General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

Help please with a 1967 425 ID etc.

Old Oct 20, 2014 | 01:52 PM
  #1  
67cutlass67GS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 188
From: Fl
Help please with a 1967 425 ID etc.

I have heard some good things about the 425. My 330 in my 67 ragtop is tired & I love a BB. The guy selling it says it out of a 1967 Ninety Eight. Engine numbers 389244. He said the head says CFD. Also said he found another number that said 548. I saw the video & it does run. He don't know much about motors or where to locate other ID markings to give me more info. I'm looking for any input at all as this motor is close in location & I'd like it if it's not some boat anchor. Thank you in advance.
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 03:00 PM
  #2  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
If it's the original motor from a 98 it's a high compression 4 barrel motor.

389244D is the casting number for all '66 and '67 425s.

CFD means Central Foundry Division, the place where all GM cast iron parts were made.

The engine number in 1967 was located on a pad on the front of the driver's side head, just under and inboard from the alternator in the photo below:




Here is a guide to the 1967 number codes:




If the car is in fact a '67 98, the code will read Rxxxxxx (with x= any digit).
There is a small chance it could read RxxxxxxS, but that is unlikely.

If the heads have been off, this number could be on the back of the left hand head instead.

Of course, it is always possible that the heads could be from a different engine, but there's no other marking that tells you what kind of engine it is on a non-Toronado.

- Eric

Last edited by MDchanic; Oct 20, 2014 at 04:25 PM. Reason: Foundry, not Forge - I always do that...
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 03:14 PM
  #3  
67cutlass67GS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 188
From: Fl
Originally Posted by MDchanic
If it's the original motor from a 98 it's a high compression 4 barrel motor.

389244D is the casting number for all '66 and '67 425s.

CFD means Central Forge Division, the place where all GM cast iron parts were made.

The engine number in 1967 was located on a pad on the front of the driver's side head, just under and inboard from the alternator in the photo below:




Here is a guide to the 1967 number codes:




If the car is in fact a '67 98, the code will read Rxxxxxx (with x= any digit).
There is a small chance it could read RxxxxxxS, but that is unlikely.

If the heads have been off, this number could be on the back of the left hand head instead.

Of course, it is always possible that the heads could be from a different engine, but there's no other marking that tells you what kind of engine it is on a non-Toronado.

- Eric
Thank you Eric, i will call him tomorrow to get the head stamp number.
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 05:09 PM
  #4  
m371961's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,163
From: Sistersville, WV
Naturally, if you can hear it run, ask if you can do a compression check and oil pressure check even if you are planning on a rebuild.
Old Oct 20, 2014 | 07:43 PM
  #5  
67cutlass67GS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 188
From: Fl
Originally Posted by m371961
Naturally, if you can hear it run, ask if you can do a compression check and oil pressure check even if you are planning on a rebuild.
Sounds like a plan. Ill have my son do it as he is up where the motor is. I wont get the motor till Dec.
Old Oct 21, 2014 | 08:07 PM
  #6  
67cutlass67GS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 188
From: Fl
Originally Posted by 67cutlass67GS
Thank you Eric, i will call him tomorrow to get the head stamp number.
It does have the R239659S what makes them better or worse ? Thank you
Old Oct 22, 2014 | 03:03 AM
  #7  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by 67cutlass67GS
It does have the R239659S what makes them better or worse ? Thank you
That's the Starfire V8, optional even on the 98, and a step below the Toronado motor.

10.5:1 compression, dual exhausts, 375HP / 470 ft/lbs (vs the Toro at 385/480).

You can't do much better for a stock motor in the Olds world.

- Eric
Old Oct 22, 2014 | 08:56 AM
  #8  
R-body_mopar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 180
Exclamation

Originally Posted by MDchanic
That's the Starfire V8, optional even on the 98, and a step below the Toronado motor.

10.5:1 compression, dual exhausts, 375HP / 470 ft/lbs (vs the Toro at 385/480).

You can't do much better for a stock motor in the Olds world.

- Eric

Couldn't agree more, Eric! I had a 1966 425 Starfire.....it was a bear! Hurled that heavy body around like a rocket...only problem now is today's fuel, with that compression.....
Old Oct 22, 2014 | 09:15 AM
  #9  
Octania's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,286
Originally Posted by 67cutlass67GS
It does have the R239659S what makes them better or worse ? Thank you
R...S

Rocket Science!

One step short of the Toronado 425
a great choice.
Grab it quickly

'548 is the latter half of the heads' casting ID 394549, split with half on each side of the lower center rocker cover bolt
See also the huge "C" on the corner of the heads, near #1 and #8 spark plug

Look for this Toronado engine ID DRILL SPOT which your motor should NOT have:

4040_66-To-425_CN6-1.jpg
Old Oct 26, 2014 | 02:27 PM
  #10  
67cutlass67GS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 188
From: Fl
Originally Posted by MDchanic
That's the Starfire V8, optional even on the 98, and a step below the Toronado motor.

10.5:1 compression, dual exhausts, 375HP / 470 ft/lbs (vs the Toro at 385/480).

You can't do much better for a stock motor in the Olds world.

- Eric
ok motor was delivered & all is as was stated. Original air cleaner is in great shape. Title from car it came out of as well. 1967 Olds 98, one owner. A guy in Glen Ridge NJ. The car got crushed by a fallen tree. It's all there flywheel etc.i wish I knew how to insert pics in thread.
Old Oct 26, 2014 | 03:23 PM
  #11  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
I want it.

