General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

To R12a or Not to R12a?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old June 19th, 2017, 10:14 AM
  #41  
Registered User
 
Junkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northeast Connecticut
Posts: 782
It has been a while since I have looked at this thread, so I will respond on some of the older posts with comments interspersed, but not in the order that they were posted.




Originally Posted by Olds64
I know this is an old thread; however, I'm considering updating the AC on my new 86 Ford f250, pics to come for those who care. Once I update the AC on my truck, I would also update the AC on my Olds.

Apparently, R12 isn't cheap:
http://www.ebay.com/itm/R-12-Refrige...tXSvYt&vxp=mtr

No, it isn't inexpensive, but the labor involved is the greater expense, even if you are doing it yourself. If you think that your time is free, then consider what you might be doing with those hours, if you weren't fixing your air conditioner for the 2nd, or 3rd or more time.

Originally Posted by Olds64

I have no idea what R12A actually is, and once you install it, you will have "contaminated" the entire system with this "new" refrigerant. I have a strong suspicion that it might be one of the newer propane derivative gasses. If for any reason you need to service the system, once you use a gas that isn't widely accepted, no one will be willing to collect this gas, and you will have no choice but to vent it to the atmosphere. I did read the manufacturers statements as to it meeting the UN Montreal Protocol, and the statement ....


Originally Posted by from Amazon
Convenient package contains everything needed to properly charge an A/C system quickly and accurately. Kit includes: 2 cans RED TEK 12a Refrigerant, 1 can RED TEK LeakStop, 1 High Side Fitting,1 Low Side Fitting, 1 Installation Hose Kit (manufacturer reserves right to package differently should packaging materials run out of stock), Installation Instructions, Conversion Charts, Decals, MSDS Sheet Not a replacement for ozone depleting substances in the U.S. IMPORTANT INFORMATION: This product cannot be returned to Amazon.com because it uses flammable liquids and gases, is classified as a hazardous material, or meets other criteria. This is a non refundable, non returnable product.
Originally Posted by Olds64
I'm wondering, if I flush the system and replace the hoses and drier would there be any reason to run a "stop leak" product through the system? Here is a flush kit:
https://www.amazon.com/FJC-2710-Syst...mpressor+flush

I strongly recommend that you use a good quality air conditioning flush, noting that items such as mufflers, receiver drier, and the compressor, cannot be flushed. Flushing is specifically recommended for the evaporator, condenser, and straight through hoses. I wouldn't use a stop leak, since it is more than likely it will gum up the system and cause you more problems than it might cure. A properly serviced system should be tight enough to hold a vacuum and a pressure test prior to installing the refrigerant.

Originally Posted by Olds64
I'm not concerned about the flammability of r12a. If it's good enough for Canadians and Germans it's good enough for me. I'm not concerned about EPA regulations either. However, I wouldn't rule out r134a if there was way to convert my system successfully.
Thanks for your input.

Having owned a number of Mercedes, I can say first hand that just because the Germans used a product that doesn't mean that it is a good product. I owned a 1995 E320, which has a wire harness that was "biodegradable", and it started cracking and shorting out wires before it was out of warranty. Mercedes solution at the time was to individually wrap every wire under the hood. At that time, they had no other solution for the problem. That solution lasted long enough for the car to be out of warranty, but failed shortly there after. Mercedes refused to replace the wire harness, and said that it was a maintenance item. They said the same thing when the rubber air conditioning hoses failed.

Originally Posted by Olds64
I want to make sure the time and money I put into a system conversion would have good results. I already know that r134a does not cool sufficiently in a r12 system. I put r134a in the AC system of my 90 Buick Estate wagon years ago and it never worked very well. Is there a way to use r134a without buying a completely aftermarket system (i.e. Vintage Air)? I've heard that r134a needs an oversized evaporator if you put it in an r12 system. If so, how do I determine what size evaporator would be needed and where do I buy it?

Stick with good quality used GM or NOS, and forget about trying to retrofit R134A into a system that wasn't designed for that gas. I believe that this is why GM/Ford/Chrysler/etc. never manufactured retrofit kits for use in their cars of previous years.



Originally Posted by Leadfoot
I obviously need a much better anti-MAW helmet...

