General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

Found an Awesome Rear Bumper Idea

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January 11th, 2017, 06:22 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jpc647's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,452
Found an Awesome Rear Bumper Idea

I ran into this car on a web search for something out. Just thought i'd share.

The idea of the exhaust coming out the bottom of the bumper seems really nice. It's obviously a project I don't have the skill or tools to do, but I just keep looking at it.

oldsmobile%20rear%20bumper_zpsnvmotzj0.jpg


A couple more photo's about halfway down:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/myo...ards/tags/442/
jpc647 is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 06:42 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
88 Cutty Classic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 216
that screams 1980 world of wheels.
88 Cutty Classic is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 06:47 AM
  #3  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 16,160
Very unique!
Olds64 is online now  
Old January 11th, 2017, 06:47 AM
  #4  
Registered User
 
BackInTheGame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado - Front Range
Posts: 2,390
Interesting concept. I'm not sure yet whether I like the design, but I really like the idea. Thanks for sharing the link to the pictures. I love looking at those Old School machines!
BackInTheGame is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 07:03 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jpc647's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,452
Originally Posted by BackInTheGame
Interesting concept. I'm not sure yet whether I like the design, but I really like the idea. Thanks for sharing the link to the pictures. I love looking at those Old School machines!

I agree. I like the concept, just not sure if I'm in love with this execution of it.
jpc647 is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 07:18 AM
  #6  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,669
That car's been discussed here before. Lots of work, but not exactly an esthetic success in my opinion. The mods are completely contrary to the lines of the car and not an improvement. Sorry, but different just for the sake of being different isn't necessarily better.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 07:39 AM
  #7  
Registered User
 
59-59-59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,142
Come on- Cadillac had that idea 60+ years ago!
59-59-59 is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 08:10 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Kennybill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Braceville, Ohio
Posts: 1,972
A lot of work and money wasted, in my opinion. It's pretty hard to improve on the different factory options available for these cars. I also like to stay with the factory colors.
Kennybill is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 08:21 AM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
jpc647's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,452
Originally Posted by Kennybill
It's pretty hard to improve on the different factory options available for these cars. I also like to stay with the factory colors.

I couldn't disagree more with this statement.

Hard to improve upon 50 year old technology? I could create a list a mile long of things than can be improved upon a 1972 Cutlass 442. Pretty much everything except the timeless look of the exterior could be upgraded and improved upon with today's readily available technology.
jpc647 is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 08:37 AM
  #10  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,669
Originally Posted by jpc647
I couldn't disagree more with this statement.

Hard to improve upon 50 year old technology? I could create a list a mile long of things than can be improved upon a 1972 Cutlass 442. Pretty much everything except the timeless look of the exterior could be upgraded and improved upon with today's readily available technology.
Styling isn't "technology." You are confusing the issue. This thread is about esthetics only. No one is saying that technology can't be improved. We are saying that we prefer the factory STYLING - and yes, that is a completely subjective statement.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 08:42 AM
  #11  
Proud Viet Nam Veteran
 
redoldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rowlett, TX
Posts: 10,071
That car looks like it could have come out of the movie Back To The Future. It is UGLY. But I am an old guy and that is just my opinion.
redoldsman is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 08:45 AM
  #12  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 16,160
Well, I think we can all agree that we're glad another classic isn't in the crusher. Even if it isn't our cup of tea.

It makes me think of the 80s. It might actually be a Transformer!
Olds64 is online now  
Old January 11th, 2017, 08:45 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Tedd Thompson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Forest Ranch Ca.
Posts: 7,734
Different strokes for different fokes I guess. I'm not a 70's fan but to me the bumper is too large and squarish for the car and doesn't follow any other lines. It looks like a made up tack on. Harvey Earl would not approve of this abortion..... Just me.... Lost in the fifties... Tedd
Tedd Thompson is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 08:51 AM
  #14  
Rocket Renegade!
 
BangScreech4-4-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 4,589
God, that's ugly. I think jpc647 is having a little fun with us.
BangScreech4-4-2 is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 08:52 AM
  #15  
Registered User
 
RandyS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 2,972
The term 'fugly' comes to mind.......
RandyS is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 08:54 AM
  #16  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,669
Originally Posted by redoldsman
That car looks like it could have come out of the movie Back To The Future. It is UGLY. But I am an old guy and that is just my opinion.
It was built in 2008 for the ABC TV series The Prince of Motor City.

