350 build help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 05:44 PM
  #1  
mikey g's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 18
From: New Hampshire
350 build help

72 350 7 heads speed pro flat tops I need a camshaft and rocker suggestions will do stall required and gear appropriately this car will not see a drag strip car shows and burnouts max speed I want to go is 90 I need a suggested parts list and some advice heads are on and machine work done stock valves need the rest of the parts any help is appreciated
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 06:55 PM
  #2  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,133
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
What octane are you planning on? What kind of idle do you want? Compression will depend if you plan on zero decking the block and how much the heads need milled to straighten. Most people put W31 valves in high performance 350 build. A 2.07 intake does fit but the 2"/1.625" is the usual go to. Get the machine shop to open the bowels for the larger valves at minimum.
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 06:59 PM
  #3  
66SportCoupe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 1,423
From: St. Michael, MN
Don't go crazy with the cam. Put a reasonable unit in it and run new factory style rockers for ease of maintenance.
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 07:03 PM
  #4  
66SportCoupe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 1,423
From: St. Michael, MN
Keep it simple if you're not racing it
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 07:04 PM
  #5  
OLDSter Ralph's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 5,220
From: St. Paul Minnesota
Automatic or manual transmission ?
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 07:04 PM
  #6  
66SportCoupe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 1,423
From: St. Michael, MN
He was asking about stall converter. Hmm
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 07:09 PM
  #7  
OLDSter Ralph's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 5,220
From: St. Paul Minnesota
Originally Posted by 66SportCoupe
He was asking about stall converter. Hmm
Ok, I missed that.
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 07:36 PM
  #8  
70sgeek's Avatar
'72 Cutlass ragtop
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,328
From: Tampa, FL
Your intended build doesn't sound too far off from mine - I had a roller cam 350 built for my '72 by CutlassEFI (Mark Remmel) from this site - he's a really well regarded Olds builder and part resource here.and I was very lucky to be local to his shop for my project.

My motor retains 7a heads with large valves and Harland Sharp roller rockers - roughly 9.5:1 CR and a custom grind Comp Cam which he spec'd to the build. - you can search prior threads to find past posts on my build (and other similar ones).

Might want to PM him for cam and other associated suggestions and he can likely provide the major parts you'd need for your build.

What rear end ratio will you be running? I have a 3.08 posi and 2200-2400 stall converter ahead of my TH350. - car idles well at about 750 and pulls strong all the way to at least 90 (which is about as much as I've pushed it). I'm also running Vintage Air a/c and power brakes, so that should give you some context of what you can do with the right combo.

Last edited by 70sgeek; Aug 7, 2025 at 07:43 PM.
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 07:38 PM
  #9  
mikey g's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 18
From: New Hampshire
it will be 93 fuel, noticeable idle preferred, car shows and flat cam are poop- it wont be 100% stock just the exterior and original color however the interior may need a different color me and white seats will not get along and where its at i know what pistons are in it otherwise id have to assume everything is stock i did not have it done 8 years ago i gave the car to my brother had massed parts then had to move he had a machine shop do the work i cant get them to call me back to get any more info they did put the speed pro flattops in it and nothing else is known other than it has arp everything and 7 not 7a heads on it apparently they told him they were cracked and gave him the 7 heads that had seats valves and gides already. the machine shop slip says cleaned line honed magnafluxed and polished crank and assembled the cam in it is a melling cl-soc-9 my brother tore the whole car appart and it sat for 3 years like that then last year i put the panels back on it and he told me he didnt want to fix the car so now i have it back after a very long trip from nh to az then back to nh so 90 mph max speed i need to go or want to mostly back road car shows and smoke shows really thats all im looking for i know it sounds boring but i will probably only drive it 15-20 times a year it snows alot here and we have a short nice season. just a great sounding healthy 350 car show burnout cruser i will build the trans and put a locker and gears in it and have the driveshaft done locally i have built chevy engines before no expert but oldsmobile are very different and it would seem parts are like hens teeth
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 07:40 PM
  #10  
66SportCoupe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 1,423
From: St. Michael, MN
Why would you spend $1800 to put a roller cam in that car? To each his own.
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 07:45 PM
  #11  
mikey g's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 18
From: New Hampshire
what are the downsides of a roller cam on an olds engine?
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 07:49 PM
  #12  
66SportCoupe's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2019
Posts: 1,423
From: St. Michael, MN
I'm not saying there is a downside. Cost is one and what are you truly gaining in a show/burnout car? PM me if you care to talk.
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 07:53 PM
  #13  
70sgeek's Avatar
'72 Cutlass ragtop
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,328
From: Tampa, FL
Budget permitting, why not?

