DOT 3 or Silicone brake fluid ?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 1, 2022 | 09:01 PM
  #1  
Charlie Jones's Avatar
Thread Starter
Phantom Phixer
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,530
From: Apopka, FL
DOT 3 or Silicone brake fluid ?

I'm getting the brake system together on my '63 Dynamic 88.
The cylinders, hoses and lines are all new with no fluid in them.
I'm undecided as to whether to use regular DOT 3 brake fluid or silicone DOT 5 fluid.
I would like advice and experience using either type of fluid.
Old Aug 2, 2022 | 04:16 AM
  #2  
VC455's Avatar
Barely Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2014
Posts: 2,629
From: Gillespie County, Republic of Texas
Charlie, I used DOT 5 silicone after rebuilding my brake system. Here's my wisdom...
  1. It is difficult to bleed because it easily incorporates bubbles when done traditionally (press the pedal). I found that gravity bleeding worked well. For the rear I had to raise the front about 6 inches to get a better angle. It took about 2 hours for fluid to come out the right rear bleeder.
  2. I had ongoing problems with leakage at the flare joints. This was mostly operator error. I double flared the stainless lines, which made it too stiff to conform well to the flare seat. I eventually used copper washers in each problem flare joint. These are purpose-made for this problem and are available in the sizes you need. They are soft enough to act as a gasket.
  3. Do all your frame and detail painting before adding fluid. Silicone is difficult to remove completely from surfaces and interferes with paint adhesion and finish. I used naptha wash to remove the silicone. Some silicone got inside the frame rails and would seep out through openings and lap joints shortly after cleaning the exterior of the frame. I made a spray tube to deliver the naptha inside.
After completion, I have been very pleased. No problems after 16 years.
Old Aug 2, 2022 | 05:36 AM
  #3  
Burd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 611
From: Outer Rim
I put 5 in my 78, it’s awesome, no issues.
and my GM mechanic said to use it.
Old Aug 2, 2022 | 05:39 AM
  #4  
68442's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 822
I have used dot 5 in all my fresh restorations for years. no problems
Old Aug 2, 2022 | 05:43 AM
  #5  
coldwar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 787
From: USA Ohio
Silicone in my rebuilds too. Brakes in my 64 98 have had silicone for more then 20 years, still work like new even after years of sitting.
Old Aug 2, 2022 | 05:47 AM
  #6  
oddball's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 2,148
From: Plano, TX
5 is nice because it doesn't eat paint. But you have to be careful not to cross-contaminate for the life of the brake system.

You can use 5.1 to get the higher temp rating in a "traditional" fluid. The Bosch fluid is available affordably on Amazon, too. I just keep a hose handy when doing anything exciting, like pressure bleeding. Douse a brake fluid spill with water and it'll neutralize the fluid before it eats anything.
Old Aug 2, 2022 | 06:53 AM
  #7  
Run to Rund's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,026
Brake fluid was designed originally to absorb water to avoid puddles in the lines which greatly degrade performance. Silicone fluid won't absorb water. I would rather have to change the fluid periodically and use Dot 3 or 4.
Old Aug 2, 2022 | 07:28 AM
  #8  
Charlie Jones's Avatar
Thread Starter
Phantom Phixer
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,530
From: Apopka, FL
Thanks guys.
DOT5 it will be.
I know that DOT5 doesn't absorb moisture like regular DOT3.
That's important in this very humid state of Florida.
Just wanted to see if there were any downsides to it.
Old Aug 2, 2022 | 07:35 AM
  #9  
BangScreech4-4-2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,712
Also, for those of us north of the Mason-Dixon who put our cars away in the winter, silicone fluid is more forgiving of longer periods of storage
Old Aug 2, 2022 | 11:54 AM
  #10  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
I'm really liking DOT 5.1. It is not silicone and it is backwards compatible with DOT 3 and 4.



Old Aug 2, 2022 | 04:38 PM
  #11  
Charlie Jones's Avatar
Thread Starter
Phantom Phixer
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,530
From: Apopka, FL
Is DOT 5.1 hygroscopic, Joe?
Old Aug 2, 2022 | 04:41 PM
  #12  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Charlie Jones
Is DOT 5.1 hygroscopic, Joe?
Unfortunately since is is glycol-based, yes it is. Frankly I haven't really had a problem with this.
Old Aug 2, 2022 | 08:02 PM
  #13  
Lonnies Performance's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2019
Posts: 321
From: Pittsburgh, PA
I recommend the DOT5.
I've had too many brake issues from cars sitting for extended periods of time.

I have it in 4 cars with no issues, with more to follow as the need arises.
1 has been converted for 30 years now that also traps at 132mph in the 1/4 & it stops just fine.

DOT5 is also standard issue in many military vehicles, so it isn't something which hasn't been put to extensive testing.
Here is a picture of the wheel cylinder pistons out of my 5 ton, from an unknown duration.



Yes, it holds a lot of fluid...

As for bleeding, gravity works ok.
Vacuum works well to pull it through the wheel cylinder/caliper if you have issues with gravity bleeding.

FYI when it ages, it turns from purple to yellow but still works well.

Old Aug 3, 2022 | 01:07 AM
  #14  
BangScreech4-4-2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 16,712
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Unfortunately since is is glycol-based, yes it is. Frankly I haven't really had a problem with this.
What are the advantages of 5.1 over silicone?
Old Aug 3, 2022 | 05:48 AM
  #15  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by BangScreech4-4-2
What are the advantages of 5.1 over silicone?
It is completely compatible with older brake systems and DOT 3 and 4 fluid, but has a higher boiling point than even silicone fluid. You don't have to worry about flushing every last bit of the old fluid out of the system. Pricing of 5 and 5.1 is about the same.
Old Aug 3, 2022 | 06:44 AM
  #16  
Burd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2012
Posts: 611
From: Outer Rim
When I picked up my new lines from in-line *****, they said if I use 5 it’s be a mushy pedal. Wrong again guys.
Old Aug 3, 2022 | 06:51 AM
  #17  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Burd
When I picked up my new lines from in-line *****, they said if I use 5 it’s be a mushy pedal. Wrong again guys.
There's nothing wrong with DOT 5. I just prefer the 5.1.
Old Aug 3, 2022 | 10:58 PM
  #18  
Fun71's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2013
Posts: 15,411
From: Phoenix, AZ
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
I'm really liking DOT 5.1. It is not silicone and it is backwards compatible with DOT 3 and 4.


The DOT 5 Composition says silicon. That’s a hard glass-like element that semiconductors are made of. I see lots of breast implants are erroneously claimed to be made of the same substance. That’ll poke your eye out.
Old Aug 4, 2022 | 05:39 AM
  #19  
joe_padavano's Avatar
Old(s) Fart
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 50,803
From: Northern VA
Originally Posted by Fun71
The DOT 5 Composition says silicon.
Not the first time someone has made that mistake...
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Phil Perlini
Brakes/Hydraulic Systems
3
Jul 30, 2020 03:51 PM
Doug69Cutlass
Cutlass
2
Jun 14, 2020 05:51 PM
72w442
Brakes/Hydraulic Systems
6
Dec 14, 2014 10:16 AM
805cut
Brakes/Hydraulic Systems
1
Sep 25, 2012 01:59 PM
cfair
Brakes/Hydraulic Systems
1
Jun 8, 2009 12:37 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:35 AM.