say it doesn't pull like a >250HP V8, be it SAE horse power or not...

I replaced my worn, crudded and misfiring points with a Pertronix, starts way better already. I'll check my ignition timing as soon as the car drives again, but timing looks good for now.

What am I going to do next? I definitely don't want to tear the engine apart right now and to be honenst I don't even want to pull my heads - too many MAWs piled up already.

I know, "no pain no gain", but what smaller tasks can I perform while working on the car 1-2 hours a day?

* See if I can get a glimpse of my pistons to see what top shape they have. What do I look for exactly?
* Hope that only the original (#5?) heads were replaced with #8 ones? Why would someone do that?
* Get a pair of correct (#5?) heads?
* Any ideas on all the #'s? Something else looking suspicious?

Thanks, guys and gals
Nop is offline  
Old February 5th, 2014, 12:40 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
nsnarsk65cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Grass Valley Ca
Posts: 973
What #s on the block that will tell you if the heads have been transplanted.Someone on here will know as i don't.
nsnarsk65cutlass is offline  
Old February 5th, 2014, 12:43 AM
  #3  
Nop
2-stroke 1-cylinder guy
Thread Starter
 
Nop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 333
Originally Posted by nsnarsk65cutlass
What #s on the block that will tell you if the heads have been transplanted.
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean by that?

The heads are not the ones that the '70 4bbl 350 came with originally, so they're transplanted.

Last edited by Nop; February 5th, 2014 at 12:46 AM.
Nop is offline  
Old February 5th, 2014, 01:08 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
nsnarsk65cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Grass Valley Ca
Posts: 973
I missed 3955582 on your first post then i'd say yes someone replaced the heads with later ones.Also carb 1705 #s are 1976-79 not sure on the rest 4938.
nsnarsk65cutlass is offline  
Old February 5th, 2014, 03:26 AM
  #5  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Photographs might help us to assess your entire set-up.

You can also look inside the spark plug holes with a scope to see the pistons - the should have a V-shaped notch on their front edges if they are high compression.

I don't want to think about how much it would cost to ship a pair of heads to Europe.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old February 5th, 2014, 03:53 AM
  #6  
Nop
2-stroke 1-cylinder guy
Thread Starter
 
Nop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 333
So I'm looking for the low-dish pistons with a small V-shaped notch, 1st row middle picture?



What other pictures would you like to see?

Originally Posted by MDchanic
a pair of heads to Europe.
Ah, peanuts!

What original heads would I look for? #5?

Last edited by Nop; February 5th, 2014 at 04:35 AM.
Nop is offline  
Old February 5th, 2014, 04:15 AM
  #7  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Originally Posted by Nop
So I'm looking for the low-dish pistons with a small V-shaped notch, 1st row middle picture?
Correct. It's not hard to see with a bore scope or similar device.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old February 5th, 2014, 04:40 AM
  #8  
Old School Olds
 
tru-blue 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Marble Falls TX
Posts: 8,940
# 6's would be the correct
heads for 1970.
tru-blue 442 is offline  
Old February 5th, 2014, 06:21 AM
  #9  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Originally Posted by tru-blue 442
# 6's would be the correct
heads for 1970.
True, but from a functional perspective, 5s, 6s, 7s, or 7As should all work as well, if you are able to find any "over there."

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old February 5th, 2014, 06:22 AM
  #10  
Old School Olds
 
tru-blue 442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Marble Falls TX
Posts: 8,940
Originally Posted by MDchanic
True, but from a functional perspective, 5s, 6s, 7s, or 7As should all work as well, if you are able to find any "over there."

- Eric
Agreed.
tru-blue 442 is offline  
Old February 5th, 2014, 10:57 AM
  #11  
Nop
2-stroke 1-cylinder guy
Thread Starter
 
Nop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 333
OK, my USB bore scope will arrive tomorrow.
Nop is offline  
Old February 6th, 2014, 11:32 AM
  #12  
Nop
2-stroke 1-cylinder guy
Thread Starter
 
Nop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 333
Additional info: The intake manifold is a iron #10, casting 404520 - didn't find any info about it besides it is a standard '70 manifold.