I'm no longer a flat tappet cam fan and would never recommend one to anyone, though I'm but one opinion in a world of many...

Incidentally Mikey - since you mentioned driveshaft intentions, I put a locally-built aluminum driveshaft in my car and it really does free up a noticeable amount of drag due to the lighter weight. It's easily stronger than my 400hp 350 needed but absolutely worth the investment in my opinion. In my case, I brought my original to the local shop and just had them duplicate it in aluminum for a drop-in replacement.
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 08:04 PM
  #14  
mikey g's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 18
From: New Hampshire
that is awesome i will have to remember that when the time comes that part of the build is a ways off yet i know my intentions and how i am honestly going to use the car its a toy not a racecar lol
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 09:09 PM
  #15  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,432
From: Phoenix, AZ
You really need to know the actual compression ratio before selecting a camshaft.

About 90 being the fastest you want to go - is that at max RPM? As in 4.88 or similar rear gears?
Old Aug 7, 2025 | 09:50 PM
  #16  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,133
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
The downside is shitty hydraulic roller lifters. Most go solid roller lifters, even hydraulic grind. I have the Comp Evolution hydraulic roller lifters and a mild hydraulic roller cam to go in with new Edelbrock 68cc heads , if they get released before I die. You will need not only the larger valves, you need roller rocker arms, screw studs, 7/16" threads preferred, guide plates with upgraded valve springs to run a roller cam and custom length push rods and gaskets.
Old Aug 8, 2025 | 09:26 AM
  #17  
mikey g's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 18
From: New Hampshire
I was told there was 20tho off the heads nothing on the block and no info on the valves used
Old Aug 8, 2025 | 11:23 AM
  #18  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,133
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Then your pistons will be .025" in the hole at minimum. My block was decked .016". Even with the taller Mahle forged pistons, they were still .002" below deck. I would get as thin as possible Cometic gaskets to improve quench. With regular Felpro replacement head gaskets, you will have around .070" piston to head, you want around .040". You are probably mid 9'to 1 compression at best. The heads need pulled anyways and you can CC them as well to get a more accurate number along with the actual pistons in the hole measurements. Good luck.
Old Aug 9, 2025 | 04:45 AM
  #19  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,496
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by mikey g
what are the downsides of a roller cam on an olds engine?
Cost is the only downside.
Lifters are getting better, haven’t had an issues in the recent past.
And what people don’t realize, is an all roller valvetrain also reduces operating oil temps, sometimes by as much as 40*.
I’m a fan of using the latest tech available, all tucked under stock valve covers etc.
Old Aug 9, 2025 | 07:45 AM
  #20  
JohnnyBs68S's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,666
From: Ft. Wayne, IN
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
I’m a fan of using the latest tech available, all tucked under stock valve covers etc.
^^^ This!
Old Aug 9, 2025 | 09:51 AM
  #21  
mikey g's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 18
From: New Hampshire
I am all for modernization of old tec I know my plans are unorthodox I get it but my intentions are honest there's 6 back roads every direction that are 50mph max most 35 and tons of summer car shows just a toy and I want it to do burnouts the heads are on I'm not feeling the need to ck everything 100% to the thousands to squeeze every ounce of power out of it nice cruser nasty idle assuming nothing taken off the block and. 020 off of the heads speed pro flat tops bored 30 over average flow I could find at. 500 lift 190cfm I understand variations exist I will use whatever stall needed and gears and long tube headers I'm maby 9:5-1 if that ya know ****** thumper... With these lifters... And this stall... And probably this