Cars For Sale Please read forum guidelines before posting.

Again - C/L - No Power H/O W-30

Old Dec 28, 2011 | 12:41 PM
  #1  
Rickman48's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,057
From: Shorewood, Il.
Again - C/L - No Power H/O W-30

http://chicago.craigslist.org/chc/cto/2771730248.html

Wonder if this was ordered as a race car, with no power options?
Might be real rare -
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 01:05 PM
  #2  
J-(Chicago)'s Avatar
Seasoned beater pilot.
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 5,468
From: Chicago
It is a cool car.
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 01:19 PM
  #3  
sicky olds's Avatar
NôôB
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,077
From: Las Vegas, NV
wasnt this posted before on this site?
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 04:51 PM
  #4  
m455sx's Avatar
Olds Nut
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 864
From: Powhatan,va
yes it was, it seems fishy
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 05:55 PM
  #5  
Axeni's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 99
Why would it seem fishy if someone reposts an item for sale? It prolly didn't sell last time.
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 06:37 PM
  #6  
Rickman48's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,057
From: Shorewood, Il.
That's why I said "again"!!
Seems too good to pass up, and I'm broke as a joke!!
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 06:42 PM
  #7  
droptopron's Avatar
delete
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,810
From: Long Island, NY
It doesn't surprise me. Its a cool car but $6,500 is no deal in that condition.
Old Dec 28, 2011 | 08:34 PM
  #8  
Vega's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 473
From: Indianapolis, IN
Ive seen it posted before, not on here though. I ran across it on craigslist months ago, however it was in Chicago then as well so it seems legit enough. Its interesting, im just not a fan of anything after 72' though
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 04:40 AM
  #9  
m455sx's Avatar
Olds Nut
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 864
From: Powhatan,va
It was on here before and someone mentioned the stripes were wrong but i did know if he was right or wrong. I sure it is 104k mile to have rust in patch panels.
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 07:15 AM
  #10  
1969Hurst's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 742
From: Orland Park, IL
I guess you have to consider what the seller means by the listing of 'no power accessories'... Are they only talking about power windows and seats or are they including steering and brakes as well. Consider also the fact it mentions 'small underhood fire' when it looks like a major portion of the hood has been toasted from underneath.

Originally Posted by Rickman48
http://chicago.craigslist.org/chc/cto/2771730248.html

Wonder if this was ordered as a race car, with no power options?
Might be real rare -
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 08:06 AM
  #11  
droptopron's Avatar
delete
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,810
From: Long Island, NY
Originally Posted by 1969Hurst
I guess you have to consider what the seller means by the listing of 'no power accessories'... Are they only talking about power windows and seats or are they including steering and brakes as well.
I was thinking the same thing. If they are talking seats & windows it wasn't uncommon back then, even on nicer cars.
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 08:21 AM
  #12  
Rickman48's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,057
From: Shorewood, Il.
I'm gonna contact this guy, and get the lowdown!
Attitude is everything!!
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 08:29 AM
  #13  
Rickman48's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,057
From: Shorewood, Il.
Left message -
Is that the correct hood? Seem to remember those bolt-on louvers or something!
Looks like someone sanded it out, and left it.
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 12:14 PM
  #14  
1969Hurst's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 742
From: Orland Park, IL
It may be the correct hood, the 73 H/O had the bolt on louvers, the 74 & 75 had the louvers 'indented' in the hood and I'm thinking I can barely make that out on that car, cannot tell. The rear stripe is definitely incorrect, should not extend to the end of the trunk, see below.

Originally Posted by Rickman48
Left message -
Is that the correct hood? Seem to remember those bolt-on louvers or something!
Looks like someone sanded it out, and left it.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
P7130020.jpg (101.2 KB, 16 views)
File Type: jpg
P7130021.jpg (87.1 KB, 13 views)
Old Dec 29, 2011 | 01:15 PM
  #15  
Allan R's Avatar
Just an Olds Guy
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 24,528
From: Edmonton, AB. And "I am Can 'eh' jun - eh"
Originally Posted by Rickman48
Left message -
Is that the correct hood? Seem to remember those bolt-on louvers or something!
Looks like someone sanded it out, and left it.
It's probably the right hood. The 442 had them in the middle like the pics 69Hurst posted. It's probably the same hood as 73 442

re: sanding it? No - if you read the ad it says
SMALL UNDER THE HOOD COMPARTMENT FIRE
So I'll go on a limb and suggest the damage was not repaired. What would be a good picture and question to ask is " How much is small?" Is this car even driveable? I'd really like to know what caused the fire.

The thing about patch panels?
SLIGHT SURFACE RUST NEAR LOWER FRONT QUARTER PATCH PANELS
may suggest that patch panels may be required? Again I don't know anymore than you do on this. Would be good to have a pic. These cars will rust out even when sitting if they aren't stored in a controlled environment. And that doesn't look like an insulated garage to me, nor is Chicago a dry environment. This might just be a nice car waiting to be claimed and fixed up.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mid-life-olds
General Discussion
2
Apr 17, 2014 04:00 PM
Ddbord
Electrical
6
Jul 18, 2011 12:18 PM
texasred
General Discussion
3
Jul 18, 2008 07:45 AM
Good_Music_n_Cars
Small Blocks
6
Oct 19, 2007 08:43 PM
2 door cut
Cutlass
7
Jun 10, 2007 02:16 PM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

All times are GMT -7. The time now is 03:25 PM.