comparing thermostats
#1
comparing thermostats
Since I'm changing out my anti-freeze in a few days, I figured that I might as well replace the thermostat. My Olds is a cruiser, not a racer, so I was figuring on staying with a standard 180 degree part since I've never had any over-heating problems. But I've seen two types out there, one is your normal everyday thermostat, and the other is this new "Hi-Flow" one.
Has anyone out there used the new thermostats and do they work any better. I know that in the grand scheme of things this is not an expensive part ($4.50 vs $11.50). I'm just curious if there is a difference.
Has anyone out there used the new thermostats and do they work any better. I know that in the grand scheme of things this is not an expensive part ($4.50 vs $11.50). I'm just curious if there is a difference.
#2
Chip, I will relate my adventure with these.
72 Chevy, original, funked up radiator. Stock gauge going to 250 on open road in summer. Did not know if it was gauge or overheat. Bought a mechanical gauges and a 160 deg stant superstat high flow. Installed all parts.
Mechanical gauge matches stock gauge to within 10%. I will remove mech gauge this spring. Temperature dropped an average 20 degrees across the board. Where the car would typically roll around town at 210, do highways at 230, and be taxed at 250, it now rolls around town at 180, highways at 200, and I may see 220 once in a while.
My application may not be the same as yours. I have the original radiator, slightly bowed from a collision in 1986, and it is surely funked up. This was the original, low flow, low emissions, high temp stock thermostat. It helped me a lot, it may not help you as much, but I highly recommend high flow stats for our classics, regardless of the temp, and I personally prefer low temp ones.
Whenever this comes up on here, I feel obliged to mention the following. Ideally, the radiator can outcool the engine, and the thermostat regulates the temperature by opening and closing based on its temp setting. This is why, with new cars, with good radiators and low resolution gauges, that temp needle is ALWAYS at dead center, no matter if idling in winter, or blasting in summer.
Our old cars, the radiator gets funked up, and the thermostat goes way open, and can no longer regulate the temp, as the radiator cannot out cool the engine. Granted, as temps in radiator go up, the cooling efficiency gets much better (it's from the temperature gradient between operating temp and the ambient, which is why cars "run hot" but don't overheat, and why cars don't overheat in winter). So, you end up with a 160 degree stat wide open, and the car fluctuates between 180 and 200 depending on what you are doing, and how hot it is that day. The radiator is simply doing the best it can.
Ideally, we'd all have radiators in good shape, and run 180 degree thermostats. I have a funked up radiator, so I run a 160 high flow to get as much coolant through there as soon as possible just to get a good thermal reservoir going to offset any load I am about to put on the engine. I keep an eye on the gauge in the summer, and I don't push the thing hard until warm in the winter.
72 Chevy, original, funked up radiator. Stock gauge going to 250 on open road in summer. Did not know if it was gauge or overheat. Bought a mechanical gauges and a 160 deg stant superstat high flow. Installed all parts.
Mechanical gauge matches stock gauge to within 10%. I will remove mech gauge this spring. Temperature dropped an average 20 degrees across the board. Where the car would typically roll around town at 210, do highways at 230, and be taxed at 250, it now rolls around town at 180, highways at 200, and I may see 220 once in a while.
My application may not be the same as yours. I have the original radiator, slightly bowed from a collision in 1986, and it is surely funked up. This was the original, low flow, low emissions, high temp stock thermostat. It helped me a lot, it may not help you as much, but I highly recommend high flow stats for our classics, regardless of the temp, and I personally prefer low temp ones.
Whenever this comes up on here, I feel obliged to mention the following. Ideally, the radiator can outcool the engine, and the thermostat regulates the temperature by opening and closing based on its temp setting. This is why, with new cars, with good radiators and low resolution gauges, that temp needle is ALWAYS at dead center, no matter if idling in winter, or blasting in summer.
Our old cars, the radiator gets funked up, and the thermostat goes way open, and can no longer regulate the temp, as the radiator cannot out cool the engine. Granted, as temps in radiator go up, the cooling efficiency gets much better (it's from the temperature gradient between operating temp and the ambient, which is why cars "run hot" but don't overheat, and why cars don't overheat in winter). So, you end up with a 160 degree stat wide open, and the car fluctuates between 180 and 200 depending on what you are doing, and how hot it is that day. The radiator is simply doing the best it can.
Ideally, we'd all have radiators in good shape, and run 180 degree thermostats. I have a funked up radiator, so I run a 160 high flow to get as much coolant through there as soon as possible just to get a good thermal reservoir going to offset any load I am about to put on the engine. I keep an eye on the gauge in the summer, and I don't push the thing hard until warm in the winter.
#6
#7
^^^This. These cars didn't overheat when new with the stock regular flow t-stat. Why do you think you need something different now, especially since the OP says he does NOT have an overheating problem?
#8
When you add hp you add heat.
When you rebuild and bore a block you take metal away,
age and water jackets scale.
All things that when new you didn't worry about.
Wouldn't a 190-195* help these engine run more efficiently?
For my daily's I use the ones that fail safe (open) .
#9
When you add hp you add heat.
When you rebuild and bore a block you take metal away,
age and water jackets scale.
All things that when new you didn't worry about.
Wouldn't a 190-195* help these engine run more efficiently?
For my daily's I use the ones that fail safe (open) .
When you rebuild and bore a block you take metal away,
age and water jackets scale.
All things that when new you didn't worry about.
Wouldn't a 190-195* help these engine run more efficiently?
For my daily's I use the ones that fail safe (open) .
#10
#12
#13
When you add hp you add heat.
When you rebuild and bore a block you take metal away,
age and water jackets scale.
All things that when new you didn't worry about.
Wouldn't a 190-195* help these engine run more efficiently?
For my daily's I use the ones that fail safe (open) .
When you rebuild and bore a block you take metal away,
age and water jackets scale.
All things that when new you didn't worry about.
Wouldn't a 190-195* help these engine run more efficiently?
For my daily's I use the ones that fail safe (open) .
#14
Knowledge is king.
Other engines use the hotter T=Stat rating to get better mpg out of them.
I figured someone might have tried to do the same with an olds engine.
What was they rated in the last cutlasses? I don't know off hand.
Every T-Stat I put in my personal vehicles I test in a pot of water. they are fully open by the rated temp, but that might be because there is no water flow through it to change the temp to cycle it back closed, In use in an engine I can see it taking a higher than rated to open fully.
I only asked about if it help or hurt efficiency, as I will be daily driving my olds all but winter and any gain here is a wonderful thing.
Last edited by midnightleadfoot; February 24th, 2018 at 10:25 PM.
#15
Wow...I did not mean to start an argument. I thought that I was asking a fairly simple question. Has anyone out there used the "hi flow" thermostats, and do they perform any better?
I'm talking about a stock Olds Rocket 350 4bbl with a/c and with only 46K miles on it, under normal driving conditions.
I'm talking about a stock Olds Rocket 350 4bbl with a/c and with only 46K miles on it, under normal driving conditions.
Last edited by chip-powell; February 25th, 2018 at 07:25 AM.
#18
No argument, the question was answered. It boils down to personal preference and what people have found that works. Like I said there is no right or wrong when selecting temp ratings. There were a few offerings for thermostats from 160-195 from Oldsmobile. You can google best engine temps and see a variety of discussions.
#21
Sorry for the thread hijack, I just wanted to add my experience with this inferior, gimmick thermostat design.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RAMBOW
General Discussion
48
March 14th, 2010 08:44 AM