gear... And headers try these... With the 37111 intake and you should probably use these rockers and they'll require this spring pressure try these... I am not meeting at the strip unless I drive there and leave it in the parking lot and I am not going to throw out new parts out of curiosity there is 800 people on here smarter than me before breakfast that's why I'm asking how to get to my desired combination everyones intentions and use of thier car are different don't ask me to take the heads off to cc the heads and ck piston deck height can anyone help me out Ill build the next one with a micrometer and Lazer it'll be a 455 when it comes to that this combination has to exist that'll be a compromise of what I'd like it to do and the proper way to do it please
Old Aug 9, 2025 | 05:50 PM
  #22  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,133
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Add one more thing, the 2711/3711 Performer intake won't bolt on with roller lifters. Either the underside of the intake needs ground in a few places to clear or you have to use 7111 Performer RPM which better for what you want.
Old Aug 10, 2025 | 12:57 AM
  #23  
CutlassMarc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 236
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Cost is the only downside.
Lifters are getting better, haven’t had an issues in the recent past.
And what people don’t realize, is an all roller valvetrain also reduces operating oil temps, sometimes by as much as 40*.
I’m a fan of using the latest tech available, all tucked under stock valve covers etc.
In a cruiser, it doesn't matter, nor lower oil temp by much if any. in a race engine turning 8000 rpm sure.
Roller cams, it is cost, hyd rollers that are HEAVY and bring on valve float and valvetrain stress because you now have to have stronger springs. Solid rollers are a headache , a race engine that you open up all the time to check on, fine, a street car, who wants to pull v/c's to check lash to make sure a lifter isn't failing or failed and is now taking out a lobe.
Only up side on a street car/cruiser is no need to hut down special oil for the flat tappet cam so it live if hotter cam lobe than the mild oem stuff.
350 chevy flat tap cam and oem rockers was 5 degrees hotter oil temp than a vortec 350 with roller ram jet cam and fully roller rockers. same oil gauge normal street driving and some spirited fun. 5 degrees oil temp difference. If you are seeing 40 degrees difference when cruising allong, something else is very very wrong in the engine.
Street use isn't the same as buzzing an engine to 7000 rpm+ And no street outlaws isn't "street use"
Old Aug 10, 2025 | 12:58 AM
  #24  
CutlassMarc's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2025
Posts: 236
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Cost is the only downside.
Lifters are getting better, haven’t had an issues in the recent past.
And what people don’t realize, is an all roller valvetrain also reduces operating oil temps, sometimes by as much as 40*.
I’m a fan of using the latest tech available, all tucked under stock valve covers etc.
You're fitting poly locks under the stock v/c's?
Old Aug 10, 2025 | 01:16 AM
  #25  
OLDSter Ralph's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2017
Posts: 5,220
From: St. Paul Minnesota
Originally Posted by CutlassMarc
You're fitting poly locks under the stock v/c's?
It was done many times before. I had them on my "E" block 400 in 1967 with the "then" W-30 cam.

Last edited by OLDSter Ralph; Aug 10, 2025 at 10:22 AM.
Old Aug 10, 2025 | 04:15 AM
  #26  
skyhigh's Avatar
1972 Cutlass Town Sedan
 
Joined: Jun 2018
Posts: 695
From: Sarnia, Ontario, Canada
Originally Posted by CutlassMarc
You're fitting poly locks under the stock v/c's?
The short poly locks will fit under stock covers from what I have read, pretty sure Mark posted that info somewhere in the past.
Old Aug 10, 2025 | 05:03 AM
  #27  
70sgeek's Avatar
'72 Cutlass ragtop
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 1,328
From: Tampa, FL
The 350 full roller motor that CutlassEFI built for me needed the E-brock 7111 for reasons stated above - underside valve train clearance. All things considered, it's pretty stout for a small block and still maintains a perfectly streetable idle quality (but you still know it ain't stock when you hear it).

