General Questions Place to post your questions that don't fit into one of the specific forums below.

HELP PLS! 70 cutlass convert rear seat interchange

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old October 5th, 2010 | 12:30 AM
  #1  
sx455raidercelticfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 555
HELP PLS! 70 cutlass convert rear seat interchange

will a rear seat out of a 70 cutlass supreme hard top fit perfect in a 70 cutlass convertable??? or are convertable and supreme hard top rear seats different?? THANKS
Old October 5th, 2010 | 03:57 AM
  #2  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
A-body convertible seats are narrower than coupe seats because of the extra width of the top mechanism.

- Eric
Old October 5th, 2010 | 06:19 AM
  #3  
sx455raidercelticfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 555
thanks md thats what i was afriad of!! i sold my interior and bought a supreme rear seat dam dam dam!!
Old October 5th, 2010 | 07:40 AM
  #4  
66400's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,393
From: Austin, Tx
Any 68-72 Chevelle, Pontiac Tempest, Olds Cutlass and Buick Skylark series convertible will have the same rear seat.

Henry
Old October 6th, 2010 | 03:38 AM
  #5  
Yellowstatue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,087
From: Too close to Toronto!!
A Supreme has rear armrests the same as a convert, so I would think that the seat would be the same width...I am not going outside right now to measure any
Old October 6th, 2010 | 07:41 PM
  #6  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Convertible vs Coupe Back Seats

Here is a convertible back seat:



Here is a Coupe Back Seat:



Notice how the top mechanism intrudes and makes the convertible rear seat smaller.

- Eric
Old October 7th, 2010 | 04:12 AM
  #7  
Yellowstatue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,087
From: Too close to Toronto!!
Notice that the Supreme coupe has fillers and armrests the same as a convert, thus making them the same size...I am not going out to measure them right now thanks...
Old October 7th, 2010 | 04:27 AM
  #8  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
I have always believed that the seats were different sizes in spite of the stamped steel filler that goes from the plastic armrest to the rear shelf, but I will admit that I never measured them, even during the many years that I had both A-body coupes and convertibles at the same time. Now, with an A-body coupe and a B-body convertible I can't go out and measure them.

If someone else here wants to go out and measure them, or has a parts manual that would confirm the part numbers are the same or different, or can say that they have interchanged them without modification, that would settle this conclusively.

I have always felt absolutely certain that the seats are different sizes, but I would be glad to admit I am a bone-headed moron if, in fact, I am.
Old October 7th, 2010 | 05:10 AM
  #9  
sx455raidercelticfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 555
ive been googling it an dcant get a straight answer some people say they inter change some say they dont! im kinda stuck idont know what 2 do
Old October 7th, 2010 | 07:37 AM
  #10  
Rickman48's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,057
From: Shorewood, Il.
Try it!! Then you'll know for sure!
What do they weigh - like 10-15 lbs.??
Old October 7th, 2010 | 08:23 AM
  #11  
66400's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 1,393
From: Austin, Tx
Originally Posted by 66400
Any 68-72 Chevelle, Pontiac Tempest, Olds Cutlass and Buick Skylark series convertible will have the same rear seat.

Henry
The above information is pretty clear as to interchange however here's info from an Olds parts manual.

70-72 f85 convert series 4267 rear seat back springs part # 9615772

70 f85 Cutlass Supreme 2dr hdtp series 4257 rear seat springs part # 9615771

This refers to the upper rear seat back.
You might also mull over the fact that all repop rear seat covers will show converts to be unique.
Henry
Old October 7th, 2010 | 08:53 AM
  #12  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
'70 Cutlass, huh?

Does your car look anything like THIS:



- Eric
Old October 7th, 2010 | 09:03 PM
  #13  
sx455raidercelticfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 555
rickman i sold all my interior and just bought new int from fusick i dont have the rear panels 2 try it yet!

66400 thanks 4 the info your right its different!! i just looked up teh interior kits supreme and convert have different rear covers

mdchanic i wish my cutlass sx looked like that LOL!!!!! wow poor car!! where did you find that pic?? thats crazy
i just seen that your from maine im from boston all my family still lives back east

Last edited by sx455raidercelticfan; October 7th, 2010 at 09:05 PM.
Old October 7th, 2010 | 09:23 PM
  #14  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by sx455raidercelticfan
where did you find that pic??
I took it myself, in September of 1987.

A buddy of mine drove that car to college from California his sophomore year.
It was painted pink with a roller.
He passed it on to another guy, that guy blew the trans and gave it to me.
I put it up on blocks and changed the trans ($75 from Charlie Molt's junkyard), then drove it for another year before the engine blew.
It had no top, so I had to wear a poncho if it rained.
It also had a high compression 350 and went like a raped ape.

I was driving a 911 Targa at the same time that year, and, let me tell you, the Cutlass was a whole lot more interesting to the girls than the Porsche was.

- Eric
Old October 8th, 2010 | 01:03 AM
  #15  
sx455raidercelticfan's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Posts: 555
I took it myself, in September of 1987



a pink convertable LOL!!!!!!!!!! i wish you still had it in need the back seat
Old October 8th, 2010 | 04:08 AM
  #16  
Yellowstatue's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,087
From: Too close to Toronto!!
Ok; So I went downstairs and measured an armrest for a '68 Supreme @ 3"...an armrest for a '68 convert measures @ 3 5/8" or so... so it seems I am mistaken again then in the parts book Supreme rear bottom cushions are alone '68(7712580) as are converts '68(7788607)...so the converts must be narrower by 1 1/2 inches than a Supreme...shoulda looked in the book first '70 convert rear cushion # 9812344 ....can't find a listing for a '70 Supreme
Old October 8th, 2010 | 04:22 AM
  #17  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by sx455raidercelticfan
a pink convertable LOL!!!!!!!!!!
For us (and the college administration) it was THE Pink Convertible...


Originally Posted by sx455raidercelticfan
i wish you still had it in need the back seat
You wouldn't have wanted it. It was in the weather for years.
The car had practically no interior, and not a single good body panel.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
The_German
Vintage Oldsmobiles
2
July 14th, 2011 03:10 PM
The_German
Vintage Oldsmobiles
3
May 15th, 2011 03:02 PM
sx455raidercelticfan
Electrical
3
May 10th, 2010 01:15 PM
lene
The Newbie Forum
18
April 6th, 2010 05:34 PM
southcarolina803
Cutlass
2
July 2nd, 2008 08:14 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:12 PM.