1965 Cutlass Sway Bar Question

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old June 17th, 2013, 11:56 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HonestDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Richmond BC
Posts: 915
1965 Cutlass Sway Bar Question

I'm pulling apart a 65 Cutlass chassis. I've noticed the front sway bar looks pretty thick. On a lot of my old GM cars (late fifties, early sixties)I've found the 6 cyl cars came with no front sway bar. Just wondering if the 65 f-85 6 cyl cars were the same with Olds. Would the Cutlass front sway be desired for another type? Maybe Chevelles or other A-bodies came with no front stabilizer bar, or maybe a thinner one.
Trying to decide whether I should take it off or not. Anyone know about this intriguing possibility .
HonestDave is offline  
Old June 17th, 2013, 11:58 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
stan 65 cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: duncan bc
Posts: 1,487
my car has none,it was an option, also have a rear swaybar on that thing?
stan 65 cutlass is online now  
Old June 17th, 2013, 12:39 PM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HonestDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Richmond BC
Posts: 915
Hi Stan,
No rear sway bar. I've got to buy one for the 442, as it's missing. Have you got a front one on your parts car for the Cutlass, or do you want me to save this one for you?
Is it like the old Chevs, where you have to actually change the lower control arms as well?
HonestDave is offline  
Old June 17th, 2013, 12:54 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
stan 65 cutlass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: duncan bc
Posts: 1,487
i guess i do have a front one, found this pic of odd chalk marks i found on my car, yes the rears have need the boxed lower control arms to mount a sway bar, your 442 will have em if still original


IMG_3577.jpg
stan 65 cutlass is online now  
Old June 17th, 2013, 02:48 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Run to Rund's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,843
In 66, there were 3/4, 13/16, 7/8 and 15/16" front bars with the lightest being on Buick 6 cyl, and the heaviest on 4-4-2. I don't know if 65s had that much variety.
Run to Rund is offline  
Old June 17th, 2013, 02:58 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HonestDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Richmond BC
Posts: 915
Originally Posted by Run to Rund
In 66, there were 3/4, 13/16, 7/8 and 15/16" front bars with the lightest being on Buick 6 cyl, and the heaviest on 4-4-2. I don't know if 65s had that much variety.
Thanks, good to know. Might measure this one and see what thickness.
HonestDave is offline  
Old June 17th, 2013, 04:17 PM
  #7  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HonestDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Richmond BC
Posts: 915
Do we know for sure if a car could be ordered without a front sway bar, or would a six cyl have got at least the thinest one?
HonestDave is offline  
Old October 13th, 2013, 11:12 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Carlos Ochoa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 2
65 cutlass do I need the frame reinforce? ??? because frame looks weak

I have a good 65 cutlass that was a v6 but. Who ever had it put in a olds 455 motor so I just check the cars fram because I want to make a limited slep and I saw the frame looks very week is stright and good just looks lil week do I have to get it reinforced? And around how much would that cost?
Carlos Ochoa is offline  
Old October 13th, 2013, 12:49 PM
  #9  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
HonestDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Richmond BC
Posts: 915
Originally Posted by Carlos Ochoa
I have a good 65 cutlass that was a v6 but. Who ever had it put in a olds 455 motor so I just check the cars fram because I want to make a limited slep and I saw the frame looks very week is stright and good just looks lil week do I have to get it reinforced? And around how much would that cost?
I wouldn't think the frame would be any different on a V6 car than any other 65 Cutlass, but I could be wrong. I've heard the radiator supports are different, but I think the frames should be strong enough. If you're just adding a limited slip rear end I don't imagine it adds that much stress to the frame. The 455 might be a bit of a pickle, though. Perhaps one of the members who is more familiar with this issue will spot this thread and give you a more expert opinion.
HonestDave is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dead Reckon
Suspension & Handling
14
December 1st, 2013 10:39 AM
HonestDave
Chassis/Body/Frame
9
November 5th, 2013 02:37 PM
misercola
General Discussion
0
September 21st, 2012 09:37 AM
my72vert
Cutlass
8
July 10th, 2010 03:28 PM
65Delta88
Eighty-Eight
3
August 5th, 2008 10:19 AM



Quick Reply: 1965 Cutlass Sway Bar Question



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 06:21 AM.