5.7 diesel to gas rebuild?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 07:09 PM
  #1  
Red97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 33
From: leslie, MI
5.7 diesel to gas rebuild?

I have 3 5.7 diesels and I believe 1 is a dx. I was wondering if it would be a good candidate for a peppy gas conversion rebuild? mild cam, headers, intake, 4bbl, etc. I have a set of 69 #5 heads just stock valves and springs to match a cam. looking for good street manners with a mild idle. It would go in a 69 cutlass s with th350 trans and stock stall. just a driver car. So my question is would I get a more reliable engine out of the diesel or rebuild a gas 350 block?
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 07:20 PM
  #2  
svnt442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,293
From: Palm Bay, FL
For that type of build I would stick with a gas block. Doing a gas conversion on a diesel block is more for the hard core type of build because of the strength of the block.

Last edited by svnt442; Aug 18, 2013 at 07:35 PM.
Old Aug 18, 2013 | 07:33 PM
  #3  
380 Racer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,130
From: Iowa
Yes just use a gas block. IMO
Old Aug 19, 2013 | 04:26 AM
  #4  
Red97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 33
From: leslie, MI
Thank you. I guess I will have to find a complete 350 sbo, to rebuild.
Old Aug 19, 2013 | 05:25 AM
  #5  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,483
From: Central Fl
Where are you located? I may be interested in one of your diesel blocks.
Old Aug 19, 2013 | 05:36 AM
  #6  
Red97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 33
From: leslie, MI
south central MI.
Old Aug 19, 2013 | 06:45 AM
  #7  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,483
From: Central Fl
Oh well thanks anyway!!
Old Aug 19, 2013 | 07:44 AM
  #8  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,791
From: Northern VA
Back in the day, Mondello used to sell a conversion kit for diesel motors. If your diesel had blown the head gasket, simply change the cam, heads, intake, and add a distributor for a minimum impact conversion. Of course, that assumed the engine was already in a car. In your case, I agree that it's overkill for a street driver.
Old Aug 19, 2013 | 10:11 AM
  #9  
380 Racer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,130
From: Iowa
Sorry Joe but there is more to it than that. No matter what Mondello said.
Old Aug 19, 2013 | 11:28 AM
  #10  
Red97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 33
From: leslie, MI
ok, thanks this is a short block that I have. My dad did a simple rings and bearing rebuild. I am trying to figure out what pistons are in it. it is a 395558 block with a big 2. the piston dish measures 2.5 x .200 deep are these the low comp pistons?

IMG_20130819_102439.jpg
He has his mind set on no cam. It will probably get a set of redone stock #5 heads a edelborck performer intake and a 600 carb with headers and 2.5 exhaust. would this make a pretty decent driver?

Thanks

Last edited by Red97; Aug 19, 2013 at 01:42 PM. Reason: wrong block number
Old Aug 19, 2013 | 08:11 PM
  #11  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,791
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by 380 Racer
Sorry Joe but there is more to it than that. No matter what Mondello said.
I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell you...

Seriously, I'm aware that my response was a simplification. They did use the existing diesel pistons in the conversion, however.
Old Aug 20, 2013 | 12:39 AM
  #12  
rustyroger's Avatar
'87 Delta 88 Royale
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,514
From: Margate, England
Unless you change the pistons the engine wont last long at high rpm.
Diesel pistons are much heavier than gas ones, they have to be very robustly constructed to deal with the 22;1 compression and shock load of diesel ignition, rather like constant very bad pinging to put it simply. That's why diesels have their characteristic rattle.
The main bearing and rod journals are the same size as the BBO, so the rods will need to be changed and suitable pistons installed, I don't think the diesel cam is suitable for gas use either.
Unless you want to make a monster power engine for the strip or similar I agree with most other posts that a gas block in good shape would be a simpler and cheaper option.

Roger.
Old Aug 20, 2013 | 03:55 AM
  #13  
Red97's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 33
From: leslie, MI
I understand that the diesel block is for performance builds now. The short block I posted is a gas block, I was told early 70's. Can anybody confirm if the pistons are 14cc dish? Is this a decent short block for 250-300 hp with intake carb and headers/stock cam?
Old Aug 20, 2013 | 04:57 AM
  #14  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,791
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by rustyroger
Unless you change the pistons the engine wont last long at high rpm.
Keep in mind that the engines converted using the Mondello kit were typically in grandma-car 88s and 98s. Not everyone drives around at 5,000 RPM all the time.
Old Aug 20, 2013 | 05:27 AM
  #15  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,483
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by rustyroger
The main bearing and rod journals are the same size as the BBO
Incorrect, only the main journals are BB size, the rod journals are SB size.

The Diesel rod is 5.885 long and has the large pin. You could change out that combo to regular small block stuff if you wanted and rebalance.

Red97, yes those are 14cc dish pistons. Yes you can get 250-300hp fairly easily with decent heads, intake and the right cam.
Old Aug 21, 2013 | 02:38 AM
  #16  
rustyroger's Avatar
'87 Delta 88 Royale
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 2,514
From: Margate, England
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Incorrect, only the main journals are BB size, the rod journals are SB size.
We are both right (and wrong) In 1981 the rod journal size increased from 2.124" (same as the 350 gas engine) to 2.500" (BBO size).
Maybe the later ones are the DX engine?.
It seems the later engines were a big improvement over the earlier ones, too late to stop the engines reputation going down the pan.

But the earlier crank should withstand any load a road use gas conversion will give. Plus it makes finding suitable rods and pistons much easier.

Roger.
Old Aug 21, 2013 | 05:22 AM
  #17  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,483
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by rustyroger
We are both right (and wrong) In 1981 the rod journal size increased from 2.124" (same as the 350 gas engine) to 2.500" (BBO size).
Hmmm that could be a misprint. Until someone can show me a 5.885 inch Oldsmobile rod with the 2.500 big end journal size I'll stick with my original info.

Thanks.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rocket Richard
General Discussion
29
May 30, 2013 09:03 AM
swansmaa
Small Blocks
9
Feb 15, 2013 03:42 PM
bigD
Transmission
3
Oct 4, 2011 07:29 PM
KRICHEN922
Small Blocks
26
Sep 19, 2011 06:02 PM
Al2011
Small Blocks
7
Jul 20, 2011 07:31 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:08 AM.