The Newbie Forum The place where you should introduce yourself. Do not ask technical questions here, use the site forum sections.

Help. new here. 350 sits to low and to far to the left

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January 22nd, 2013, 08:12 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Markopolo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 10
Help. new here. 350 sits to low and to far to the left

I'm trying to finish reassembling a 1970 w31 after putting on core support I went to see how the fan shroud was fitting it was hitting the fan on the bottom so I took out the rubber isolatores under the core support but shroud still hitting the fan at bottom. It has the proper 2261 motor mounts and the prober 350 mounts I'm baffled any ideas? Thanks mark
Markopolo1 is offline  
Old January 22nd, 2013, 08:42 AM
  #2  
Administrator
 
oldcutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Poteau, Ok
Posts: 40,801
Trans mount, xmember?
oldcutlass is offline  
Old January 22nd, 2013, 09:58 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
brown7373's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Fort Pierce, FL
Posts: 1,124
Too low could be a trans mount that is too tall, causing the engine to be tilted forward (down) slightly. But too far to the left? Is the engine actually to the left, or is the radiator support not aligned properly? Is it slightly high and to the right, which would cause the fan to hit on the bottom and be to the left, in respect to the shroud.

I saw an Olds changed from 3 row core to 4 and the original top plate was modified, and the shroud sat too high and the fan rubbed at the bottom.
brown7373 is offline  
Old January 22nd, 2013, 05:55 PM
  #4  
GM Enthusiast
 
OLD SKL 69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 3,982
Originally Posted by brown7373
Too low could be a trans mount that is too tall, causing the engine to be tilted forward (down) slightly. But too far to the left? Is the engine actually to the left, or is the radiator support not aligned properly? Is it slightly high and to the right, which would cause the fan to hit on the bottom and be to the left, in respect to the shroud.
I was also thinking that the support was not centered. Also, are the mounts for the front radiator support too thick or the wrong ones?
OLD SKL 69 is offline  
Old January 23rd, 2013, 07:51 AM
  #5  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Markopolo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 10
Originally Posted by oldcutlass
Trans mount, xmember?
Hello trans mount x member apear to all be fine. Thanks for the suggestion. Mark
Markopolo1 is offline  
Old January 23rd, 2013, 08:00 AM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Markopolo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 10
Originally Posted by brown7373
Too low could be a trans mount that is too tall, causing the engine to be tilted forward (down) slightly. But too far to the left? Is the engine actually to the left, or is the radiator support not aligned properly? Is it slightly high and to the right, which would cause the fan to hit on the bottom and be to the left, in respect to the shroud.

I saw an Olds changed from 3 row core to 4 and the original top plate was modified, and the shroud sat too high and the fan rubbed at the bottom.
Hello the motor measures 1/2" off center in the frame. Core support is centerd in frame. it's the original 4 bar core support. It seems to
Be in the motor mounts but they show to be corect. Any idea how much clearence I should have between oil pan and cross member? At the very front I have a little less than 1/2" thanks for your suggestions mark
Markopolo1 is offline  
Old January 23rd, 2013, 08:37 AM
  #7  
morgan
 
pogo69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 1,925
sounds like one or more of your parts are not correct for the application...double check your parts making sure you dont have something from another year or different car you should have a process of elimination...a 72 core support or a 68 mount for example could make a big difference
pogo69 is offline  
Old January 23rd, 2013, 09:54 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Octania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
This must be the uber-rare Cutlass Supreme with the OFFSET ENGINE that the header companies measured to check header fitment, thus the warning that 68-72 headers WILL NOT FIT SUPREMES!!!



My '68 had shroud interference also, at the bottom; I solved it with a saw.

Back then you could just grab another shroud, not so now.
Octania is offline  
Old January 23rd, 2013, 05:51 PM
  #9  
Old(s) Fart
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 47,716
Let's recap. The 2261 mounts are correct. If you have the original frame mounts bolted in the correct locations on the crossmember, then the engine CANNOT physically be in the wrong place. I'm 99.99% sure you DO have the correct frame mounts, because if you had the 69-72 BBO frame mounts, the oil pan would have hit the crossmember before you could get the bolt in the motor mount.

Having established that, here are the other potential sources of trouble.

1) Trans crossmember and mount. If the rear of the trans is too high and offset, this will slew the front of the motor the other way. Look at the bottom flange of the frame. I have one car where an idiot P.O. jacked the car under the open section of the frame rail, deforming it where the crossmember bolts. This caused exactly the problem of the rear of the trans sitting too high. Note also that the crossmember may be tweaked.