- Eric
Old Oct 27, 2014 | 04:06 AM
  #12  
lemoldsnut's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 3,345
From: Redmond, Oregon
Very nice. If anyone is looking I have a running 67 toronado 425. Still in the car.
Old Oct 27, 2014 | 07:02 PM
  #13  
67cutlass67GS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 188
From: Fl
MDchanic the motor is at my sons house. He found these numbers R239659S. Does that help ? Thank you

Last edited by 67cutlass67GS; Oct 28, 2014 at 10:09 AM.
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 05:55 AM
  #14  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
I saw that engine on ebay, looks very correct to me as a 67 Sfire 425. Air cleaner is correct with the longer 4bbl snout on it which was a Sfire only unit. Dual exhaust manifolds etc. It should have a D cast on block just above water pump to the tight of oil fill tube and C letter heads. Hope it works out for you, that is a great engine!
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 07:10 AM
  #15  
67cutlass67GS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 188
From: Fl
Originally Posted by Oldsmaniac
I saw that engine on ebay, looks very correct to me as a 67 Sfire 425. Air cleaner is correct with the longer 4bbl snout on it which was a Sfire only unit. Dual exhaust manifolds etc. It should have a D cast on block just above water pump to the tight of oil fill tube and C letter heads. Hope it works out for you, that is a great engine!
Ya it does have the D at the end of the numbers behind water pump. Yes it was on EBay & amazingly the seller lived about 5 miles from my son. He delivered it free. I didn't take the trans as I was advised it wouldn't work in my Cutlass. He made me a deal for engine only. Super nice guy with some bad *** cars.
Old Oct 29, 2014 | 07:18 AM
  #16  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
Originally Posted by 67cutlass67GS
I didn't take the trans as I was advised it wouldn't work in my Cutlass.
Well you really should consider a stronger trans to go behind that 425. I am thinking you have the 2 speed Jetaway now which is not a Chevy Powerglide. That 98 trans turbo 400 switch pitch could be made to work with a shorter driveshaft but would be better to get a short tail Turbo 400 like the 442 used as it would make the install much easier.
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 06:21 AM
  #17  
67cutlass67GS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 188
From: Fl
Originally Posted by Oldsmaniac
Well you really should consider a stronger trans to go behind that 425. I am thinking you have the 2 speed Jetaway now which is not a Chevy Powerglide. That 98 trans turbo 400 switch pitch could be made to work with a shorter driveshaft but would be better to get a short tail Turbo 400 like the 442 used as it would make the install much easier.
Ya Oldsmaniac there is no question that the 2 speed junkaway has to go. The short tail TH 400 seems most practical or a very well built TH350. Will the TH400 go in as easy as TH350 ? Im looking for less aggrevation & modification if possible. Thanx
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 06:38 AM
  #18  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
Ok let me see if I have this right... The T350 would need a downshift cable hooked to throttle for passing gear. The 400 uses a switch that you already have on your accelerator. I would go with the 400 and not worry about beefing up a trans. Externally they are not much different and install about the same. Yokes are different between the 2. You will want to decide if you want a switch pitch turbo 400 which was the 67 A body trans or the later 68 up non switch pitch trans. The switch pitch requires the appropriate torque converter.
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 06:46 AM
  #19  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
The TH400 will require a shorter driveshaft or having yours shortened, as well as a different yoke.

The TH400 also mounts with the crossmember in the rear set of holes, which will require a new set of emergency brake cables, because the mounting locations will move.

- Eric
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 06:52 AM
  #20  
Oldsmaniac's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 7,318
From: NJ
If yours is a column shift you may want to look for this dash bezel with the extra S range.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
t400.jpg (56.7 KB, 8 views)
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 08:24 PM
  #21  
67cutlass67GS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 188
From: Fl
Originally Posted by Oldsmaniac
Ok let me see if I have this right... The T350 would need a downshift cable hooked to throttle for passing gear. The 400 uses a switch that you already have on your accelerator. I would go with the 400 and not worry about beefing up a trans. Externally they are not much different and install about the same. Yokes are different between the 2. You will want to decide if you want a switch pitch turbo 400 which was the 67 A body trans or the later 68 up non switch pitch trans. The switch pitch requires the appropriate torque converter.
Ok gotcha. The trans is my next hunt. My real fantasy is a 4 speed but I couldn't take the aggravation. Lol
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 08:26 PM
  #22  
67cutlass67GS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 188
From: Fl
Originally Posted by MDchanic
The TH400 will require a shorter driveshaft or having yours shortened, as well as a different yoke.

The TH400 also mounts with the crossmember in the rear set of holes, which will require a new set of emergency brake cables, because the mounting locations will move.
Aaaaahaaa I see u have done this. Lol
- Eric
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 08:28 PM
  #23  
67cutlass67GS's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 188
From: Fl
Originally Posted by Oldsmaniac
If yours is a column shift you may want to look for this dash bezel with the extra S range.
Yes it is column shift. So I'll need to find the extra set up. Thank you
Old Oct 30, 2014 | 08:45 PM
  #24  
MDchanic's Avatar
Connoisseur d'Junque
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 21,183
From: The Hudson Valley
Originally Posted by 67cutlass67GS
Aaaaahaaa I see u have done this. Lol
Nope. Just try to remember most of what I read and hear, so I make as few of everyone else's mistakes, and as many of my own new ones, as possible.

- Eric
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
197064buickspec
Site Help
43
Aug 20, 2014 08:01 AM
Octania
Parts For Sale
2
May 5, 2013 08:32 AM
Steve Wike
General Discussion
2
Mar 11, 2012 11:47 AM
real57vetteguy
Parts Wanted
11
Jan 13, 2012 01:03 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:05 AM.