The Clubhouse Place to chat about whatever's on your mind - doesn't have to be car related. NO POLITICS OR RELIGIOUS DISCUSSION ALLOWED.

Did we really need a study for this?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old April 14th, 2009, 02:01 PM
  #1  
Old(s) Fart
Thread Starter
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 48,269
Did we really need a study for this?

http://www.autoweek.com/article/2009...NEWS/904149995
joe_padavano is offline  
Old April 14th, 2009, 02:15 PM
  #2  
Registered User
 
olds67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: italy
Posts: 540
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
hi joe
in italy they are quite a lot of it and they are comfortable, they consume little.
the only problem is the engine 80000 km/40000s miles and gives to refer.
marcello
olds67 is offline  
Old April 14th, 2009, 02:21 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Nilsson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 1,076
They forgot to mention how these roller skates can also double as a casket. Once run over by a suv just pick it up with occupant still in it dig a hole and drop it in.
Nilsson is offline  
Old April 14th, 2009, 02:26 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
olds67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: italy
Posts: 540
Originally Posted by Nilsson
They forgot to mention how these roller skates can also double as a casket. Once run over by a suv just pick it up with occupant still in it dig a hole and drop it in.
hi Nilsson
you are right.
me some years ago has seen one roll of it he didn't stop more but the boy has gone out unharmed and not as.
marcello
olds67 is offline  
Old April 14th, 2009, 03:49 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
csstrux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Overton NV
Posts: 1,728
I saw a smartcar crash test done at 70 mph on youtube. Wild. The were saying the collision would have killed you, but from rapid deceleration, not structural collaps. Those looked to be tough little cars for their size.
csstrux is offline  
Old April 14th, 2009, 04:35 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
citcapp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rathdrum, Idano
Posts: 9,127
Lets face it their size is against them. The bumper on a full size puckup it going to take them out. Nothing but sheet metal in the way at that height. You won't find me even taking one for a test drive. Rather ride my motorcycle at least I can dodge most issues
citcapp is offline  
Old April 14th, 2009, 04:42 PM
  #7  
Registered User
 
jensenracing77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brazil Indiana
Posts: 11,536
i would feel safer on my 4 wheeler 30 foot in the air.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
3369300592_4383e20715.jpg (44.2 KB, 8 views)
jensenracing77 is offline  
Old April 14th, 2009, 06:08 PM
  #8  
olds..older..oldest
 
derek nesdoly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 364
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
After 25 years in the Emergency dept. putting some back together[and pronouncing the rest], the answer Joe is NO! I'm sure as a mechanical engineer you have some great physics equations that explain things.I keep it simple and just know that small car meets big car-big car wins,and car metal meets human tissue-car wins .We get the same inane funded studies in Medicine..." Does smoking 3 packs a day&drinking a 60 pounder of JB a day affect your chances of becoming an Olympic sprinter ". derek
derek nesdoly is offline  
Old April 14th, 2009, 06:13 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
csstrux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Overton NV
Posts: 1,728
I'll keep my truck.
csstrux is offline  
Old April 14th, 2009, 06:35 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
68conv455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 634
It's all about momentum.
Momentum = mass * velocity
The baseball flies off the bat, the bat doesn't fly off the baseball.
Hence, the microcar flies off the Delta 88.
68conv455 is offline  
Old April 14th, 2009, 06:45 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
csstrux's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Overton NV
Posts: 1,728
let's see here hmmmmm 78,000 lbs verses 2600, going ..... I WIN!!!!! Too bad the little shitz still try. the last one actually moved me about 2 " in my lane before he started rotating under my nose, man you should have seen the mess after he over corrected, and did the dukes of hazard across the median, over 10" curbs, 3 lanes ov traffic, and bounced off the curb in the oncomming lanes. Think he was doing a bit better than the posted limit? The cop laughed in the guys face when he told him that I hit him. Punks street racing.
csstrux is offline  
Old April 14th, 2009, 07:30 PM
  #12  
Registered Luser
 
ent72olds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: LI,NY
Posts: 3,783
Maybe this will wake some people up! If those cars had rear seats, I'm sure you'd find some idiots with child car seats in the back, trying to justify why they drive these...just dangerous!
ent72olds is offline  
Old April 14th, 2009, 07:30 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
Eric Anderson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: North East PA
Posts: 766
Hmm... I think we should fund a study to study the validity of the previous study...
Eric Anderson is offline  
Old April 15th, 2009, 04:43 AM
  #14  
Moderator
 
Olds64's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 16,486
It is an attempt to justify hiking up insurance rates on smaller vehicles. Once gasoline passes $4.00 again people won't be driving their SUVs and Oldsmobiles. There will be more small cars on the road, and the insurance companies will rake in the big bucks because they have some lame @$$ excuse to charge the Joneses more for insurance.

