Exhaust Manifold ID Help
#1
Exhaust Manifold ID Help
I ran these manifold numbers through the search engines and looked at the ID charts and can't seem to find them. I know they are not Pontiac, obviously, the GTO written on the one is clearly wrong -- they came in a pile of Pontiac parts I bought. By the way, I am swapping to a small block in my 64 Dynamic 88 and was hoping I could use these but they don't look like they will clear the steering. Thanks for the help.
#3
The one with the X casting is absolutely from a 65-67 big block. The other is from a later model. I'm not sure of the engine size. Looks too small to be a big block manifold.
Last edited by edzolz; December 15th, 2021 at 08:12 AM.
#6
As noted, 387992 is 1966 Toronado only.
406301 is 1971-72 full size with 455, period. It is not internally divided. It was never factory installed on a Cutlass. It may be a dimensional replacement for the A-body cars, but it does not flow as well as the 402295 "Z" manifold. Note the individual runners in the 402295. Also note that 412287 has individual runners like 402295.
406301:
402295:
412287:
406301 is 1971-72 full size with 455, period. It is not internally divided. It was never factory installed on a Cutlass. It may be a dimensional replacement for the A-body cars, but it does not flow as well as the 402295 "Z" manifold. Note the individual runners in the 402295. Also note that 412287 has individual runners like 402295.
406301:
402295:
412287:
#10
Small block Olds 330, 350, 403?? I don't know about 1964 but 1965 all the way to and including 1970 "full size" B/C were rear steering box. I'm "assuming" 1964 is also. To put a small block Olds in the 1965/1970 full size, you'd need a Driver's side #2 and a passenger side #4. There may be others but I'm not sure.
#11
Hallo all -==- I have a line on a 350/350 that I want to use. I had one in my 74 Cutlass Supreme and it was plenty powerful for what I want from this car. I could use a 403 too but wonder about lack of coolent flow between cylinders and cracked heads and overheating potential -- I do live in the desert after all. I had a 403 in a Buick and had no problems but that was Seattle. I am not stuck on a small block, just that they seem to present themselves more affordably. If a 400 425 or 455 showed up I might go that way as well but worry that the 200-4R I have wont hold up to the torque. Any advice on the 403 concerns and 200-4R use with big blocks is appreciated.
#12
Hallo all -==- I have a line on a 350/350 that I want to use. I had one in my 74 Cutlass Supreme and it was plenty powerful for what I want from this car. I could use a 403 too but wonder about lack of coolent flow between cylinders and cracked heads and overheating potential -- I do live in the desert after all. I had a 403 in a Buick and had no problems but that was Seattle. I am not stuck on a small block, just that they seem to present themselves more affordably. If a 400 425 or 455 showed up I might go that way as well but worry that the 200-4R I have wont hold up to the torque. Any advice on the 403 concerns and 200-4R use with big blocks is appreciated.
#13
Yes, you assume correctly -- Olds all the way. Fabrication is not an issue as I have a full restoration shop and I have done countless engine swaps.and custom work projects. The info on the manifolds is very useful, thank you. Thoughts on the 403?
#14
#16
#18
#19
Hallo all -==- thanks for the help so far. I picked up a 65 330 from Roger Green up outside of ABQ so will be proceeding with the SBO swap.
Are these the manifolds that will work on my 64 88? They say 65 and up B and C bodies but they had rear steering as well and left side has similar configuration the the 64 394 Starfire I have. Anybody use these?
From ad:
Are these the manifolds that will work on my 64 88? They say 65 and up B and C bodies but they had rear steering as well and left side has similar configuration the the 64 394 Starfire I have. Anybody use these?
From ad:
GM Starfire Delta 88 98 Dynamic Olds B&C body big block dual exhaust manifolds
#20
You really only need the driver side manifold, which is available by itself. The normal 330 passenger side manifold works fine with a cap. The problem with this BBO manifold is that it isn't designed for the short deck SBO. I know people have used them with SBO motors in the 1965-70 cars and they are VERY tight, but do clear. I don't know if the differences in the 1964 frame and component location will still allow it to clear or not. I do know that it works on a BBO in a 63-64 frame, but again that's the taller deck height so there's an extra inch of clearance to the steering box.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post