11.5 comp, solid roller, 959 production block, not filled, solid roller, 781 GM oval ports, Edelbrock Vic Jr ported, 1000 HP 1 inch, kick out pan, tested on Q-16.

 

Obviously a BB Chevy - and why do we need to know this?

 

Well Rickman because he's pretty full of himself.

O.K. it just keeps getting better, now you're at .33 bsfc.
***** why don't you just do it at 70 degrees, why run it all the way up to 111, wow that's hot!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
So according to your dyno sheet, if this was fuel injected you're saying I can make 820hp with less than 40#/hr injectors. Man are you full of shyt!! I made 620 with 42's on a 427 Ford Windsor with Yates heads, and the injectors were at about 90% of duty cycle. I'd be happy to send you the cal. Wow, this just keeps getting better!!!!!!!!!!!!

Talk about bullshyt numbers.

Whatever.

 

The fuel flow numbers are from the observed HP @ 6400 feet. Never the less it pushed this 3870 pound streeter well into the 9s, on bias plys, so how much HP is that. LOL

 

Got a time slip and/or video, I've asked for that numerous times as well, still nothing.

Here's the 427. Be happy to send you the cal. Notice the Accel Gen 7 box, of which I'm a dealer for. I'm sure I can get the dyno sheet. But I do have the cal in my computor, and from that you can compute hp within 5% or so. Oh yeah, that's right you wouldn't know what you were looking at.

 

So it's observed not corrected? I still want to see a timeslip and/or video. I've asked for that many times before, still nothing.

Quite frankly I don't believe it, anyone else want to chime in?

 

Here you go....TEEBONES Chevelle
Finally made it to the track 1/8 mile. I got a really good day to tune on the motor and mess with the shock adjustments. Base line run 1.40 60' 404 6.31 108.01.
Pulled sum jet out slowed down. Started putting jet back in it and it was picking up pretty good.
1.38
3.99
6.27
108.37
Went full loose on the shock and full tight on rebound.
Up a jet next pass.
1.37
3.92
6.21
108.93
I ran a few pass's right around these same numbers trying a few things out. The best pass was my last tightened up the ext, on the shocks 2lbs of air out of the slicks.
1.35
3.89
6.20
109.01
Loaded up came home got the car out of the trailer and took it get ice cream lol. Very happy 4 a big pig it gets after it pretty well.
Gotta go off to the Nationals game hope to get 1 out of there from the Birds!
__________________
68 Chevelle
Vortecpro Race Engines
505 N/A
6.20@109.1 1/8
3870lbs w/d

 

Heres a 467 that made 799 hp on the BS dyno.....awww LOLhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n59aP...ature=youtu.be I got more if you want.............

 

Uhh I didn't see a time, the camera conveniently panned away just in time LOL!!!!!!

 

O.K is this a real time sheet? No, or just your bullshyt numbers. How about a real time slip and/or video that will remove all doubt. This is 1/8th mile, you said sub 10.00's in the 1/4 mile, so what validity does this have? You have my word I'll apologize and be quiet once the truth is posted, promise.

 

It wasnt me filming the car, pretty well know car though, good luck with that. Mark, if this is hard for you to believe, just consider this, maybe you should watch and learn like Ive said before, is that too much, its only for your own benefit, think about it, just sayin.........

 

Tony Troboli posting his track times 6.2 X 1.57=9.73I got more videos.

 

You have to be a former politician, you have to be.
Wow, so still no vid, still no authentic timeslip. O.k., I think I've made my point.

By the way, my all original 72 convertible runs 11's with a nearly stock 350 that makes 500+hp. But all I can do is post some bullshyt numbers, but maybe my blind aunt can attest to it.

Have a nice evening. Done here.

 

Why are we tying up bandwidth on classicoldsmobile dot com with dyno results for chevy engines?.

No offense but this has no place here. No one cares.

 

At least he put it in the non-olds powered section...but I don't care about the engine. I remember another guy trolling the site a while back talking about how awesome his Chubby engines were just to get a rise out of the members here. It's kind of pointless. Ignore it unless it's your thing. Until Mark started in on him about his dyno this thread was virtually unnoticed.

 

Actually Mark you requested the dyno test, you forgot that part. Making your point, well not exactly, heres a video from a few years ago when the car went 5.97 in the 1/8, of course now hes working with some 5.85s, but for your viewing pleasure............ Now how about some videos of your engines at the track, have you ever been to the track? Heres another Notice the peddling on the launch?

 

Really this is what started this:Originally Posted by VORTECPRO
Milling the divider will make more peak HP with a 750 carb, if you can fit a 1 inch open spacer it will also accomplish the same goal, more peak HP, a 4 hole 1 inch spacer will probably make more average HP, and TQ.
No it won't. With the spacer you're actually adding more plenum area, moreso than just cutting down the divider.

Check out my dyno session with the RPM intake. It had the divider cut down but still picked up 14hp just by adding the spacer.

I wish more people could back their statements with facts. I realize not everyone has access to a dyno, but if you would have thought for a minute I'm sure you would have realized your statement was incorrect.
__________________
'72 Cutlass Supreme Conv., Accel Multiport EFI'd 350, Performer RPM Air-Gapped, Erson Hyd Roller, 200-4R, 3.73 Posi. Engine builder and Accel DFI, Erson, and Lunati cams dealer, EFI Tech Im on here to talk about my Oldsmobile 455 build, nothing more.

 

I find it quite interesting, but hey I'm the one with the funny looking Chevelle.