No, I hadn't heard of it either...

https://www.mecum.com/lots/SC0510-93...cutlass-coupe/

http://www.autoblog.com/2008/06/08/a...ur-long-drama/


joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 09:19 AM
  #17  
Registered User
 
RROLDSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: North Delta, BC
Posts: 1,067
Looks like a Barris abberation, I mean creation.
RROLDSX is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 09:41 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Kennybill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Braceville, Ohio
Posts: 1,972
I was commenting on factory options such as different hoods, cut out bumper the wing/spoiler available from the factory and factory colors. I don't know what "technology" is in this car. I was only commenting on the rear "bumper" photo. I did say that it was just my opinion. An owner can do as they wish with their car.
Kennybill is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 09:43 AM
  #19  
Rocket Renegade!
 
BangScreech4-4-2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Vancouver Island
Posts: 4,589
The rear view was ugly, but the front view is ... obscene.
BangScreech4-4-2 is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 09:49 AM
  #20  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,669
Originally Posted by '69442ragtop
the front view is ... obscene.
Reminds me more of a GTX or Roadrunner


joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 10:33 AM
  #21  
Registered User
 
m371961's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Sistersville, WV
Posts: 2,163
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Reminds me more of a GTX or Roadrunner
Maybe that is why I kinda like it.
m371961 is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 10:41 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
88 Cutty Classic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 216
it looks like a design they would use for a video game car that they want to look like a cutlass but dont wanna pay licensing fees for. (Grand Theft Auto: Sabre)
88 Cutty Classic is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 10:54 AM
  #23  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,669
Originally Posted by 88 Cutty Classic
it looks like a design they would use for a video game car that they want to look like a cutlass but dont wanna pay licensing fees for. (Grand Theft Auto: Sabre)
Which is EXACTLY why they did this for a TV show.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 11:59 AM
  #24  
Registered User
 
oldsmobiledave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Delta BC Canada
Posts: 3,688
mint please

Oops. I need a mint. I just threw up a little in my mouth.
oldsmobiledave is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 12:28 PM
  #25  
Registered User
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,824
Blaspheme! It is on very rare occasion that someone can out-due the factory design team. Most body mods are just plain bad.
Even a lot of the aftermarket wheels take away from the factory styling and ad little. I used to think the 69 cutlass/442 would look better with the W25 hood, guess what I was wrong. The hood was out of scale and the lines did not flow well. Yes it looks okay but it was not a upgrade in style.
The factory is very tough to beat when it comes to styling. Yes there were many years that they produced ugly cars but those are not the ones being modified.
Bernhard is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 01:33 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
anthonyP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Poconos, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,029
Originally Posted by jpc647
I ran into this car on a web search for something out. Just thought i'd share.

The idea of the exhaust coming out the bottom of the bumper seems really nice. It's obviously a project I don't have the skill or tools to do, but I just keep looking at it.




A couple more photo's about halfway down:
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/myo...ards/tags/442/

At least the spoiler on the Hamilton looks better than the OEM spoiler installed on the trunk of the Cutlass Supreme, the Vista Cruiser's roof, and the trunk of the Cutlass/442 convertible that are all parked in the same area.
anthonyP is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 01:46 PM
  #27  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,669
Originally Posted by Bernhard
Blaspheme! It is on very rare occasion that someone can out-due the factory design team. Most body mods are just plain bad.
Even a lot of the aftermarket wheels take away from the factory styling and ad little. I used to think the 69 cutlass/442 would look better with the W25 hood, guess what I was wrong. The hood was out of scale and the lines did not flow well. Yes it looks okay but it was not a upgrade in style.
The factory is very tough to beat when it comes to styling. Yes there were many years that they produced ugly cars but those are not the ones being modified.
While I can't say that I've always been enamored with factory styling cues, at least they are relatively integrated. The mods on this car have nothing in common with the rest of the styling. Trapezoidal taillights? Seriously? There are no other lines on the car even close to that shape. Worse is how those new taillights don't even come close to fitting in the shapes in the trunklid and rear quarters. Sorry, not feeling the love.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 01:46 PM
  #28  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,669
Originally Posted by anthonyP
At least the spoiler on the Hamilton looks better than the OEM spoiler installed on the trunk of the Cutlass Supreme, the Vista Cruiser's roof, and the trunk of the Cutlass/442 convertible that are all parked in the same area.
You clearly put WAAAAY more time into scrolling down that page than I wanted to.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 01:57 PM
  #29  
Registered User
 
anthonyP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Poconos, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,029
Originally Posted by '69442ragtop
The rear view was ugly, but the front view is ... obscene.
Not my cup of tea, but much nicer than any Chip Foose's custom car designs or suppose 'restorations'.
anthonyP is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 02:01 PM
  #30  
Registered User
 
