Is this a real 442?
#3
#8
Just an Olds Guy
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
There isn't any drip line trim on the car. It was RPO option B80 and also required RPO B85. It was included automatically on RPO C08 which is vinyl roof. Also, unless this car shows PNT 19 19 it's someones repaint special (which is highly likely) as none of the A body cars in 72 offered black as a color choice.
#9
I'm afraid you have that backwards. You could order RPO B80 drip rail molding by itself. If you wanted B85 sill molding, then B80 was also required. Maybe you meant to say that B80 "also WAS required WITH RPO B85". Note also that this only applied to the Cutlass S models (body code 3677 and 3687). The B85 sill moldings were not available on the Cutlass models (body code 3287). Back to the car in the first post, if you zoom up on the photo, it appears that there is a push-on vinyl edge molding on the unpainted drip rails. Look closely at the corner where the A-pillar transitions to the roof - you can see that this vinyl molding is wrinkled as it goes around the corner. Factory stainless trim was three pieces with a separate angled corner piece to fit that transition. It's also obvious that the window fuzzies at the sill have been replaced with poor repros, since they are also wrinkled going up the curve at the rear quarter windows. Of course the side pinstripes are not correct for a 442 either. I'm not trying to pick this apart, but it has clearly been redone and is not a real 442.
#10
brother in law was given a red one like that when he graduated from college.but his was a bench seat.350 2bbl single exhaust.i still have the 7a heads.
#11
the drip rail stainless was an option I believe. Sorry I pulled this page up and got distracted for about 45 minutes and did not know this had already been addressed.
Last edited by oldspackrat; September 15th, 2018 at 09:31 AM.
#12
Just an Olds Guy
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
#13
Just an Olds Guy
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
#14
#15
Just an Olds Guy
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
I do have to admit that there appears to be controversy about this topic in the product information Brochure. The Cutlass (3F87)which isn't even listed to have B80 appears to have it in this product display, and no B85 with it either. I guess it comes down to whether the SPECS or Brochure are on the same page so to speak
#16
I do have to admit that there appears to be controversy about this topic in the product information Brochure. The Cutlass (3F87)which isn't even listed to have B80 appears to have it in this product display, and no B85 with it either. I guess it comes down to whether the SPECS or Brochure are on the same page so to speak
#17
Just an Olds Guy
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Posts: 24,525
Yes, I saw that too but elected only to post the SPECS portion. Says the same thing. Actually though the 32 series cars DID have the option for B80 molding, but it was Sedans and Cruisers, not coupes. IMO a lot of people just like the look of the roof line stainless and added it for aesthetics more than anything. I have both the B80 and B85 for my 3687. Interesting that the B80 is stainless while the B85 is anodized aluminum. To me that makes no sense.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post