When I had the system evacuated and replaced the receiver/drier, the old oil collected resembled 40 weight mixed with coca-cola. Although a very close examination revealed no metal particles, something clearly has affected the system oil in a pretty ugly way.

This is an indication that the system had previously serviced, and improperly evacuated, and was contaminated with moisture. Some shops don't use virgin refrigerant, and install the refrigerant that they have collected from doing evacuations. It could also be a result of cross contamination of refrigerant oils. It would take an oil analyst to determine the exact cause. This is the reasoning behind flushing an old system that you have no history of its past service life.

Originally Posted by Leadfoot
Further, when I decided to replace the service port Schrader valves, the old high side valve came apart, with the body of the valve stuck in the port. I could not manage to remove it without damaging the port body. So my plan has changed. Right now the system is sealed up and holding at 5 psi, with nitrogen in place of R12, while I wait for new parts to arrive.

At this point, I think it's prudent to replace some of the 46 year old original stuff just because it's gotta be getting tired (like the port valve). I will not convert to R134a, but whatever hardware I replace will be R134a compatible, even though, for the time being, I see no good reason to convert to R134a.

I have a new (3) hose set and O-rings on the way from Original Air and a spare (new) receiver/drier on the shelf. I'll also replace the compressor. Although the Four Seasons A6 compressor that's in the car now seems OK and doesn't (measurably) leak oil or refrigerant, it's at least 25 years old, and now is a good time to replace it. I'm thinking the new compressor will be a Pro6Ten from Old Air Products. Keeping things 100% original under the hood has become a lot less important to me than having a system that works and lasts. I haven't ordered the compressor yet, so any comments or opinions about this are very welcome.

I'll flush the system, and as long as I'm replacing things, I'll replace the TXV. Does anybody have an opinion on the $15 Four Seasons TXV available from AutoZone vs the $60+ TXV from Old Air and others? Is this just a case of price gouging, or is there really a price-justifiable difference?

I'll test the POA valve, and I'll keep the original evaporator and probably the condenser. MAW issues may change my mind about the condenser, but I'm convinced that both coils are still in good condition, and a good flushing should be all they require.

Any opinions from you wrench heads who've already gotten into this are very welcome.

Incidentally, this thread is no longer about R12a...

The quality of the materials in some of the reproduction air conditioning condensers and evaporators is no where the quality of the original GM parts. Find NOS whenever you can, and they will always out perform the reproductions.

Originally Posted by Koda
I find r134a to cool sufficiently in an r12 system. It does not cool to original specs, but it does work. My vehicle with r134a in a r12 system was converted in 02, needed a charge in 09, and a charge in 15, and it will put out mid 60s air on max on a 100 degree day. It should be putting out 30s or so, but it does work enough for me.


It will go back to R-12 during a restoration some years down the road.


If you are planning on returning to R12 at some time in the future, start collecting all the necessary part now, since they are going to get harder to find in the future. In many instances getting the R134A fittings off of the R12 fittings is going to be difficult, if not impossible. Originally, they had barbs that would dig into the original threads if you tried to remove them. I have been told that the newer ones don't have this feature, but never having done a conversion in recent years, I can't say for sure. After having done a few conversions from R12 to R134A, with mediocre success of sufficient cooling, I realized that the savings of R134A wasn't worth the extra work to put it back to R12 when someone was dissatisfied with the cooling of the system. A system that was designed for R12 will always work better than trying to retrofit a R134A system into it. To me, it is like trying to adapt a Ford part to fit a GM car. It can be done, but at what cost?????

Last edited by Junkman; June 19th, 2017 at 10:30 AM. Reason: spelling correction
Junkman is offline  
Old June 19th, 2017, 10:53 AM
  #42  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 16,167
Thanks for the input. I've been doing some browsing and apparently there are even folks out there that use difluoroethane from computer air dusters to recharge their AC:


To me this seems a bit like jury rigging an AC system. While I might be willing to use r12a or freeze 12 to recharge my AC system, I don't think I would be willing to use this trick. Thoughts?
Olds64 is offline  
Old June 19th, 2017, 11:14 AM
  #43  
Registered User
 
71Convertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 85
Conversion to R134a