IMHO, I wouldn't drive a Smart or modern hybrid car because you can spend $1000 and buy a 1990 Dodge Colt that gets better gas mileage.
Olds64 is online now  
Old April 15th, 2009, 05:07 AM
  #15  
Past Administrator
 
Oldsguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rural Waxahachie Texas
Posts: 10,166
The insurance angle is surely possible. I think there are basically two issues here. First; the hypocracy of the Federal Government making a big deal about these small cars and their safety issues (as clearly stated above) to explain the protectionism exerted upon foreign car manufacturers in the name of safety when on the other hand they do nothing about motorcycle safety and won't federally mandate the wearing of safety gear on all motorcycles. Second, which was eluded to in the first point, America drives differently than Europe/Asia and has a preponderance of larger vehicles and more of them per population which makes it more unsafe for the little cars. I bet there aren't as many serious accidents in Europe/Asia because ALL the cars are smaller there with much fewer, if any big SUVs with mommy behind the wheel trying to talk on the cell phone, appease the kids, drink her coffee and drive at the same time.
Face it, we are just different.
Oldsguy is offline  
Old April 15th, 2009, 09:35 AM
  #16  
Old(s) Fart
Thread Starter
 
joe_padavano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 48,269
Originally Posted by Oldsguy
The insurance angle is surely possible...
Yeah, given that the study was done by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. For those who don't know, the IIHS is the lobbying agency for the auto insurance industry. This same study came out in the mid-1970s when cars were being downsized after the first OPEC oil crisis and again in the 1980s in response to government CAFE standards. Of course, the IIHS includes such folks as Joan Claybrook, who advocated long and hard for mandatory airbags in the 1970s then complained when those early airbags started killing people who sat too close to them...

Bottom line is that the number one mission of the IIHS is to increase profits for the insurance industry.
joe_padavano is offline  
Old April 15th, 2009, 06:39 PM
  #17  
GM Enthusiast
 
OLD SKL 69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Long Island, New York
Posts: 3,982
I'll keep my truck.
x2

I could never drive one of those little turds anywhere, especially on the interstate.
OLD SKL 69 is offline  
Old April 17th, 2009, 03:30 PM
  #18  
Captain of my ship
 
wolfman98's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Annapolis Valley , Nova Scotia
Posts: 1,880
Crash

I just took apart the bumper and steel bumper liner with the very solid steel bumper brackets that bolt onto the very solid steel frame. Thi is a 69 Olds 98 , I wonder what any small car would look like in a 60mph head on crash with something like that Pancakes turned on edge comes to mind I can't even imagine with a tractor-trailer
wolfman98 is offline  
Old April 17th, 2009, 04:28 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
kartmaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Great Bend, KS
Posts: 174
This is a shocking result. Truly shocking!
kartmaster is offline  
Old April 17th, 2009, 06:01 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
Coltonis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 208
HA! In the parking lot on my way into work one day, I saw a mom buckling her 4(-ish) yr old into one of these:


I thought to myself, "What's the point!? Being thrown from that thing is probably the safest outcome you could hope for if it crashed! Plexiglass,fiberglass,aluminum - it all turns to razor sharp shards when its crunch time. At least getting tossed out you have the slight chance of landing on a comparatively soft bush/piece of grass."

I was in Northern Ireland not too long ago and was amazed at how roadways just looked like roller-skate rinks. Biggest car I saw the whole time I was there was the occasional full sized beamer or benz. It was almost a good thing though when the sliver-thin streets get factored into the equation.

I have never wanted to drive my Cutlass more in my life... The Renault's and Peugot's would would quake at the very echo of its 455
Coltonis is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
kellyjo6603
General Discussion
9
February 17th, 2012 06:58 AM
johnnyquick
Electrical
7
April 16th, 2011 08:34 PM
Jaybird
The Clubhouse
19
January 7th, 2011 07:28 AM
442much
The Clubhouse
5
December 21st, 2010 07:06 AM
citcapp
The Clubhouse
15
November 6th, 2010 11:09 AM



Quick Reply: Did we really need a study for this?



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:16 AM.