425 Olds in Buick 63 wagon.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 14, 2019 | 02:53 PM
  #1  
RocketRonnie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 407
From: , CA
425 Olds in Buick 63 wagon.

Im going to be putting a 425 Olds and th400 in a 63 Buick Lesabre Wagon which is the same as a dynamic 88 wagon. Well I will be updating the journey and asking question on the 425.

The engine is supposedly rebuilt but who knows.

Any advice will be very helpful if anyone has done such a swap
Old Jan 14, 2019 | 02:59 PM
  #2  
RocketRonnie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 407
From: , CA


When I opened up the valves.
Old Jan 14, 2019 | 03:03 PM
  #3  
RocketRonnie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 407
From: , CA


Old Jan 14, 2019 | 03:05 PM
  #4  
RocketRonnie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 407
From: , CA
I like how the wagons taillights are the same as the 63 cutlass's i used to own, full circle.
Old Jan 14, 2019 | 07:09 PM
  #5  
Kennybill's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,972
From: Braceville, Ohio
Looks like it wasn't oiled/sealed good. I'd try to get a Borescope and look in all the cylinders. The intake looks rusty. Depending on what you find, you might want to pull it apart. Jmo.
Old Jan 15, 2019 | 10:13 AM
  #6  
RocketRonnie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 407
From: , CA
Originally Posted by Kennybill
Looks like it wasn't oiled/sealed good. I'd try to get a Borescope and look in all the cylinders. The intake looks rusty. Depending on what you find, you might want to pull it apart. Jmo.
thanks for your post, what did you mean by not oiled/sealed good?
Old Jan 17, 2019 | 05:00 AM
  #7  
RocketRonnie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 407
From: , CA
Whats are my carb choices. And also what are my HEI choices.

anybody on the board willing to sell me any of thrle above?
Old Jan 17, 2019 | 10:21 AM
  #8  
RocketRonnie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 407
From: , CA
?
Old Jan 17, 2019 | 01:54 PM
  #9  
Kennybill's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,972
From: Braceville, Ohio
Fluid film is a good spray sealer/protector, better than WD30 but wd is better than nothing. 3M has a foil tape that's good.
I'd spay the ports then tape, valley area and the whole valve train. Tape every port/hole,spray inside crankcase/ inside oil pan, valve covers etc if engine is going to sit. Jmo
​​
Old Jan 17, 2019 | 02:20 PM
  #10  
therobski's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 3,191
From: Dallas-Fort Worth
That swap maybe similar to 400-425-455 into a 64 and earlier Big Olds. It's not "plug and play" by any stretch, there are posts here in this Club about this type of project.
Old Jan 17, 2019 | 09:20 PM
  #11  
RocketRonnie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 407
From: , CA
Originally Posted by Kennybill
Fluid film is a good spray sealer/protector, better than WD30 but wd is better than nothing. 3M has a foil tape that's good.
I'd spay the ports then tape, valley area and the whole valve train. Tape every port/hole,spray inside crankcase/ inside oil pan, valve covers etc if engine is going to sit. Jmo
​​
Ok that clears it up for me thanks.
Above you wrote you would tape the valve train. Did you mean spray?
Old Jan 17, 2019 | 09:24 PM
  #12  
RocketRonnie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 407
From: , CA
Originally Posted by therobski
That swap maybe similar to 400-425-455 into a 64 and earlier Big Olds. It's not "plug and play" by any stretch, there are posts here in this Club about this type of project.
Thanks for pointing me in a good direction, ill browse around for info. Is it safe to say I should treat this just like swap in a car with the exception of a longer driveshaft?
Old Jan 18, 2019 | 04:56 AM
  #13  
Kennybill's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,972
From: Braceville, Ohio
Spray inside the intake ports then tape/seal the ports, then spray valley area, valve train area, etc. Tape won't stick to sprayed surface. Any bare metal iis going to rust.
Old Jan 18, 2019 | 08:17 AM
  #14  
Tedd Thompson's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,743
From: Forest Ranch Ca.
You might try and see if it is stuck (turn it over with a socket and a beaker bar), that's a lot of rust for it to not to be in the cylinders. You might just end up with a core rather than a run able engine..... Tedd
Old Jan 18, 2019 | 03:20 PM
  #15  
RocketRonnie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 407
From: , CA
Originally Posted by Tedd Thompson
You might try and see if it is stuck (turn it over with a socket and a beaker bar), that's a lot of rust for it to not to be in the cylinders. You might just end up with a core rather than a run able engine..... Tedd

i will report back after i try rotating the engine.
Old Feb 8, 2019 | 08:53 PM
  #16  
RocketRonnie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 407
From: , CA
What are you guy's opinion on a edelbrock torker 455 intake on a 425. Or any aftermarket intake?

Any dual carb or tri setup?

opinion on stock intake?
Old Feb 9, 2019 | 07:17 AM
  #17  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by RocketRonnie
What are you guy's opinion on a edelbrock torker 455 intake on a 425. Or any aftermarket intake?