I've only done one A/C conversion and it was on my 1971 Cutlass Supreme convertible. I did this about 4 years ago when I had the entire power train out of the car. I'd previously done seal replacements on the older GM R12 compressors. That and availability/cost of R12, I felt it was time to move away from that compressor design. I replaced all of the R12 components with R134 components. My Cutlass isn't a show car so I wasn't concerned with the different look in the compressor; though I did save the original R12 compressor and mounts if I or someone else wanted that all put back. In the warm, humid coastal Virginia climate, I find that the R134 cools very well. I run the A/C on hot humid or rainy days when it's not comfortable to have the top down.
71Convertible is offline  
Old June 19th, 2017, 11:16 AM
  #44  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 16,167
Don, you mentioned that you installed r134a components. Did you just install a Vintage Air system or did you replace pieces individually so you could run r134a?
Olds64 is offline  
Old June 19th, 2017, 03:08 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
71Convertible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Virginia
Posts: 85
Originally Posted by Olds64
Don, you mentioned that you installed r134a components. Did you just install a Vintage Air system or did you replace pieces individually so you could run r134a?
In 2012, I purchased and installed items from Classic Auto Air, Tampa, FL. for my 1971 Cutlass Supreme convertible. This included the replacement compressor with mounting bracket, POA valve, condenser, dryer, evaporator and all hoses. They were good to work with and quickly resolved the only issue that I encountered with the parts I purchased. I decided there was enough corrosion/oxidation on the 41 year old condenser and evaporator that I would bite the bullet and replace it all when I had the engine out of the car for rebuild. Here is a picture from today, showing some of the components.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
2017 Cutlass AC.JPG (35.9 KB, 16 views)
71Convertible is offline  
Old June 19th, 2017, 04:00 PM
  #46  
Registered User
 
zeeke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Nassau County, NY
Posts: 1,019
Originally Posted by MDchanic
Sorry, but after two repetitions, I have to respond to this.

R-134a is a molecule with two carbon atoms attached to each other, with four fluorines and two hydrogens attached to them.
Its diameter is 5.24Å.

R-12, with only one carbon, two fluorines, and two chlorines is smaller.
Its diameter is 5.09Å.

R-12 weighs more at 120.91, versus R-134 at 102.03, so R-12 is heavier (because those chlorines are heavier than those hydrogens), but that has nothing to do with what you're saying.

Sorry for going full NERD on you but the last thing we need is people to start substituting propane for R12 because its cheaper and readily available.


- Eric
Originally Posted by MDchanic
You're welcome.

No offense intended - it's just that all of us here try hard to stop inaccurate information before it starts, so that it doesn't get a leg up (I think we're the only site on the interwebs to do so. ).



- Eric
And you missed the biggest reason of all R12 is dichlorodifluoromethane which has no upper or lower explosive limit and propane is dimethylmethane which is a completely different chemical with different carbon bonds and has a UEL of 9.5% and an LEL of 2.1%. In other words R12 is not Propane. Another point to mention, with propane, the flame cannot travel into the lines due to the lack of oxygen so it can only burn in the vapor space which needs to be between 2.1% and 9.5%. To rich or lean it will not burn.

What we see in the movies with gas tanks on cars exploding doesn't happen, they rupture with a sudden rush. Just like that propane video. I've been to hundreds of car fires and have never once seen the violent explosions portrayed in Hollywood, however a propane tank can BLEVEI which will cause a much more violent rush.

The violent flame you see from R12 freon is most likely caused by the gas escaping and creating a vortex introducing more oxygen to an already burning fire.

The reason R12 was no longer manufactured is the damage it does to the ozone which protects us from the sun. R134a was its replacement.

Last edited by zeeke; June 19th, 2017 at 04:06 PM.
zeeke is offline  
Old June 11th, 2024, 07:23 AM
  #47  
Registered User
 
FarmerDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2024
Posts: 1
Originally Posted by Junkman
I can image the same scenario with PROPANE in place of the R12 or R134A refrigerant. I can hear it now, when the flames hit the PROPANE, the flames will travel through the hoses, and all the a/c system will go BOOM, like a hand grenade. Don't want to be anywhere near when that happens.
That's not how it works. Flames don't travel thru the hoses and thru the system. Just like the flame doesn't go from your bbq burner thru the hose and into the tank and explode. There needs to be enough oxygen in the mix to support combustion. The small amount of gas would just burn off in the engine compartment once released to the atmosphere if there was a fire and a leak. I would be more concerned with the gasoline that is pumped to the engine.
R290 (propane) has been used for decades around the world. And R12a is a mix of propane and butane.
FarmerDave is offline  
Old June 11th, 2024, 08:11 AM
  #48  
Registered User
 
bw1339's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 522
Another vote for R152A (which is a proper refrigerant commonly found in keyboard duster sprays):
Click on link to watch on youtube - Won't let me embed.

