General Discussion Discuss your Oldsmobile or other car-related topics.

Anyone see this

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old October 30th, 2012, 08:41 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
my72vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Lakemoor IL
Posts: 181
Anyone see this

Seems like 100k is a bit much. Maybe I'm too picky but the left front bumper bothers me.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1971-...orcev4exp=true
my72vert is offline  
Old October 31st, 2012, 03:11 PM
  #2  
72 Olds CS
 
RetroRanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 6,657
yeah that bumper is off a bit...I noticed they skipped the front in their walk around video
RetroRanger is offline  
Old October 31st, 2012, 04:46 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
compedgemarine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Dahlonega, GA
Posts: 492
I think for that kind of money the car should be correct. the bottom of the floor pans are body color and painted over undercoating in spots, the bottom of the rear quarters is rough, in several places there are bolts painted over that would have been installed after the car was painted, etc, etc. it is a nice car but if you are going to go into all the detail of the painstaking restoration then it should look like it is sitting at the dealership in 1971.
compedgemarine is offline  
Old October 31st, 2012, 05:34 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
stevengerard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chi-town
Posts: 4,511
25k seems like a lot of money to me when you can go buy a brand new Mustang V6 convertible for around the same price that will blow the doors off that car but........ the prices of W30 convertibles are sky rocketing, that seems like a fair price to me, we can pick at these cars all day, there are only so many of them left.
stevengerard is online now  
Old October 31st, 2012, 06:32 PM
  #5  
71 & 72,now I want a 68
 
w-30dreamin's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NW Indiana
Posts: 1,864
Having the valve covers on the wrong side bother me.
w-30dreamin is offline  
Old October 31st, 2012, 06:44 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
compedgemarine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Dahlonega, GA
Posts: 492
Originally Posted by w-30dreamin
Having the valve covers on the wrong side bother me.
that would be my point. all cars have flaws but when you talk about all the work done in a frame off resto then it should be correct and present that way. this is a nice car but there are a lot of flaws for a car that is supposed to be near perfect according to the seller.
compedgemarine is offline  
Old October 31st, 2012, 07:04 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
oldspackrat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 4,846
Maybe if us Oldsmobile geeks didn't waste so much of our lives learning every little thing about these cars, we'd have less to gripe about. I wouldn't mind being a little more ignorant & having 100k to throw at a car. :0
oldspackrat is offline  
Old October 31st, 2012, 08:27 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
davebw31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: crawfordville, florida
Posts: 857
There is way, way more things wrong with this car then was mentioned previously. I.E. check out the side strips at the fender/qtr. lips where the strip then goes horizontal. The upper edge of the bottom strip should curve and the thinner upper strip lower side should curve the same. Typical body shop/Restoration shop who does ch**y, GTO s , and f**ds.

Just to mention a few more, no blue emission or air pressure labels at the drivers door, no gas tank tar paper insulation mat above tank, jack stowage and posi labels in wrong place, and air cleaner appears to have wrong style/size label. And the list goes on. Not worth $100,000!

It also looks like it got the "famous In-line Tube sticker treatment" !

