What qualifies as a "Land Yacht?"

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old January 13th, 2011, 03:02 PM
  #201  
Registered User
 
64Olds98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pittsburg, KS
Posts: 136
This is the biggest problem with the Holiday. This section of rust behind the rear driver's side door goes all the way through everything thats there. There is a bit on the running board near the BBF trim as well. I guess I can cut it all out and use the LS for a perfect match. I would have to take the front driver's side door off the LS as well due to a horrible old bondo repair.

Attached Images
File Type: jpg
rust.jpg (118.0 KB, 133 views)
64Olds98 is offline  
Old January 19th, 2011, 01:17 PM
  #202  
Registered User
 
64Olds98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pittsburg, KS
Posts: 136
Originally Posted by delmontcrusier
do you have any pic's of the second car posted.Many times it is easier to exchange interior but depends.I for instance have one car that has little to no interior so I will have to figure out what I want to do.The blue one doesn't look all that bad but body work can be a real pain and doesn't always hold up here in the rust belt of ny.My blue 67 has rust issues that need to taken care of but the funds arn't there.
Here are some pics of the LS. It was originally white, now a lovely brown primer.






64Olds98 is offline  
Old January 19th, 2011, 05:27 PM
  #203  
67 heavy metal
 
delmontcrusier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 527
not a bad looking car my olds was white origionally.I like it better blue though.Do you know what color your going with or do you plan to repaint the light blue on the one you are fixing.
delmontcrusier is offline  
Old January 19th, 2011, 09:59 PM
  #204  
Registered User
 
64Olds98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pittsburg, KS
Posts: 136
Originally Posted by delmontcrusier
not a bad looking car my olds was white origionally.I like it better blue though.Do you know what color your going with or do you plan to repaint the light blue on the one you are fixing.
Well, I haven't quite decided which to do. If I end up going with the Holiday I will definitely repaint it blue. It was repainted in the 70s by the owner. He worked for Chrysler so it was repainted in their blue which is surprisingly similar. It has bad repair work on it though, the driver's door has a huge crack in the bondo and the rocker trim is held on with a wood screw. There is essentially no rust on the LS though, just a lovely rust colored primer. I was considering black if I decide to go with that one. Wife says I can only have one, so I'm in the process of deciding
64Olds98 is offline  
Old January 20th, 2011, 08:44 PM
  #205  
67 heavy metal
 
delmontcrusier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 527
Oh I know of redneck repairs seen many and have done a few over time to get by in a pinch.I didn't have much in the funds dept when I did my blue car it needed metal work but had to do bondo for the time being and that never holds up in NY.What ever you decide should be decent in the end and as long as you enjoy it and drive it thats all that matters.
delmontcrusier is offline  
Old January 21st, 2011, 04:29 AM
  #206  
Registered User
 
Destructor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Braintree, Mass
Posts: 729
One of my early cars was a beautiful 1971 Caddy Coupe Deville that I bought soon after college. Caddy two doors were the same size as the 4 doors. From looking at an early 70's 98 at a cruise night it appeared that they were roughly the same size.
Destructor is offline  
Old March 19th, 2011, 05:29 PM
  #207  
Registered User
 
stranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 94
which body is in better overall condition, the LS or the Holiday? I would go with the one that had the best overall body and just work from there.. Just my 2-cents...

I always liked those 6-window sedans over the Holiday Sedans... GM tried to mimick that design (somewhat) in '75 and '76 with the B and C-body cars with that rear quarter window...
stranger is offline  
Old May 8th, 2011, 09:00 PM
  #208  
Registered User
 
bammax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mansfield, Ma
Posts: 94
Blue one is a '73 Buick Electra "duece and a quarter". Those who think the 80-85 cars qualify as huge are sadly mistaken. The '84 Lesabre almost disapears between the other 2 cars. The red one is a '94 Caprice of the '91-'96 bubble b-body family and it's much longer than the '84 is.

