455 F/Fa Blocks
#1
455 F/Fa Blocks
Ok,what year did they start with the Fa 455 blocks. The Super Cars Unlimited fact book says the the F block was used 68-72 and the Fa block was used 72-76. Was 72 a over lapping year or is the book wrong? I have always thought the Fa block was a 73-76 deal. Anybody?
#2
That incorrect info just keeps getting regurgitated. I personally have a sans-serif "F" block with a 1973 VIN derivative stamp, and I've seen a similar "F" block with a 74 VIN derivative. I should note that the engine I have also has a manual trans crank and "KA" heads. One may infer from this that the F blocks were used past 1972 on cars with manual transmission, but I've also seen an "FA" block with the hole for the pivot ball drilled and tapped. I have not seen any "FA" blocks with a 1972 VIN derivative.
For what it's worth, here's the "FA" block with the pivot ball hole. It's hard to make out, but that's a 1973 VIN derivative.
For what it's worth, here's the "FA" block with the pivot ball hole. It's hard to make out, but that's a 1973 VIN derivative.
#4
#5
That incorrect info just keeps getting regurgitated. I personally have a sans-serif "F" block with a 1973 VIN derivative stamp, and I've seen a similar "F" block with a 74 VIN derivative. I should note that the engine I have also has a manual trans crank and "KA" heads. One may infer from this that the F blocks were used past 1972 on cars with manual transmission, but I've also seen an "FA" block with the hole for the pivot ball drilled and tapped. I have not seen any "FA" blocks with a 1972 VIN derivative.
For what it's worth, here's the "FA" block with the pivot ball hole. It's hard to make out, but that's a 1973 VIN derivative.
For what it's worth, here's the "FA" block with the pivot ball hole. It's hard to make out, but that's a 1973 VIN derivative.
#8
But the number isn't zero. A good friend of mine in college had a 1973 442 V-code (factory 455 and four speed). While I've never been a fan of the collonade cars, I wish I had appreciated how rare that one was at the time.
#10
I would love a car like that! Do you know what four speed they would have put behind the 455?
#11
#12
#13
The 73 442 4 speed would have had the same powertrain as the same specced 72?
#14
From '72 to '73 the compression ratio stayed the same, but the heads changed from Ga to J. The J heads are supposed to be more restrictive on the exhaust ports but I dunno if there was any overall difference from a "black box" perspective.
#15
#18
Collonade cars were GM A bodies from 73-77, named so because the name means row of pillars. New federal regulations banned hard tops by mandating better rollover performance, so every one had a B pillar.
https://www.chathamthisweek.com/opin...-the-mid-1970s
https://www.chathamthisweek.com/opin...-the-mid-1970s
#20
https://www.chathamthisweek.com/opin...-the-mid-1970s
The interesting trivia factoid is that the downsized 1977 B and C-body cars essentially used the chassis from the 1973-77 A-body colonnade cars.
#21
yes- years ago i got new front springs for my 74 supreme- didn't notice at the time but after we got em on and the front end seemed a little high, I noticed the slip said '1974 full size' .. I thought the counter guy knew the cars..maybe that's why he was thinking full size..
#23
#26
I never said the engine was original to the jet boat. The boat was a 78 model. The VIN ID confirms it came out of a 73 Oldsmobile. My 71Cutlass is probably its third home. The E heads did not come with the motor either, but the intake numbers are consistent with the 1973 block.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post