Any dual carb or tri setup?

opinion on stock intake?
Let's start with how you intend to use the car. This is a heavy car and likely is never going to be a drag car. I don't know what you've done to the engine, but if it's close to stock internally and your primary use is street driving, I'd use an E-brock Performer dual plane and don't look back. The Torker is a single plane intake designed for higher RPM HP. If the engine rarely sees 5 grand, it's wasted. The only tri-carb setup is the factory L69 intake from 1966. You probably know what those go for. There are only two options for dual quads, the long out-of-production Edelbrock O65 dual plane dual quad and the Offy dual quads that are still in production. Offy sells (or sold) multiple versions of their intake, the single plane 360 degree version and the really goofy 180 degree version. The latter is basically two stacked single plane intakes, one that feeds off the primaries and one that feeds off the secondaries. It should tell you something that in the half a century since Offy came out with this concept, no one has copied it (and any patents ran out 30 years ago). The single plane is horrible from a flow standpoint. It's sole reason to exist is to mill the carb flanges flat and weld on a plate for a 6-71 blower. The E-brock is actually a reasonable street manifold. I ran one on a 455 with dual Carter 500 CFM AFBs and progressive linkage and got 14 MPG in a Cutlass. You can find them on ebay periodically. In all cases, the single quad Performer will make more HP and give better mileage and driveability than any multi-carb setup. The mult-carbs are for show, not go.
Old Feb 9, 2019 | 08:53 AM
  #18  
Jon442's Avatar
Gearhead
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 438
Good luck with the build. I'll be following this thread, since I just picked up a '63 LeSabre wagon myself. Mine will stay with the stock engine and trans, though.
Old Feb 9, 2019 | 09:36 AM
  #19  
RocketRonnie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 407
From: , CA
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Let's start with how you intend to use the car. This is a heavy car and likely is never going to be a drag car. I don't know what you've done to the engine, but if it's close to stock internally and your primary use is street driving, I'd use an E-brock Performer dual plane and don't look back. The Torker is a single plane intake designed for higher RPM HP. If the engine rarely sees 5 grand, it's wasted. The only tri-carb setup is the factory L69 intake from 1966. You probably know what those go for. There are only two options for dual quads, the long out-of-production Edelbrock O65 dual plane dual quad and the Offy dual quads that are still in production. Offy sells (or sold) multiple versions of their intake, the single plane 360 degree version and the really goofy 180 degree version. The latter is basically two stacked single plane intakes, one that feeds off the primaries and one that feeds off the secondaries. It should tell you something that in the half a century since Offy came out with this concept, no one has copied it (and any patents ran out 30 years ago). The single plane is horrible from a flow standpoint. It's sole reason to exist is to mill the carb flanges flat and weld on a plate for a 6-71 blower. The E-brock is actually a reasonable street manifold. I ran one on a 455 with dual Carter 500 CFM AFBs and progressive linkage and got 14 MPG in a Cutlass. You can find them on ebay periodically. In all cases, the single quad Performer will make more HP and give better mileage and driveability than any multi-carb setup. The mult-carbs are for show, not go.
thanks Joe. First off the car would be just likr you said, a street car. Just a strong driver. Appriciate your solid advice, ill pass on the torquer and keep my eye out for what you posted. Any advice on a cam choice... I still want it to be fast on the street.
Old Feb 9, 2019 | 09:40 AM
  #20  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,802
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by RocketRonnie
thanks Joe. First off the car would be just likr you said, a street car. Just a strong driver. Appriciate your solid advice, ill pass on the torquer and keep my eye out for what you posted. Any advice on a cam choice... I still want it to be fast on the street.
Cam choice depends on accessories - A/C or not? Automatic or not? Power brakes or not? Mark Remmel set me up with a nice cam for my 67. I'd talk to him about your needs and intended use. Obviously you'll need to know lifter diameter and bank angle.
Old Feb 9, 2019 | 09:48 AM
  #21  
RocketRonnie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 407
From: , CA
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Cam choice depends on accessories - A/C or not? Automatic or not? Power brakes or not? Mark Remmel set me up with a nice cam for my 67. I'd talk to him about your needs and intended use. Obviously you'll need to know lifter diameter and bank angle.
Thanks Coach!!!! I hope you have a good day Sir.
Old Feb 9, 2019 | 09:51 AM
  #22  
RocketRonnie's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 407
From: , CA
Does the 425 respond better with a 800cfm or 750cfm qjet
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RocketRonnie
Big Blocks
13
Oct 1, 2019 03:20 PM
scott_442
Cars For Sale
10
Jun 14, 2018 05:49 PM
jaunty75
Cars For Sale
3
Aug 30, 2017 10:54 AM
Yellowstatue
Non-Oldsmobile Classified
0
Jul 14, 2014 07:44 PM
ncwitte
Ninety-Eight
0
Apr 18, 2007 12:24 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:14 PM.