Rocker Arm Ratios??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old April 20th, 2010, 08:47 AM
  #1  
Land Yacht Captain
Thread Starter
 
66ninetyeightls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shelburne, Ontario
Posts: 1,727
Rocker Arm Ratios??

I have been looking at different rocker arms to replace mine since one of my rocker arms broke last Friday.

I have found a number of different options:

1) Sealed Power Stamped Steel 1.5 Ratio $14.50CDN pair = $116CDN (FULL SET)
2) Comp Cams High Energy Stamped Steel 1.6 Ratio $130CDN (FULL SET)


What would the difference be between these rocker arms? What difference would the ratio make???
66ninetyeightls is offline  
Old April 20th, 2010, 09:22 AM
  #2  
Registered User
 
Eddie Hansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South River, New Jersey
Posts: 3,515
ratios..

the ratio decides how much the cam will open the valves the stock ratio of olds motors is 1.6, if you think about it your cam pushes up on the lifter the lifter pushes up on the pushrod, which pushes up on the rocker, which pushes down on the valve. by going with the 1.5's you will decrease the amount of push down, thus reducing the valves opening so you will be restricting both intake and exhaust, lowering performance.

Other guys will jump in with more technical advice, but I would go with the stock ratio, unless your using a cam that requires less ratio.

you do know you need studs put into the heads for the roller tip rockers right?
Eddie Hansen is offline  
Old April 20th, 2010, 09:23 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
Eddie Hansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South River, New Jersey
Posts: 3,515
rollers?

are these roller tips? just reread your post, now not sure
Eddie Hansen is offline  
Old April 20th, 2010, 10:11 AM
  #4  
Land Yacht Captain
Thread Starter
 
66ninetyeightls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shelburne, Ontario
Posts: 1,727
No these are not roller tip. I was looking at those as well but didn't see the point of rolelr tip without going full roller. They are supposed to be stamped steel stock replacement rockers.
66ninetyeightls is offline  
Old April 20th, 2010, 10:28 AM
  #5  
Registered User
 
Eddie Hansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South River, New Jersey
Posts: 3,515
craig, ok disregard about the studs then, but the ratio info is still valid.
Eddie Hansen is offline  
Old April 20th, 2010, 10:38 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
svnt442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 4,249
The stock ratio on all modern (64-90) Olds V*s is 1.6 so stay with that.
svnt442 is offline  
Old April 20th, 2010, 11:01 AM
  #7  
Land Yacht Captain
Thread Starter
 
66ninetyeightls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shelburne, Ontario
Posts: 1,727
The ones from Federal Mogul (Sealed Power) 1.5 Ratio are the only ones local parts suppliers can seem to find, which are listed as stock replacement units and they can get them in 1 day. However the Comp Cam units at 1.6 ratio will take 3-4 weeks to get.

I wonder if it’s just a misprint or something..... They are listed for 66+ Oldsmobile engines 260 - 455.

If that ratio of 1.5 is correct how much difference would that make in regards to power??? Would it be noticeable?? I am not really looking for a racer as you can tell by my vehicle choice (1966 98 LS) LOL, just a car I can cruise around in. However if it’s going to make a noticeable difference in power & fuel economy I might rethink it.

Last edited by 66ninetyeightls; April 20th, 2010 at 11:04 AM.
66ninetyeightls is offline  
Old April 20th, 2010, 11:08 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
svnt442's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Palm Bay, FL
Posts: 4,249
Trust me when I say that 1.5 ratio is not correct. It is either a misprint or he looked up the wrong parts.

On a stock cam where the advertised lift is say .440 with a 106 you wold drop down to .412. If is was a .400 lift you would drop down to .375.

So you see it can make a big difference.
svnt442 is offline  
Old April 20th, 2010, 11:12 AM
  #9  
Land Yacht Captain
Thread Starter
 
66ninetyeightls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shelburne, Ontario
Posts: 1,727
I trust you. I have done the searching and come up with the same specs... Thats why I posted this thread to begin with.

I was looking to see if there was a way to contact Federal mogul to verify the specs but can't find anything.
66ninetyeightls is offline  
Old April 20th, 2010, 11:44 AM
  #10  
Registered User
 
geckonz08's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: new zealand
Posts: 537
[quote=Eddie Hansen;168189]the ratio decides how much the cam will open the valves the stock ratio of olds motors is 1.6, if you think about it your cam pushes up on the lifter the lifter pushes up on the pushrod, which pushes up on the rocker, which pushes down on the valve. by going with the 1.5's you will decrease the amount of push down, thus reducing the valves opening so you will be restricting both intake and exhaust, lowering performance.

Other guys will jump in with more technical advice, but I would go with the stock ratio, unless your using a cam that requires less ratio.



sounds like a mighty fime explanation to me Eddie.
Some of us (me) don`t do technical!!
mike
geckonz08 is offline  
Old April 20th, 2010, 11:46 AM
  #11  
Registered User
 
Eddie Hansen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: South River, New Jersey
Posts: 3,515
craig try here?
http://www.federalmogul.com/en/ContactUs/NorthAmerica/

here is some good info
http://www.442.com/tech/enginearticle.html

also while your looking
http://www.streetperformance.com/par...8-1242-16.html

http://www.rockauto.com/catalog/rafr...856&a=FR8-R856

hope it helps
Eddie Hansen is offline  
Old April 20th, 2010, 12:06 PM
  #12  
Land Yacht Captain
Thread Starter
 
66ninetyeightls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Shelburne, Ontario
Posts: 1,727
I contacted Summit Racing and they gave me the technical contact number at Federal Mogul. 1-800-325-8886

I spoke with the guy at Federal Mogul and explained to him about the difference in ratio. He said it was most likely a misprint as they are straight copies of the factory rockers.
66ninetyeightls is offline  
Old April 20th, 2010, 12:46 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
cutlassefi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Central Fl
Posts: 7,920
One other thing, by changing your rocker ratio to something different than stock you also change your effective overlap. Although not much of an issue on a stock cam, by lowering the ratio you decrease effective overlap. By increasing ratio the reverse is true. You're holding the valves open more or less at that point of overlap depending on the rocker ratio. Gets to be an issue on bigger cams. Stick with the 1.6 at least. If you go with an adjustable setup then I might consider a 1.7.
cutlassefi is online now  
Old October 24th, 2010, 04:40 PM
  #14  
InfoJunkie
 
InfoJunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Belleville ON Canada
Posts: 287
If you are looking for stock replace parts from Federal Mogul this link takes you direct to the catalog.http://www.fme-cat.com/
It will give you the part numbers for what you need.
InfoJunkie is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Oldskool84
Small Blocks
10
January 14th, 2014 02:59 PM
GoldOlds
Drivetrain/Differentials
5
January 8th, 2008 09:52 PM
martine
Drivetrain/Differentials
16
September 13th, 2007 10:12 PM
thomaswatk
Cutlass
2
March 22nd, 2007 01:31 PM
69olds350
Transmission
0
November 9th, 2006 07:32 AM



Quick Reply: Rocker Arm Ratios??



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:30 PM.