I cruise my ragtop where ever I can - beach runs, car shows, just out to be out, etc. It pulls 17-18* vacuum and runs 180-190* temps all day long in FL heat. It's carbureted with a Quick Fuel 780 and ignition via Pertronix Ignitor II distributor that I dialed in at 16* initial / 34* total timing and I run the Thornton shorty headers thru a 2.25" dual exhaust (no H pipe).

So the 350 I had in my car before this was built similar to what Mikey describes for his motor - 7a heads, Speedpro flat-tops, a Howards street performance hydraulic flat tappet cam, E-brock 2711 and a modified Qjet. It ran strong but even with decent oil the cam wasn't holding up and started exhibiting lobe failure after about 15k miles (albeit that mileage was accumulated over a 6 year period).

So now I'll take roller over hydraulic every time
Old Aug 10, 2025 | 05:51 AM
  #28  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,133
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Good thing there seems to be less issues with current hydraulic roller lifters in recent months. Even if I have plunger stick, the Comp Evolution has a replaceable catridge, a very nice feature. I had a custom Erson go flat from Mark that was pretty mild. I have a feeling a lobe may be heading south on this Edelbrock 204/214 flat tappet.
Old Aug 10, 2025 | 09:46 AM
  #29  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,432
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by CutlassMarc
You're fitting poly locks under the stock v/c's?
Yes, as said already. My engine has them with factory valve covers.
Old Aug 11, 2025 | 08:23 AM
  #30  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,934
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Cost is the only downside.
Lifters are getting better, haven’t had an issues in the recent past.
And what people don’t realize, is an all roller valvetrain also reduces operating oil temps, sometimes by as much as 40*.
I’m a fan of using the latest tech available, all tucked under stock valve covers etc.
up to 40deg drop is incredible. I searched everywhere to find anything on that claim. couldn’t find a single thing on the up to 40deg drop

I did however find a few documented tests that roller lifter’s only marginally reduced bulk oil temps , which was negligible. even studies that had internal censors directly at the lifter/ lobe interface , only found a marginal reduction …that’s because the roller wheel does not actually roll along the lobe, it skids quite a bit.

Old Aug 11, 2025 | 01:18 PM
  #31  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,496
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by CANADIANOLDS
only found a marginal reduction …that’s because the roller wheel does not actually roll along the lobe, it skids quite a bit.
I said ALL ROLLER RICHARD CRANIUM.
Do you think stamped steel non-roller rockers don’t create any heat? Bullshit.
Old Aug 11, 2025 | 03:21 PM
  #32  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,934
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
I said ALL ROLLER RICHARD CRANIUM.
Do you think stamped steel non-roller rockers don’t create any heat? Bullshit.

yes exactly..just like Olds did it from the factory. show me anything that proves it’s up to 40 deg drop in oil temp.

I want to read and learn. what’s weird is GM and every other manufacturer didn’t go with full roller rocker arms for years ….many years after they went roller lifters.


Old Aug 12, 2025 | 06:28 AM
  #33  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,496
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by CANADIANOLDS
I want to read and learn. what’s weird is GM and every other manufacturer didn’t go with full roller rocker arms for years ….many years after they went roller lifters.
Why do you think they went to roller lifters? Apparently you’re not remembering what happened there. The industry had to reduce the zinc in the oil because it was contaminating catalytic converters, they had no choice. They didn’t have to do that because of the rockers, the real potential issue was Cam and lifter wear, not the rocker wear.
Finally, I did two identical 455 short blocks a couple of summers ago that were dyno’d just a week apart. The only difference was the valve train, one was all roller, the other was a flat tappet with regular stamped steel, but roller tip rockers. In breaking in the engines, the flat tappet engine got to 180°+ oil temp pretty quickly and stayed there. The roller engine took forever just to get to 150, and pretty much stayed there. What I saw is what I saw. That’s what I stated.

