330 heads

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jun 28, 2016 | 09:18 PM
  #1  
Cutlass Fan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 568
From: Saskatchewan
330 heads

What are the differences between the #1,2,3 & 4 heads on the 330. I saw that they supposedly had a different number head in each year of production.
Old Jun 28, 2016 | 10:42 PM
  #2  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,108
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
#1 had rocker shafts and a 45 degree cam angle. #2 had 3/8" rocker studs, same angle. #3 and #4 had the same 5/16" rocker set up as all later Olds V8's. #3 had the 45 degree cam angle, #4 the 39 degree cam angle like all Olds V8's to 1990.
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 01:52 AM
  #3  
svnt442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,293
From: Palm Bay, FL
The heads don't determine the lifter bank angle, the block does.
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 06:31 AM
  #4  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,108
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Yes, but it means there may be push rod interference if they are put on later blocks.
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 06:48 AM
  #5  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by olds 307 and 403
Yes, but it means there may be push rod interference if they are put on later blocks.
^^^This. There are minor variations in the pushrod holes in the heads due to the lifter bank angle.
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 07:22 AM
  #6  
edzolz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 3,009
From: Red Oak, Texas
Also, supposedly, the #4 heads had smaller combustion chambers.
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 07:29 AM
  #7  
Redog's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,145
From: Far Northeast Philadelphia, PA
The #4 heads I have at the "WG" heads which are the hi compression heads Not sure if all #4 heads are Hi-Comp heads
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 09:28 AM
  #8  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Redog
The #4 heads I have at the "WG" heads which are the hi compression heads Not sure if all #4 heads are Hi-Comp heads
Every single 1964-1972 SBO head has chambers in the 60cc-66cc range. Variations are more due to manufacturing tolerances and how many times the heads and valves have been cut than due to any design differences. "High Compression" was achieved by changing the piston dish, not the combustion chamber. The no. 8 heads from 1973 were the first SBO heads with different size chambers (approx 80 cc).
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 10:00 AM
  #9  
Octania's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
Nice summary.


"HC heads" is probably Chevy-centric voodoo. Olds used variously dished pistons.
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 12:25 PM
  #10  
Cutlass Fan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 568
From: Saskatchewan
Thx for the info. I take it they all have similar flow and that it is similar flow to 350 heads.
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 05:37 PM
  #11  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,108
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
Originally Posted by Cutlass Fan
Thx for the info. I take it they all have similar flow and that it is similar flow to 350 heads.
My understanding is yes. Same size valves as regular 350 heads and similar ports.
Old Jun 29, 2016 | 08:16 PM
  #12  
Cutlass Fan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2016
Posts: 568
From: Saskatchewan
Good to know, thx.
Old Jun 30, 2016 | 06:37 AM
  #13  
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 3,688
From: Delta BC Canada
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Every single 1964-1972 SBO head has chambers in the 60cc-66cc range. Variations are more due to manufacturing tolerances and how many times the heads and valves have been cut than due to any design differences. "High Compression" was achieved by changing the piston dish, not the combustion chamber. The no. 8 heads from 1973 were the first SBO heads with different size chambers (approx 80 cc).
I disagree with the cc range. It is 64-69 cc not 60-66 cc. Only the #4 heads are 64 cc the others are 68-69 cc as cast.
Old Jun 30, 2016 | 06:44 AM
  #14  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by oldsmobiledave
I disagree with the cc range. It is 64-69 cc not 60-66 cc. Only the #4 heads are 64 cc the others are 68-69 cc as cast.
Maybe as-designed, but not as-cast. Every Olds head I've ever seen has an as-cast chamber that's larger than the advertised numbers. Until someone performs a survey of chamber volumes with a statistically valid sample size, I'm not going to worry a lot about published numbers. The reality is that a couple of cc's of difference in chamber volume will not be measurable in performance.

Obviously, anyone who is building an Olds motor for performance should properly measure and set chamber volumes, piston heights, dish size, etc, etc. For the vast majority of people who simply want to bolt heads onto their stock or nearly stock motors, they will never see the difference in performance with any #1 through #7A heads. Normal production tolerances everywhere else (not to mention using FelPro blue gaskets) will far outweigh a 4cc chamber difference.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Nor Cal Andy
Small Blocks
3
Aug 22, 2011 07:17 PM
65cutty
Small Blocks
7
Oct 30, 2008 08:27 AM
65cutty
Small Blocks
2
Aug 27, 2008 10:09 AM
Run to Rund
Parts For Sale
0
Aug 4, 2008 02:08 PM
DennisG.
Parts For Sale
0
May 23, 2008 12:00 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:07 PM.