Here we go:

Took a random shot at cylinder #4 with my new amateur gynecologist USB gadget, bingo:

piston4_01.jpg

piston4_02.jpg

Looking at the printed chart I posted this looks like a shallow dish to me. Plus one V-shaped notch. Do you agree?

Last question: Why would someone put the high-cc heads on? Afraid of horsepower?

Last edited by Nop; February 6th, 2014 at 12:16 PM.
Nop is offline  
Old February 6th, 2014, 12:35 PM
  #13  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Yes, those look like shallow-dish pistons to me, with the correct V-notch, but, boy are those pictures hard to see.

As for why change the heads?
Three reasons I can think of off the top of my head:
1.) Original heads were no good - loose guides, leaking, burned - and these were the cheapest / easiest replacements to find
2.) In the early 1980s, when there was no high octane fuel available, they were changed to prevent detonation
3.) Somebody wanted the #6 heads, and took them before selling the car.
Odds are you'll never know.

If you replace them with correct heads and correct steel 0.016" (0.4mm) head gaskets, you will probably need 100 octane gasoline (using the current European octane rating scale), but if you use a regular FelPro 0.043" gasket, you may get away with using 98 octane.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Old February 6th, 2014, 12:44 PM
  #14  
Nop
2-stroke 1-cylinder guy
Thread Starter
 
Nop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 333
Tilt your screen or stand up for better contrast... I'll try to get some better pics outta that awesome $12 device.
Nop is offline  
Old February 6th, 2014, 10:07 PM
  #15  
Nop
2-stroke 1-cylinder guy
Thread Starter
 
Nop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 333
Good morning.

Does anybody have a nice pic of a clean HC piston crown? Yes, that scope is crap basically, but with an image for comparison it'll be easier.

you will probably need 100 octane gasoline (using the current European octane rating scale)
Used 102 ROZ/88 MOZ (Euro) plus lead additive for the first two fills, as I assumed high compression. I'll stick with that.

Originally Posted by MDchanic
Odds are you'll never know.
So apparently there's no common cause I didn't know besides the obvious reasons, OK.

I'll have a look for 5/6/7/7<sub>A</sub> heads then.

Last edited by Nop; February 7th, 2014 at 12:19 AM.
Nop is offline  
Old February 7th, 2014, 01:41 AM
  #16  
Registered User
 
nsnarsk65cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Grass Valley Ca
Posts: 973
Hard to see but to me looks like a lot of pitting ?or detonation wear on the piston?
nsnarsk65cutlass is offline  
Old February 7th, 2014, 02:04 AM
  #17  
Nop
2-stroke 1-cylinder guy
Thread Starter
 
Nop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Bavaria, Germany
Posts: 333
From the cam's live video that looks a bit clearer than the stills I rather think it's a thick flaky coal crud.



Circled a supposed chipped off flake of coal.

What seems strange to me is the gap between cylinder wall and piston crown - it looks rather large in relation to the bore radius?

Engine is running very very smooth though without rattling or any other strange sounds like .25 piston clearance

Last edited by Nop; February 7th, 2014 at 02:12 AM. Reason: 20863 edits later - Lost my English abilities completely over night
Nop is offline  
Old February 7th, 2014, 03:03 AM
  #18  
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
MDchanic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: The Hudson Valley
Posts: 21,183
Yeah, as nsnarsk65cutlass said, it's really hard to say anything about the surface because of the photo quality. If everything is working well, I wouldn't worry about it now, and if you're going to replace the heads, you'll see them directly soon enough anyway.

- Eric
MDchanic is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Last98
General Discussion
8
August 4th, 2013 05:46 PM
tmatador
General Discussion
1
August 9th, 2011 09:37 PM
Dave Siltman
General Discussion
1
July 19th, 2011 09:22 AM
wdgraham1
Interior/Upholstery
1
June 26th, 2011 08:51 AM
ChrisM
Other
3
September 11th, 2008 08:45 PM



Quick Reply: My inventory - Not what it is supposed to be



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:40 AM.