Last edited by cutlassefi; Aug 12, 2025 at 06:33 AM.
Old Aug 13, 2025 | 11:45 AM
  #34  
CANADIANOLDS's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2013
Posts: 2,934
Originally Posted by cutlassefi
Why do you think they went to roller lifters? Apparently you’re not remembering what happened there. The industry had to reduce the zinc in the oil because it was contaminating catalytic converters, they had no choice. They didn’t have to do that because of the rockers, the real potential issue was Cam and lifter wear, not the rocker wear.
Finally, I did two identical 455 short blocks a couple of summers ago that were dyno’d just a week apart. The only difference was the valve train, one was all roller, the other was a flat tappet with regular stamped steel, but roller tip rockers. In breaking in the engines, the flat tappet engine got to 180°+ oil temp pretty quickly and stayed there. The roller engine took forever just to get to 150, and pretty much stayed there. What I saw is what I saw. That’s what I stated.
what a load of bs. your claims are pretty wild as usual. nobody should ever trust any testing or data from you.

you couldn’t even get the afr correct on an intake manifold correct.
Old Aug 13, 2025 | 05:22 PM
  #35  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,496
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by CANADIANOLDS
what a load of bs. your claims are pretty wild as usual. nobody should ever trust any testing or data from you.

you couldn’t even get the afr correct on an intake manifold correct.
Easy for you to criticize tests that you’ve never done yourself.
How about quit bashing people who’ve done different tests, and do them yourself. We’d all LOVE to see your results.
Old Aug 13, 2025 | 06:31 PM
  #36  
bccan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,739
From: West Hartford, CT
Sorry Canadian, been “biting my fingers” for awhile.

Who ***** in your Cheerios each morning?

You are one of the most knowledgeable people on here, yet only rarely offer any help or constructive information, though it does occasionally happen. Why can’t you be helpful? What you’ve done for the Olds community pathetically pales compared to your favorite target for sucker shots. It’s a shame, you could offer so much more but just seem to prefer being a nearly useless, but full on, ******* *******.

The only complete, informative and frankly amazing thread I ever remember you posting was your Engine Masters project. That was what “we” should be able to get from someone with your knowledge and skill. But, you choose to post a scant few constructive or interesting things (the W31) or ever so rarely manage to decently ask for a clarification but usually swoop n like a buzzard with dysentery, time after time, year after year.

Cant you be a contributor instead of a detractor? You obviously have time to peruse the site and snipe at Cutlassefi, why not take some pics or video from your shop, or at least post something helpful or useful? What’s going on in your shop that’s of interest, Olds or not? What available products are working for you?



​​​​​​….

Last edited by oldcutlass; Aug 25, 2025 at 02:36 PM. Reason: edited out personal attack profanity
Old Aug 14, 2025 | 05:54 AM
  #37  
cutlassefi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,496
From: Central Fl
Originally Posted by bccan
Sorry Canadian, been “biting my fingers for awhile.

Who ***** in your Cheerios each morning?

You are one of the most knowledgeable people on here, yet only rarely offer any help or constructive information, though it does occasionally happen. Why can’t you be helpful? What you’ve done for the Olds community pathetically pales compared to your favorite target for sucker shots. It’s a shame, you could offer so much more but just seem to prefer being a nearly useless.



​​​​​​….
Don’t sugar coat it, tell us how you really feel! lol!😉
Thank you, you hit the nail on the head, except he ***** in everyone else’s Cheerios as well.
Again thank you.

Last edited by oldcutlass; Aug 25, 2025 at 02:36 PM. Reason: edited out personal attack profanity
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
christianeasterby
Small Blocks
5
Jan 29, 2023 01:31 AM
65-330
Small Blocks
4
Jan 22, 2022 12:29 PM
73-s
Small Blocks
5
Jun 11, 2015 03:10 PM
VinMichael
Non-Olds Engines
32
Nov 22, 2014 06:28 PM
1974 Cutlass
Small Blocks
13
Mar 1, 2010 10:46 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:19 PM.