88 Cutty Classic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 216
Originally Posted by anthonyP
Not my cup of tea, but much nicer than any Chip Foose's custom car designs or suppose 'restorations'.
nooooo way. not even on his worst day.. dont judge him based on a TV show. he made boyd and then he made himself. the guy is skilled in every facet of a build.
88 Cutty Classic is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 02:41 PM
  #31  
Registered User
 
RROLDSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: North Delta, BC
Posts: 1,067
Originally Posted by anthonyP
Not my cup of tea, but much nicer than any Chip Foose's custom car designs or suppose 'restorations'.
Yup, that's exactly why he won the Ridler.

Last edited by RROLDSX; January 11th, 2017 at 03:22 PM.
RROLDSX is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 02:43 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
Bernhard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 2,824
I like Chip he seems to be a genuine good guy. He does custom builds and that has to be something one likes, to appreciate his work. I like all forms of the car hobby even the cartoon builds that came from the early 60's.
I think true customs that are well thought out and executed ad to the hobby but to many are not well planed out and executed and detract from the looks of the car.
There are emblem and chrome trim delete's that look very good but if taken to far again can detract from the overall look of the car.
Bernhard is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 03:26 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
anthonyP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Poconos, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,029
Originally Posted by RROLDSX
Yup, that exactly why he won the Ridler.
Not even sure what a Ridler is, but in my opinion, I do not like what he does to cars, especially ones that already look nice from the factory. It was different back in the late 40's and early 50's when most the designs were holdovers from before the war.

Except for a few cars, most of the cars designed in the late 50's up through the 70's and part of the 80's do not need customizing.

If anything customizers should work on early Falcons, Novas, the X-cars, and most of the mid-Eighties front wheel drives that were pretty much devoid of style.

Of course, that is my opinion.
anthonyP is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 03:41 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
RROLDSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: North Delta, BC
Posts: 1,067
You of course are entitled to your opinion but my opinion is the Hamilton is one ugly debauchery. The Ridler award is one the most prestigious awards given in the custom car industry. I too do not like everything he does but some of his work is absolutely amazing as verified by his peers in the industry.
RROLDSX is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 03:48 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
anthonyP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Poconos, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,029
Originally Posted by 88 Cutty Classic
nooooo way. not even on his worst day.. dont judge him based on a TV show. he made boyd and then he made himself. the guy is skilled in every facet of a build.
I have never seen a person take a great looking car like the '67 Shelby Mustang and make it worse than the original - in my opinion.

I know you said not to base him on the TV show, but the one time I watched a girlfriend took her boyfriend's factory stock GTO Judge to Chip Fooze for a 'restoration'. Fooze slapped on some goofy looking oversized rims/tires, installed oversize speaker throughout the car, painted the car with stripes that made no sense, and made other odd changes. When the owner saw his car he cried and said some things they seemed to be cut out.

I am not a fan of his other customs done on the '60-'80 cars.
anthonyP is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 04:07 PM
  #36  
Registered User
 
Gary M's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: St. Louis
Posts: 2,357
Creative, lots of work put into it

But not doing it for me. JMO. At least it appears to be well taken care of.
Gary M is offline  
Old January 11th, 2017, 04:12 PM
  #37  
Registered User
 
anthonyP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Poconos, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,029
Originally Posted by RROLDSX
You of course are entitled to your opinion but my opinion is the Hamilton is one ugly debauchery. The Ridler award is one the most prestigious awards given in the custom car industry. I too do not like everything he does but some of his work is absolutely amazing as verified by his peers in the industry.
I sure agree with you about the Hamilton, it is like they just threw everything they had at it. Poor Cutlass.
anthonyP is offline  
Old January 12th, 2017, 05:58 AM
  #38  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 16,160
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Reminds me more of a GTX or Roadrunner.
I agree that it looks like a MOPAR.

Olds64 is online now  
Old January 12th, 2017, 06:49 AM
  #39  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,669
Originally Posted by anthonyP
Not even sure what a Ridler is,
The top award for street rods. You should Google it. Last year's winner was a 1939 Olds street rod that actually had a 455 Olds motor in it.

joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 12th, 2017, 07:01 AM
  #40  
Bfg
Registered User
 
Bfg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 2,049
I think they got the idea from the cow catchers they used to put on the Old General Locomotives!
Bfg is offline  


Quick Reply: Found an Awesome Rear Bumper Idea



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:38 AM.