bw1339 is online now  
Old June 11th, 2024, 08:25 AM
  #49  
Registered User
 
dc2x4drvr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 2,681
Old thread
Has anyone actually used RedTek or another R12 clone, if so, please share your results.
I have redone my ac system with new dryer, etc, and I have a few cans of Red Tek ready for installation, hopefully it works as advertised.
dc2x4drvr is offline  
Old June 11th, 2024, 08:27 AM
  #50  
Registered User
 
69HO43's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 2,013
Talk about NECROMANCING!!!!!!!

I'm going to use the 152a (computer duster) refrigerant in an experiment when I recharge my 85 442 system with new components and a newly resealed R4 NOS compressor. R4s are notorious for leaking around the shell o-rings and front seal. Just use oil for a 134a system and recharge a smaller amount of R152a and it should be fine. Has close pressure/temperature chart comparisons to the way R12 reacts, so the pancake compressor should live just fine. There's some reports that said there's a potential of shortened compressor life, but haven't heard of any real life issues. It's actually more environmentally friendly than 134a. The slight issue is the flammability part as it is a bit higher than the lowest level where R1234yf is.
The R1234yf stuff in the newer cars is a flammable risk too, they just don't like scaring people with that fact.

I got some R12 too, but we'll see how it goes.
69HO43 is online now  
Old June 11th, 2024, 04:55 PM
  #51  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 16,167
I ended up using Red Tek Freeze12 (R12a) in my 86 F250. It worked great. Unfortunately it all leaked out. I tried to charge it again but couldn't get it to blow cold. I think I need to do some maintenance on the system.

I still drive my 71 98 without AC. We'll see how long that lasts.

Olds64 is offline  
Old June 11th, 2024, 06:22 PM
  #52  
Registered User
 
bw1339's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 522
R152A in a 72 Buick.

bw1339 is online now  
Old June 11th, 2024, 07:10 PM
  #53  
Registered User
 
Lonnies Performance's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 289
I've used Frosty Cool R12a in a few vehicles with good results.
It requires 35% by weight of R12 & 40% of 134a.
The cans are 6oz to help with the ratio.

It definitely cools better than 134a.

Yes, it is flammable but consider the volume of actual gas in your system...
it is not a huge volume & also the oil (which is mixed with the liquid freon) in there is flammable which can ignite if you rupture a hose anyway.
I've run it for a few years in multiple vehicles with good results.

I also recently used it in a 134a vehicle where I added a refrigerated intercooler for the supercharger.
I wanted the colder temperatures that it could provide with good results.
Lonnies Performance is offline  
Old June 12th, 2024, 06:38 AM
  #54  
Out of Line, Everytime😉
 
olds 307 and 403's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melville, Saskatchewan
Posts: 9,009
Interesting on the flammability of these A/C and it is a bit scary. I have done a few of the R134A conversions a few years back. They worked OK up here but we see 40C (105F) max up here. Usually more like 30C to 35C or 85 to 95 Fahrenheit in Summer up here and only a few weeks of it. Only our cities have any amount of stop and go traffic to really test it. We did the R4 compressors, would grab any quiet used ones, would usually take a few and they would leak and usually pile up at some point. I did the Redtek 12A with their oil in my 88 Cutlass. It cooled quite well but it eventually, leaked and seized like a R4 compressors do. I may do an aftermarket system on my 70S at some point with a Sanden compressor in the SBC serpentine setup with some sort of aftermarket setup which looks like they use R134A which should work well in a system designed for it.
olds 307 and 403 is offline  
Old June 12th, 2024, 06:42 AM
  #55  
Registered User
 
bw1339's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 522
One factor we often overlook is that the fin and tube condensers in our cars are very inefficient and get very poor air flow (in my '66 there is no shrowding to duct fan air through it). Putting a big electric fan on the condenser, or replacing it with a modern parallel one makes a big difference, regardless of refrigerant used.