By the way the Blue car is a Buick 455/th400, the brown car has the Olds 307 with a 200-4r, and the red car has the Chevy L99 4.3 V8 (baby LT1) with a 4l60e.

carline2.jpg
bammax is offline  
Old May 9th, 2011, 10:17 AM
  #209  
Registered User
 
stranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 94
^^^^
that 91-96 Caprice is the same length as the 1977-1985 Buick LeSabre, Olds 88, and Pontiac Bonneville, as well as the 1977-90 Chevrolet Caprice, and 1983-86 Pontiac Parisienne... The rounded body just gives it a "longer" appearance... The B sedans from 1977-1996 rode on a 115.9 inch wheelbase with overall length of 212"-215"... The differences in length were in bumper changes
stranger is offline  
Old May 9th, 2011, 12:21 PM
  #210  
Registered User
 
bammax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mansfield, Ma
Posts: 94
The chassis stayed the same but the body definitely grew in '91. They basically dropped a longer, wider, rounder body on the old chassis and called it a day. That's the reason why the 91+ cars have the rear wheels almost tucked into the rear doors. Also the reason why the rear windows only go down half way, there just wasn't enough room in the bottom of the door to put them all the way down. The '94 was almost a foot longer than the '84 was. A few inches wider too. That's based on me actually owning them and parking them together on a fairly regular basis.

When I scrapped the '84 it weighted in at 4,160 with me, and 1/8th tank of gas, and the fullsize spare and jack in the trunk. Since I'm 190 that makes the car a tad bit under 4,000 pounds. Not a light weight, but not far removed from the midsize cars of a few years earlier and a few years later.

I would say that the 77-85 C-bodies count, but if you include the B bodies from those years you also have to include the 91-96 B-bodies. And of course the 91-96 D-body which was pretty huge by any standards.
bammax is offline  
Old May 9th, 2011, 03:22 PM
  #211  
Registered User
 
stranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 94
Originally Posted by bammax
The chassis stayed the same but the body definitely grew in '91. They basically dropped a longer, wider, rounder body on the old chassis and called it a day. That's the reason why the 91+ cars have the rear wheels almost tucked into the rear doors. Also the reason why the rear windows only go down half way, there just wasn't enough room in the bottom of the door to put them all the way down. The '94 was almost a foot longer than the '84 was. A few inches wider too. That's based on me actually owning them and parking them together on a fairly regular basis.

When I scrapped the '84 it weighted in at 4,160 with me, and 1/8th tank of gas, and the fullsize spare and jack in the trunk. Since I'm 190 that makes the car a tad bit under 4,000 pounds. Not a light weight, but not far removed from the midsize cars of a few years earlier and a few years later.

I would say that the 77-85 C-bodies count, but if you include the B bodies from those years you also have to include the 91-96 B-bodies. And of course the 91-96 D-body which was pretty huge by any standards.
Numbers speak for themselves... Here you go, so figure from here:

Length: Fleetwood - 225 (increased from 221), Roadmaster - 215.8, Caprice - 214.1 (previous B-Body 77-85 215.7)...
stranger is offline  
Old May 9th, 2011, 04:19 PM
  #212  
Registered User
 
bammax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Mansfield, Ma
Posts: 94
Originally Posted by stranger
Numbers speak for themselves... Here you go, so figure from here:

Length: Fleetwood - 225 (increased from 221), Roadmaster - 215.8, Caprice - 214.1 (previous B-Body 77-85 215.7)...
Sure are argumentative aren't you . I could care less about numbers pulled from a book. I've owned and driven them and know first hand. The sizes are not the same no matter who the author is. All they have to do is get them together and it becomes obvious. That's how we found out that the wagon is noticably longer than the sedan. The book says it's alot closer than it really is.