2) Core support in the wrong place. New rubber mounts can cause it to sit higher, raising the bottom of the shroud.

3) Shroud not installed properly. Are you sure the bottom mounts for the shroud are not distorted and that the bottom of the shroud is installed in them properly.

4) Incorrect shroud or fan.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old January 24th, 2013, 10:44 AM
  #10  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Markopolo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 10
hello trans crossmember looks good, the core support is center of fram holes and sqere off the fire wall and all this miss alingment and i dont even have the rubbers under core support, the fan shroud has 69-70 stamped on it, any ideas how i could conferm this is a 1970 core support? i dont see anything stamped any were on it. here are some photos
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
CIMG1646.JPG (211.8 KB, 42 views)
File Type: jpg
CIMG1652.JPG (214.2 KB, 39 views)
File Type: jpg
CIMG1653.JPG (213.7 KB, 39 views)
File Type: jpg
CIMG1654.JPG (211.9 KB, 40 views)
File Type: jpg
CIMG1655.JPG (213.4 KB, 40 views)
Markopolo1 is offline  
Old January 24th, 2013, 11:34 AM
  #11  
morgan
 
pogo69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 1,925
the mount looks ok the fan looks ok the shroud (69 71? looks like) does not look like it is sitting right, is the support bent? like joe said the trans mount could be tweaked also,...seems like you can rule out fan blade and motor mount so your narrowing it down
pogo69 is offline  
Old January 24th, 2013, 11:41 AM
  #12  
morgan
 
pogo69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 1,925
i have to think support or shroud are not correct for each other (or installed incorrectly) thats all i can think...
pogo69 is offline  
Old January 24th, 2013, 12:00 PM
  #13  
"Car"mudgeon
 
GAOldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Perry, GA
Posts: 5,191
Must be the car that Hooker and Hedman headers measured
GAOldsman is offline  
Old January 24th, 2013, 01:58 PM
  #14  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Markopolo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 10
I would like to thank you all for all of your suggestion. I just left a guys house that has a 70 cutlass to take some mesurments all mesurments I took conferm I have a 70 core support. Doing some more measuring his motor is 1/2" off center to the right of the frame just the opposite of mine wich is 1/2"off center to the left. Is the a difrence in right and left motor mounts?
Thanks mark
Markopolo1 is offline  
Old January 24th, 2013, 02:20 PM
  #15  
morgan
 
pogo69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: CT
Posts: 1,925
my understanding is the mounts are the same for A body,if they are original mounts, if they are new mounts anything could be possible as far as one be slightly off.but they should be the same
pogo69 is offline  
Old January 24th, 2013, 02:43 PM
  #16  
"Car"mudgeon
 
GAOldsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Perry, GA
Posts: 5,191
Sounds like something is out, kind of need good clear pics to see what exactly you are saying. If the car hasn't been hacked on or tweaked by an accident the engine should sit centered between the frame rails.
GAOldsman is offline  
Old January 24th, 2013, 04:16 PM
  #17  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Markopolo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 10
Ya that's what I would think. I'm running out of ideas frustrated. Thanks mark
Markopolo1 is offline  
Old January 25th, 2013, 09:25 AM
  #18  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Markopolo1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 10
Any one know what size fan it should have for this 1970 w31 I see we're there is a 17-1/2" fan Avalible for this year and it's running a 19" fan
Markopolo1 is offline  
Old January 25th, 2013, 08:01 PM
  #19  
GM Enthusiast
 
OLD SKL 69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 3,982
I don't know the answer to whether or not the 19" fan size is correct for your application, but certainly a smaller fan will probably correct your issue. It still makes me wonder why your cars engine is off center in the other direction. Did you check the trans mount and support as Joe P suggested?
OLD SKL 69 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
arod40
Chassis/Body/Frame
4
August 27th, 2022 06:20 AM
1yesfan
Eighty-Eight
13
June 12th, 2015 06:49 PM
viper771
Other Oldsmobiles
12
February 15th, 2013 07:38 PM
88ToroSteven
General Questions
2
December 25th, 2011 01:37 PM
jpaulwhite
Ninety-Eight
3
August 3rd, 2010 08:35 PM



Quick Reply: Help. new here. 350 sits to low and to far to the left



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 10:55 PM.