Also, the POA valve may need to be adjusted for the characteristics of the refrigerant being used.
bw1339 is online now  
Old June 12th, 2024, 01:28 PM
  #56  
Registered User
 
Fun71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 14,151
Originally Posted by bw1339
One factor we often overlook is that the fin and tube condensers in our cars are very inefficient
yeah, I noticed that one day while working on the cars. I measured the fin spacing and found the Cutlass had 11 fins-per-inch compared to the new (at the time) 1998 that had double the fin-per-inch count. Made me thing just a better condenser would vastly improve the cooling capability, especially in the Phoenix 110+ summer temps.
Fun71 is online now  
Old June 12th, 2024, 03:59 PM
  #57  
Registered User
 
bw1339's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 522
Originally Posted by Fun71
yeah, I noticed that one day while working on the cars. I measured the fin spacing and found the Cutlass had 11 fins-per-inch compared to the new (at the time) 1998 that had double the fin-per-inch count. Made me thing just a better condenser would vastly improve the cooling capability, especially in the Phoenix 110+ summer temps.
Next time it's warm, pour some cold water on your condenser while running. If you see a noticeable drop in A/C temperatures, you could benefit from improvements there, either in a more modern condenser, auxiliary fans... Or both.
bw1339 is online now  
Old June 12th, 2024, 07:12 PM
  #58  
Registered User
 
Funkwagon455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Aledo, Texas
Posts: 2,433
Originally Posted by marxjunk
i have a bunch of r12 for 20 a can for 12oz and 25 for 14oz...

nothing works as good as r12 period..ive tried it all over the years...it just works..
Reasonable price for a great product. (35 degree duct temp at 95 degree oat on my way home today.😀
Funkwagon455 is online now  
Old June 12th, 2024, 08:41 PM
  #59  
Registered User
 
twilightblue28A's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 903
Anyone have R12 for sale? Please send me a private message. marjunx has R12 for sale, but I can locate his original message. Thank you for your help.

Last edited by twilightblue28A; June 12th, 2024 at 08:43 PM.
twilightblue28A is offline  
Old June 13th, 2024, 01:25 AM
  #60  
Registered User
 
bw1339's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 522
Originally Posted by twilightblue28A
Anyone have R12 for sale? Please send me a private message. marjunx has R12 for sale, but I can locate his original message. Thank you for your help.
Check Facebook Marketplace.
bw1339 is online now  
Old June 13th, 2024, 03:56 AM
  #61  
Registered User
 
chip-powell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,298
Maybe I just lucked out. I converted my system over to 134 about 4-5 years ago. Other than checking it (and sometimes having to top it off) in the spring, it blows nice and cold all summer (knock on wood). Given, I don't live in Phoenix like Ken so I'm not dealing with 110 on a regular basis, but for a few hours cruisin' in summer temps in the low to mid 90s, my wife and I have been very comfortable.
chip-powell is offline  
Old June 13th, 2024, 06:24 AM
  #62  
Registered User
 
Junkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Northeast Connecticut
Posts: 782
Originally Posted by FarmerDave
That's not how it works. Flames don't travel thru the hoses and thru the system. Just like the flame doesn't go from your bbq burner thru the hose and into the tank and explode. There needs to be enough oxygen in the mix to support combustion. The small amount of gas would just burn off in the engine compartment once released to the atmosphere if there was a fire and a leak. I would be more concerned with the gasoline that is pumped to the engine.
R290 (propane) has been used for decades around the world. And R12a is a mix of propane and butane.
I can't say you are correct or incorrect, since I have no personal experience with this happening, however, what you have said does sound reasonable. I was told about the "explosion" hazard by my supplier of acetylene, who was discussing why you should have flashback check valves on your cutting equipment. Once again, I have never experienced a flashback on my oxy/acetylene setup, but after the discussion, I did install the valves. I prefer to learn from other's experiences rather than make avoidable mistakes.

Junkman is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
smparr
Other
15
June 12th, 2024 06:59 AM
Ger
The Newbie Forum
5
April 10th, 2020 12:39 PM
1970-W30
General Discussion
18
April 2nd, 2013 06:21 PM
hurstman1972
Other
9
August 14th, 2012 06:46 AM
markowyo
Other
6
June 1st, 2008 09:56 PM



Quick Reply: To R12a or Not to R12a?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:56 PM.