General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

Is ZDDP a good ingredient in oil??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jan 5, 2014 | 10:11 AM
  #1  
Longhorncutlass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 77
From: Texas
Is ZDDP a good ingredient in oil??

Allan R, you mentioned in another of my threads that my '87 Cutlass was lucky to be able to accept lower levels of ZDDP in its oil. What is ZDDP and is it a good thing or a bad thing for car engines?

I take it the tree hugging environmentalists thought it was harmful to nature so manufacturers are putting less of this compound into newer oils?

Last edited by Longhorncutlass; Jan 5, 2014 at 10:13 AM.
Old Jan 5, 2014 | 10:24 AM
  #2  
Run to Rund's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,026
Zinc diethyldithiophosphate is an anti-wear, anti-scuff additive that is very valuable in oil, especially with flat tappets (mechanical or hydraulic). Many use diesel oils so long as they are also rated on the S (spark ignition) scale because the C (compression ignition) rated oils usually have much more ZDDP.
Old Jan 5, 2014 | 10:55 AM
  #3  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by Longhorncutlass
Is ZDDP a good ingredient in oil??
Yes, for cars with flat-tappet camshafts.



Originally Posted by Longhorncutlass
I take it the tree hugging environmentalists thought it was harmful to nature so manufacturers are putting less of this compound into newer oils?
You take it wrong.

The tree-hugging environmentalists were made sad by the malodorous pall that fell over many US cities at least occasionally (and LA almost all the time), that caused people to cough and wheeze (cf: Chinese cities today, with people wearing respirators as part of their normal daily dress).

The tree-hugging environmentalists prevailed upon the liberal warmonger Johnson Administration, which was in the process of murdering and maiming tens of thousands of Americans and Vietnamese, and which had just passed legislation that would allow black people to vote, and to use white-people water fountains, and had just created socialized medicine (called "Medicare"), to pass legislation that would require that automotive exhaust emissions be reduced.

As the car companies did research to figure out how to accomplish these reductions, they developed the catalytic converter, which removes many harmful things from exhaust gasses, and which is still used to this day.
Unfortunately, as it turns out, the catalytic converter is sensitive to impurities, and can be permanently "poisoned" by even small quantities of certain metals, rendering it useless. Initially, it was clear that lead could do this, and this was one reason why lead was removed from gasoline (the other was an epidemic of lead poisoning in children at that time, which was probably not from lead in car emissions, but that was not completely clear at the time). As time went on, it was discovered that zinc was bad for catalytic converters, too, so the amount of zinc in motor oils has been reduced. This is not harmful to newer cars, because they have roller-tappet cams, but the zinc is an essential lubrication component for flat-tappet motors.

If you google "ZDDP" you will find enough to read on this subject to keep you busy for the next several years.

- Eric
Old Jan 5, 2014 | 11:12 AM
  #4  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by MDchanic
Yes, for cars with flat-tappet camshafts.

As time went on, it was discovered that zinc was bad for catalytic converters, too, so the amount of zinc in motor oils has been reduced. This is not harmful to newer cars, because they have roller-tappet cams, but the zinc is an essential lubrication component for flat-tappet motors.

If you google "ZDDP" you will find enough to read on this subject to keep you busy for the next several years.
Just found this thread but x2 on what Eric said. This topic of ZDDP has been beat to death on this site - all with the same basic conclusions. Bottom line is for your 87 Olds, use whatever brand of new oil you want in the manufacturers specified SAE range - it won't hurt your engine.
Old Jan 5, 2014 | 11:12 AM
  #5  
redoldsman's Avatar
Proud Viet Nam Veteran
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,817
From: Rowlett, TX
Sure seems like a long political answer to a simple question. I specifically remember the "White" and "Colored" water fountains being removed from the Montgomery Ward store in Monroe, LA in the late 50's during the Eisenhower administration. Now let me be clear, I agree with everything else you said.
Old Jan 5, 2014 | 01:30 PM
  #6  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Of course it was a long political answer, Red.
My answer was completely made up of mindless political characterizations (some of which were incompatible with one another), in response to the OP's reference to "tree hugging environmentalists."
Saying that a stereotypical group of people is responsible for a significant change to the chemical composition to a lubricant, with no recourse to historical or technical information, or to further thought, is farcical, so I provided a farcical response.

The point is that you cannot explain a technical engineering change with reference to the political stereotype of your choice. There may be people around who resemble political stereotypes, and those people may have some influence on some policies sometimes, but overall, there are reasons why things happen, and understanding those reasons helps us understand the world around us, including understanding how to best maintain our cars.

- Eric
Old Jan 5, 2014 | 02:08 PM
  #7  
1969w3155's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 9,483
From: Muskegon, Mi.
Weren't the '87 307's using roller rockers, hence no need for ZDDP?
Old Jan 5, 2014 | 07:17 PM
  #8  
2Olds4U's Avatar
Majored in rear tire demo
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 274
From: Hingham, MA
Longhorn, This article may give you a little help understanding the need for it in older engines:
http://www.enginebuildermag.com/2013...80803-83615821

HTH
Old Jan 6, 2014 | 07:54 AM
  #9  
Longhorncutlass's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 77
From: Texas
Allan and 2Olds4U, I appreciate the good information.
Old Jan 6, 2014 | 08:12 AM
  #10  
wmachine's Avatar
Trying to remember member
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,112
From: Ohio
Originally Posted by 2Olds4U
Longhorn, This article may give you a little help understanding the need for it in older engines:
http://www.enginebuildermag.com/2013...80803-83615821
HTH
Decent article, but I totally disagree with him about not using a ZDP additive. If you read it carefully, he does not base his "no additive" stance on anything more than personal conjecture. His notion of not mixing has no basis in fact, when Lubrizol Corp has repeatedly shown that additives *do* get adequately mixed.
Old Jan 6, 2014 | 08:21 AM
  #11  
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 10,110
From: Melville, Saskatchewan
An 87 307 does have roller lifters, any oil is fine. I can still find some older diesel oils and can get expensive ZDDP additives here. My cheap convient source for high ZDDP oil is gone. But according to some tests, ZDDP is only somewhat important in wear resistance. The whole additive package and how the oil is made is more important. Any original, non performance Olds V8 with factory tiny cam and worn out springs won't need it anyways.
Old Jan 6, 2014 | 05:51 PM
  #12  
2Olds4U's Avatar
Majored in rear tire demo
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 274
From: Hingham, MA
Originally Posted by wmachine
Decent article, but I totally disagree with him about not using a ZDP additive. If you read it carefully, he does not base his "no additive" stance on anything more than personal conjecture. His notion of not mixing has no basis in fact, when Lubrizol Corp has repeatedly shown that additives *do* get adequately mixed.
That is a possibility, Kurt. It is his perspective. My reason for posting was to give Longhorn some information pertaining to his vehicle and not necessarily gospel for today's vehicles.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dan Wirth
General Discussion
118
Jun 17, 2019 12:08 PM
oldcutlass
General Discussion
39
Apr 21, 2012 10:10 AM
Rickman48
Transmission and Driveline
5
Apr 13, 2012 10:05 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 07:28 AM.