By the way the Fleetwood is stretched 6" at the rear door for greater rear legroom. Side by side the Fleetwood and Caprice are actually about 7" different, not the 10" that your chart shows.
bammax is offline  
Old May 9th, 2011, 05:11 PM
  #213  
Registered User
 
stranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 94
I'm glad to hear you've owned and driven them.... and parked them side by side, and measured them end to end... But the General built these cars, and his measuring tape is more acurate than your parking them end to end... And yes the wagons have always been longer than the sedans... They are 2 inches longer.... But there's no need in arguing with someone who has the ruler out for every car they see in the parking lot... And as for the Fleetwood, the C/D RWD body has always been a stetched version of the B platform since 1959...

But I won't argue anymore since you're ruler must be longer than the Generals...
stranger is offline  
Old October 5th, 2011, 05:20 AM
  #214  
Registered User
 
steve e summer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North East New Jersey
Posts: 64
Okay I'll toss in my two cents. Someone made mention of it (along with other qaulifiers) but I think the core principal is sound. ANY CAR EIGHTEEN FEET OR LONGER.
steve e summer is offline  
Old October 5th, 2011, 05:38 AM
  #215  
Registered User
 
stranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 94
Originally Posted by steve e summer
O ANY CAR EIGHTEEN FEET OR LONGER.
Just sold my '93 Roadmaster and I know it was just a few inches shy of an 18 foot... So she didn't qualify...
stranger is offline  
Old October 5th, 2011, 05:42 AM
  #216  
Registered User
 
DreWRoolZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Richmond, Va, USA
Posts: 190
my 60 88 is a land yacht but the 67 cadillac fleetwood i used to have was a land cruise ship lol i miss that car!
DreWRoolZ is offline  
Old October 5th, 2011, 06:16 AM
  #217  
Registered User
 
stranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 94
Originally Posted by DreWRoolZ
my 60 88 is a land yacht but the 67 cadillac fleetwood i used to have was a land cruise ship lol i miss that car!
A 57-58 98 was about the same length as a Crown Vic while the 88 models were only 208" long... Comparing those to todays "big cars", the current style Lincoln Town Car would look huge...
stranger is offline  
Old January 25th, 2012, 01:54 PM
  #218  
REO
Registered User
 
REO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 23
Plenty debate on cut off date, but what about the start? Some consider the 49-51 88s to be muscle cars. So would that mean 52 or 54 for the 88s?

Top 3 longest non limo cars are 76 Fleetwood Brougham, 73 Lebaron, and 78 Town Car.
REO is offline  
Old January 26th, 2012, 03:15 AM
  #219  
Registered User
 
stranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 94
Originally Posted by REO
Top 3 longest non limo cars are 76 Fleetwood Brougham, 73 Lebaron, and 78 Town Car.
1979 was the last year for the big Lincoln but it wasn't a "Town Car", those were a Continental. The "Town Car" was an interior trim package on the Continental Sedan and coupe through 1980. Wasn't until 1981 that the Town Car became a stand alone model....
stranger is offline  
Old January 27th, 2012, 07:16 AM
  #220  
REO
Registered User
 
REO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 23
I know, I've had two of them. There also was the Town Coupe.

What year 98s you looking for? Might have one for sale soon, and my uncle is selling his '83 coupe.
REO is offline  
Old January 28th, 2012, 12:49 AM
  #221  
Registered User
 
stranger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 94
right now - guess plans for "any" older car are on hold... finances just got pretty tight this last week...

I also had a 1978 and 79 Lincoln - a 78 with Town Car package and the 79 was just a 4-door Lincoln Continental Sedan...
stranger is offline  
Old January 28th, 2012, 05:53 PM
  #222  
Registered User
 
landbarge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 10
our car is 19' 6" and 6' wide... it has been called lad yacht sooo many times. lol. i would say anything over 15 feet would be land yacht material...
landbarge is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
lazy394
General Discussion
28
August 20th, 2012 04:47 AM
Allan R
General Discussion
4
November 8th, 2011 10:27 PM
jeffreyalman
General Discussion
15
July 1st, 2010 05:26 AM
bigoldscruiser
Cars For Sale
8
September 9th, 2009 08:55 AM



Quick Reply: What qualifies as a "Land Yacht?"



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 04:13 PM.