Last edited by davebw31; October 31st, 2012 at 08:50 PM.
davebw31 is offline  
Old November 1st, 2012, 05:01 AM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
my72vert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Lakemoor IL
Posts: 181
Originally Posted by compedgemarine
I think for that kind of money the car should be correct. the bottom of the floor pans are body color and painted over undercoating in spots, the bottom of the rear quarters is rough, in several places there are bolts painted over that would have been installed after the car was painted, etc, etc. it is a nice car but if you are going to go into all the detail of the painstaking restoration then it should look like it is sitting at the dealership in 1971.
This is exactly why I threw this topic out there. Although I still think 100k is too much to pay for this car, for that kind of money I would expect a blue chip collectable. Also makes me wonder if it really sold for that price. Anyone who would pay 100k for a car should know what they are paying for.
my72vert is offline  
Old November 1st, 2012, 06:42 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
frankr442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 404
Another nit-pick, but it's major. That rear end wasn't used in a W30.
frankr442 is offline  
Old November 1st, 2012, 07:18 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
mike's88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: brookfield, ill
Posts: 450
Originally Posted by frankr442
Another nit-pick, but it's major. That rear end wasn't used in a W30.
No, but you COULD get the cover in 71, as this 1 has. No alum. center section.
mike's88 is offline  
Old November 1st, 2012, 08:20 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
mmurphy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,079
I've never seen that vertical fuel filter arrangement except on Chevys. Is that correct?
mmurphy77 is offline  
Old November 1st, 2012, 09:17 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
frankr442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 404
Actually I wasn't referring to the cover, I know it was a dealer installed and over the counter option. The 3.23 ratio wasn't used in W30's.
frankr442 is offline  
Old November 1st, 2012, 09:24 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
frankr442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 404
Originally Posted by mmurphy77
I've never seen that vertical fuel filter arrangement except on Chevys. Is that correct?
That is correct for a W30.
frankr442 is offline  
Old November 1st, 2012, 03:46 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
mmurphy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,079
Originally Posted by frankr442
That is correct for a W30.
Thanks Frank!
mmurphy77 is offline  
Old November 1st, 2012, 11:22 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Mr Shifty Sidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: South Central, KY
Posts: 1,288
SS is correct for 3:23 gears in a 71 W-30. TM is the 3:42 gear and TO is the 3:73 gear. The SS is not a W-30 exclusive code, the TM and TO are.

From 71 inspectors guide:

"C60 (A/C) is available with W30 option with M40 (auto) trans, power disc brakes and 3:23 axle."


Anyone notice the drivers side inside door handle pointing down?

I always like this color combo. A "little old lady" in town had a 71 Supreme hardtop in this color combo when I was in high school. I guess she eventually died. I seen it several years later and someone had bought the car and drove it into the ground. I still tried to buy with no luck. Have not seen the car in a few years now.

Don W
Mr Shifty Sidney is offline  
Old November 1st, 2012, 11:55 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Mr Shifty Sidney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: South Central, KY
Posts: 1,288
Dave B,

Are the 71's suppose to have insulation above the gas tank? I thought I had read that after 70 they quit putting the pads on. Seems like it was in a thread by 70Post. The 70 assembly manual shows the pad, the 71 does not....but you were there then.

Don W
Mr Shifty Sidney is offline  
Old November 2nd, 2012, 07:06 AM
  #18  
Registered User
 
stevengerard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Chi-town
Posts: 4,511
I still like it, but then again I'm not bidding on it.
stevengerard is online now  
Old November 2nd, 2012, 02:24 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
70worm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 42
I would rather buy 4 $20,000 Oldsmobiles instead of 1 $80,000 cutlass with a front bumper that's 2 inches off.
70worm is offline  
Old November 2nd, 2012, 06:32 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
charlierogers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: illinois
Posts: 560
i will start with saying that it is a beautiful car and color combo! yes there are many things wrong/incorrect but i think we get a little biased{sp}/spoiled when we look at some of the "correct" restorations going on here. example lee pears 70 vert w-30. heck that sweetheart went 220,000 + and did not make reserve if i remember right. 80,000 seems kinda high to me on the car but if it is 1 of 110 that is ultra rare numbers. heck i would love to own and cruise it as its a driver quality car. but like most here i cannot afford to spend 80,000 on a car to cruise weekends.
charlierogers is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Radius
Eighty-Eight
9
May 20th, 2013 02:12 PM
esisson
General Discussion
20
March 7th, 2012 08:34 PM
Tom442
General Discussion
9
July 6th, 2011 07:44 PM
coltsneckbob
General Discussion
6
June 12th, 2011 07:29 PM
gearheads78
The Clubhouse
11
June 15th, 2009 09:56 AM



Quick Reply: Anyone see this



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 02:26 PM.